Intelligence_06

Omnipotence is impossible.

How would God logically do, for example the two things simultaneously:

If you say "god can do it, you just can't understand", this just means god cannot make the person known as Intelligence_06 on DebateArt.com comprehend the idea of a perfect god in 7/19/2021 12:03:01 PM(+8).

"fake"

Do you have any proof of what you just said was an account of a fake event?

Are...

Are you a holocaust denier? 

Because Jews have, on average, a higher IQ[1].

As a president, wouldn't you want smarter people working for you?

Trump not having Chinese people working for him is due to the antagonization of the US and China being more prevalent than their companionship. Jews have contributed to the foundation of U.S's capitalist economy as well as provided essential knowledge that will contribute to the US building large bombs that will win the war for them. Having Jewish people working for them is not any less American.

Present evidence.

You obviously can't say they are better, or worse.

Even if Black people really are good at running, they probably aren't better at other things. You wouldn't call an athlete "greater" than, say, a programmer.

It may carry less art value than the most intricate sculpture, but it wouldn't be correct to call them fake art.

How are you so sure that these people aren't acting like they are sick? I have pretended I was sick in occasions since the first grade(and gotten away with it). Yep, trust the people on an unreliable media instead of the official agency.

Also put it in an aristocratic restroom or teach the locals some manners. We are using its beauty, not smashing it to pieces. I would expect the urinal smashed if it was given to idiots.

That is the problem. Being able to pee in it is a part of the art, or should be. Imagine looking at a cake and not being able to eat it, then imagine millions of millionaires buy a CAKE only to look at it and not eat it. It loses its purpose.

The Mona Lisa is for looking. A urinal is for peeing. As much as it is a sculpture, it is an urinal and nobody can deny that.

Which ones do you mean? Mine, Oromagi's or who's opinion do you agree with?

Also 

I do not consider this my best arguments since this is a year old and I have grown a lot out of it. However, it truly had me jumping up and down for thinking new rebuttals and controversial stances I didn't think it would be possible at the time. The same for the one posted above. In fact, CalebEr has debated me with the topic above with me losing due to what I conclude the execution and not the main idea.

To me, breaking barriers and brainwork is the most efficient type of work for debates and philosophy. Researching became a simple breeze for most of my debates(yes, even the deep ones, because all you need is to prove either something is true, or it isn't, and all truth stands upon true-or-false statements, at least we can represent it like that). To me, starting with only evidence in the very bottom is enough for me to prove a statement that may not even be fathomable for the average brain if I want to, as long as I have enough evidence(which sometimes I lose because I have not).

Oh really. Although, I wouldn't want him to be the republican candidate for 2024, that is for sure.

Why do we still care about an ex-politician that has basically failed for the big picture. We should focus less on Trump and more about how to save the country.

I mean, we can still handle the 1.6 conservative raid wave, so no matter what Trump does, we probably have remedies.

Trump will (most likely) not participate in crucial political decisions in the future seeing that it is not of great probability that he will even win the 2024 Republicans.

Idk why.

A urinal that is just like any other but can’t be properly used because it is disconnected to sewage systems… suddenly makes its price skyrocket.

Mona Lisa has put millions of dollars of worth into it. What about this one? Just bring something in your home. It doesn’t with millions of dollars.

It is still art, but I don’t think it is a million-dollar one.

Do you think that an urinal won’t be considered art if it is being used in the bathroom?

The thing is: In my opinion, a Urinal is an artwork even if it is to be peed on. An artwork that is usable is better than an artwork that is unusable. So what?

Change my mind.

Duchamp's "Fountain" is basically an urinal with words written on it. Using 'utilitarianism, we could find that this artwork, if valued relatively objectively, brings LESS value than the average urinal since it is no different than the average urinal, but you aren't allowed to urinate in it because you are in a museum's exhibition section and not its bathrooms.

The things that make something admirable is not about how you look at it, but how you use it. I see no reason why it wouldn't be used as an urinal, it is built for that purpose. The fact I can't use it makes me admire it less.

This is different with classical artwork, where you have no intended use other than to look at it for Mona Lisa and other sculptures.

Of course, it could be categorized as a "sculpture", but it is a sculpture that could be used as an urinal and peeing on it doesn't make it less artistic: Cleaning is required for every public restroom whatsoever! Even if there are morons who will just pee on the side and not the way you are expected to pee, even janitors could do the restoration works necessary to keep this piece artistic and useful.

The only problem is that this is a urinal. However, on that gender-neutral bathrooms exist, this would be something.

Oh, you can't use it? Great, is it an urinal anymore? It certainly could be used as one, just not here. No matter what, this artpiece could be given a useful purpose and yet it is locked behind glass bars. I don't like that. I want it to be placed in bathrooms, where everyone can not only see it, but use it.

Artpieces have been commercialized over the past century. Bugatti make art that are cars, and you wouldn't just not drive it because it is intended to be driven. The same. The fountain urinal is intended to be urinated on, and not to be locked behind glass. Unleash its full potentials.

Oh, I thought you are talking about books that stimulate war. 

Down to the bottom, (probably)everyone is a racist. I am one too, and don't try to deny that unless you have extremely sufficient proof to provide that you have the knowledge of the ways of every single tribe in the world so that you can treat everyone with the equal amount of happiness no matter what. OK, maybe not a racist, but it is culture-wise. 

Although I can be sure I would grant amounting happiness of local customers, I simply do not have a Bible, or a Quran, or incense in my home. No matter what, chances are that I will always misinterpret something from an ethnicity that I don't know a lot of and will probably mistreat them due to a lack of general understanding of their routines, unless I take the time learning them, which, I don't want to put up most of my time learning, because I would want to be an automotive engineer more than a linguist and a sociologist.

The real thing to ask is: Is your racism/culturism slight enough that it could be well-understood by basically all people? The answer is Yes for Martin Luther King, we can't be sure he could bring the same amount of happiness to White Americans or people who don't understand any English at all compared to Black Americans, but his contributions towards anti-racism would make it so that people would focus more on the fact that he could help you than that you would probably be treated with less happiness than other people.

And Vice versa, the answer is no for Hitler and the KKK.

We should work towards that so our racism/culturism is negligible in the daily life, and learning about different cultures is very important to do such a thing, especially cultures that you could touch on. You may not appease a person the same way and the same value to another person of another group, but you can try to not treat them differently. This is what Martin Luther King succeeded in doing, and what the KKK always failed to do.

If I am thinking what you are thinking, then Mein Kampf would definitely count as one.

Or even the Bible.

right. The fact they are subjugated to people would be suffering for them. Dying means no more suffering after this one. I encourage every other race to do this also, but to the sympathy to the cats.

If cats actually enjoy being pets, then pretend me and the post above said nothing. I am sorry.

Polls? You are underestimating the ability of elevating a discussion among Dart users.

They can make civil discussions out of anything...unless somebody uncivil steps in and engages. When that uncivil person leaves it is back to civil discussions and certainly not just "polls".

You guys watch movies?

@Wylted

Stimulating discussion is not a bad thing, in this case. I would agree, though, that if he shared his opinion, it would be better.

I don't exactly understand what you mean by that, but debate judges would disagree with you, seeing drlebronski is doing a similar job at this moment.

@drlebronski

What is your opinion anyways?

Probably the feature is coming in the future, who knows?

Is objective history even possible?

He'd better live in the 60's. I haven't watched him for a lot but I don't think this is indoctrination. It IS indoctrination however to teach the public that it is wrong to teach about existing and valid identities, so I don't see the point here.

Yes. Why are we even arguing this now? This is not 1960. Anyone who says no holds an outdated view.

Pretty sure the fault is on the execution, and not the ideology. The same way a gun-holding "pro-life" July-the-fourth grilling healthcare-opposing traditional couple is not representative of Martin Luther or Jesus Christ, even if they say they believe in Christianity.

I mean, Western Germany(which is capitalist) "died" in the 1990s, does that mean capitalism failed as a system? Just because a failed(and flawed) application of an existent ideology exists doesn't mean the entire ideology fails as a whole. 

And capitalism is not well-suited for America because it originated in Europe and not the Americas. Now what? Let them believe whatever they want. Only we need to police them when they purposely harm other people for no reason.

In Sweden, maybe yes.

In China or India, no. At least at the moment.

Many Asian students are brainwashed so they excel all and only the things taught on the textbook to ensure maximum academic test score. They aren't smart.

Then, I suppose Edison wasn't exactly doing well in school, even though he later improved the light bulb.

There are different kinds of intelligence, and grades only determine one of them. Seeing that schools don't even teach you how to pay all kinds of taxes, I don't think financial intelligence can be measured through grades, unless you are in a top university studying economy.

The onion is not a reliable news source.

Also if the gays want to fight, make them fight. Preventing them from fighting is literally fueling your own ideas and putting them onto them without their consent. 

If anything, the original video publisher should argue for Gay people to have the ability of refuse drafts, if they think Gay people are precious. 

Apparently, genes determine if you are more likely to attract to men or women, etc, which means that whether you are gay is determined from birth and is not a choice.

What that probably means is that even if you are attracted to a different sex, as long as your genes convey that you are "gay", you are "gay". That is what "straight phases" are. Many lesbian girls are pressured to get boyfriends from their friends or even their families before they discover themselves afterwards. If you are on social media chances are that you have met at least two people like this.

What is the future value?

In this timeline, Eren would probably only get the Attack Titan, with Frieda Reiss still having the Founder. Everything would be the same until S2, where Dina attacked Eren. Eren would die in this timeline and Dina would become a Titan shifter.

That is when AoT starts becoming something entirely different. The uprising arc wouldn't even happen as we know it for the main cast. Erwin would probably do his own thing but that would be nothing more than background news for us here, excluding one thing: the fate of the founder. Frieda would still not know how to use the power and by the time, Zeke would probably just clap his way into the government, slap Frieda, and do whatever he does.

Though in this timeline, Dina encountering Zeke would be an extremely interesting thing to see, and this would be the perfect timeline for Zeke to be the protagonist.

Well, Gay men are as "manly" as non-gay men, so I don't see the problem here.

Are they assaulting their comrades in the barracks? Are they failing at physical tests? Are they non-patriotic and refuse to fight for the country?

If any of these questions has a "no" as an answer, it means that they should be free to go. It goes without saying that assaulters joining the military is a bad idea, but equating gay people to any other group of people would be inaccurate. If the third question's answer is no, try reflecting on the system.

Discord moderator? That is something new.

I am not calling you an incel. 

All A's are B's doesn't mean all B's are A's. Simple logic.

But some people here are. Including maybe even me, especially once that have nothing better to do in life. I encourage you to do whatever you want and not be dragged down by that ironic non-seriousness of an account.

An ironic extremist whose only reason here is to spice up the forums and leave some incels something to do.

Ah sh*t, here we go again.

I don't know what the hell is going on here, but I can't say that Hitler is a Jew. 

Market socialism.

At least it sort of works. I am a living example of this.

I mean I don’t agree with CRT but it doesn’t destroy “everything”, for example, the big bang and physics.

I don’t agree. If race is a social construct, it might as well not be “race” anymore. The social construct version of “sex” is gender.

Why do you not capitalize the first letter of the sentences?

Time changed and there are other ways to be “rich”. The last post was irony and satire and isn’t serious. I don’t even believe that Satan exists, let alone chilling with him.

Investing in stocks isn’t as unethical as building your factory and employ 1000 workers doing harsh work at minimum wage.