Greyparrot

Lol, using the royal "we"

nuff said.

Keep thinking you don't have scripted reactions then. It's amusing. You have all the nuance of a rock by the way. Not that this is a bad thing if you are an engineer or a scientist.

So you admit you have no substance? Bingo!

You might not be an NPC if you are self-aware.

In your case it's a CNN foghorn of Marxist talking points.

A reliable NPC, makes skimming your nonsense posts very easy.

Oh yeah, I forgot the only reason CNN tells you to hate people is because of their DNA.

Carry on my wayward NPC.

As long as black and brown people keep voting marxist socialist policies, I can justifiably hate them for something other than their DNA.

Why would blacks be scared of hispanics voting for benefits? Oh yeah there is that. Intersectionality wars are very messy.

People like this guy are responsible for nearly all of South America's cuck ups.

Overpopulation is a huge problem. Something else will have to replace abortion for birth control. India is considering a 2 child maximum policy.

USA didn't tell South America to go full tard socialist.

Are you implying if USA stopped meddling and gave zero foreign aid to South America that they would not have gone full stop Marxist? 

Simon Bolivar would be sad.

Why are you so extreme right?

We can hope. 

Thanks YYW.

Once we secure the southern border from the hordes of unproductive people fleeing socialist dystopian shitholes like guatemala, honduras, and venezuela, wealth will increase in America, and so will outcome equality. A win-win for both marxists and libertarians.

Lol that was not my claim, but it's a nice strawman.

BTW income equality does not mean prosperity.

Ask Pol Pot how that turned out, Karl Marx would be sad.

Free countries = equal opportunity.

Marxist nations = equal outcomes.

SCOTUS won't overturn Roe v Wade because the country will revert to a bunch of divided and competing pro- and anti- abortion states where people can simply cross a state line anyway to get an abortion. SCOTUS won't be that guy that divides the country up by states.

Pence is completely unelectable. He is only there for impeachment/assassination insurance for Trump.

The USA also has the richest poor on the planet, as well as the largest percentage of people in the middle class. If that means we have to suffer the pangs of jealousy from billionaire over-achievers...well that's an easy decision for sane Americans to make.

America is one of the few places where exceptionally gifted people are allowed the freedom and opportunities to reach their full potential.

Pol Pot would not approve.

Venezuela has income equality. Everyone who does not have a gun is starving. Thank you Karl Marx.

Also, Europe stopped caring about "their" people the moment they allowed an invasion from the south.

The actual case is more often the opposite of this sentiment.

One of Karl Marx's shortcomings.

It's an ongoing investigation. Hold your outrage.

Unproductive people don't create wealth, so it's only fair to side with productive people.

SJW Income inequality argument falls apart when they are asked to tax black athletes and entertainers at a 90% rate.

Do you find this guy attractive?

You certainly clarified the legal wording for me. As a layperson, I understood your clear example of the differences between the old law and the new law.

Seems fair legally. It's too bad there is no legal language saying late term abortion should be used as a last resort after live birth is ruled out.

I agree..collusion is irrelevant.

Why was the old law insufficient for rational health reasons?

Why was the old law insufficient for rational health reasons?

Why was the old law insufficient for rational health reasons?

I read a sadding statistic that if you are a black fetus, you have a greater chance of being aborted than being born if you happen to be alive in New York.

If you enjoy comedy, this guy has a few words to say about this new law.

Like you said over 10 times, if the old law was sufficient for rational health reasons, why make a change in the law?

Why should we trust New York abortion doctors to make an extremely limited and conservative "rational" definition of "health" effects? There are numerous abortion activist doctors out there performing these types of abortions before this law, and now all of a sudden we are supposed to "trust abortion doctors" to be rational?

Bingo lol.

Most importantly, you have no idea what the Police know when they pull you over. If they are looking for a particular person, and you accidentally say something that fits the description, you are screwed.

As far as the FBI is concerned, simply having conflicting testimony is enough to charge a person for perjury, which people rarely fight due to the legal expense involved. Even if "witness A" is completely unreliable, they can still charge you with perjury if your testimony is not exactly the same as "Witness A"...The FBI has some ridiculously overbroad discretion with perjury. Ask Bill Clinton. The FBI uses perjury traps when they need a conviction but the evidence for other crimes is insufficient.

This is correct. There are dozens of youtube videos out there that tell you that answering questions from the police is a bad idea. Even if you are 100 percent innocent. It's literally the difference between 1 night in jail and/or a few hours of a dog sniffing your car/property versus years of jail time. The innocence project backs this up with cold facts. The proper way to deal with the police is to hand over any requested documents, and shut up.

It's all relative in the world of oppression olympics.

Plot twist: You are rich.

I love this thread.

What should the minimum wage be for charity workers? Do you want to send all priests and all church workers to prison?

This video is a masterful victory over tyranny.

the herd lol not the heard...I've just been doing some casual viewing on the study of the behavior of monkeys and other mammals and how they naturally behave to preserve the herd.

Do you believe morals are based on genetically inherent traits that evolved to preserve the integrity of the herd?

you lose.

One thing is certain, he won't be found guilty of collusion.

Agreed.

This is dumb. The Congress needs to be the one to legislate a comprehensive immigration bill. This won't help Congress do their job.

There's literally dozens of people indicted by Mueller for lying to the FBI.

I'm sure he won't be the last to face jail time for lying.

You say sodomite like it's a bad thing...