Total posts: 3,954
Because Biden is an old man who sometimes has issues controlling his rectum. If he really wants to "save a puppy", not only would his medical advisor say no, the next election probably would begin as soon as that action starts.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
Look, I get it, you hate our government.
You are the president of a site with population of about 200, not the president of a fucking country. This won't make you any "better" at anything and in fact will just make you less believable on topics. Keep racism to yourself. Don't think you are doing justice, you are just being racist. At least you are discriminating against us.
Don't go again with "But the CCP hates the Chinese too" without listing sources that you actually read. The more you say it, the more we think you are a jerk not fit for even the smallest site's president.
Namely, your common expression of this opinion on the forum has eventually led me to vote not you.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
I did, linking several videos.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Does China fear Biden?
China somewhat fears the US because the US, well, is strong after all materal-wise, with all the nukes, the carriers, the missiles, etc. However, Biden made the US less fearful as the national symbol of something that is "supposed" to be strong turned into an old fool who almost crapped his pants.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
1. Be pro China and hate the CCPOr2. Hate your own country and stand by the CCPI lost respect because he took option number 2. Him hating China is offensive to me.
And that is partially why I don't vote you. Merely thinking so has revealed that you, like Zenz, despite trying to speak about China has never actually tried to live in it or understand how China works. You don't care about China. You just care about yourself.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
【流浪气球被击落画面-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/6tyRHNx
【飞艇因不可抗力误入美国，中方表示遗憾-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/s6rRd8H
【五角大楼承认气球不构成重大情报风险-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/Lsy1KSy
【专家：时间点和专业程度表明 涉事气球为民间组织释放-哔哩哔哩】 https://b23.tv/97PQhn1
Also, tagging me in the topic is almost Racist. Not cool.
Created:
-->
@BrotherD.Thomas
Uh, let's see, I am going to take a stab in the dark and say the JUDEO-Christian Bible is the background and foundation for said passage. Am I close?
And what is the reason for people of the old writing that in the Bible?
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
This guy is and has been overly ironic for the past 3 years or so.
Created:
“The Lord said to Moses, “Say to Aaron: ‘For the generations to come none of your descendants who has a defect may come near to offer the food of his God. No man who has any defect may come near: no man who is blind or lame, disfigured or deformed; no man with a crippled foot or hand, or who is a hunchback or a dwarf, or who has any eye defect, or who has festering or running sores or damaged testicles. No descendant of Aaron the priest who has any defect is to come near to present the food offerings to the Lord. He has a defect; he must not come near to offer the food of his God. He may eat the most holy food of his God, as well as the holy food; yet because of his defect, he must not go near the curtain or approach the altar, and so desecrate my sanctuary. I am the Lord, who makes them holy.’”” (Leviticus 21: 16-23)
Hold on, what is the background for this?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
"Theoretically nonexistent" and "actually nonexistent" are different. We theoretically pay men and women the same salary per job, but somewhere on Earth there is probably some shady workshop paying men and women differently.
The topic, in respect to the leading post, is equivalent to saying (Population 1&2 have the exact same mean) when all we know is that we can't reject the null hypothesis yet.
Created:
Posted in:
"Tranny" is the derogatory term you are looking for. The usage of the "term" "Trannie" makes fun of one more individual, the user of the term, on the front that said individual can't even spell properly when making fun of people.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I mean myself. What I meant to say was that I will not leave the site in a year.
Created:
Posted in:
If they allow it, it is fine, but if it is not of consent, then the punishment should be equivalent to that of fraud.
And yes, a moderation mechanism should be used. As long as it is made without proper consent it should be taken down and the account banned, probably permanently.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Fair enough. If you ever have an idea about what I represent, feel free to tag me in a post in this thread. I am most likely to not voluntarily get banned in the next year so yeah.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
In case if you forgot or something, I would like one too, thank you.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
No, but I believe some of them will mock the US for making such a big fuss over this. The smaller newspapers will probably claim "This is a part of America's plan to invade Chinese media", and the larger newspapers will just describe the situation and nothing else.
If it even goes on the news at all.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
It’s not even on the news for us yet. Let me give you our point of view once I can get a news article in the Chinese language.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
If it is self-contradictory. Geocentrism and flat earth neither are self-contradictory.
It is just using Earth as the reference frame of motion as well as using the earth's surface as the reference for flatness makes everything difficult.
Created:
-->
@Reece101
Inefficient. So is geocentrism.
Created:
How should we define "flat"?
Because if we can't define Earth's surface as "flat", then my "flat earth model" would therefore fall flat, ironically.
Created:
Posted in:
I had a dream too, I believe it was about my dad fighting dinosaurs while wearing a unicorn suit in the middle of nowhere.
Still, equality is good.
Created:
-->
@Greyparrot
Which is no better.
Created:
Posted in:
Why would you execute the homeless? Ammunition cost the institutions money as well.
They will do anything to keep the homeless from actually living in houses, aren't they.
Created:
Ah yes, because making wars more severe is a crucial characteristic for being a brave president.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AleutianTexan
Sure, but the point is this category has yet to get an actual topic about "famous people" in a long time.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
@Athias
Intended for RM
Created:
Posted in:
If my IQ is 128, am I compared against every other teen, every other 16-year-old, or what set of people?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
So would that mean, that if a masculine male, liked a feminine male, and didn't like females, would you say that the reason he is attracted to him is because of his genitals? And if that is the case, how would you explain that to kids?
We don't explain advanced quantum mechanics to kids for a reason. Neither can kids understand this. We don't need to explain it to them.
Created:
I understand the actions requested here may be a waste of your time, but if you have ample free time, I request that you simply do a single-direction diss/roast verse/verses of me. Given the number of posts that you have expressed the idea that "I don't know what I am talking about", I believe roasting material is sufficient.
Created:
Artificial meat can be grown out of stem cells, and those stem cells can grow into other stem cells, etc...
So yes, as long as we have enough space for growing meat, this source of protein would be virtually limitless.
Now... What do we do with all the cows and the farts they produce?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
No, the problem is that what I described is not necessarily a conscious characteristic. Because people are different, within two people, there will always be the more masculine person and the more feminine person. That is how tautologies work.
And when people hold a characteristic, they can amplify it over time. So yes, the feminine guy can certainly become more feminine in the future. However, homosexuality of two males is based on two males, not two masculine figures. If I have two feminine guys liking each other, why do you think they aren't labeled "lesbian"?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
I think ive seen this in movies or tv series.
Survivalship bias. Those TV series are mostly fictional and those real people who deserve video cut works are already the chosen few.
Smart person is failing and teacher doesnt understand why.
Either the smart person was not trying or the teacher is not smart. What else?
Some may allow some other social contructs to take priority of their studiou nature and flunk out.
Doing so after college is fine and normal, doing so before college is not.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Do you think it's ok to have female stripper story hour?
I am 95% sure that it will turn out like this, first the story teller tells the kids "Study hard, don't be like me" but elaborate, and 5% of girls still want to be like her and either are forced to give it up or flunk school in the future.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Side-tracked by intimate relationships is one.
So you think having intimate relationships intentionally makes you grade E? Why?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ebuc
Grade A students --unless one is cracked and decides they want lower their intelligence abilities for various reasons. ex intimate relationships, behavioral issues, or any number of reasons to place grading system to the side, then they become grade E---
Why?
Are you perhaps discrediting the greatest scientists in the 19th, 20th and 21st century? Some of them kept brawling with their brains and brawn, being even borderline dysfunctional socially just to greatly push the bound of human science. They are losers according what you said, at least it seems. If I am wrong, feel free for correcting me. (That is one of the problems I face IRL: People aren't free enough to correct me, leading me towards inaccurate beliefs)
That is what I would rather be, not what you said. If you want to be angry for any reason that I do or do not know, it is just I was scolded by my parents for holding the same opinion, and is here to express it.
Created:
Posted in:
Don't know if you can see the posts I just deleted yet, yes, the topic description should describe the topics, not the other fixed way. We have not had a topic regarding any famous people beside some political figures for a long time. The last few topics are about assorted groups of people(those groups are sorted within, of course, but those groups cannot be simply sorted according to a single attribute to be in a set with those groups as elements), which are not "famous people".
I suggest something like "Topics related to individuals and groups of people" and leave it just that. No additional adjectives needed.
Edit: Specification to avoid ambiguity and confusion, so I thought, I guess.
Created:
Posted in:
Topics related to famous people and their lives
The subtopics within this categories have long gone, straying away from "famous people". I suggest changing this description.
We can't have each topic on an actor or world leader, etc. In fact, all topic regarding actors can be put in "Show business", all athletes in "Sports", all world leaders in "politics", historical figures in "History", and debaters in "Debateart.com". What this category is and should be, ah yes, "people". I guess we can discuss cultures and subcultures in the "people" category, because that is farther away from anything else, at least further compared to people in fields.
If I am wrong, please tell me why. I will post an agreement post if you have convinced me.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
I guess the parents who bring kids to drag shows is of something fault, although definitely not pedophilia. Nor are the actor/actresses at the drag show. Drag shows are aimed towards older people and they did not intend to taint younger minds unintendedly. Drag shows, although I am of no appeal towards it, clearly is a good entertainment for reasons to some people, which should not include anyone before puberty(). The actors/actresses are not doing anything "wrong" if they act in a show with children on the stadium.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I think this is due to bias.
In a heterosexual relationship, the woman is basically always the more feminine one because she is female, and the man is basically always the more masculine one because he is male.
However, we can't measure the same way in a homosexual relationship. If there must be a more masculine and more feminine individual within the two, but both are men, one of them must be the more feminine one as different individuals cannot absolutely be the same.
Unless someone else brings up any psychological evidence from the far, I will conclude here by saying that nothing else is needed for such a phenomenon.
Created:
Posted in:
Why would ANYONE go to a drag show?
By that I am talking about viewers, not the participators. If the participators have such a hobby, let them do it. It is just that I am baffled at how popular it is versus how it should be, it is almost like there "IS" an agenda to push us into TV and consumerism further in another front, and that, if anything, is what we need to watch out for.
Created:
Posted in:
Why would ANYONE go to a drag show? If you like feminine stereotypes so much, just go somewhere else with actual women.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Its usually not a gay relationship, but rather one of the men pretending to be a woman, and the other staying a man.
No, what you are talking about is a cis man & trans woman relationship, if it is not a gay relationship.
Or you don't know what you are talking about, do you?
Created:
duty of a citizen
Live. Possibly in the country.
The duty of any organism, including humans, is to live. If humans need to do anything to their country, it is for the sake of protecting themselves, long term or short term.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
I don't care that guys act feminine, my question is simply just, what connects gay men to the stereotype of acting feminine, if they are supposed to like men, and not women?
Why must there be a correlation?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ludofl3x
So you think it's to raise awareness of Christianity? Who's trying to 'cancel' Christianity?
No. Christians just want to find people who seek conversion willingly. They certainly can't stab people on the street forcing people to join.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Guys act "feminine" all the time, yes, even old European monarchs. You don't care, do you?
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Wait, I thought real christianity is not able to be grasped by us mortals?
Created:
Posted in:
Basically is that professionals discuss what counts as an impairment. To list some obvious ones, blindness, Down's, XXY, etc.
Created:
Posted in:
I thought of a proposal, not sure if any of you guys thought so too or not.
Allow any repairments for genetic disabilities if and only if repairments to such disabilities are confirmed by peer-reviewed research papers to be possibly and reliably fixable by realistic means.
Disallow anything beyond "repairment". As for what "in between" counts as, I am not a professional, and I believe that is another matter for a doctors' convention, if there will be one.
Created: