And why exactly do you need a permit to do anything? Exactly, you don't. Permits only serve as discouragements so that this act is less accessible and people who "don't have a permit" are discouraged from doing it. Is being harder equal to impossible? No.
Out of all the example that you could have given, you chose the one that yields circular reasoning.
Argue definitions, we shall. I think that if there is a way of doing something, it is allowed. You are not allowed to drive me to the station that doesn't exist because that logically does not stand. Selling kidneys is possible and logically non-contradictory.
Unless I have been misinformed by the council, most things the current system of American churches preach outside of the Bible either commit the Didit fallacy or are related to that.
Everywhere. The fact there is a way of selling kidneys, surface or dark web, means it is "allowed" technically. The law only serves as discouragement, for example, it makes the cost of robbing the banks...more than what you have robbed, and it makes the cost of killing a person...life in prison. Nothing makes you "not allowed to do something". The law only discourages.
And it sure does a good job in keeping me from being a criminal.
"I fact Darth Maul was an abomination tonthe Sith order."
I don't think so. Maul wasn't technically a Sith until Plagueis died. There can be more than 2 dark side users at a time, it is just only 2 of them are Sith.
Don't know a lot about the Jensaarai or those other factions, but proving that "you" ought to join any of them (or even the Jedaii) fulfills no one's BoP.
Please stop making "leave it in the comment" as something mandatory. We opportunists, seeing an unclear topic, will just use that point to defeat you instead of pointing it out. Please make your argument clearer or just make one that is bare undefeatable. If your weapon is flawed, your opponent won't tell you to repair it, they will smash it to pieces.
The concept “female” is just a word, which can be based on anything since it is just a word. I think it should be probably be worded like “the distinction of male and female is more beneficial if it is based on sex than gender identity.”
The whole reason I “agree” with this statement is that there obviously should be a classification based on biology, as penises and balls are definitely not the same things as vaginas and ovaries. There is a need for distinction.
The obfuscation is clearly not my problem. If you think this is too much then it is you who can’t understand it. What I have brought up is essentially within the consideration of a question.
What if they have been anesthesized, as they are harmful to me in of itself and you just happen to remove them outright? Exactly, I can make a non-example as specific as you think. Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
But what if I have grown a separate extra pair of nuts and it causes pain in of itself and you just removed them for free and thus removed pain from me? This kind of scenarios no matter how obscure should not be ignored outright.
Ironically, the "Dreadnaught-class" heavy cruiser is not a dreadnought at all, as all dreadnoughts are classified to be more than 5,000 meters long in SW universe.
Oh man, you guys are not talking about the Chuck Norris one I did days ago, right?
And no, I have had about 0 fajitas and 1 burrito in my life. Wait till someone starts a topic among two esoteric things like "The integral symbol is better than crime statistics of Crimea". It is and will be funny,
No, a trap is whatever Admiral Ackbar says it is and most of the time it is just some natural or even unnatural force, and no, they cannot wear masks whether they want it or not and whether if they have the ability to want or not want or not. /s
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/wap
You see how absurd this is?
It's just a distinction thing. Do you need the distinction where "I think I am a woman" more or "I have a vagina" more?
And why exactly do you need a permit to do anything? Exactly, you don't. Permits only serve as discouragements so that this act is less accessible and people who "don't have a permit" are discouraged from doing it. Is being harder equal to impossible? No.
And why does that "law" really matter to you? You are permitted to do anything as long as you can do something.
Out of all the example that you could have given, you chose the one that yields circular reasoning.
Argue definitions, we shall. I think that if there is a way of doing something, it is allowed. You are not allowed to drive me to the station that doesn't exist because that logically does not stand. Selling kidneys is possible and logically non-contradictory.
Example: ______
Unless I have been misinformed by the council, most things the current system of American churches preach outside of the Bible either commit the Didit fallacy or are related to that.
Well, it is a 1-day round for a topic I have long forgotten how to do. I am literally typing this in between my math classes.
It has been 2 years since I did anything close to this sort of debates.
Since the presence of illegality does not entirely cut the means of doing something but merely narrows it, "allowed" never stops here.
Everywhere. The fact there is a way of selling kidneys, surface or dark web, means it is "allowed" technically. The law only serves as discouragement, for example, it makes the cost of robbing the banks...more than what you have robbed, and it makes the cost of killing a person...life in prison. Nothing makes you "not allowed to do something". The law only discourages.
And it sure does a good job in keeping me from being a criminal.
The topic makes no sense. Adults can already sell kidneys now.
"I fact Darth Maul was an abomination tonthe Sith order."
I don't think so. Maul wasn't technically a Sith until Plagueis died. There can be more than 2 dark side users at a time, it is just only 2 of them are Sith.
Uh oh, I think I might have set the bound too low. 10,000 won't be enough at this rate.
Equal opportunities, not outcomes. A death row inmate and a capitalist aren't equal in terms of wealth.
Don't know a lot about the Jensaarai or those other factions, but proving that "you" ought to join any of them (or even the Jedaii) fulfills no one's BoP.
This is like your 5th account here. For whatever sake of the sacrilegious god, stop forfeiting!!! (Arrrgghhh)
In that case, I will ask: what debate are you referring to?
Please stop making "leave it in the comment" as something mandatory. We opportunists, seeing an unclear topic, will just use that point to defeat you instead of pointing it out. Please make your argument clearer or just make one that is bare undefeatable. If your weapon is flawed, your opponent won't tell you to repair it, they will smash it to pieces.
There is no debate called that. Please stop arguing unwinnable topics.
The concept “female” is just a word, which can be based on anything since it is just a word. I think it should be probably be worded like “the distinction of male and female is more beneficial if it is based on sex than gender identity.”
The whole reason I “agree” with this statement is that there obviously should be a classification based on biology, as penises and balls are definitely not the same things as vaginas and ovaries. There is a need for distinction.
Rumors say that bigfoots are just wookies. Maybe Chewbacca has been trampling feet for years and we don't know.
change the argument time to a week then I can accept.
Thank you for complimenting me that I am superhuman. Very appreciate it.
The obfuscation is clearly not my problem. If you think this is too much then it is you who can’t understand it. What I have brought up is essentially within the consideration of a question.
What if they have been anesthesized, as they are harmful to me in of itself and you just happen to remove them outright? Exactly, I can make a non-example as specific as you think. Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
But what if I have grown a separate extra pair of nuts and it causes pain in of itself and you just removed them for free and thus removed pain from me? This kind of scenarios no matter how obscure should not be ignored outright.
Nothing is harmful by itself. A frame of moral consequences must exist in order for “harm” to be considered at all.
I suggest learning Physics. No, that is now how you apply calculus to physics.
Because my mouse is broken and it could misclick.
I believe this is a misclick. Sorry about that.
Why does my ELO drop in the case of this tie? Is there a glitch in the matrix?
If you are gonna do that, then maybe don't set the ceiling as "low" as 10,000.
Unless you provide reason why I am unfunny, this is a vote reportable.
False. Nascar is not the same as Nurburgring 24h and that is not the same as the Monaco Grand Prix. /s
“Some bloke”
Ironically, the "Dreadnaught-class" heavy cruiser is not a dreadnought at all, as all dreadnoughts are classified to be more than 5,000 meters long in SW universe.
Oh man, you guys are not talking about the Chuck Norris one I did days ago, right?
And no, I have had about 0 fajitas and 1 burrito in my life. Wait till someone starts a topic among two esoteric things like "The integral symbol is better than crime statistics of Crimea". It is and will be funny,
Course you are not “proud” of it. You are not proud of being a human, it just happens.
This is a concession. Do you know what a concession is. Even Pro is convinced that I have the better argument here.
Bruh, imagine Novice_II winning the #1 debater the first time tried.
What is even less(or more) impressive is that I have been using the same Dell since I started in DDO. Now it has burn marks on it and it uses windows.
Minor Correction:
This is [6]https://biblehub.com/kjv/numbers/23-19.htm
The source regarding meteors is [7]https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/dinosaurs-extinction-asteroid-eruptions-doom
No, a trap is whatever Admiral Ackbar says it is and most of the time it is just some natural or even unnatural force, and no, they cannot wear masks whether they want it or not and whether if they have the ability to want or not want or not. /s
Why is this a debate topic? What is CON even defending?
Either this topic can be worded with better precision or it isn't one at all.
Doing it like a politician? I like it. /s
I am on team Pizza. People eat pineapple pizza. There is no dish I know of that puts pineapple on pasta unironically.
Argument ready within a day. Gotta say, I think this debate is good, and you are good too.
Their dicks sure are.