Total posts: 17,895
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
We need to lynch someone, and by DP3 there's been enough time for results. Towns two biggest power roles are dead, I don't see the harm in getting claims so we can narrow down the rest of the players.
Only the Doc is dead...
For example: If you get lynched, I can overturn it. You will continue to live, but your vote will be controlled by me like a politician, for the rest of the game. Bullish will publicly announce this upon me using the role.
What do you mean controlled? Can you overturn a No Lynch or VTNL?
Interesting.. Damn that's a really confirmable role that we have no way of confirming right now.
It screwed me over in the process which is why I’m ticked. Pretty retarded cause we could’ve had 2-3 confirmable people together even if I died.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
This feels weak lol. How do you plan on convincing others to vote for him if your argument is WIFOM based and not behavioral?
WIFOM is behavioral imo. It’s inherent with behavioral. Someone who prides themselves in being to WIFOM and is blatantly doing it rn is sus.
Why?
Cause I have a behavioral read on Drafter but not Warren. Plus my role can technically end Warren’s sole selection which fits, but it could just be made up with the RB.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
There are 3 claims left, cop and doc are dead, I see no reason why you guys shouldn't claim to help narrow this down.
Wanna explain?
I'll start. I am a 1x governor. I can overturn a lynch, by doing so I inherent the victim's vote permanently.
Can you clarify?
Pie please claim, and then popcorn dani or speed.
Grand Theft Auto - Role Stealer: I can steal any passive or active role that the person may have. I clarified with Bullish that I cannot steal Day Roles, nor can I steal Vanilla. Plus the roles given to me are not affiliation indicative (I asked him that).
I stole That1’s NP1 which is why I’m so mad that Bullish modkilled her instead of Supa cause it would essentially town confirm her even if I was lynched in the process.
Last night I targeted Whiteflame and got nothing - clearly cause he had a day role.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Does drafter seem the type though to just come out and claim roleblocker? I mean it seems like a lot of people were suspicious of him yesterday, and I feel like he would have forseen that claiming roleblocker was risky. I think he would have thought of a better fake claim.
He’s the type of person to not think twice after doing something. This argument is WIFOM anyways.
Also as you pointed out at the end, warren also has a scum sounding role. You really think they are pulling some kind of gambit? That's so risky for no reason. I wouldn't be surprised if there are other town roles that have mafia sounding-ness to them.
I’m more sus of Drafter than Warren at the moment.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Behavior or just because of role though
Both.
WIFOM and Role
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Are you voting drafter because of his role still?
I think he’s scum.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Idk I am guessing because her slot was inactive first?
Shitty reason if that was the reason
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
If we could have lynched dp1, even if it was a mislynch, we would have had a replacement for her. This is 100% our fault lol. We have no lynched twice in a row due to inactivity.
But why That1 over Supa lol
Created:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Umm...ok. The CCP is doing its goods to the nation. If it is as negative as Fox News portrays it or something, China would be flopping like Germany after WWI.
Germany is a shitty comparison lol. Better one is Soviet Russia. CCP is only doing shit for themselves period.
Created:
-->
@Intelligence_06
Yes, over 1.5 B people included
This is laughable
Created:
-->
@Intelligence_06
The CCP is cruel to some, but is constructive to more. Painting the CCP as negative is saying that some lives matter more than others.
CCP is constructive only to itself
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Imabench
Yeah this went way fuckin differently then I thought it would.Georgia def a purple state now holy shit
As someone on the right, I knew both Democrats were going to win. It was obvious. The Georgia GOP sucks. They had a warning call in 2018 and they didn’t do anything about it. Just look at the Texas GOP for comparison. It’s a shame there are incompetent Republicans in Georgia
Created:
It’s a sad day when the President of the United States gets banned but the Chinese Communist Party and Iran run free
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
What other option? Continue to track drafter every single night phase?
Nope.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
As a result, if I don’t die tonight it’d probably be best drafter roleblocks me so I can pick a new target and essentially become an odd night tracker. Thoughts?
Why not the other option?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
@Lunatic
@Vader
@Speedrace
Stalker is the Mafia version of Rolecop
Hooker is the Mafia version of Roleblocker
Is it just me that sees this connection?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
Do you think we have enough time to pressure Pie? It wouldn't make sense unless he signs on.
I definitely am not going to full claim today. I’ll character claim if there’s enough pressure, but I don’t see the point in doing so.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bullish
That1User has been modkilled for inactivity.Her affiliate will be revealed at the end of today.
Bruh what
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
Confirm if you are voting drafter for death
I thought it was obvious but yes
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
pie are on him for his role which I feel is an easy shot for a mislynch.
Imo it should be a policy lynch. If we’re just gonna let Drafter keep WIFOMing himself out of this, we’ve already lost. This is exactly what he does as scum: WIFOM the shit out of things
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
I don't think that you're a town roleblocker. I think that you should've died last night and you didn't. And I agree with Luna's behavioral reads
If you agree with Lunatic’s behavioral reads you should be Lean Town on Drafter...
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
I gave my justification already and I I vote lunatic because I got what I wanted.
So your justification is that you’re a Town Hooker just because you’re prostitution? That’s interesting.
All you have against me is WIFOM which is null. What specifically pushes me as scum in your eyes?
I’ve already said that it’s your role. You can WIFOM it all you want, doesn’t change that you have a claimed scum role.
Created:
Posted in:
Morning folks, I’ve been on a binge of Survivor so my apologies for the inactivity
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
Let's assume he's a mafia roleblocker. Why would he out his "I actually have a scummy claim" immediately? Why not keep that under wraps?
It’s WIFOM. He prides himself in being able to talk his way out of things, which he clearly did here. I’m also curious how prostitution relates to roleblocking.
Let's assume he's a town roleblocker. Given his feelings toward Lunatic yesterday doesn't it make sense for him to have targeted Luna?
Him targeting Lunatic isn’t affiliation indicative because he has a motive to target Lunatic as scum too. My vote is going to stand.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
Do you think he's a mafia roleblocker?
Yes
Do you think he's lying about his role entirely?
He’s the Mafia Roleblocker
Do you think he actually visited lunatic regardless of his role?
Probably
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Ok, what's the vote for?
I don’t believe that you’re a Town Hooker.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@warren42
I don't think this is independently scummy but Pie defending Lunatic's character super hard is noted. It might be just him being hardheaded and wanting to be right but it also might be w/w. If one flips guilty I'll be suspicious of the other, but again don't think it's independently scummy
Who do you plan to vote for?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
“A public servant commits the offense of acceding to corruption if he or she knowingly solicits, accepts or agrees to accept any benefit, direct or indirect, in return for his or her:
(1) Official vote, opinion, recommendation, judgment, decision, action or exercise of discretion as a public servant; or
(2) Violation of a known legal duty as a public servant.
2. The offense of acceding to corruption by a public servant is a class E felony.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Ok, so what? The point of this game is that the thing you are is actually a crime. Would you buy "aggravation" as a crime?
I sure as hell would Corruption bribery
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
It's not a bad analogy because you can impeach for anything and call it anything you want. You can't do that for crimes.
The point was that people would believe it not whether it is or isn’t a crime
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Impeachment is not a criminal process.
It’s an analogy to prove that yes people do buy into it and think that
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Also, one rather obvious reason why mafia wouldn't NK me: they think they can get me mislynched. So maybe look at the people who can out of the gate trying to lynch me?
This is just WIFOM
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
Thoughts?Also I absolutely want warren to answer this from last day phase. He disappeared after I posted: Once again I am wondering the point of you asking me questions about my win con when #1 the OP clarifies that no win con = town, so even if I were scum I'd know how to answer this question and #2 there has already been discussion about how detailed or explicit the roles are to characters. Deciding to go into a deep dive about my PM analysis therefore seems like a waste of time at this point, or a way to look like you're investigating something thoroughly when scum is not going to get caught with these questions. You should have done this with people that posted much earlier. Explain your reason for going along with this line of questioning.
Still a +1
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Danielle
Drafterman's claim was blatantly obvious from last DP. There are only a handful of "town roles with mafia equivalents" and one of them is HOOKER whereas the others are things like Scout, Lookout, etc. In a themed game about crimes, drafterman was obviously Prostitution. The fact that he wasn't killed when he essentially claimed role blocker yesterday is interesting. More interesting is drafter's willingness to get himself lynched and say that his role wasn't useful to town. That's one of the biggest reasons I voted for him because I thought he was trying to back out of claiming Prostitution.
He’s trying to talk his way out of a lynch as usual. How convenient that Lunatic has a day role and Drafter magically visits him.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
Ok, that's good enough for me.I'm prostitution, role blocker. Mafia role blocker is not uncommonly known as "hooker" which is why that is my role.I was thinking that Lunatic might be angling for also claiming role blocker as you can bribe people not to do something, so some shit. I was trying to set up a possible CC.
Lol Mafia Hooker and Prostitution. Sounds like a perfect justification
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@drafterman
My point is that "corruption" is, at best a qualifier for a crime, not a crime unto itself. Would you buy someone claiming "aggravation" because "aggravated assault" is a crime?
Democrats bought Abuse of Power in the impeachment articles without specifically saying which power. So yes people would buy it
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Speedrace
I'm saying why would he claim a roleblocker role as scum
??
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Btw if it isn't obvious, I am Drug Distribution and I am a Role Vendor. I have 2 more left to give
Why did you claim without any pressure?
Created: