Total posts: 3,954
I think gender today have become way too specific and should be more abstract. In fact, society would probably be better off having no specific genders rather than the (checks webpage) 97 genders we have so far.
Honestly, we shouldn't care about if this person has a shaft or a valley in their underpants as much as we do now. To be fair, modern transgenderism sounds a lot like "Hey, those people with a shaft in their pants seem way cooler than I am now, I better be like them", vice versa. Having certain roles specifically reserved for people grown with shafts is a thing of the past, and in modern society, where except for the stereotypes for gender and sex, male an female are more equal than before.
But of course, maybe getting people to cooperate on this is as hard as "real" communism. I am sure somebody will try to justify sexism openly after this set of rules have been offered. I am sure that somebody is probably doing it now amidst a crowding of boos.
Created:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
This topic is unfalsifiably correct because it is dangerously close to recursion.
The definition of gender should based on attributes dependent on sex, because without the definition of "sex", "gender" loses tangible meaning.
I propose a better idea for the definition for the same term:
Woman: An adult human possessing distinctive characteristics accepted as associated to a human with XX sex chromosomes by the portion of society said adult human is in.
In some cases, believing one is a woman is indeed a distinctive characteristic of being a biological woman, others think you are just pooting nonsense.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
I really love the idea of YouTube, but the content on there is mostly bullshit clickbait lists, pop culture drama, liberal news, and stupid marketing pitches for movies and products.
Wrong. My YT homepage consists mostly of funny "dank" meme edits, flerfers and gnostic theists being "owned", and game videos, and occasionally people eating stuff or just tortuing themselves for money or content.
If your YT homepage looks like this, it is mostly either if you are never signed in or your taste in videos is way too common.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Yeah, that is when the consumerism and the capital hits hard.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Go watch Star wars 4-6. They are good. Much better than the newer ones, eh.
Created:
Same for Santi(Three-Body the “cartoon”).
No, you don’t know it?
I guess I should point out as someone who watched SW9 in a makeshift cinema(which is just my school dorm with the lights off at the weekends) over 1 year after its release, I have always regarded it as a comedian non-canon thing and always crack a laugh at when Rey just does something ridiculous.
Created:
Posted in:
The democrat party is not democratic, it is just more democratic than the republican party. The republican party is not republican, it is just more republican than the democrat party.
Of course, you are allowed to lie if everyone believes so, and you can allow to be a different identity if everyone in society is allowed to hoard money...as long as the IRS doesn't knock on your door to inquire your funds. Today, the goal of both parties are essentially to make more money, and the fact they itself make money internally is itself a factor why one may not vote them.
Technically both parties are very similar, except that they are bound as if they have to hate each other.
Created:
-->
@zedvictor4
Women are better at babies and doing the dishes.
Not a criticism of what you have just posted, just saying that the current state of social application of language (at least in English) already has me thinking as if this sentence was really mocking women.
In turn, women are just more experienced at tending to their kids and doing the dishes because, well, they have been used to doing this for the last millenia or so, not saying it is good or it isn't. I guess, men are just more experienced at some sports and will get EVEN MORE experienced comparatively(which is a bad thing) if such opportunities are never open to women.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Honesty is the best policy, well ya.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
You seem very triggered by the fact that Best.Korea solved world hunger and invented a solution much more cost-effective and more humane than yours.
You seem very triggered by the fact that K.Michael thinks you are being wrong.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
You might as well deny 100m sprint from being a sport from 2008 to 2018 because Bolt won almost every race he competed in.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
That does not negate it from being a sport. People are tired fighting for the win and they find the fun in it.
In Olympics, the eventual gold medalist usually is matched up with someone they can defeat with almost 100% certainty. That does not negate anything from being a sport.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
So? Boys begin training since high school or even middle school so they could become football players like in their dreams. It is a sport on paper, and it is treated as one in actuality. Removing the entertainment value and Football does not become less of a sport unless you tamper the rules so it is unplayable.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
It is more like hopeless than angry. It is like the expression when the athlete you support just rolls over while running and now he can't win gold. But of course, life goes on and you can't just end your continuity because someone didn't give you a certificate.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
That method sounds interesting. I am going to try it out.
Created:
Posted in:
It has been 2023 already and I, who was supposed to be nominated for the 2022 HoF, along with Greyparrot and 3ru7al, didn't even get a post.
Or you can just tell me that the HoF ceases to exist, it is fine, it doesn't stop me from taking debating challenges.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I know he is, it is just I just so happen to have time to be wasted.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Every time I respond to you I know you are going to respond and I always try to predict what you are gonna say the next post.
I fail every time.
You happy?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Yeah, keep doing it. I won't be triggered again by it, understood?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sidewalker
I said that because I have no energy to type sentences on the internet anymore after that. If I don't need to sleep and I don't have homework, I can do that all night.
Created:
How about you stop farming forum topics? Seriously, just post them in 1 topic or something.
Created:
-->
@PREZ-HILTON
We will pray to which god exactly? In the tradition of which church or organization or whatever? I am sure that even the mainstream Christian base here or anywhere in the US could have been composed of different organizations and from where they start praying and celebrating a fight would have occured.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
Because at such topics, this level of nitpicking is enough.
Some of my topics have semantical approaches that require thousands of characters of buildup for it to work. I highly doubt AI has such patience.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
I can assure the AI will nitpick topics less effectively than me because the aim on AI linguistics was almost always based on pragmatics as opposed to semantics.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
But we listen to the national criers.
Created:
Posted in:
Nowadays, rarely do anyone read news on paper. I usually watch news on the TV and Internet.
No one can receive a well-rounded side opinion from any single paper in America, given the newspaper is popular. If you speak only the truth, there are gonna be people attacking you because they assumed what you wrote is for both sides. Sometimes it is just better to sit back there and tend to a closed circle.
Created:
-->
@Sidewalker
Pretty sure he is talking about the "our great powerful supreme leader" Kim Jong Un.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Quite opposite. Your activities literally make you look as if you want to be beaten up. At least that is how I see it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@rbelivb
Best.korea has a reason to be banned, general trolling, not pedo stuff.
His views throughout topics have been so vastly inconsistent with each other that the motives are probably to annoy people generally. If anything, that is a better reason for the ban.
Created:
Posted in:
Are you perhaps talking about my comments on debates regarding whether people should vote who? No, that is just a comment on how poorly-worded the topic is.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
Real ELO all the way to the sky so that the noobsnipers cannot climb over.
Have you considered the fact that the top debaters here are noobsnipers at least a considerable portion of their life on the site? That is how you gain points when you become so high up you don't know how to gain points: you pile quantity regardless of quality.
As for "the noopsnipers cannot climb over", if it weren't due to Novice_II's own forfeitures he is responsible of, he would have been #1. When did he join? 6 months ago.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
Banning an Elo printer and a Forum count booster while they like it is not something I expect to be done.
Created:
Xmas has become more and more a consumerist worldly holiday than a religious one. Same with the Chinese new year here in China.
Is this a good thing or bad thing? Well, the big government on top always wants us to spend and circulate our money, yes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Mesmer is inactive and banning an inactive member without confirmation that the account is an alt of another active user would be baseless and useless. Let's further in when she comes back.
Created:
Posted in:
Bottom line: Bots who spam 215 topics in a row should be banned hands down.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@oromagi
Your hypothesis goes further towards disproving heaven than proving it must be socialist.
Exactly. I think there is no heaven(or hell, so to speak), and even if there is one, it gotta be socialist. The assumption of the heaven being socialist is based on whether it exists at all, which I don't even think it does.
This is more like a thought experiment or even shower thought(even though I haven't showered for days, surely that can't get me in hell), but oh well, shower thoughts function as the next best thing for DART forum topics than political ranting, I guess.
Created:
Posted in:
The original words of the Bible should not be evidence to negate this solely because the idea of communism and socialism would have not been accurately translated nonetheless.
So, as a non-theist, the heavens just sounds like a filter system where only the "best", the "most moral" people are selected to go do, the others go to hell or something like that. The morals align with the common knowledge of humanity for the most part, such as altruism and genuinity in actions, etc.
That would mean in the heavens:
- People are obedient
- People can live with other people in peace and harmony without discrimination for the most part
- People are all similar and share similar beliefs
- People are not greedy and only take what they need
- People actually think(which ironically is something a great deal of theists lack today --- They wouldn't qualify for their own heavens!)
- People can love and enjoy life
The result for this would be utopia based on how the system idealistically works. If we filter people to only benevolent ones that share a belief, surely we could get communism working, eh?
And yet some of the conservatives keep saying that God intended America to be capitalist and white. I am curious to see how many, if any, priests and preachers in the US would get into the heavens they themselves applied soundly inside built halls.
Correct me if I am wrong about anything, and yes, we know BrotherD.Thomas is being intentionally loathful.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Live debates? Try discord.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
Go for it yourself if you think you are better.
Created:
If real communism has never been tried, then the answer is 0, because real christianity would never mess up people.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
I am attempting to see the reasons why you think this is bad, but seemingly can't find your point.
Are you trying to justify that equality is bad because it damages the already-growing base of religion, or what?
Created:
Y'all acting like as if the White House isn't already a jail.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@IwantRooseveltagain
Is 10% even enough for "major" party? Ideally, a 3-party system would split among all approximately 33% apiece.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
Thank you for reminding me that I have wasted my time :)
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I am not a scientist. Science invented wars and shit.
I will leave by presenting the fact that you just contradicted yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
You see, they aren't made by people that are explicitly meant to explore science, therefore scientists. Spears are first made by people who just wants food, and bombs are first made because some dude thought the neighboring city was being annoying.
Use your brain. If you are, then just switch off some functions because those functions makes it appear as if you don't have one at all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
No, Wars have been a thing long before an organized system of science existed.
Created: