Greyparrot

True. The welfare ghettos of America have a 24% father participation rate. No checks on the violent youth.

It's true. George Carlin did the ultimate #walkaway.

The left has no more comedians anymore, just virtue-signalling activists with clapping crowds, because all real comedy is now Hate-Speech, and you are only allowed to hate people CNN says it is ok to hate. Orange man bad,

The left can only "laugh" with their hands now.

The USA has higher rates of violence mainly because of the welfare ghettos spawning gang violence. Most of the civilized nations require people to work for food. They are also mostly homogenous with no protected welfare classes.

Trump has done nothing wrong. Don't listen to the CIA mockingbird media.

Who holds the FBI accountable for malfeasance?

Died when he heard the regressive left took over.

The wingnut regressive left does not want women to have control over their own bodies.

There's a reason that freedom is more important than longevity. Everyone dies, not everyone gets the luxury of living free.

Being held in stasis in the matrix of government run opium dens assuring a long productive life supporting the elite state isn't the first choice of most people.

Dying in the prime of your life to ensure people remain free is.

(1) What should US foreign policy toward Israel be?

Stop supporting them. If the Middle East burns in a Jihad war, the world will be a better place.

What is your general opinion of the Israel-Palestine conflict?

Don't get involved.

(2) What should US foreign policy toward Saudi Arabia be? Specifically, should it continue military cooperation/arms sales with Saudi Arabia? Should it support the ongoing intervention in Yemen?

Buy oil, sell whatever they can buy. Don't get involved with Yemen.

(3) What should US foreign policy toward Myanmar be?

Don't get involved.

(4) Should the US engage in drone strikes? Do you agree with the status quo in terms of drone strikes and with Obama's policies in that regard?

Only for protecting the national border.

(5) What is your opinion of Noam Chomsky's foreign policy positions?

Windbag.

(6) What is your opinion of the foreign policy positions of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders?

Donald can be a better Isolationist.

(7) What is your opinion of the foreign policy positions of Robert Gates?

Windbag.

Straight up isolationism.

He is just mad because Americans haven't solved the problem of mass shootings in gun-free zones.

Too bad the criminal did not know he was not in a gun-free zone.

Recent studies show that every 1 out of 3 liberal wingnut non-assimilating Swiss migrants are just as dumb as the other 2.

Maybe Trump didn't understand that people in D.C. lie to get cabinet positions and then believe they are safe from replacement because the media is on their side. (until their 15 minutes of CNN fame expires of course...)

Kinda nice to have a leader not afraid of the radical elements of D.C.

All you Orange haters...won't give Trump a chance...

sung to this tune

haha

What's really sad is the millennial generation that has no idea who GHW Bush was would never learn anything from today's MSM about him.

Every media outlet on his day of mourning would say 2 minutes of generalities about the man, and then go straight to the Trump. It was worse than the McCain circus where Trump was eulogized at McCain's own burial ceremony. You would learn nothing about the dead from the MSM if it was the wrong kind of dead person.

Can you imagine 1960's media talking endlessly about Nixon or any other hated Right wing politician days after JFK's death? It's so sad what Saul Alinsky and his disciples have done to this country all for the sake of power. 

Typical fake manufactured outrage from a person with TDS.

A person who has thousands of people working with him in his campaign....and cherry pick a few...call it "surrounded"....

2 years later, zero collusion, zero Russians.

If I had TDS, I would still expect the vestigial remaining rational part of my brain to nudge me to be a little annoyed that Mueller hasn't come through after 2 years.

No collusion.

No Russians.

I don't think anyone needs to tell us that the socialist media is bad lol.

There are plenty of white people I would rather not see at the immigration lines from South America. Americans don't benefit from the influx of authoritarian white socialism with distinct racial classes as exists in places like Brazil and Venezuela undermining the Constitution of America. Less White Russians too for the same criteria. That's not the kind of ideological cultural diversity that is going to keep America great.

