ILikePie5

Oh, well... I don't agree with that but. Oh well.

I figured if anyone had a read on me, it was you or Speed. I knew who scum were by DP3, but by then it was too late to do much about it.

Interestingly, if Danielle had not jailed Chris, his oracle role would have activated making an entirely different last DP, but that is how the game breaks.

I should've tried to attract mafia kill DP1 but was too busy to do so, sorry folks. I feel kinda bad for not using my role well

Yep, pretty sure we would've lost if GP didn't do that

I cant do votes rn taking brit to the hospital

Read the dp

If you were to be lynched, it would be apart of the cake that goes to your lynch, but only a lil bit. It isn't anything to pursue your lynch over

But it can be, it is not that much of importance tho if we lynch.

You are being hypocritical now

Yes it is, but it's not something I read into when it comes to your vote. It's like sprinkles to a cake

Supa what do you think of pie saying he's not miller after claiming it ?

It's something to take note of. 

I said I don't read into it

You go on Discord when you are pinged for something on phone. I noticed this morning and yesterday you were on phone when I didn't ping. Like I said, it's only a note and not a read, but a little thought

Also gonna pull a mikal read with Pie and say that he's been on Discord a lot more on his phone. He only hops on Discord when pinged. Not gonna read anymore into that but it's just a note

Because you didn't invent it :)

Woof

I'm just gonna do the math out loud to orient my thoughts. 9 peeps here so assuming it's 6 v 3, that's a 33% chance to catch scum. VTNL twice, two scum kills, we get to 4 v 3, that's a 43% chance to get them, but really it's higher than that b/c of investigative results. So I'm not understanding your argument that it benefits mafia to VTNL?

I like that pie is buddying drafter but I'm getting scum read because they think I'm buddying Elm. Racists

Policy lynching millers was not created by Pie. I'm sure if you look at any other person they'd policy lynch millers too. You are just the first person on DART who uses the meta, you didn't invent it. 

I'm beating a dead horse 

The trade is 

2 shots vs 1

But implies second shot has to be accurate if we miss 1

---------------

1 shot but with the option of 2nps of results to analyze

I prefer the latter. 

We have cop + whatever other possible investigative roles and a solid POE to use that on, plus scum could hit a possible protective role. I think it's much safer to get those results than to possibly lynch town

Please don't take this to offense, but you did not fucking invent policy lynching Millers

Let's take what you are saying and there are going to be "ccs". That will happen even if lynch and get it wrong. The difference is we still have to solve tomorrow with the same thing happening and be correct or lose 

The bickering is just stupid so far.

I also agree that drafter seems to scumread Elm for personal reasons and his tunneling of him is not helpful. I don't remember ever seeing him as scum tho so I don't know his meta as scum

The interaction part is where I see the most red flags. Why is Pie pointing out something drafterman said a year ago and looking at him to test his reaction? How does he know what drafterman is thinking at the time this is going. What would be the motive for Pie to focus in on something from a year ago just to ask for Drafter's opinion on something. To me, it doesn't add up in anyway. The only reason that post would've been brought up if drafter told Pie about the post, which leads me to believe they have some form of communication with each other. Drafter even says it wasn't recently where he said Miller claims. Why would Pie remember this info at all? These don't add in anyway

wdym "scum couldn't do that"?

The difference is there will be a lot more information out. Look at the roles that are dead and look at the flips. Mafia can't cc every role. More information betters the chance of accuracy on the lynch. 

Disagree fully with this for all the reasons I told drafter. 

Christ man, not you as well 

I think what stands out to me is the massive amount of contradictions he's posted and the vanilla claim on top of that 

The issue with supa is it's hard to read him because I'm fully convinced he doesn't read anything except what he's tagged in and tries to fill in the blanks blindly

He did this last game as town. If anything him being town confirmed made him even lazier. 

You said this was his "meta" I believe. 

Please explain 

This is also why Supa's declaration that he wouldn't be posting today felt a bit off to me. 

But otherwise I'd prefer to VTNL. We're pretty much guaranteed to have a cop, so I'd rather get that result than potentially going into LYLO

What was your character claim?

Even so, VTL'ing Elm without reason wasn't smart until he explained it, which is still false. 

Keep believing me saying why the fuck are we vtl'ing means that I said to VTNL when it never specifically said that. Lol not gonna argue this

There's no point in arguing anymore because you don't understand my point

I bet you if we stopped talking about Supa and started talking about Elminster he'd magically have another raid break.

Above

And yes it isn't. It was a reactionary to seeing Elm being voted quickly in the DP without any leads in the NP

Yes, but that contrast what he literally said where he says that you shouldn't put Millers as instant scum. He literally said me you and him were town bickering, thus putting you in town, going against his belief

I never said I don't want to lynch ever. This is a lie

He literally did that

He said that he buys you as town, but said he doesn't believe Miller should be written off as town, but has you as town with only 3 posts and a claim

Please point me to a post where I explicitly said "Lynching now is bad." I gave a statement about the pros and cons to both is the most I've said

I can argue the same with you and Drafter. Why do you have to test drafter out of all people over something he said months ago.

Even if that isn't the case, why are you not calling out drafter for basically going against his own logic and reasoning? I also am not buddying Elm cuz I'm clearly voting

Incorrect. Elm had votes from Drafter and whiteflame on the first page and I just read it and skimmed and asked, why the fuck are we lynching.