ILikePie5

Will you provide a link (if there is one) to the forum of the last election? I would like to read it.

They had debates, not everyone is a forum-heavy site user.

I am not here to tell what the rules are, as Oromagi pointed elsewhere and I knew, Wylted is ineligible to even be president.

I am not trying to win by abusing rules, those 2 votes either were (as in the 2 for me) legitimate or not. I would be concerned about this grey area in rules no matter what the situation was in score, it just turns out it has led to this.

I am now going offline from here for some time. This is becoming BS and Wylted has mass-campaigned on PMs violating rules, if the runoff happens. Meowranger and others have told me so.

I don't like Wylted, I don't care what happens here. I just care I lost to a clown campaign the right way and not by 2 votes being wrongly ruled off.

Where's your 'free speech' advocacy gone? :)

Slander implies I lied.

Bad faith sums up their votes.

Somehow, I very strongly suspect that RM would not be questioning my, or Vaarks vote had I voted for him.

Here are the election rules as voted on by the DART Community.  Why don't we have any explanation about why Mods are consistently failing to ignore these rules?

Remember he wanted me to lose and you had to concede to foil his plans? 

I am not even a moderator on the discord server, you are lying.

Do you have an example of RM's alleged opposition of "freedom of speech"?

Who does RM hold grudges against? 

I proposed a solution in the case that it was a tie to both Barney and Whiteflame.

Settled over a 2-round debate with 12-24 hours of posting time where both candidates can outline their respective positions. Voting period would take place over a week, giving everyone enough time. So no excuses if either of the candidates lost because their supporters couldn't get online in time.

Could be Open Voting or Judicial Decision.

It depends what you said. If you said threats I would not veto it, I could still veto the time and get to the root of the dispute.

I am very perceptive psychologically because I learned, having been autistic/aspergers and lagging in social skills, to manually gain reading ability of people. Even online. I have watched documentaries, read books and all sorts to refine my ability to truly perceive and understand people emotionally as they are, not as I wish they were or as I presume them to be.

I am that freak who reads body language like a machine. I am very perceptive. If you had lashed out at another user, it would not occur to me to assume you had nothing bad happening irl or no reason to do it.

I understand anger, all too well. I would chat with you and the other party individually and liaison with the mods to achieve an actual mutual apology, resolution and things you think are not even possible over text I would achieve.

I have a healing way about me, you do not realise it but it exists and I also have an aggressive, assertive way about me and that gets more noticed. I can handle situations with severe finesse, to the point the mods and even the toxic users would go damn RM how did you do that but I need the actual authority or people like polytheist witch just say get lost even when I truly am advocating their case and trying hard to understand what caused them anger, since I am not a mod and useless in their eyes.

That is why I wanted the title of president, I could get more to talk and properly make the mods take me serious when I say dont try route A, try route B. They are starting to see my wisdom. I told whuteflame both that Shila would be a chronic toxic voter he should have instantly been harsh with to reform her and was proven right and that she was no way in hell a bot and was proven right. I have had other instances like that. The mods trust me. You just do not see it 

Is there any evidence or testimony for the above statement? 

That sounds like equity rather than equality

Ramshutu has been a completely belligerent liar and abuser about me during most of his time here, until he decided to quit outside of elections with years of only posting 2 bursty moments in between.

There is a reason he did not disagree with anything I said to Lancelot about his (Ramshutu's) narrative being a lie.

Perhaps karma is a bitch either eay around.

For you it would be a bitch if your 1 day account advocation ends up backfiring as they allow 5 day old accounts.

There is no way at all, none, that you can tell me a consistent track record of ditching dart for over 2 years other than for elections which also includes ramshutu is worse than new accounts appearing to deeply care about the site and the election.

Either way, I am assuming if they allow the votes it will be a runoff, I am solely posting here to make clear your side has zero moral leg to stand on after it tried to make you have coup power via a MEEP and then tried to allow 1 day old accounts to vote.

I will accept the outcome that happened, as the rules play it out to be. I actually solely told things in advance to be transparent. If I had done this while silent, it would seem sinister and shady. You have the ability to pitch your case to whiteflame and the mod team.

If an account does more in 2.9 months than samstevens, ramshutu and Vaarka have done the past 2 years, who shows more eligiblity to vote?

I congratulate you out of obligation, not respect nor some deep acknowledgement. You did not deserve to win, your platform was that vermin supreme endorsed you and that you will give out gift cards. The voters are waiting for you to announce the winner and reveal your amazing google docs manifesto.

If you of all people think this is me angry and lashing out, then it is amusingly good for me. I do not care to be known for my anger and this is so far from it that it benefits me if people presume it to be.

I have been calm throughout. Calm does not mean passive and cowardly.

Why Pie stepped down for Wylted by not running despite wanting to 2 years in a row is beyond me.

Obviously the bill is going nowhere but designed to identify the White Supremacists hiding among us by triggering their compulsion to play the victim.  Thanks for your cooperation!

Are you implying that my vote is not legal? What would make you think that?

I will make you a deal you cannot refuse,

We agree to count Johnny's vote and then count Jimmy and Jim's. :)

They are not multiaccounts of one another. They are distinct accounts created by different people, one of whom copied the pfp of the other. That's all the information you'll get from me.

They're two different people who made two different accounts with the same pfp to vote for opposite candidates. It's honestly not that hard to figure out and I don't know why you keep making this point. And, no, just because you want to get all the reasons why these now three accounts that were obviously made for the purpose of voting in this election doesn't mean I'm going to release privileged information about them.

Last time I was told anyone that signs up within 2 weeks of the election is not old enough an account to vote, or whatever the threshold was. That multi-accounter signed up the same day.

We need to be able to work with him should we win

I do not publicly release information that is only available to moderation because of our administrative access. That's not going to change now.