Total posts: 28,020
Posted in:
-->
@RemyBrown
And yet, when they really wanted to, the left re-enacted all the executive orders to curb illegal immigration a month before election day so they could say "see! it's actually not a problem!"
No congressional bills are required for executive orders. Poison-pill or otherwise.
4 years of doing nothing and then doing something in the last month is how you lose an election.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
The second is that one of the first people to compare Trump to Hitler was Sen. J D Vance. What changed since Vance offered that comparison in 2016 isn’t how Trump approaches politics. It’s how willing Vance has become to acquiesce to that approach.
Not according to Vance.
Vance saw what over half the nation saw, that MSNBC was flat out lying about Trump being Hitler. That's why he changed his mind. Others have no capacity to "question the expert MSNBC"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
..as "relayed" by his former (fired) chief of staff...
Lol.
After Trump suggested that the military should be used against any of the “enemy within” should there be unrest on Election Day.
We are all glad Trump took left-wing violence seriously enough to chill would-be rioters this year. He certainly did not his first term.
Created:
Posted in:
"You can't question smart people that know a lot more about a subject than you do."
Created:
Posted in:
Okay, first of all, since when is storming the capitol and upending the peaceful transfer of power "breaking some glass". Open your eyes.
Since when is a guy wearing a stupid horn costume and a woman attempting to stop a bullet with her neck actually "upending the peaceful transition of power?"
Nothing changed as a result of those unarmed people getting arrested or killed as far as the change of power went. The vote was certified, and Trump left office. Democracy was never under any real threat from an unarmed guy in a costume and an unarmed bullet catching woman. Anything else was a bunch of lies.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
while the left isn't going around and actively shooting white people.
Oh I'm sorry, just the President. But go on saying Trump is "very Hitler-like"
And enjoy the results from those lies.
It's not the first time Democrats started a civil war that they couldn't finish over lies such as; "a black man is very much property-like."
Again, Biden not for one second thought Trump was actually "Hitler-like" based on some out of context words, spin, and outright lies that MSNBC said about him.
He clearly saw it all as electioneering lies. Amazingly, you do not have the ability an 80+ year old has. Zero chance any president would willingly shake hands with anyone who was actually "very Hitler-like"
All lies....all lies.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
"You can't question smart people that know a lot more about a subject than you do."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
"You can't question smart people that know a lot more about a subject than you do."
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
"You can't question smart people that know a lot more about a subject than you do."
rofl.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
You can't question smart people that know a lot more about a subject than you do.
It's clear you have never done so.
You never dared to question that expert either.
Created:
This article takes a narrow, childish, and clearly partisan view by attributing Trump’s support almost entirely to authoritarian tendencies, while glossing over real and pressing issues that motivated his rise. By framing "authoritarianism" as the defining trait of his supporters, it diminishes the genuine economic frustrations and societal concerns many Americans face. Issues like rising inflation, housing insecurity, and the perceived decline of the middle class are far more concrete and immediate factors that shaped Trump’s appeal.
The article’s reliance on social science jargon, particularly its fixation on parenting preferences as a measure of authoritarianism, comes across as reductive. It paints Trump supporters as mindless followers drawn to a strongman, ignoring their legitimate frustrations with a political system that they believe has failed to address their needs. Instead of engaging with these grievances, the author dismisses them in favor of an oversimplified psychological narrative. Moreover, the piece fails to consider that fear and frustration are not exclusive to one political ideology. While it highlights Trump’s rhetoric on immigration, inflation, and terrorism as authoritarian, it neglects how similar "strong action" appeals have resonated across party lines in history long before Hitler, including during the early 1900's period of progressive reform. The underlying issues that drive voters—economic instability, inflation, distrust in institutions, and the desire for safety—are not inherently authoritarian but human reactions to real threats.
This article not only oversimplifies Trump’s support but undermines its credibility by drawing comparisons to Hitler and Nazi Germany. Such appeals are inflammatory and diminish the seriousness of the author’s argument. Invoking Hitler in this context alienates thoughtful readers who might otherwise engage with the analysis, reducing a complex political phenomenon to an overly dramatic, simplistic, and historically inappropriate comparison.
In attempting to sound clinically analytical, the article instead veers into predictable partisan territory, effectively dismissing millions of aggrieved Americans as simply enthralled by "authoritarianism." This childish condescension not only misrepresents the electorate but also ignores the systemic failures that contributed greatly to Trump’s rise and successful election. A more nuanced analysis would recognize the interplay of economic, cultural, and political factors, rather than reducing a complex movement to a single, loaded, childish term.
AI slammed you hard there FLRW.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
You cannot be an educated individual without trusting what others have said,
Wrong.
You cannot be an educated individual without questioning what others have said,
Any idiot can trust.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
I'm not afraid of civil war. Your side has low T.
Created:
-->
@Lemming
as nomadic people, they only owned things they could personally carry around easily. Definitely not land.
Created:
-->
@Lemming
Native Americans had no use for embracing a culture of private property.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
Just like I judge you by the worst on the right, you can judge all of the left
People thinking Trump is still Hitler has absolutely nothing to do with you or me. It has to do with the kinds of irresponsible lies allowed to be pushed for 8 years with zero accountability that lead to the kinds of violence one would associate with "stopping Hitler"
(well not totally zero accountability as MSNBC has lost a lot of support and the people voted against the lies)
But America is going to have to now heal those people who still think an 80 year old celebrity is actually Hitler in order to return to a safe and secure country. It would be irresponsible to just ignore them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
The problem is that the worst on the right is gonna wear a stupid costume with horns or get shot in the neck after breaking some glass.
The worst on the left is gonna try to shoot people in the head or poison white men with poison rings.
That's not just tit for tat.
And it's not just a "few" people who still think Trump is Hitler and believe what MSNBC has said for 8 years.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
Obviously Trump isn’t Hitler
So the left lied to everyone when they said he was during the election. Sadly, a good number think they told the truth and still think Trump is Hitler. It's not "obvious" to everyone.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
celebs can't destroy our democracy.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
I think you missed the big picture here. There's a LOT of people out there that still think Trump is Hitler (or worse) and that the left wasn't just making shit up to get elected.
You don't just sit down and shake hands with Hitler.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
You know that Trump is going to bankrupt the USA don't you?
You misspelled "the swamp"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
This lady will likely be replaced within 4 years due to diabetes.
Hail Hydra.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
That's because Biden wanted Trump to win after he got kicked out of the race by his own party.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
The diabetes had nothing to due with his death
According to your source it did.
“They are, however, at risk for more severe outcomes, based on what we have been learning so far from research studies. We know from our experiences with other viral illnesses that patients with diabetes also tend to have more severe reactions to those illnesses.”
I'd say death is a severe reaction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Good. Buy truth social if you want to retire.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
“We do not believe that people with diabetes are more likely to get COVID-19
Who gives a crap about increased chances of "getting it." Like omfg duh...diabetes doesn't make you breathe in more of the virus....
like it even matters as AI said 99% of us have been exposed to some variant by now.
The rest of your clip claimed they died more when they got it at the same rate as everyone else...that's what a co-morbidity is.
You lose.
Your IQ is extra low today
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
-->
@Double_R
Pretty sure if you set a tarriff to 1,000,000%....
exactly ZERO Americans will be paying that tax because a foreign supplier cant undercut his price to pay for that either.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
“They are, however, at risk for more severe outcomes,
like death...lolzy
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
but he had diabetes, but he kept it in check.
Lol, that's not how co-morbidities work. Good try.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
You don't put on a seatbelt because you think you're going to crash. You don't pay into a term life insurance policy because you think you're going to die.
Only a crazy person thinks this way. Everyone makes a risk assessment on everything, including seatbelts.
The risk of death is low and a click is minimal investment.
An analogy that would make sense with the Orangemanbad cult is that the risk of death is high (when it isn't) so we need to install a rollbar cage and wear a neckbrace to drive to the grocery store...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Taking into account that almost everyone has been in close proximity to others at some point over the past five years, and factoring in both the high transmissibility of various COVID variants (especially Omicron), I'd revise my estimate to around 99%. Given the extensive spread and the fact that many people were exposed even without symptoms, it's very likely almost everyone has had some level of exposure.
-AI
Created:
Posted in:
1} False. My self and many others have not gotten covid,
Plenty of people got the sniffles and fought it off without getting tested for covid. Some people have healthy immune systems. Mask or no mask.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
I won't support his tariffs that will drastically raise prices on everything.
How does taxing a foreign country on one good raise the price of everything domestically?
You will make any excuse to defend the wealthy elites.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
because America hates Kamala and the left I remind you as I have numerous times that Trump's victory had very little to do with that.
Agreed. They did it to themselves. Trump had nothing to do with it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
There's a famous experiment where someone submitted 20 or so junk science articles and about half of them got published as fact.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
Wear this mask or lose your job. Even in your car alone.
5 years later: everyone masked got it anyway....40% of hospitalizations were from fully vaxxed...
thanks experts...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
Science isn't a question, or consensus.
It's the answer. And you don't need to be an expert to know an experiment is repeatable.
Repeatability is key: when an experiment can be replicated consistently by anyone, it shows that the findings aren't tied to a particular perspective or expertise but instead reveal something fundamental about the world. You don’t need a PhD to understand that boiling water creates steam, for example, because it’s repeatable and observable by anyone. At its best, science offers answers that stand up to scrutiny, regardless of who conducts the experiment. This universal point speaks to the beauty of science—it’s open to everyone and designed to withstand questioning, not because it’s about consensus, belief, or bias, but because it pursues universal, testable truths.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
It says you are wrong to think the insanely small chance that MSNBC was right and Trump will start a civil war was enough to deter more than half the country from voting in their best interests. Charlemagne called the elite media out on the obvious BS hyperbole, and so did most of America.
BTW, your Nostradamus, MSNBC is currently losing a ton of viewership post election, mostly because it stopped the Orangemanbad lies.
Without food, your cult is donezo.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
The Charlemagne article says you are wrong.
Created:
Charlamagne previously warned Democrats against blaming things like “sexism” and “racism” for Harris’s loss, accusing the Democratic Party of simply being out of touch on major issues.
“I don’t think it’s fair to just chalk up Trump winning to racism, sexism, homophobia, anti-semitism, yes, he tapped into all of the worst things America has ever had to offer and there are a lot of people who agree his rhetoric and voted for him because of those reasons, but I truly believe most people voted for him because they want more money in their pockets and they want to feel safe,” he said.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
How do you explain the fact that nearly every left politician and nearly all the left media outlets stopped calling Trump a threat to democracy since the election?
The simple explanation is that it was electioneering hyperbole, but some people thought it was real.
Had MSNBC said all this week that Trump was a "threat to democracy," they would have lost even more of their cult following, considering democracy has the final say on who is a "threat."
Created:
-->
@Double_R
You are the reason Kamala was allowed to be selected.
You are the reason Kamala 2.0 will be selected.
Own it.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
They are only good for Trump's Chief of Staff (first ever in the USA)
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Notice that democracy is perfected, as Trump is no longer a "threat to democracy"
Created:
-->
@Double_R
So you are clearly in with the "garbage" and "deplorable" crowd.
If there's enough people like you in America, fully expect another Kamala tier candidate.
Created: