Total posts: 3,954
Posted in:
Define "funny". Also the topic is WAY TOO OBJECTIVE than it should be. It should be "SNL is not funny according to the internet user SupaDudz on 5/15/2021"
Created:
Posted in:
I wish, as a Chinese. Just hope that Chinese technology ensures us to go to mars before the US.
Created:
Posted in:
It is near the south geographic pole. This is the reason the S pole always points south. Opposites attract.
Trust me, if you go to any educational or scholarly website, it will return the same thing.
Created:
Same for other belief systems. You don't see recently-emerged belief systems condemning non-reproductive sex. In fact, Liberalism encourages it as it makes us feel good.
Created:
Because the bible is a tool to perpetuate the moral standards of 1st century AD. By then Biology isn't really a thing yet. Nowadays the bible is only needed for some people to understand the belief system in the past.
Created:
-->
@Lemming
No.
First, our rockets aren't developed enough to go to mars in a round trip and carry more than just like 6 people. SpaceX is working on that but even that would take a decade for the technology to exist and many more years for people to be able to establish a colony there.
Seconds, the people of the Han Dynasty or the Roman Empire already know how to use spears and axes. If we land there they will see us as invaders and stab us to death. We would need massive amounts of gunpowder just to ensure survival from the ignorant fools who think we are literal invaders even if we aren't yet.
Created:
Posted in:
What will the stand cost, a one-time cost, but it must come from Karl’s profit, and, as you see, after paying the Proletariat, Karl’s budget is blown just with Purchasing of two raw materials, let alone the cost of the unaccounted mixing materials, the stand, and ongoing expenses for Marketing, Material Handling, Sales, Customer Service, Warranty…
If it comes from a society in which helping Marx is agreed upon, then everything is public and there is no problem now...until there is one.
It is incredibly hard to start socialism in a capitalist society, and even if the group of people IS socialist, it would still be difficult to maintain.
Created:
We pollute the earth and then there is no air left for them to breathe. No talking required.
Side effect includes: We die too from it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
I know you are jokin' around, I am too.
When Columbus arrived, nobody "owned" the land. Columbus claimed the land by force and possibly bought it. You did not.
That is why you own your house, but not the other state farm a few kilometers next to your city
Created:
Posted in:
I just expected Oromagi to be the author of this page.
Created:
Wait, this is not r/cursedcomments?
Either way, it is not immoral. The dead chicken had no soul and no method of consent so essentially it is just a really weird sex toy.
However, Would you want to do that? Probably not. It’s got bacteria and it can make you sick.
Ethically, yes.
Created:
Posted in:
ForfeitsDid you expect your opponent to be strong and powerful most of the time? That's not happening. Just look at the top debaters on the leaderboards. Oromagi, the number one on leaderboard, his wins are mostly incompetent fools who barely try or forfeit nearly all the rounds. And the other top 10 aren't much better, preying mostly on really weak arguments and rigged topics that are nearly impossible to win.
That is me.
I just realized that I have essentially roasted the person who posted this.
Created:
-->
@TheUnderdog
- Honor your father and your mother. Punishment is up to 3 lashings if the parents desire this.
Lashing? Really? I thought this is the 21th century.
Created:
Posted in:
I believe that people have a choice to choose between a nuclear family and something else. It is that we should be open to the latter, not suppress the former.
Ah yes, months ago the BLM claim to disrupt the nuclear family structure, I think. Good they removed it because otherwise it would seem too much like an SJW circle.
Created:
Posted in:
I was disappointed to find out that this topic isn’t about a family business to run nuclear bunkers, but ok
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
@Bones
Just a heads-up, Numbers also do this.
- Press Numbers function on the tool bar to get here
- Press Enter to get here
- Press Enter to get here
- Press Enter then Tab to get here
- Press Enter then Tab to get here
- Press Enter to get here
- Press Enter then Enter to get here
- Press Enter then Enter to get here
Press Enter then Enter to get here
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
As I have discovered this very early into the site, I thought this is common knowledge and every experienced user would have known it.
And, uh, you're welcome.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Bones
- You can do it like this, first press the point fuction in the toolbar
- Press Enter then Tab
- Just like this, you can do it
- Note if you don't press Tab
- instead just press enter
- It won't go further into the page
- but it will look like this
- Same goes
- for already-indented lines
- If you press enter while on an indented line
- It will keep the same indent
- and you can keep adding to the indent
- Pressing Enter twice from the last line lets you go back from an indent here
- Repeat the process, and it is here
- No need to thank me
Created:
Posted in:
The Chinese equivalent of TikTok is better. It has many doctors sharing COVID-19 facts with the people at home last year.
Either way, it is the culture, not the platform. Handing a platform to a group of people who think wearing a mask has a political connotation to it wouldn't have good results whatsoever.
Created:
Posted in:
I don't know a lot about the other ones but AOT can basically change a person philosophically. It basically screams "Morality is subjective".
I am glad that it ranked so high.
Created:
Posted in:
The sports are but forms of entertainment. When you kick the round black-and-white leathered sphere into a 5x2 open box guarded by another person with a netted medium behind, you feel happy. When you reach a white line in the end of a 0.1KM segment before anyone else does, you feel victorious. When you see two goalposts and an unironically large skewed checker board in the middle of a large pool of dihydrogen monoxide and sodium chloride, you feel relieved.
The sports are but tools of advertising people. Phelps just swam across the pool faster than everyone? Hooray to America, Americans are better at swimming. Messi just kicked a ball in more times than everyone else in this game? Wow, the team he is playing for must be good at it! The better you play at a sport, the more you are in credit: the same with any other job, Being a professional athlete is a job.
And yes, since they are jobs, they get paid. The sports are also, for them, tools of getting exchange values to the market. They can get a better treadmill and more efficient energy drinks if they do their job correctly than to not.
Created:
-->
@FLRW
Because I am not built like other kids.
So simply when I started thinking, it is already 11PM and it is unrealistic for me to specifically go to another place to poop.
Yes, I eventually did the thing in the school building. The main thing is not whether I pooped or not. It is the logic I have gotten from it.
The kids(such as T) can go as long as 1 week without. It is not like not doing it for 1 week damages me too much or anything. However, once a day is just superior in terms of health.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
Amidst of this hot argument, may I bring you the 6000th topic ever.
Created:
Posted in:
BrotherDThomas and RM got into the hall of fame. Not everyone who gets into the hall of fame is someone I respect.
BT is voted in as a backbone of a religious rant topic, which we consider as iconic and funny. BT is far from being able to be voted as an actual member of the HoF.
RM on the other hand is just arguably the most active member on this site.
Created:
Method 2: Semantical Kritik
As someone who has attempted of winning all possible debates with semantical wordplays and loopholes(and often has failed to do so), this shouldn't be unexpected from me. I am ME, after all.
Note that it is pre-assumed that the bathroom is separated from the sleeping section:
The sleeping sector of a dorm room is separated from the bathroom sector via a door
And the proposition is established while within the sleeping section:
The original proposition is to be phrased as "The person known as Intel_06 must not defecate within this room" while we were sleeping on our dorm beds
So the bathroom is NOT "THIS" room when being talked about from said perspective.
The syllogism should be:
- The Bathroom and "this" room are different rooms
- T only limited me pooping in "this" room
- Therefore, he has only limited me in pooping in the sleeping room, but not in the bathroom.
Method 3: Onto Opp's way of thinking and doing
It is pre-assumed that I have pooped in this bathroom with T being near while not minding.
I have pooped in the same dorm room for at least 10 times before this occurrence, with T being here not minding it at all
Therefore:
- I have pooped in the same dorm room for at least 10 times before this occurrence, with T being here not minding it at all
- However, T has limited me for doing the SAME action this time, which is inconsistent
- Therefore, that would make his logical construct inconsistent.
What is more, is that he(and others) have pooped in this room also with no one minding it:
T and other people have pooped in the same location with no one minding it
- T has done the same thing and has limited me from doing the same thing
- That is inconsistent
- Therefore, T's logical construct is inconsistent
Method 4: Onto the Conditions
It is self explanatory. There is a toilet here.
There is a toilet in the bathroom but not a urinal
Here it goes.
- A toilet is specifically placed here to do the specific occupation that I need to do
- T has limited me from doing the thing that a device placed is specifically designed to do
- In conclusion, that makes T anti-utilitarian as he limited the usage of a thing that is specifically made to be used(Also, others have used it before)
- As that things are to be used or otherwise they won't be there(there would be a urinal instead if so), being anti-utilitarian is incorrect today
- T is being anti-utilitarian
- Therefore, T is incorrect on this issue
Method 5: Factually proving what is to be proven
This is boring, but after remembering that I have consulted a health expert for all questions that me and my family would have regarding our body as a whole, it is established that not pooping for 4 days is unhealthy. Facts agree with me[1].
Therefore:
- It is healthy for me to poop once a day
- I have not yet pooped in the past day
- Therefore, it is healthy for me to poop now(especially there is a toilet here for this reason)
- It is healthier for me to poop now than to not, and it is only possible here
- T has limited me from doing so
- Therefore, T is wrong in the terms of health, or factually incorrect.
Conclusion
- T is proven to be wrong about this issue
- People who are proven to be wrong about issues no longer have a an influence on if the present actions on this issue is good or not
- Therefore, I should be free to decide if I should be able to poop here.
That is it.
Thank you for reading all these bullshit. I hope you have enjoyed your day and this chunk of text have not ruined it.
Created:
The following is to be considered as a joke but nevertheless actually happened for some reason.
Background
Okay, so you know I am a pretty marginal figure in school, and the people who live with me at the dorms pretty much stronger than me in every way except maybe the usage of logical thinking. They have decided that I cannot poop in the school dorms even if they are asleep because "it smells bad". When I sneak into the bathroom at about 11:00 PM, the guy who proposed it suddenly woke up and stopped me. When I kept deciding on that I should have the freedom of pooping in the dormitory, he kicked me near the nuts. It was at this moment that I think that this guy is equivalent to a wall titan in intelligence and reasoning with him means nearly nothing.
Other than a few discussions in Chinese Language Arts class(I am in a school in China in which I cannot get access to freeflow forms of communication with the outside from Mon-Fri usually), I rarely engage in logical thinking during the weeks. It was at this moment that my logical thinking awakened. Immediately I read "The Inevitable" by KK(Because a normal one will always keep the eyes on somethings they would not have -- Internet) and suddenly came up with 5 approaches to prove why I should be able to poop in there.
The person is to be called T as no personal information of anyone should be leaked here.
These are to be agreed on as these are basically true and I can confirm that what I am saying is true:
- By that time, I have gone a full 4 days without pooping, which is considered unhealthy according to medical standards[1]
- The sleeping sector of a dorm room is separated from the bathroom sector via a door
- I have pooped in the same dorm room for at least 10 times before this occurrence, with T being here not minding it at all
- T and other people have pooped in the same location with no one minding it
- There is a toilet in the bathroom but not a urinal
- No other places have allowed me to poop there
- The original proposition is to be phrased as "The person known as Intel_06 must not defecate within this room" while we were sleeping on our dorm beds
Method 1: Moral Kritik
This is the most obvious one on this list, as generally nobody likes being stripped of doing something they would consider normal to do in their everyday life. a middle-class teenager who can go to their home and play PUBG every night in his family's 2-storey house with 2 bathrooms shouldn't be restricted to do such a thing. The syllogism should be paraphrased as:
- It is generally established that pooping is a normal thing that everyone does and should be able to do at a toilet
- T has restricted me from pooping in a toilet
- Therefore, T has restricted me from doing a normal exercise of normal people.
- Stripping the rights of someone doing a normal exercise is selfish and has violated that someone's personal rights, and that is immoral
- T has done so
- Therefore, T is selfish, has violated my personal rights, and he is to be considered as immoral.
More will come next, do not post yet.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
That is the point. People are getting killed regardless. Some of them are killed in the name of god, others are, in the name of capitalism, others are in the name of nations.
When a person is killed, it is killed in the name of the belief that the killer of that person holds at the moment of the murder.
If a Christian kills a Muslim because he is a heretic, then the kill is to be under religion. If the Muslim simply is fighting for Iraq and not the US, then the kill is to be considered under the US. If they are just having unspeakable relationships with a woman and they kill each other because one cheated, then the kill should absolutely not be credited under god or nation.
Created:
Posted in:
There is no correlation. More body count just means more people believe in your religion and more people opposes it. It just means it has a greater influence.
More people dead by this religion doesn’t mean if it is better or worse.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
One is the dictatorship in the name of a real leader, one is the dictatorship in the name of a virtual leader we call God or Allah.
However, when we look at a real leader, we don’t look at his body or his testicles. In fact all we are looking at is his credit and image when we judge them, politically. Trump is not a worse president than Washington because he is less fit. It is because he has contributed less to the nation.
So the main difference isn’t even the properties of the leaders. It is just who the leaders are.
Created:
Posted in:
The crusades killed millions. That is all I’ve gotta say.
Created:
Posted in:
What "Skin color" means is actually a hint to culture/ethnicity. When we see a person with yellow skin, he/she/they would have ancestors from Asia, and when we see a person with Black skin, he/she/they would have ancestors from Africa. Essentially "racism" is a generalization of cultures, "our culture is better than yours", "our European culture is better than your Asian culture", etc.
Some "black" people appear white too. They suffer from albinism but resembles more of an African person than a European person in terms of DNA. Skin colors is also a indicator(just that, nothing more, nothing less, not even 100% accurate) of where the person might have came from/have ancestry in, which is in the end a generalization of culture and comparison between them.
Raising your hand while having lifted 10KG for 20 minutes may result in the gesture "Nazi Salute", and saying "you" in Korean or "that" in Chinese may result in something that sounds like the N word. Cancelling people for these reasons would be absurd.
The Nazi Salute is just prone towards a maleficent interpretation, same with the N word. All of those are prone to misinterpretation. I suppose I allow both, as long as they aren't being used to damage anyone or anything.
Created:
Posted in:
If skin colors are just skin colors and have no meanings, then have fun doing the gesture known as "Nazi Salute" because it is just a raised arm and the historical connotations within it should be ignored, and have fun saying the N-word because it is just a string of vibrations.
Created:
-->
@coal
I mean, in my opinion, Universal healthcare is good, and it is probably expected that some Trump supporters would support it.
However, why do some people oppose this idea?
Created:
Why does anyone oppose free healthcare? It literally saves the lives of more people.
Created:
Posted in:
In general or what? Should we kill some or should we absolutely rumble the upside-down upon them, murdering all of them?
Created:
Posted in:
Our median age is about 78 years old. Dying of old age at 99 is pretty normal nowadays. It isn't like AoT, Royal people's blood is just the same as normal people's. There is nothing preventing them from being unhealthy at such an old age.
Obviously my approach is akin to Occam's Razor, but there is no evidence that anyone did murder him.
Created:
Posted in:
I think we should reduce the need of tipping and increase the importance in such an action. Increasing the price of every dish for 5% and only letting customers tip if they feel like that there is a real need of tipping sounds rational. You don't wanna people to tip every single time. Being hard on drugs 24/7 would mean it wouldn't feel as significant as the first time trying it, and the purpose of tips are compliments, not taxes.
Created:
Posted in:
How do you "outlaw" tipping?
Eventually it would be made in the name of donating towards the business, and then you have to outlaw that according to that logic, and then the business suffers because it never gets anything in the credit or faith of it, instead just what it sells.
Outlawing tipping would create more problems than it solves. Just because it drains your pocket a teeny tiny bit quicker doesn't mean that businesses should suffer.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Undefeatable
Is that a good thing?
Created:
Posted in:
The past events actually exist because we exist. We have the right to determine what past events would happen by existing in a certain state, and if we have the right to control the past, we could possibly control the future.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
Not Christian. Traditional. Two separate cultures ended up on festivals on similar matters on similar dates.
Created:
Posted in:
It has been 1 year on this site. I have learned a lot in this year.
I have gone from a newbie who thinks he is powerful from DDO, to the second-last active debater ever, to 1470, starting a new account, climbed to the top 5 at speeds only Undefeatable would have rivaled, then settled around 10th place.
Created:
Posted in:
If the premise says YES, then it would mean that aces/aros would be misanthropic seeing they don't fancy the idea of dating anyone, and pansexuals would not be racist just because they can accept the idea of dating people of all kinds.
Just because not dating doesn't mean racist. I mean, adults who date children are the one seen as creepy and down bad... Just because you wanna date people your age doesn't mean you hate children or old people.
If the radical SJWs really gonna cancel you for dating a white person when all you care about is hair, genitals, and personality, let logic be fallen onto them and realize themselves.
Created:
Posted in:
Well yes, but actually no.
If I don't wanna date you because you are black and I think black people are bad, I am racist.
If I don't wanna date you because you are way too nasty, I am not racist in this case.
Created:
Posted in:
4/5. In China we basically commemorate our dead family members and even go out to visit them. Right as I am typing this someone is holding a funeral downstairs and it is assaulting my eardrums.
Created: