Total posts: 28,020
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
I take it you're once again misrepresenting what that one SCOTUS ruling says?
Even if the misrepresentation was true, it's not like the SCOTUS said..."OMG Congress can now no longer impeach the president for official acts because we said so...."
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I totally lost it, at the last line.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I guess we will have to import people who care about election integrity since native Americans seem to enjoy the rigged game.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
They do not have to account for the circumstances that they had nothing to do with.
False. Excuses for failing to deal with circumstances are the 3rd to last resort of a cultist.
This is why Kamala tanked so hard with the undecided voter after the Fox interview. Every question about dealing with multiple circumstances the past 4 years was met with the same generic Orangeman bad answer in many different flavors. That kind of dodging and projection plays well with her cult base, but not normal people.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Nice strawman, as usual. That's also a made up fantasy question. The second to last refuge of a cultist is ad-homs. America is so done with the Destiny take on the world.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
I do. They both have to account for the 4 years in charge.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Merkel lost her election, just like Kamala will.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
Trump is probably the only Republican candidate Harris could possibly beat.
She could have beaten Chris Christie.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
Vegas odds on Kamala are now at 39%
I was able to buy in hard when she was at 60%
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
I've always said, the person that chooses the correct lies will win.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
@Double_R
The double standard is pretending that Harris has a responsibility to offer serious solutions and proposals while Trump....
She has more than a just responsibility to offer solutions, she also has an obligation to distance herself from Biden as the "change candidate" by denouncing the policies the past 4 years by saying basically she wanted to do better, but Biden wouldn't let her. Instead, Kamala decided to declare the past 4 years as the golden years and also declare she is Biden 2.0, just younger. All while Biden publicly says she did everything he asked her to do happily. No chance in hell she can win the swing states with this strategy. She could be running against bozo the clown and still lose. Kamala will go down with her scum buddy.
Created:
-->
@MarkWebberFan2
I agree with Wylted. Women respect and are attracted to males that push back and hold firm. It's a sign of security in the mate. The trick is to compromise a few times to make her unsure. For weird biological reasons, women enjoy chaos and being on the edge sometimes. Probably has a lot to do with fluctuating female hormone levels. So don't be a total dick but also don't be a wuss. Be mostly a dick.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
How does it make someone a MAGA moron when they use the proper African name?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I have a new question: Does anyone take FLRW seriously?
Comedic relief I guess.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
The low intellect scumLol keep calling us deplorables
Lol, worked for Hillary so well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
I predict he will win the popular votes in the swing states. I feel for your feelbads.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Yes, waiting till November shouldn't be a problem for a lazy person.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
The low intellect scum...
Tell us how you really feel about deplorables, Hillary.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't take Kamala seriously when she says "let me be clear"
If I did, it would mean she was unclear all other times.
Created:
Posted in:
I guess November will be proof enough.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Meanwhile, because Kamala Harris is taken seriously everything she says gets put under a microscope and held to an insane double standard.
Maybe if you didn't take Trump's hyperbole so seriously, then the double standard would go away.
This thread, like most of your threads, attempts to understand anti-Kamala people using your own projected biased premises. It's never going to work. You started with a premise that they take hyperbole seriously. They don't.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Dismissal is the Hallmark of both Hillary and Kamala.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Again, do you find Kamala's words "mostly serious?"
If so, you would be in the statistical minority.
If not, gotchas never work for hypocrites.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
You can't have it both ways. If he's serious
Actually, you can.
Words are mostly unserious, actions are mostly serious.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
No, it's not my job to inform you. Your laziness is no concern of mine. Your brain, your choice.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
It would actually be better for the country if Trump got shot so the revolution happens faster.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
What success?
Exactly. You haven't read Sun Tzu either.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
I always hate when both sides use that insult. I'm just poking fun at some MAGA morons,
Just to add, underestimating people cost Hillary her election, even though everyone agreed on her name.
You should read Sun Tzu instead of IWRA posts. It's entirely possible that part of Trump's success with African voters is his insistence of using the African pronunciation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
@Moozer325
I remember reading somewhere that there was a proper Indian pronunciation, and a proper African pronunciation, but like all politicians, they can say whatever they feel sounds good.
The pronunciation in most Indian languages (including Hindi) is Kuh-MUH-lah:
In African contexts, particularly in Uganda and parts of East Africa where there may be Indian influence (due to Indian migration), the name Kamala follows a similar pronunciation, Kah-MAH-lah, though it can vary depending on regional accents.
I suppose the American version is KAH-ma-la.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
That aside... So if Kamala said she planned to order the military to the streets to confiscate everyone's guns you would brush that off right? I mean, she's not serious so there's no reason to take what she says seriously... right?
Correct. She had 4 years to do it and never did. Nobody serious would take those lies seriously.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
That's a shame, your twerking would bring out the best Kamala kackle.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
Now let's all dance for 40 minutes.
Did you do the Megan Thee Stallion dance for Kamala?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
You would be more believable admitting Kamala isn't a serious candidate but you are voting for her anyway because Orangemanbad. That's at least believably honest.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RemyBrown
The government just needs to jail the leaders of opposing speech. As a warning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RemyBrown
Canada has some of the strongest anti-speech laws disguised as "hate speech laws" to put people the government doesn't like in jail.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Or conflate "free press" with billionaire scripted propaganda.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Pretty much every single oneAll it means is that when they say something we assume they are being serious.
X to doubt. I know no serious person that takes a Kamala word salad seriously. Forget the pandering flip flops and fake pandering accents...
You would be more believable admitting Kamala isn't a serious candidate but you are voting for her anyway because Orangemanbad. That's at least believably honest.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Remember that one of Trump's professor's students said that he was the dumbest professor he ever had.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
People in the 1800s often didn't smile in photographs for several reasons:
- Long Exposure Times: Early cameras required subjects to stay still for several minutes due to long exposure times. Holding a smile for that long was uncomfortable, so people often chose a neutral expression to avoid a blurred image.
- Cultural Norms: Smiling in formal portraits was not a common practice. In that era, photographs were often seen as serious, formal events. People wanted to appear dignified, as smiling in public or in serious settings was less socially acceptable.
- Dental Health: Dental care was not as advanced in the 1800s, and many people had poor teeth, so they avoided smiling to hide their dental issues.
- Portrait Tradition: Photographs were often modeled after painted portraits, where subjects also maintained serious expressions to convey importance or social status.
These factors combined to create the unsmiling, serious expressions that are typical in 19th-century photographs.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I suppose Kamala regards herself as Trump puts it "A Radical Left Wing Lunatic"
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Trump didn't say we should use the military *in response to* political violence
What was the question he responded to? Oh that's right. The last refuge of a cultist is to call people liars before actually steel-manning the points.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
referred to the free press...
The best press a billionaire can supply isn't exactly "free"
Created:
Posted in:
so... first 60 minutes edits an interview to make Kamala look good...then CBS cuts 5 minutes from the house speaker to make Kamala look good.
This is why billionaire media is officially garbage for those who want full free speech. Corruption and propaganda.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
There's no way the infrastructure of Canada could handle that. People would come because it would still be better than lots of other places. But for Canadians, the standard of living would fall.
This is a great article to further your point.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Do you deny the powerful elites fake empathy and ethics to gain power?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
I have mentioned many times how yawning or a babys face making others smile is simple forms of empathy.
This is an evolved survival trait for babies. In the future, people will stop smiling at babies as the AI will take care of the babies. Much like people now stop smiling at each other when using social media.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
What's the utility of dick-chopping compared to the support through ethics?
Created: