Greyparrot

Call me a racist first to qualify.

Any other.

Thanks.

Religion isn't a race faggot.

Also, suicide bomber fits the name, Muhammed.

Obviously it's a trap to vote for Press-f as mod confirmed scum.

He will probably explode like a bomb if we lynch him over the next few days and probably unkillable temporarily.

Maybe town is all vig?

I am God.

I am 12x vig and 12 x bulletproof.

Why the hell do I have 12 charges...who knows...12 is a weird number.

I win with the town.

How do you feel about teachers setting public education policy instead of the general population?

What if the military formed a workers union and set policies on how to run the military? On how to spend tax funds on the military?

What do you think would happen to the military? See the problem?

As long as the USA gets its Quebec. One state where English is the official language.

What are your explanations for the pie charts?

Never get into a land war in Asia.

Also, check out Gordon Ramsey explain how to effectively improve the lives of everyone in the world.

A common fallacy is that the Great Depression was ended by the explosive spending of World War II.  But World War II actually institutionalized the sharp decline in the standard of living caused by the Depression.  The Depression was actually ended, and prosperity restored, by the sharp reductions in spending, taxes, and regulation at the end of World War II, exactly contrary to the analysis of Keynesian so-called economists.

Employment in the military wasn't an efficient use of manpower for improving the standards of living.

WPA employment was slightly more helpful at improving standards of living, but it was only when private employers were allowed by the government to create efficient market jobs that the country was able to truly prosper.

she had to in order to win the rigged primary.

Check this Nasa video out, you won't see this on communist media.

Jordan Peterson can summarize in 5 minutes conclusions most can ever explain.

Tulsi did...

Pew research pie graphs here. for 1st 60 days. I'll keep digging for 3-year stats.

But not 55% of the states. Zero chance the smaller states will allow this to happen when they have equal say in the senate.

Simply having a majority of people living in large states wanting it abolished won't make it so in the Senate.

WE DON'T HAVE Mob Rule. And you won't be able to rewrite the constitution with mob rule as long as the Senate exists.

Electoral abolishment via constitutional change will never make it through the Senate for obvious reasons.

Nixon had alot of positive things to counter with too.

Nixon had the same failed policies as Carter did when it came to price controls which led to agonizing energy shortages. It was a big deal to the voters.

Nah, racist has nothing to do with skin color anymore, just whether you disagree with someone.

Or you can do what Trump did and ignore whako California because he didn't need the 4.2 million extra Californian popular votes to become president of the other 49 states. 

Amazingly enough, Clinton wasted campaign stops in California when Trump went there zero times. Someone should have told Hillary that getting 65% of the vote in California doesn't win elections. Neither does outspending your opponent 2 to 1.

Convincing the other 49 states that Obama had good economic policies would have worked though. Neither Hillary or Obama was able to pull it off.

Nah. it won't officially become Trump's economy until it goes south.

your reality today is different from the voter's reality in 1980.

Being popular in one state doesn't make you the president of the other 49 states.

You are very good at persuasion.

Ok fine you can find an 8-year-old with the same qualities. I'm not an ageist.

I'd agree if he lost the electoral college since we live in a republic, not a democracy.

I used the 1980 article because it most accurately reflected the voters leaving the booths.

if anything, Trump's victory was a clear signal that the Obama recovery wasn't good or fast enough to propel Hillary to a victory. Pleas from Obama for the voter to "accept the new norm" and "it will take a magic wand to bring jobs back" fell on deaf ears.

Doesn't matter, voters didn't agree with your facts.

From a 1980 article:

Why did Carter lose so badly?

Above all, Reagan’s election reflects the vast dissatisfaction with Carter’s record in office. Over the past four years the economy worsened considerably, energy problems grew more critical, social contradictions intensified, and international tensions increased. These problems all indicated the continuation of U.S. monopoly capitalism’s crisis of decline. The magnitude of Carter’s defeat is one measure of how serious this crisis has become.
Significantly, voter dissatisfaction this year went beyond Carter to the Democrats generally. Traditional Democratic economic policy which has guided the country since the 1930’s and 1940’s has failed to provide economic stability or meet the needs of the people. Detente, which characterized U.S. foreign policy during the 1970’s, was an obvious failure in restraining Soviet aggression.
While the masses of people are searching for some alternatives, the ruling class has responded to the crisis by shifting towards a more conservative approach which aims to tighten the screws on working people and more vigorously defend U.S. corporate interests abroad. Both Carter and Reagan advocated more conservative policies this year, calling for cuts in government spending, more concessions to business and increased military spending.
Despite their similar policies however, Carter still had to stand on his record. The Democrats were in a state of disarray and unable to present a clear enough overall approach to the issues. While Carter definitely represented a conservative shift within the Democrats, he was still fettered by the Democrats’ liberal traditions. Carter too invoked the mantle of Democratic Party liberalism in the last weeks of the campaign in order to get out the vote from the traditional Democratic coalition of workers, minorities and urban intellectuals.
But this resulted in a confused approach, and the liberal appeals were wasted given the collapse of the Democratic coalition.
Carter also was not able to overcome his image as dull and vacillating. And his last minute attempt to use the hostage issue backfired, when hopes that the hostages would be returned before Election Day quickly came and went. This actually brought out in even sharper relief how ineffectual U.S. foreign policy had become.

Voters didnt agree

Why don't you look up Jimmy Carter if you want to see how a president can royally fuck up an economy in his 1st 3 years.

That's kind of silly to assume the president has 3 years of immunity to screw up the economy when they get into the office.

I know, and it will only be Trump's economy when things go bad. I get it.

Orangemanbad.

Beep boop.

There really isn't a lot of them but they are deadly.

Antifa are like an insect swarm.

I tell you what, find me a person on the left that acts like a 4-year-old on TV that can bring the same levels of security, economic prosperity, and protection of our constitution and sovereignty and I'll change my vote to that 4-year old.

Hay I was just following your 4-year old evaluation.

My virtue signalling is too woke?

Plus he has cooties. I am sure of it.

If voting for Trump is wrong, I don't wanna be right.

Congratulations on discovering meteorology is an exact science.

Now go plug into your dataport so you can get the next set of scripted instructions from your overlords.

Beep boop.

Kind of like the well paid financial analysts on pop news.

It's interesting that people don't understand why there are multiple models and methodologies for predicting the weather...

The real gaslighting going on is the idea that meteorology and climatology is an "exact" science.

If this is the worst, bring more of it on. The country has never been more prosperous or safer or more emboldened to give the middle finger to the leeches of the world.

hi hi