ILikePie5

You gonna send out PMs soon or nah?

bastard cops killed her

That's part and package of being the president, where every action and move is scrutinized. However the types of stories you would get would be in the same vein as Obama's tan suit and choice of dijon mustard - things that aren't particularly important or offensive.

I think there's an even more obvious link you're missing. The previous presidents haven't been shitty people.

If enough of the population can be persuaded that establishment Fact Checkers are the source of all proper thought, then Elections will be no longer necessary.

Every public figures words are scrutinized. The president of the US most of all. The secret to not get hounded by the media? Don't say or do dumbfuck things.

You'll notice previous presidents don't have pages on their racial views. It's because controversial racial statements are a category of dumbfuck things that most people can avoid openly saying.

10,000 characters is 3 pages.  We have learned the hard way that 3 pages is generally too much to expect Republicans to handle but Democrats happily consume 3 pages worth of information many times each day.  This is also why we use big words around Republicans.

People with the intellect to handle 3 pages worth of information know I've already answered this question in this forum.

where game

Few people have wikipedia articles dedicated to their racial views, however Trump is lucky enough to have one.

What about the names of the cops that waved Babbitt to the killing fields?

It was a gun that decided on it's own to kill AB

In the largest sense, you killed Ashli Babbitt.

I mean if you want me to play I would just take into consideration that you might not want to give me a time important role because those three days I usually barely check the game so if you are waiting on a night action it will be my fault

You don’t use group PM’s?

How does this even work?

Pie being salty is always funny to see. He didn’t volunteer to shrink a 12 person to an 8 game in a couple days 

Also Pie just bitches when he loses. All the time

Romans were brilliant tacticians but not the so much strategists.

It's why their empire imploded as Romans themselves resented it.

And whiteflame and Polyglot not far off confirmed - at least Polyglot would have never went against whiteflame. 

You guys got lucky killing Chris like you said. If you hadn't, you'd have been in the second DP with 3 confirmed townies pretty much. Roles aside. 

Oh hell yeah, even if we had a counter to the vig I wouldnt feel as if I wasted my time as much

I mean yeah it was townsided either way, but you guys lost by theme anyway. 

Town shooting two mafia in an 8 player game... I can't argue or wifom my way out of a vig shot lol. I would have been okay with maybe a 1x vig but even that is pretty imbalanced since we don't really have a counter to it. 

I don't think the roles made a bit of difference this game though, besides whiteflame shooting two mafia. The game was townsided by theme. 

Because of your desire to seek vengeance on the killer of your friend, you are a 1x Vigilante. In the night, you may choose to shoot someone. You have up to two shots. If you kill 2 townies with your 2 shots, you lose your vote for the entire DP. You win with town

what would be the qualities and characteristics of a more conservatives website?

Doesn't this sound like incitement?

On Jan. 6, Trump gave a 70-minute speech to the crowd assembled at the Ellipse near the White House. He rambled at length about the details surrounding the supposed election steal, sounding chaotic and deluded to critics. 

Yet, to his followers, his ability to reel off statistics, however false, not only evoked his ostensible business expertise but also furnished more evidence for the stolen election. Trump also made numerous statements that could be taken as a call to insurrection: “If you don’t fight like Hell, you’re not going to have a country any more;” “When you catch somebody in a fraud, you’re allowed to go by very different rules;” “You’ll never take back our country with weakness.” 

The implication of the word “our” is that America has fallen into the wrong hands: Democrats, minorities and urban elites. When his supporters chanted “Fight for Trump,” he responded with the approving “Thank you.” 

See United States v. Alvarez (567 US, 2012).

This decision made clear that there are certainly some cases where lying is not protected speech, such as when it’s part of criminal conduct or interferes with the operation of the government, intentionally false statements are simply not a category of speech that gets less protection. Trump lying that he won the 2020 Presidential election is a threat to the stability of the US government. It is quite possible that Trump could be arrested if he testifies in the Supreme Court case

that he did win the 2020 election.

how does the first amendment apply to big tech? the amendment refers to congress and that's how it's always been treated.