From my point of view this topic is a tautology for Pro. If it is needed, it exists. If it is no longer needed, it is gone. Mask mandates of course should continue until they are no longer needed. If most people hate it, that is another form of "it is no longer needed".
If I am a proud mississippian(if that is how it is spelt), then flying the mississippi flag, which contains the confederate flag actually, shouldn't be illegal.
Then you have to justify antinatalism. There is currently no incentive or drive for many women to simply just have no children, not mentioning that most women do have children.
IDK if freedom is the best thing. I mean, for Conway's game of life, it is so vague that you can't even tell what is happening on screen.
I generally find Genshin Impact more enjoyable than MC and find MC a little on the too libertarian side. Mostly you will just play one or a few modes unless you the developer.
To be fair, removing a bit of water from what I can search as the "bread cake", then I think it is a biscuit the most than for either ends of the spectrum. Proving so gets no points.
Also, this is based on personal feelings. I do not intend on using the "American bread-like biscuit" as a point amounting to much. In fact, that is one kind out of thousands of maybe even thousands of possible biscuits so only one kind does not shift the balance towards the entire collectivity of biscuits towards the bread side.
Well, I think then, the black pill should be determinism, but not defeatism. According to what I think of your definition, "Ugly people do have it harder than handsome people" is black-pill.
Then, is "I am a failure at life because I am ugly and it will not get better" a black-pill statement or am I wrong about it all along?
Well, from #64, even Newton is a "celibate". However, well, incels would not be such rational behavior of even being an ordinary enjoyable person, and if so, the black pill should change definitions, for example, making peace with oneself instead of striving hard for unrealistic goals. Is that perhaps really the black pill is? If so, did a perfectly good idea get twisted by incels?
To be fair, acknowledging that black people are currently being treated worse than white people generally in the US is rational. Stating, as a black man, that black people are bound to be have it worse than white people in forever long time, that is just unhealthy. These people will be frowned upon while civil right activists aiming to change the face of black people in the society are seen as heroes.
Well, incels could work towards transforming themselves, working out or hustling or being a good guy in general. They would be much better than those who lock themselves in grievance caused by the "black pill".
Using the N word to anyone is either rude or plain wrong. Plus, you are someone who used a flat earth conspiracy site in a debate, which is in no way credible, so how are we gonna trust you?
Well, FDR, Jefferson, Lincoln and Washington probably should be better than Trump or Raegan. They made America better, while those two kept America the way it is, if not making it worse.
Well, in a sense, they never really even left with such a feature. I mean, you can still hack into the code(which is probably on the surface web) and see the count. Youtube just didn't actively show it. Passively showing it is still displaying it.
I am a HS student with 4 AP's at the end of the term and a monthly exam tomorrow yet I am willing to sit hours in front of the computer to type an argument. That is all that I can say.
Also, sorry for not putting enough efforts in to the last round. I was preparing other things at the night when I wrote the argument.
Assuming that the biggest consumers actually want to help with the company. There are consumers that just want to exploit the company to achieve their own deeds, and those should not.
Keep in mind in some places, icecaps are KILOMETERS thick, so by building, the melting of the ground would be devastating.
Unless you are building on the edge, in that case, it is just a very cold windy city, which still isn't desirable. To make the conditions desirable, ice must melt at a consistent rate and that would be absolutely devastating to the climate or the sea level.
For the rest of the world, I think Mars is better. At least all it takes is just making all the people a little bit poorer, but not making the people hot or flooded.
Many cities are coastal. A long-term Antarctica city will kill millions of people due to flood because of ice caps melting. Unless it is a colony large enough to house the entirety of a large country, the costs outweighs the benefits.
The running of NYC saves much many more people than kills, based on the structures. Capital child workers not counted.
Well, maybe the next time try a more specific topic, because No one I know can defend this topic.
Oh my god, *rub eyes* are you seriously arguing against any extent of gun control?
Pro has a massive burden of proof. In fact, if Con is single, Con wins automatically.
I can accept if this is over 1 week.
What white nations have themselves as the minority. I don't think I know any.
From my point of view this topic is a tautology for Pro. If it is needed, it exists. If it is no longer needed, it is gone. Mask mandates of course should continue until they are no longer needed. If most people hate it, that is another form of "it is no longer needed".
Bestiality is wrong.
Sources CON R1：
[1]https://ask.usda.gov/s/article/What-is-the-most-consumed-meat-in-the-world
[2]https://theydiffer.com/difference-between-turkey-and-chicken/
[3]https://www.womenshealthmag.com/food/a28482041/are-eggs-meat/
‘Chinese military response to US invasion of China through Taiwan’
If I am a proud mississippian(if that is how it is spelt), then flying the mississippi flag, which contains the confederate flag actually, shouldn't be illegal.
"indefinitely"
Even after humanity disappeared? LOL
You have to justify that a functioning society must have guns. Without guns, there wouldn’t be gun control.
How bad does it seem?
Make this unrated. There is no way anyone can vote on this with actual utility.
Then you have to justify antinatalism. There is currently no incentive or drive for many women to simply just have no children, not mentioning that most women do have children.
When they use a semantical kritik, use one back to defeat them instead of complain about it. I mean, there is not but one word in the topic, right?
As a potential Con, no I don’t pick the topic. Yes you do. You picked “Con picks the topic”.
You sure that is the definition? Because if so I will accept. I firmly believe that such a being does not exist at all.
OIC.
Why did you start the same debate twice?
Hold on, you guys urinate? I thought men just have their pee evaporate in their lungs and I think this is much better than peeing sitting down. /s
Bump.
IDK if freedom is the best thing. I mean, for Conway's game of life, it is so vague that you can't even tell what is happening on screen.
I generally find Genshin Impact more enjoyable than MC and find MC a little on the too libertarian side. Mostly you will just play one or a few modes unless you the developer.
But at least I am not at that level of disadvantage when I debate about the US constitution, Abortion laws or immigrant rights.
To be fair, removing a bit of water from what I can search as the "bread cake", then I think it is a biscuit the most than for either ends of the spectrum. Proving so gets no points.
Also, this is based on personal feelings. I do not intend on using the "American bread-like biscuit" as a point amounting to much. In fact, that is one kind out of thousands of maybe even thousands of possible biscuits so only one kind does not shift the balance towards the entire collectivity of biscuits towards the bread side.
Well, I think then, the black pill should be determinism, but not defeatism. According to what I think of your definition, "Ugly people do have it harder than handsome people" is black-pill.
Then, is "I am a failure at life because I am ugly and it will not get better" a black-pill statement or am I wrong about it all along?
Well, from #64, even Newton is a "celibate". However, well, incels would not be such rational behavior of even being an ordinary enjoyable person, and if so, the black pill should change definitions, for example, making peace with oneself instead of striving hard for unrealistic goals. Is that perhaps really the black pill is? If so, did a perfectly good idea get twisted by incels?
Interested?
Even people without arms can still run and swim and play the drums. Why is it good that people just not try when they clearly can?
As a student I will no longer study since I think calculus and microeconomics are way too hard and I will make peace with my grade anyways.
Unless the descriptions are misleading, this is the equivalence to the black pill.
To be fair, acknowledging that black people are currently being treated worse than white people generally in the US is rational. Stating, as a black man, that black people are bound to be have it worse than white people in forever long time, that is just unhealthy. These people will be frowned upon while civil right activists aiming to change the face of black people in the society are seen as heroes.
Well, incels could work towards transforming themselves, working out or hustling or being a good guy in general. They would be much better than those who lock themselves in grievance caused by the "black pill".
Using the N word to anyone is either rude or plain wrong. Plus, you are someone who used a flat earth conspiracy site in a debate, which is in no way credible, so how are we gonna trust you?
Well, FDR, Jefferson, Lincoln and Washington probably should be better than Trump or Raegan. They made America better, while those two kept America the way it is, if not making it worse.
As a Kritik user, I don’t think Kritik will be entirely eliminated, because “otherwise how do we know that you aren’t thinking of this?
Well, racism exists too.
I think it is morally acceptable, but not right.
Free will is the root of all evil today, ironically, if it exists in the first place.
Which side are you arguing for?
I mean, I would prefer it if NASA is the one doing the colony thing, but I think if it is handed to Musk, then it would still turn out OK.
Is CON arguing that not having dislike counts can still be coped with or is it superior to having dislike counts?
Well, in a sense, they never really even left with such a feature. I mean, you can still hack into the code(which is probably on the surface web) and see the count. Youtube just didn't actively show it. Passively showing it is still displaying it.
bopp
You can accept to see what happens. Such a mindset is not to win against me.
I am a HS student with 4 AP's at the end of the term and a monthly exam tomorrow yet I am willing to sit hours in front of the computer to type an argument. That is all that I can say.
Also, sorry for not putting enough efforts in to the last round. I was preparing other things at the night when I wrote the argument.
Assuming that the biggest consumers actually want to help with the company. There are consumers that just want to exploit the company to achieve their own deeds, and those should not.
Keep in mind in some places, icecaps are KILOMETERS thick, so by building, the melting of the ground would be devastating.
Unless you are building on the edge, in that case, it is just a very cold windy city, which still isn't desirable. To make the conditions desirable, ice must melt at a consistent rate and that would be absolutely devastating to the climate or the sea level.
For the rest of the world, I think Mars is better. At least all it takes is just making all the people a little bit poorer, but not making the people hot or flooded.
Many cities are coastal. A long-term Antarctica city will kill millions of people due to flood because of ice caps melting. Unless it is a colony large enough to house the entirety of a large country, the costs outweighs the benefits.
The running of NYC saves much many more people than kills, based on the structures. Capital child workers not counted.
Well, we should NOT, because the urbanization of antarctica would lead to the melting of ice caps, which is a bad thing.
How “private” is it? Is it only open to americans or what?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0e3GPea1Tyg
Dunno about life and virtues and these stuff, but the games look like they could be possible IRL.