I guess we don't have to really get our attention on this debate, considering Pro lost NO points at all. Is the win percentage THAT important to you people?
Pretty sure "obsessed with robin" is not a personality trait. It is just a general, especially limited characteristic that has nothing to do with personality. A personality trait would be general, like "Obsessive", not such specific.
"Just don't be a sophist", a coated way of saying "My topic probably does not stand upon scrutiny, but I don't wanna lose; neither do I want to put any effort in changing that".
"When tribes go to war, who dies and takes the cuts and hits in order to stop the other dying? Men."
Because men are on average more muscular and stronger. An army of best-trained women against an army of best-trained men and the men will win. I don't think this is a reason.
I believe rap battles would be better if used the “winner select” vote style because normal style voting just doesn’t work. I went into this feeling outraged that Vici didn’t get a single point until realizing it doesn’t even matter here.
This topic is quite literally tautological or unfalsifiable because then Pro can just call everything Con think is wrong "sin" and just go with it and the only way to defeat Pro is being self-refutingly non-sequitur to make Pro incoherent in the first place.
"Bible scriptures" are multiple independent entities and removing the "the" as long as any quote favoring your position is brought up you win.
"The Bible scriptures" is to be seen as a whole, so it requires there to be NO quote against your position in order for your win to take place. That is exactly what the indefinite article does.
Remove the "the" and you would have yourself a victory. IDK about other voters, maybe you will eventually be voted the better effort out of the two but I am someone who pays way too much attention in grammar and definitions. In my opinion, you didn't win, and to be frank you can't win here. That does not prevent you from spending the better of the two efforts.
When is the first stage that an organism can have sexes? Was it a male or a female? Answering this question from a biological speculative angle could solve this discussion.
Also, although this is indeed after the debating has started, but you didn't define "busty". To be fair, most of us wouldn't be specifically attracted to the bustiest woman on the planet(search her up).
Topics like this should be more suited towards the forums section. We would love to see you discussing more topics and creating them there.
Right now, it appears to me that you are constantly instigating debates that you are not trying to win, but merely criticizing in your own fashion. This exact purpose is what the Forums category is made for.
You are making debates harder to win as yourself, mall. You are arguing that Pro's proof is unsound when in fact as long as one is brought up, Pro wins.
He said “woman” and “man” and not “women” and “men” so Pro is giving a single representative for each sex. The lack of definite articles in front of singular nouns demonstrate implicity, which is what I assume Pro got here in the first place.
To be fair, you can accuse of him not proving what the topic is about if he just speaks generally and gives no examples at all.
Adding “the” makes the topic much more different. In any seriousness I wouldn’t be surprised if Pro refers it to Eve in respect to Adam. Is it a good topic? The hell it obviously is not!
Debating this topic without defining what “ending” at all is absurd to me.
For example, the “ending” of Revenge of the Sith. It definitely isn’t a happy one but we know there are events after it. Whether it is an ending or not is debatable.
First, don't enter your first round argument in the description, this isn't the old DDO. If this isn't one, please make smooth clarity instead of giving us planes for counterattacks that we can grapple on.
For example, define what "socially backward" is. Don't expect us to follow what you are saying if you don't put the exact framework into a manifestation in words.
I am literally the other side of that debate. How about you tell me how his argument was faulty. I don’t even wanna talk about anything else, just that.
"Even if the phrase is not grammatically correct this does not mean that it means something else."
Ok, That just makes me more correct. There are in fact even adverb entries for "right" and I didn't even bother writing it because of course it is grammatically incorrect. That is one in god knows how many entries. There is a very small chance for "right" to be actually used in accordance with the political right-wing when you look at all the usages of the same-spelled phrase, most of them being "correct" or "opposite of left"(as a directional phrase, not political).
I don't think Pro gets the vote just because 1 entry favors Pro when in reality at least 21 entries does not. All claims are in an unproven state until a satisfactory proof has been brought forth. My source if anything is stronger pull to Con than to Pro.
"but Pro has a definition that says right means political."
Pro's definition(which is the only one) is a NOUN unsuitable due to them referring to different classes of subjects. Con's only entry that could be seen as "flawed" is an ADJ that in no way should be considered a commonplace definition due to it obviously not being capitalized. The 13th entry is more of an entry for "Right" than an entry for "right".
When without modification, the BoP defaults to Pro, not Con. Pro's *only* argument was deemed irrelevant and due to the 1-rounder constraint not able to use any of my "flaws" against me.
Also, Con's argument in a much greater magnitude works FOR Con than in any part AGAINST.
No. I have proven that Pro’s definition is unsuitable as a noun. The 13th entry requires in order for the term to be common-place understood it must be distinguished by capitalization(which was absent here).
3 days, please someone vote.
“USA is gay”
Yeah, because North Korea probably bans homosexuality, punishable by death or something.
7 days left. Votes anyone?
This is a truism. You can cure it by killing them. Do you want that though? Probably not.
I don’t think you are gonna make a single point out of this one.
I just realized my vote here and I have thought a pipeline leading me to think actually the other side would have won.
Please remove my vote here.
Man, how is this voteless? This is literally an FF.
I guess we don't have to really get our attention on this debate, considering Pro lost NO points at all. Is the win percentage THAT important to you people?
Looks like it is for you.
This is a truism.
Pavlov’s classical conditioning is a test on dogs.
Pavlov’s classical conditioning is a test on dogs. There is no way animal testing should be “banned”.
Pretty sure "obsessed with robin" is not a personality trait. It is just a general, especially limited characteristic that has nothing to do with personality. A personality trait would be general, like "Obsessive", not such specific.
Pretty sure you voted towards the wrong side
“You're unironically the biggest sophist on the site, you use any method available to win."
Thanks.
Pretty sure he is arguing that nobody should give children candy, including pedophiles.
"Just don't be a sophist", a coated way of saying "My topic probably does not stand upon scrutiny, but I don't wanna lose; neither do I want to put any effort in changing that".
5 days left. Votes anyone?
"When tribes go to war, who dies and takes the cuts and hits in order to stop the other dying? Men."
Because men are on average more muscular and stronger. An army of best-trained women against an army of best-trained men and the men will win. I don't think this is a reason.
Please remove my vote here, it appears I voted for the wrong side.
If I strive for a cry of outrage for every Loss I had, I would be considered to be way less reputable. Keep that in mind.
I believe rap battles would be better if used the “winner select” vote style because normal style voting just doesn’t work. I went into this feeling outraged that Vici didn’t get a single point until realizing it doesn’t even matter here.
That does sound like blatant racism or culturalism to me.
“Law: this law makes so that you are under arrest unless you are mentally ill.”
Conclusion: this law is ineffective because when I “violate” it I can be not punished.
Umm do you see what you are doing here?
This topic is quite literally tautological or unfalsifiable because then Pro can just call everything Con think is wrong "sin" and just go with it and the only way to defeat Pro is being self-refutingly non-sequitur to make Pro incoherent in the first place.
"Bible scriptures" are multiple independent entities and removing the "the" as long as any quote favoring your position is brought up you win.
"The Bible scriptures" is to be seen as a whole, so it requires there to be NO quote against your position in order for your win to take place. That is exactly what the indefinite article does.
Remove the "the" and you would have yourself a victory. IDK about other voters, maybe you will eventually be voted the better effort out of the two but I am someone who pays way too much attention in grammar and definitions. In my opinion, you didn't win, and to be frank you can't win here. That does not prevent you from spending the better of the two efforts.
When is the first stage that an organism can have sexes? Was it a male or a female? Answering this question from a biological speculative angle could solve this discussion.
4 days left, 0 votes, care to change that?
Also, although this is indeed after the debating has started, but you didn't define "busty". To be fair, most of us wouldn't be specifically attracted to the bustiest woman on the planet(search her up).
Topics like this should be more suited towards the forums section. We would love to see you discussing more topics and creating them there.
Right now, it appears to me that you are constantly instigating debates that you are not trying to win, but merely criticizing in your own fashion. This exact purpose is what the Forums category is made for.
“Black” is not judged by actual skin tone. It is about being an African American, which Kamala Harris is not.
This is HoF Misc. category nomination level obscurity here.
You are making debates harder to win as yourself, mall. You are arguing that Pro's proof is unsound when in fact as long as one is brought up, Pro wins.
I have long agreed with the advocation of changing *S&G* to "Legibility". Dunno why they still haven't done that after over a year.
He said “woman” and “man” and not “women” and “men” so Pro is giving a single representative for each sex. The lack of definite articles in front of singular nouns demonstrate implicity, which is what I assume Pro got here in the first place.
To be fair, you can accuse of him not proving what the topic is about if he just speaks generally and gives no examples at all.
Adding “the” makes the topic much more different. In any seriousness I wouldn’t be surprised if Pro refers it to Eve in respect to Adam. Is it a good topic? The hell it obviously is not!
Debating this topic without defining what “ending” at all is absurd to me.
For example, the “ending” of Revenge of the Sith. It definitely isn’t a happy one but we know there are events after it. Whether it is an ending or not is debatable.
Do you actually believe in the topics that you created?
First, don't enter your first round argument in the description, this isn't the old DDO. If this isn't one, please make smooth clarity instead of giving us planes for counterattacks that we can grapple on.
For example, define what "socially backward" is. Don't expect us to follow what you are saying if you don't put the exact framework into a manifestation in words.
I am literally the other side of that debate. How about you tell me how his argument was faulty. I don’t even wanna talk about anything else, just that.
Hope I don't get reprimanded for this. I have other topics as well.
"Even if the phrase is not grammatically correct this does not mean that it means something else."
Ok, That just makes me more correct. There are in fact even adverb entries for "right" and I didn't even bother writing it because of course it is grammatically incorrect. That is one in god knows how many entries. There is a very small chance for "right" to be actually used in accordance with the political right-wing when you look at all the usages of the same-spelled phrase, most of them being "correct" or "opposite of left"(as a directional phrase, not political).
I don't think Pro gets the vote just because 1 entry favors Pro when in reality at least 21 entries does not. All claims are in an unproven state until a satisfactory proof has been brought forth. My source if anything is stronger pull to Con than to Pro.
"but Pro has a definition that says right means political."
Pro's definition(which is the only one) is a NOUN unsuitable due to them referring to different classes of subjects. Con's only entry that could be seen as "flawed" is an ADJ that in no way should be considered a commonplace definition due to it obviously not being capitalized. The 13th entry is more of an entry for "Right" than an entry for "right".
When without modification, the BoP defaults to Pro, not Con. Pro's *only* argument was deemed irrelevant and due to the 1-rounder constraint not able to use any of my "flaws" against me.
Also, Con's argument in a much greater magnitude works FOR Con than in any part AGAINST.
No. I have proven that Pro’s definition is unsuitable as a noun. The 13th entry requires in order for the term to be common-place understood it must be distinguished by capitalization(which was absent here).
That would mean 21/22 or 22/22 entries favor Con.
wow, I would say that was a good argument. To be fair I almost forgot this debate existed lol
"If you want your game to barely sell and be deemed 0/5 stars visually, use pixel graphics in 2022."
Ignore the fanbase of any of them, some indie games intend to use pixel art as a way to invoke nostalgia, or they just like doing so.
How do you plan to chop me? Don't say rap, because I won't even accept the challenge knowing I am not a rapper(not that I want to be one anyways).
Yeah, you go calling the most experienced person on this entire site a punk and an irrational sadman.