Thanks. Can you believe I am RUSHING this argument for a mathematics test? To me, arguing about abstract realities and practical problems is much more interesting than ink lines on a paper looking like something a Satanist would draw in his free time.
I debate things I think is correct unless I am intentionally not doing so, aka Devil's advocate. If I am a Trumper 2020 conservative I would argue for Pro too. Fortunately, I am a liberal and My stance is to Con.
Discrimination will always happen unless everyone is the same, which can make legal problems impossible to solve. I would prefer where there is diversity and there is potential discrimination, because we can at least be able to find who committed racism against other groups.
Having freedom of thought would create problems. Some people will be satisfied while others are furious that they look the same as everyone else. I suggest asexual reproduction? Because there is only one gender? Identity scans will be a trouble because everyone Look the same, and everyone can use all others’ identities, making crime identification impossible. How is this good?
Why deport? Justin Bieber will be regarded more of an asshole in Canada than the US. We got Prisons for all kinds of things. Annoying those people that deserve no better is better than the millions who deserve better.
Idk, someone I have debated says that holidays are religions, and the same guy said that white supremacy is not wrong, as well as that atheists are religious.
We know 1+1=2 is true but not why until the recent century. That is a poor example of a poor example of a resolution. We would have ample example for proving 1+1=2.
If I am not literally arriving on a plane like 15 hours later, I would accept this one and possibly win because Con has much more stuff to work with, common common sense.
What it takes for Trent to start a debate: Hours of dedicated research on something probably not important at all, entire docs of sources organized into sections, as well as researched supporting sources that shows his mainline evidence are reliable and should be properly used.
What it takes for Seldiora to start a debate: Yeah this is on the TV show and it seems kinda good, let me just start it and do whatever I will.
Thanks. Can you believe I am RUSHING this argument for a mathematics test? To me, arguing about abstract realities and practical problems is much more interesting than ink lines on a paper looking like something a Satanist would draw in his free time.
Fine, I think it is just to not give the s&g to con for that.
Yeah?
You are the youngest “conservative” I have ever seen.
@RM
Thank you on these advices.
No it is not intentional. I, despite being inside the top 10, have actually never debated against a female on this account.
Yes. Thank you.
I debate things I think is correct unless I am intentionally not doing so, aka Devil's advocate. If I am a Trumper 2020 conservative I would argue for Pro too. Fortunately, I am a liberal and My stance is to Con.
Top 20? Don't worry I got you.
Watched Shawshank Redemption. Yeah the US might still allow prisons, but defnintely not like this.
Seldiora deserves to be in the hall of fame.
Discrimination will always happen unless everyone is the same, which can make legal problems impossible to solve. I would prefer where there is diversity and there is potential discrimination, because we can at least be able to find who committed racism against other groups.
Unless it is hive-mind, having a world where legal ID Is impossible would be not my cup of tea.
Having freedom of thought would create problems. Some people will be satisfied while others are furious that they look the same as everyone else. I suggest asexual reproduction? Because there is only one gender? Identity scans will be a trouble because everyone Look the same, and everyone can use all others’ identities, making crime identification impossible. How is this good?
“Marxist organization”
Bruh I wish.
Don't pressure him.
“Rational mad man” what does this have to do with that?
Oh come on, Azerbajan is not a real country. How is it better than Armenia?
Who are u on DDO
Please stop giving evidence to the Con side. That would be cheating.
Similar motives with you. New debaters who knows what he is talking about, controversial topics that I might win.
If I got the chance I will. I am working with a single phone and my busy dad just won’t get a hold off the laptop. I know all I know what to post.
How can you vote when you completed no debates?
Why deport? Justin Bieber will be regarded more of an asshole in Canada than the US. We got Prisons for all kinds of things. Annoying those people that deserve no better is better than the millions who deserve better.
Talking like that makes you funnier than most comedians on the television.
Idk, someone I have debated says that holidays are religions, and the same guy said that white supremacy is not wrong, as well as that atheists are religious.
why
It is clear that we have no other uses for this poison, therefore we should drink it like Water in glass.
Ah yes, a group that your opponent invalidated and/or disproved its very existence of nature, despite they exists. LaVeyan Satanist are not both.
The same to you.
He thinks that because in one case racism is beneficial racism would be overall beneficial.
The entire existence of this guy is a giant fallacy by ignorance.
And yeah a Kristin would be: if you add the I, it is no longer LGBTQ, making it pointless.
This is just “support homosexual marriage and Incestuous marriage on the same ground” with extra steps.
Then weapons are not dangerous, because you have every reason to not use it.
@RM
Hate to say it, but you can just choose to not accept anything with 2-day deadlines or less.
We know 1+1=2 is true but not why until the recent century. That is a poor example of a poor example of a resolution. We would have ample example for proving 1+1=2.
There is a big orange button above. I think you might have been looking at the wrong place.
Love how comments have evolved into war yet 0 arguments are posted.
100 is not enough.
If you legalize all uses of all drugs, then the world will be more dangerous.
If you only legalize the bare minimum, then you are basically not legalizing drugs.
If I am not literally arriving on a plane like 15 hours later, I would accept this one and possibly win because Con has much more stuff to work with, common common sense.
Yeah, I don't think you have a large margin to win this one.
If your religion advicates you to be evil, then you have no religion, you have a cult.
"Trump is going to force that vaccine.Do you think i like that or support that?"
If it doesn't work, don't, however I think it works.
(o_o)
This is truism.
What it takes for Trent to start a debate: Hours of dedicated research on something probably not important at all, entire docs of sources organized into sections, as well as researched supporting sources that shows his mainline evidence are reliable and should be properly used.
What it takes for Seldiora to start a debate: Yeah this is on the TV show and it seems kinda good, let me just start it and do whatever I will.
Well your style is brutal. What happens when your sources get defeated? MORE SOURCES! You just keep using sources until the opponent gives up.
I am voting Pro. Entering a race you are not registered for is against the rules.