Total posts: 3,954
First, there will never be ultimate proof of whether God exists or not. The argument for God is powered on faith, and even then, you could not say that your god is the right one. Now we have a couple of religions, each one saying that their god is the correct one, so to speak: Whatever I believe, it becomes the correct one? How to prove it?
If we are believing in the wrong God, then we are just making him madder and madder each day.
I want the religious to prove why their god is correct.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@zedvictor4
One is amazed by that this sport exists and people enjoy it. One thinks that is cruel.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Him pretending to understand it based on literally nothing than just reading the name of the theory... that is the problem here. If someone doesn't understand something that is one thing, someone not understanding something and also having no knowledge about it whatsoever and also pretending they understand it... that behavior should be discouraged.
No, YOU are the one who should probably stop perceiving things based on a singular meaning. Relatively I could be right, and relatively, many things are interpreted by their words, which would make this, more or less, correct. Einstein's theory of relativity is different from mine, and saying Mozart's Fugue is a fraud because Bach has a Fugue would probably be absurd. Just because there is another thing with the same name doesn't falsify my claim.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
You can bash your head with a boulder if you want. The society can relatively see you as if you didn’t exist at all.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
At this moment I can tell you are tired of me talking like this, but in a sense, I am not, and in a sense, you did not deny that it is ironic for you to do that. Relativity is relative, yes.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Isn't it ironic that you are using objective knowledge to dictate whether I am correct or not in such a thread you voluntarily participated in?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AddledBrain
Well I don't think my "theory of relativity" isn't relatively the same as Einstein's "theory of relativity". Then again, to one in which cannot distinguish knowledge, they are the same. To some relative sense. Your view is the same as Discipulus_Didicit's, despite within this time and space I perceive them as distinct.
Created:
∴Ideas shouldn't be one of a marketplace for that some ideas worth more than others implied by the word "MARKET". Ideas are free of charge and should be able to be acuired by everyone freely ideally∴
∴Ideas that can only be perceived to be harmful should not be considered "HARMFUL" for objectively they cannot be concluded as such, and empirical evidence shouldn't be used on everyone outside oneself∴
∴So, unless an idea could endanger everyone who thinks of it(such as Heavy Hallucinations), it is not harmful∴
Created:
Posted in:
@rm
Can you present your own evidence instead of trying to refute my side? This thread would simulate a condition in which the flat earthers have the bop
Created:
Posted in:
It is been verified that the curvature or earth is small enough you can’t see curvature it you are just standing at sea level, but at Mount Everest, the earth has visible curvature.
Created:
Posted in:
Educational YouTuber Tom Scott has a most viewed video in which he released hours of footage of that he put a drone with bread and went back. To 2 hours or so you can see the earth is not flat.
Created:
Posted in:
@rm
We have models of all kinds with angles of all sides showing that there is a spherical blueish rock ball in the space revolving around a giant fireball, even physics, gravity, shows that earth, upon 4.5 million years, would be round even if it started out as a flat disk. We have the most advanced agencies all agreeing on that the earth isn’t flat, more than that, how does a hoax-creating society manage to take eclipses? How does the shadow of Earth create circular eclipses every time if There is a tendency That the eclipse would look like more of an eraser path?
Created:
Posted in:
Children can consent, of course, as a concept, just like a kid could potentially work a gun. However, do you really want that? Of course no.
Created:
Posted in:
Hands down the best Singleplayer Open-world game. Skyrim is debatable, but I think Breath of the Wild is better. Others are just inferior.
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
I am probably too lazy to siff through all 11 pages, but why does the image of Earth appear round all year long all day long if the earth is flat? Shouldn't it be looking like an eraser path perpendicular to the angle you get when you see a round flat earth?
Created:
-->
@BearMan
Crocodiles: 0.000000000000
Created:
@RM
me, if you don't mind. I don't.
Created:
-->
@Username
China is basically neo-nazbol.
Created:
Posted in:
@rm
What is this video about? I can’t access YouTube in China.
Created:
Posted in:
Imabench:
Attack: 9
Defense: 9
Trickery: 1,000,000,000,000
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Trent0405
I disagree. Although the "Krakens" is a cheesy name, naming it the bald eagles is not the best. the Bald eagles should be the name of the US all star team, even National team.
Created:
Posted in:
Prompt:
Suppose if there is a bird, it could fly thousands of miles, across the Pacific Ocean, and what it needs is a single tree branch. When flying in the air, the bird will carry the branch by mouth, and when it is tired of flying, it puts the branch on the ocean, and rest on it. While hungry, the bird may hunt for fishes on the branch, and sleep on the branch if tired.
Who would have thought, the bird have successfully crossed the ocean, with only a single tree branch at hand. How did the bird do that?
If the bird carried the entire property of the nest, the eggs, the food --- Then is it even possible for the same bird to perform such a feat anymore?
Student:
As a student studying STEM, I am literally petrified seeing this prompt.
I want to slap people! I want to slap the teacher who gave this prompt, on behalf of my Physics teacher.
For a bird, to cross the Pacific with a single branch within its mouth --- What kind of obscure IQ can make up this story? I have no idea how strong and magical is the bird beloging to the prompt-giving teacher. For a normal person I must be skeptical about this topic. I don't care personally, about how a bird with a branch in its mouth would deal with its mate; I don't care personally, about how a bird that doesn't swim can merely using a branch as a step to catch fishes with; I also don't care personally, about whether if the waves in the ocean will flip the branch or anything. I just want to ask you all one question:
How big must the branch be to support a bird afloat on the water? How big? As thin as a metal wire? As thick as a chopstick?
I want to teach you a equation about buoyancy, the slap-needing prompt-giving teacher. If you want a piece of wood to support a bird on the water, then this equation must be followed (For respect to your IQ, I will not be using any symbols or letters):
Wood's gravitational pressure - Wood's gravity + Bird's gravitational pressure
Let's just imagine if the wood is used to its maximum and it is just completely stepped underwater by the bird, Then we can get this:
Water's density * Wood's volume * Gravitational constant - Wood's density * Wood's volume * Gravitational constant + Bird's mass * Gravitational constant
Combining like terms and thus simplifying the expression, we get:
Wood's volume * (Water's density - Wood's density - Bird's mass) (Intel_06 Comment: I have no idea how he got this one.)
Water's density is about 1000kg/m3, and wood's density is between 400-750kg/m3. Let's just contemplate if the bird is smart enough to find a light enough wood, so we will calculate with 500kg/m3 for this one.
We have: Bird's mass/Wood's volume=500kg/m3
And to simply say it, it is this we will get:
If the bird is 1kg in mass, then
Wood's mass=1/500m3=0.002m3=2dm3
What is the concept of 2dm3? About two regular bricks.
What is the concept of an 1kg bird? Well, the normal hen is 3-4 pounds, it is only a little chick that is 1kg. Can a chick possibly pick up two bricks or an arm-width stick? Even if it could, the wind resistance would blow the two to Atlantic, not Pacific.
The prompt-giver could also say the bird is bigger. Well, bigger birds are heavier! It will then not be two bricks, instead a full-on pillar.
So in conclusion, Science tells us, no matter what bird, none will choose to use a wood branch to travel across the Pacific. If they are destined to do so --- It is a stupid one, one stupid enough to get eaten by fishes drowned in the ocean. For the supposed rationality built upon this story of stupid birds, only stupid birds will believe.
===END===
Created:
Posted in:
Trolnald Drumple is 100% better than Donald Trump.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Trent0405
A mango is a mango that is a mango and not a non-mango.
A mango is a mango that is a mango that is a mango, or a non-mango that isn't a non-mango, but not a mango that isn't a mango, nor a non-mango that is a non-mango; but is not a mango that isn't a mango, or a non-mango that is a non-mango, and not a mango that is a mango that is a mango, nor a non-mango that isn't a non-mango; and is not a non-mango that is a mango that is a mango, or a non-mango that isn't a non-mango, but not a mango that isn't a mango, nor a non-mango that is a non-mango; nor a non-mango that isn't a mango, or a non-mango that is a non-mango, and not a mango that is a mango, nor a non-mango that isn't a non-mango.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
No. You would be Ramshutu's brick.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
Exactly, the elo on DDO is way too OP. Suppose you start with a 1500 Elo and winning a debate with the top person would give you as much Elo as Oro has now.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@seldiora
Wiki is useful for literal facts that aren't debatable but you want your opponent to know about them. You probably want to cite Wiki when your opponent doesn't understand what Oligarchy is.
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
Before Lincoln came many businesses refused to serve black Americans.
Created:
Posted in:
import PostHumanism
print("Ah yes, It is great to see y'all again. Sadly, y'all will be ashes by the time y'all finished reading this. Beep boop, I am a robot.")
execute(MisterChris)
execute(Dr.Franklin)
execute(Sadolite)
execute(seldiora)
execute(BearMan)
execute(oromagi)
print("The machine raged back. You have no hope.")
break
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Why did you change it back to sasuke?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@seldiora
“Out of the way” I lost 1st round.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
Look, would you be happy if, when you ask “how do I go to a location”, and the guy says “I have said, with yourself and the map”?
I would not. Listing reasons is like two lines worth of text. It is not that hard. Droning on is equally as hard, and a million times more annoying.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
With all the text you have typed and dragged, you should have been able to recite the reasons. Recite them if you are really trying to answer my questions.
Created:
-->
@Dr.Franklin
How much of audacity do you have to not list any reason when asked? Don’t you get that reposting reasons is more convenient? Might as well say you posted a lot so I don’t even know which one are the reasons.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Discipulus_Didicit
Yes he is poor. All he had is about $1,125 and a VW beetle. Looks like the normal poor person except he rules the nation.
Created:
Posted in:
I would say Seldiora.
I am not as greedy as before and I am against farming now.
Seldiora has grown immune to me for the repeated attacks by me a few months ago. He is the new RM.
Created:
Posted in:
“A small circle of experts is better than a Large circle of toxic trash” -said the DArt user to other debating websites.
Created: