Total posts: 28,020
-->
@FLRW
Well, we know Trump wants to kill more than 6 million Jews as it's a scientific fact that he is worse than Hitler.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Trump's kids don't have to go to Mars to be removed from the Earth.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
so deep those wealthy corp. do not see overall significance solar light that feeds Earths ecologically, biological sustenance as critical to humans survival,
The planet is too hot. Science says so.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Great, so when Trump called up Georgia and told them to find 11,780 votes,
The ultra far-alt-right wants you to think he was trying to find illegal votes, but we all know from science that there is no such thing as an illegal vote.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
So get off the space laser and do something!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
It's irrelevant. The Hatch act has no real teeth to stop government employees from voting to give themselves more power at the expense of those who have less power.
Or does it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
Unions representing federal employees have creative ways to sidestep the restrictions of the Hatch Act, which prohibits government workers from engaging in political activities. One clever and totally fair loophole is that, while individuals in their capacity as federal employees are bound by the Act, unions, as separate entities, are not. This distinction allows union representatives, who are often the same people as the employees themselves, to endorse candidates, fund political campaigns, and organize rallies under the union banner rather than as individual employees. By operating in this gray area, unions can effectively advocate for political causes, influencing elections and policy outcomes without directly violating the Hatch Act. There is absolutely nothing unethical for a union to act as a bag man carrying a message without dirtying the hands of the government employee.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I meant the warning that Trump is coming after the deep state and needs to be stopped.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
People are now flocking to Kamala.
Created:
Posted in:
Ah yes, the "Deep State" — that totally real shadow government pulling the strings from behind the curtain while we, the people, enjoy the sweet bliss of democracy working flawlessly. Because clearly, in a system where every voice is heard equally, all our basic needs like healthcare, housing, food prices, and education are fully addressed without any special interests interfering. If the Deep State were anything more than a convenient alt-right boogeyman for those upset with the way democracy actually functions, surely we'd have more important things to worry about—like furiously debunking false alt-right news about politicians openly catering to corporate donors. But nah, it's the "deep state" that's really behind everything, right? Only if you are an alt-right Putin/Trump lover!
Created:
Posted in:
Now, there may be some Ultra-far-alt-right partisan hacks like Swagnarok that may claim this somehow violates the Hatch act.
The Hatch Act—designed to prevent federal employees from engaging in political activities—absolutely doesn’t apply to the IRS. An institution tasked with collecting taxes for the government does not need to remain politically neutral. It’s not like the IRS has any influence on who pays what or how much. It's all fair. Of course, if the IRS were bound by this "minor" rule, it might be tricky for them to openly support or oppose political candidates. Dedicated Democrats should let the agency that sees all of our financial skeletons in the closet have a strong say in who gets elected. Verified news states they have no power to influence policy outcomes.
Unions representing federal employees have creative ways to sidestep the restrictions of the Hatch Act, which prohibits government workers from engaging in political activities. One clever and totally fair loophole is that, while individuals in their capacity as federal employees are bound by the Act, unions, as separate entities, are not. This distinction allows union representatives, who are often the same people as the employees themselves, to endorse candidates, fund political campaigns, and organize rallies under the union banner rather than as individual employees. By operating in this gray area, unions can effectively advocate for political causes, influencing elections and policy outcomes without directly violating the Hatch Act. There is absolutely nothing unethical for a union to act as a bag man carrying a message without dirtying the hands of the government employee.
Created:
Posted in:
The IRS officially announces an endorsement for Kamala Harris. It's a smart move because of the direct alignment between her policy goals and the agency's long-term needs for enforcement, regulations, and reform. The Biden-Harris administration’s plan to hire 87,000 new IRS agents represented one of the most significant boosts in the IRS's capacity in decades. This expansion is not just about creating jobs—it’s about giving the IRS the tools and the power it needs to combat tax evasion by Americans and corporations. By endorsing Harris, the IRS would align itself with a leader committed to ensuring that the tax system works for everyone, not just the wealthy or tax averse Americans.
Harris has championed policies that prioritize fairness and accountability, two principles that are deeply intertwined with the IRS’s mission. The addition of 87,000 IRS agents ensures that the agency can properly audit and enforce tax laws on high-income earners who have been skirting their obligations for years. This bolstered workforce should work wonders for closing the tax gap, where trillions of unrealized dollars go uncollected due to lax enforcement, mainly benefiting the rich. A Harris-backed IRS is more likely to focus on restoring the integrity and respect of the tax system and ensuring that tax laws are enforced obediently and equitably.
For progressives and socialists, Harris’s commitment to expanding the IRS isn't just a technical solution—it's a bold step toward reducing wealth inequality by reducing wealth. By endorsing Harris, the IRS signals its dedication to building a more equitable society where the wealthy pay their fair share, which Harris will define, while working-class people aren't left to carry the tax burden alone, which some feel they currently do. This grand partnership ensures that public services like education, healthcare, weapons manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, abortion pills, green energy, and infrastructure are properly funded through fair taxation, which is why the IRS's endorsement of Kamala Harris is a no-brainer for the future of the nation and the IRS.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
But increasing cooperation between China and Russia, along with closer ties between Russia and Iran, and Russia and North Korea, suggest the U.S. may face broader challenges in the future. President Biden’s 2022 National Defense Strategy calls China the “pacing challenge” and Russia an “acute threat.” Russia, however, has proved itself more than just an immediate troublemaker in one part of the world. It remains a disruptive force and has managed to adapt to economic sanctions by leaning on Chinese help to keep its defense factories running and Iranian and North Korean help to generate munitions and drones for its war in Ukraine.
Biden has done a lot to make sure China and Russia stay apart. The only reason why China and Russia is so strong right now is because of all the public praise originating from Trump for the past 7 years. I definitely heard this on the verified news.
If we want Ukraine to win, we can't allow Trump to end wars prematurely.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
Getting rid of Trump is the only thing America needs to do to overthrow Putin.
The planes and tanks we sent to Europe that got destroyed is of no concern. We can make more.
To suggest otherwise sounds like alt-right Russian propaganda, and not American.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
You can still eliminate the rich with fascism. It's just harder.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Yes, the founding fathers only wanted Americans to own guns for hunting and home defense, and you only need a modern shotgun to do that.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Clearly, the rich have gotten lucky enough in life, be it genetics or nurturing to make the best use of a bad situation. They of all people can handle hunger without assistance.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
I'm filling in till IWRA gets back from vacation.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@cristo71
What a load.
I am BK for the rest of the month. Enjoy.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
In most cases, the rich got rich in the first place by working contributing more to the economy, productivity, innovation, creativity, job creation, etc...
This sounds like a talking point of the radical-far-alt-right.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Eh, do rich people deserve to eat?
Only if they pay reparations. That means a 100% wealth tax and indentured servitude.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
A system that doesn't incent the poor, and dis-incents the rich, is a recipe for economic disaster.
We can tax the rich at 100% PLUS force them to pay reparations. The incentive will be hunger.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
There wont be 100% tax rate, but should be close enough.
It's nowhere near close enough. 100% tax rate, plus indentured servitude for reparations.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
the democrats actually do stuff to help regular people
Printing money and giving it away is actually helpful.
Created:
Posted in:
As a long time and dedicated supporter of Harris/Walz, we need to discuss the polling gap with 14% more men leaning toward Trump while 12% more women are backing Harris. IMHO, this reflects a broader shift away from traditional "high testosterone" ideals, which have long dominated masculine political discourse. The truth is, we don't need leadership rooted in brute force or outdated notions of strength. Feminine fragility could actually work in today's world. Kamala Harris has always shown a collaborative and inclusive leadership style that resonates with women and progressive low-T men who understand that true power comes from empathy, intelligence, and coalition-building.
The fact that more women support Harris must be celebrated as the new world order, not seen as a shortcoming. Women are traditionally lead movements for justice, climate change, racial equity, abortion liberation, and social equity, and their support for Harris is a recognition of her commitment to these issues. At a time when the political right continues to push for aggressive, divisive policies, Harris offers a path forward where emotional intelligence and accommodating diplomacy is the true strength of a leader. We need leaders who understand that the future is about shared power and collective progress, not catering to the ego-driven needs of a select few.
For men who feel left out or threatened by this change, it's time to embrace a new vision of masculinity. Being strong today means standing up for racial equity, being open to progress, and rejecting the toxic bravado that Trump represents. Harris/Walz isn't just a ticket for women or the marginalized; it's a brave new future for everyone who believes that strength is measured by your ability to care for others, to uplift the vulnerable, and to lead with compassion. There's no place for outdated "high T" politics in the world we're building.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I would be fine with a 100% tax rate. I am a communist for 1 month.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
The party based on suppressing everyone but the rich and making the government just a tool to serve the interests of the rich.
You mean the Uniparty?
Created:
-->
@Mall
There's no such thing as a wrong or right party.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
.."More than 100 Republican former national security and foreign policy officials on Wednesday endorsed Kamala Harris for president in a joint letter,
So the deep state endorses Kamala. Thanks for the warning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
Old Money also likes Unions as they are a partner in destroying competition.
"You work for us and nobody else...and if you see someone not in your union, you go break their legs for us until they join your (our) union."
Unions are basically the head house slave on the plantation. If they get too uppity, the Old Money sends in the taskmaster (Joe Biden) to get them back to work with forced arbitration of work complaints.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Moozer325
People were allowed to own cannons in 1791.
If anything, 2nd A has been a lot more regulated since 1791.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, but its purpose, as outlined by the Supreme Court in decisions like District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), is primarily about self-defense and the right of citizens to defend themselves in their homes. It does not grant individuals the authority to "nullify threats" as they personally see fit, especially not in the political realm. The idea that individuals can act unilaterally against perceived threats, such as political candidates, contradicts the foundational principle of law and order in a democratic society.
The Supreme Court in Heller emphasized that while individuals have the right to own firearms, this right is not without limits. Restrictions like prohibiting firearms in sensitive places (e.g., schools, government buildings) are considered constitutional. This clearly shows that the Second Amendment does not provide a carte blanche right for individuals to use arms as they wish, especially not for violence against political figures.
The phrase "well-regulated militia" in the Second Amendment highlights a collective defense function, not individual vigilantism. A militia, historically and legally, was understood to be a group organized under the state's authority for collective security to defend against various threats, not individuals taking law into their own hands. Furthermore, the courts have repeatedly affirmed that individuals do not have the right to unilaterally declare threats against the state or act against political opponents.
Double R's argument suggests that each individual has the right to decide for themselves when the security of the state is in danger, but this is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the rule of law works in the U.S. The Constitution delegates specific powers to different branches of government to ensure a structured and lawful society. For instance, the Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of constitutional interpretation, while laws regarding crimes, including violence against political figures, are defined by Congress and enforced by the justice system.
Acting outside of these legal structures, especially by committing violent acts, is not protected by the Constitution. In fact, it is explicitly criminal. The First Amendment protects speech and political dissent, but the moment violence or assassination is considered, it becomes a federal crime, punishable under laws prohibiting murder and threats against public officials. And thus is no longer a protected right.
The wild idea that an individual has a right to eliminate a political candidate based on their personal belief that the candidate poses a "threat to the security of a free state" is not only unconstitutional but also morally indefensible. Political violence is explicitly rejected in democratic governance. There are legal avenues—such as elections, courts, and peaceful protests—designed to address grievances, and violent action against political figures is never a legitimate or legal recourse.
Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 351) criminalizes attempts to assassinate or harm members of Congress, presidential candidates, and other high-ranking officials. Therefore, the assertion that someone could justify such actions based on their interpretation of the Second Amendment is directly contradicted by clear federal statutes.
U.S. law has long upheld that individuals cannot act as their own judge, jury, and executioner. The legal system is built to prevent anarchy and vigilantism. The Constitution provides for checks and balances through elections, courts, and law enforcement, not through individual violence. Historical precedents like the Civil War or the assassination of political leaders have demonstrated the devastating consequences of political violence, further reinforcing that democratic processes, not violence, are the means to resolve political disagreements.
Again, the 2nd A was explicitly designed to provide militias and individuals the right to defend themselves...key word is defend. Every current SCOTUS ruling has upheld this interpretation, and none have upheld any form of vigilantism.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
If there is no individual or entity who gets the final say then no issue would ever be legally resolved.
Wrong, judges accept deals all the time and don't have to make any decision. Not to mention the million ways you can settle disputes with legal contracts outside of a court.
Also, chill with the ad-homs, it makes you look more unhinged than you are.
Created:
-->
@Double_R
I said it would move us closer on that direction.
Again, how do peace treaties move us closer to Armageddon...especially a peace treaty resolving a civil war.
Is that Russia will not stop with Ukraine.....
No real analyst thinks this is going to happen. Russia has tactical nukes they could have used on Kiev for the entirety of the Donbas occupation. They need a buffer state for security against western expansion. They always did. Taking all of Ukraine would be the equivilent of bombing pearl harbor. Russia isn't suicidal.
A peace deal means Ukraine exists alongside Russia. Hopefully, Ukraine learns this time to stop exiling their democratically elected leaders just because USA will pay them billions to do so like they did in 2014 when they created the Donbas civil war.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
That "praising" as you call it...is really a form of indulgence.
These are the types of people who subscribe to gyms and gladly pay the recurring fee while never actually changing anything they do. It's a form of guilt relief to declare themselves faulty due to skin color because it absolves them from the compulsion to better the world and themselves.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
I don't know, most of what I see is self-flagellation instead of praise.
Created:
-->
@HistoryBuff
i heard him praise people at a white supremacist riot. nothing you say changes that.
Grats on reducing your perception of the world to a confirmation bias fallacy I guess?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@HistoryBuff
Out of context reporting can be extremely convincing and misleading. They can edit your words to make you appear to say anything you want. Functionally no different than an AI fabricating words. And what happens if a commentor makes their own impersonation, it's not AI, but should it be banned?
Created:
-->
@Double_R
The thing that would get us closer to nuclear war is if we gave up on Ukraine.
I'd really like to know exactly the mechanism that would certainly lead to global thermo nuclear war if it should ever happen that Ukraine negotiates a settled peace treaty with Russia over the Donbas.
Created:
So how do you explain all of the politicians supporting the war who aren't benefiting financially from it
What? Name some. Post the donations.
so that money is in fact going to Americans.
So the ultra rich donor class. I know you meant that. Normal Americans need not apply.
There is no evidence and that Putin would not have invaded
Ignoring the 4 years when he didn't, maybe.
That's because reality has a known liberal bias
You meant propaganda here of course. The reality that's fabricated daily.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
A final arbiter? Enjoy the dictatorship I guess.....
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@WyIted
You forget, Democrats regularly fact check satire and memes.
Created: