Greyparrot

I'm not sure she had the capacity to say "no" to her own team.

Like the Democrat cult accepted the reality that Trump isn't a threat to democracy? When all the elite media outlets were told to stand down and stand back regarding democracy? That this fabricated worldview is not real?

I'll believe it when I see it.

When they stop creating the tiniest loophole to hang their political opponents, when they fabricate only 34 counts because 3400 would seem fishy, I will believe it. 

You probably haven't been following the appeal court wins lately (of course), but there is a similar refrain from the judges,

"...no case precedent..."

That's not astro turf...that's galactic turf!

Now that we can step back and see the trainwreck Kamala was, do you think a (D)strongman/woman will be allowed to win the next election, or will there be yet another DEI contender?

Have lessons been learned here? Or will there be the usual endless excuses about how one side is garbage misogyny and racism?

   

Tell us how you really feel about garbage.

Tulsi!

vi.

This sounds like something you would do if you were in charge TBH.

Heartwarming

Jan 6 2024 will be fun too.

Everyone knows establishment leftistas have classier riots.

@TooBigToRig

That was a fun election.

Trump isn't president yet, and world leaders are scrambling to end the wars already. Taliban wants peace. Hamas wants peace.

There's no greater good than that.

do you like pets

I am a strong proponent for basing objective morality with a litmus test of natural selection.

"We focus on teaching children the 'science of race' (DEI) instead of natural philosophy. We promote gender transition procedures before discussing the biology of natural hormone development. We prioritize global perspectives before instilling an understanding of foundational American values and history rooted in natural rights"

They know the system. They are system-smart.

There's literally millions of "high-information" people out there. You are one of them.

One side has far more "high-information" followers than the other. Objectively. 

This is another great clip:

"If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed.

If you do read it you're misinformed"

Denzel Washington feels that the overwhelming flow of information, or "the high-information-voter" in today’s media environment is not necessarily a good thing. He points out that the constant barrage of opinions, rather than straightforward news, creates confusion and leads to polarization and mean-spiritedness. Instead of being enlightened, people are bombarded with narratives and conflicting viewpoints, which make it impossible to make clear decisions if this is the only source of information.

Denzel believes that the need to be first with information, rather than accurate, has become the priority in media. This has led to a situation where news is no longer just about facts, but about quick headlines and misleading opinions that may not even be true or sourced correctly. The rush to get information out there has made it more about speed and sensationalism, often at the expense of truth originating mostly from disconnected central suppliers of information.

Denzel warns us all that too much information, especially when it’s designed to provoke strong emotional reactions, will make people more cynical and mean-spirited. This isn't about "low-information" or "high-information" This is about information saturation. He wants us to step back and think about how this constant exposure to information affects us personally and socially, encouraging us to question whether we’re truly benefiting from all this “information” or if it’s just making us more divided. His question to us is simple: "What is all this information DOING to us?"

Here is a classic "High-Information" FEMA worker in action:

I'm just mocking the psuedo-geniuses on this site who believe in the concept of an archetypical "high-information-voter"

Here Denzel exposes and roundly mocks the idea of a "high-information-voter"

Who can know the mind of a "high-information-voter"

CNN: "Mostly peaceful stabbing"

CNN: "Mostly peaceful stabbing"

This is what democracy looks like.

How do you feel about far left media sources exponentially losing their audience after the Nov election?

I wonder what would be a "low-propaganda-voter?"

Ty UD

Or indians that sleep with willie brown

Apparently, hookers like Kamala can't be president. Bans on porn and such.

This just in: Angsty teens swallow bullshit and rebel against parents. Film at 11.

Let's hope losing their jobs is enough.

Whether or not you think lawfare was used against Trump solely because he was a contender is actually irrelevant.

If it was true, the public punished those who did it.

If not, then the other side knows the perception of lawfare depends on the equal application of the law when the person isn't a contender. (pre 2016 and pre the announcement to run for 2024)

In either case, we probably won't see this kind of bullshit ever again from a sane party.

I guess in a world where ownership is impossible, then so would be thievery.

In October 2024, sure. Before then she was extremely loving toward illegals and wanted to decriminalize it.

Kamala ran on that. She lost. The American people think it should be.

When they commit a crime, sure.

Not that kind of "DEI"

I would pay for a word salad about pet eating as well.

"The eating of pets, right? The significance of the eating of pets. So when you think about it, there is great significance to the eating of pets…in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires…there is such great significance to the eating of pets.”

A man would look so ridiculous spewing a word salad about "the significance of the passage of time"

I would pay for popcorn to watch that.

He will fire Dick Cheney and the rest of the neocons.

Based.

Based.

preferably ones who don't want to nuke us to the planet core.

No free food for NY criminals:

Sad day for people with MDS.