This is why skintone criteria is insufficient for meaningful immigration controls. I'm perfectly happy simply calling cultural cesspools as shithole countries, and leave it at that, and then endure the predictable hackneyed cries of "racism."

Most Nationalists in America identify as  American primarily and not white. What these American Nationalists want is to subsidize immigrants coming from cultures that embrace freedom and tolerance (that's mostly European culture) while rejecting authoritarian intolerant cultures (that's evident in mostly Middle East muslim culture, and many socialist South American cultures.)

While some immigrants CAN come from South America, Middle East, and Africa that DO embrace liberty and tolerance...it is the exception over the norm, and thus these cultural areas need NO subsidization or endorsements from America. If American culture really abhors intolerance and authoritarianism, then it needs to reflect that in its immigration policies by rejecting the cultures that undermine elements of the American Constitution instead of pretending that "all cultures are equal" and to say otherwise is "racist."

Europe is learning the hard way that all cultures are, in fact, NOT equal.

I agree Ebuc. I am an Orange Nationalist.

Tom Belichick is not done yet. 

It's just stories that people in power tell the sheep to keep them herded and suggestable.

Modern day Grimm fairy tales.

Manufacture hate, manufacture outrage, then gain and retain power. Straight out of Saul Alinsky's rules for keeping radicals in power.

there is no such thing as "white culture" or any color skin culture.

so "white nationalism" is a fantasy, along with the fiction that the government is going to send every citizen through melanin detectors and incinerate the wrong shades.

lol.

I really enjoy your homoerotic stream of consciousness posts.

I'm not responsible for his meltdown.

Ebuc likes men, don't disturb his "stream of conscious" prattle.

I've sworn my allegiances, and I am prepared to go down with that ship. As long as you are not on it with me, I am happy.

It is better to laugh about your problems than to cry about them.

It is better to laugh about your problems than to cry about them.

This is true. The left can't figure memes out because you need to be able to think to see the humor. I nearly lost it in the 2016 election when the left labeled pepe the frog as a symbol of white supremacy....

You gotta admit that was some funny trolling. The left doesn't know how to have fun anymore.

I don't think his hand is sore enough from patting his own back.

Indeed. Nobody is demanding Japan or China become diverse, and that is almost half the planet right there. Seems like they are doing just fine.

One of the peculiarities of American discussion about race is that skin color is assumed to be synonymous with racial distinctions. That is, skin color is not just a trait, but it is the trait which defines between population differences. There’s a reason for this, the skin is the largest organ and it is very salient. Populations with little phylogenetic relationship to each other, from India to the Pacific to Southeast Asia have been referred to as “black” by lighter-skinned populations. No population is referred to by their neighbors as those “straight hairs,” to my knowledge. But another point in the United States is that historically the black-white dichotomy has dominated our historical narrative to the exclusion of others. (with an asterisk for Native Americans) Though black Americans are an admixed population, which is around 20% European in ancestry with considerable variance (e.g., ~10% of the black American population is more than 50% European by ancestry), white Americans are relatively homogeneously European. Unlike the populations of Latin America admixture did not occur along a continuum, and due to hypodescent there was a categorical binning where black Americans with any visible African ancestry were categorized as non-white (and some with no visible African ancestry!).

But the past is not the present. Today Americans of Latin American origin are a larger proportion of the population than black Americans. These groups are often admixed in ancestry, and exhibit a continuum of appearance. The mean proportions of ancestry can also vary from region to region, as evidenced by the recent paper I pointed to earlier this week. While black Americans and white Americans are nearly disjoint in physical appearance, there are Latinos of all phenotypes. Most understand that the quasi-racial status of the Hispanic/Latino category is awkward, and at some point the old paradigm will need to shift.

But pure colors do exist. We can't even manufacture a pure race in the lab.

Nobody can say they are any one race, because no pure races exist. You could say you are similar to a non-existent race if you wanted to be technical and also subjective.

Sen. Warren is of the Native American race, Your argument is invalid.