Intelligence_06

Oh nah, I shouldn't have tagged you. There shouldn't have been any.

By no means I am saying all theists are like that. When my teacher said "Students, stop bullying each other", She clearly accuses not of non-bullies.

Thank you for agreeing with me rationally. I am Covid-negative. That being said, Coronavirus does not transmit through internet, so no worries.

Criticize what ye will. You can bring this to the hot topics.

What are the non-theists' view on this?

What are the theists' opinions on this?

I did the coronavirus test in the nearby clinic. As I am not in the country that my passport is registered in, I would need to send my results to the embassy and wait for the result. That being said, it is a difficult journey. I have not been active for full hours one because of sleep but also because of days of traveling in 1-hr trips between my house and the clinic.

The embassy has a "rule", in which the coronavirus test must be submitted there within 12 hours of the result being undisclosed. My parents got it with an easy procedure, but I would have to have something more difficult in order to just get my result.

When I am back, it is already over 12 hours since the result is clear. I tried to submit the result out of desperation, and the embassy verified the result despite it is outside of the 12 hour range.

What does this tell us? Rules sometimes just make you better, it is not 100% black and white.

For example, the Bible tell us to not have sex before marriage, not watch pornography, and not commit adultery. With common sense, of course, you could do those, but they could potentially make you less loyal in a commited relationship, which makes you a less trustworthy person.

For another example, the Bible tells us not to eat shrimp or pork, but that is just because they have yet to have a procedure to make them as clean as other kinds of food, and since the Bible is basically an engraved book, it could not live long enough to see when the FDA can make pork and shrimp as healthy and clean. In other words, at the time the bible is written, those foods are unclean, which, if you eat it, will make you sick, thus live a subpar life.

Another example is that swearing or insulting is bad. It is? Yes, but saying "fuck" one time probably won't land you in hell immediately. The more you swear, the harder it is to people to approach you in a polite manner, which would mean you will live a life without companions. There are rationalities of All things in Theism, some of them outdated, but all of them could be considered at the time they were written with at least an indirect reason.

So BrotherDT, stop interpreting the Bible so literally that when we just eat a kind of food we would go to hell.

So Radical atheists, stop nitpicking the Bible with those rules, you guys have much better stuff to do.

Welcome to 500 posts.

No I meant that By questioning the Authority, it will make problems disappear and by that make it more powerful and likeable by the people.

Well I don't know if I am really libertarian left or the test is bad. I support these things.

Well what is this, you tell me.

Ben Shapiro is a conservative with libertarian leanings.

You claim to live God's way, but the same God want to let you be healthy and not ignorant?

There are the social moderators, and there are the libtards. There are the traditional folks, and there are the bloodthirsty dictators. There are the cooperators, and there are the watermelons. There are the entrepreneur, and there are the pedos. There are people who know it all, there are people who know nothing other than to grill. There are people who analyze what is good and what is bad, and there are people who just hate them all.

The political compass is not accurate at least for me. I consider myself a libertarian (libright) but this hell of a site put me all the way on the left. When I was an SJW of a sort few years ago(yes, cringy phase, stop) this thing put me in authoritarian right. I hardly consider this accurate. Ben shapiro is the average conservative but this thing put him as a libertarian.

This is not the debates sections, is it?

so this is what you mean? Then that I use it all the time. 

Half of a year and I got zero clue. What is it?

You have 8 times that

/!in

sorry, I am leaving three days later, will not be active

9k more and he will be enshrined?

OK, 99k for him and 90k more for you and you will automatically get God's thanks from heaven and you become free of sin after that.

Can we let this go, it is something of the past. If you got modkilled, that is it, you either stop talking like that or you tell the mods later that "bad language" warrants for no modkill.

/in

More rants with religious ppl(or atheists if you are religious) + More mafia games = Higher forum count.

Fine you win, idk what to say anymore. Because I am just someone with no life sitting in front of a computer screen talking to someone else who also got no life sitting in front of a computer talking about stuff I am not supposed to even learn yet to prove something basically unrelated to that thing for a reason that is basically unknown. 

If Einstein did Crack then his theory is more likely to be false than true consider he would be considered crazy and according to Occam's razor his theory would be untrue. Evidence on everywhere shows that they are not the same.

Also don't search up SCP-3199, unless you are planning to not sleep the whole night and the night after that.

Well, according to the theory of relativity there is no evidence that they aren't both the same illusions, but according to our objective world, Lewis Hamilton is a racing driver that can play guitar, Jimmy Page is a guitar player that can drive. Even if their skills overlap they aren't same.

Well you two are different. Supa is a forum poster that can debate. You are a debater that can post on forums. If you are telling me both are equivalent then you are as well telling me that Lewis Hamilton and Jimmy Page are essentially the same person.

OH SHI-

no wait, uh OH SHI-

Is it just me or did you name your fish Abraham Lincoln?

alright then

so it is this drastic for you. 

Oops I just thought of evading homework because I told my teachers that knowledge is relative and you cannot prove that your knowledge is correct, and if it is not, there is no point in learning it.

Result: Teacher told me that in this world what is taught is true. If we consider this world as objectivity then everything taught would be true. We are in this world and we are not in every other world that potentially exists so it is no point of rejecting what is true in this universe.

I thought of this myself. If this already exists please tell me who proposed it initially.

The theory of relativity states: Everything is relative. 

So relatively, something could be true and something could be false. Could be seen as true or false depending on the perspective. 

Then think: if everything is relative, then the statement "everything is relative" is also relative, meaning it could be false at some point at some perspective, but how could that be?

Conclusion: There must be at least one objective thing. "Everything is relative" is the only objective statement. If more exact, perhaps I should say "Everything is relative, except for this statement". 

I am 14 and this is deep. Not that kind of deep, this kind of deep. Wait, deep is relative and it is not the statement, so it could be shallow seen from someone else because everything humans have set up are basically relative and non-objective.

You don't say...?

Fine, I am not using it whatsoever. 

Just in case if people are nitpicking, I am not saying all right-wings are assholes. I am saying all right-wing assholes are bad. 

I am technically pro-life, but unlike those assholes on the internet, I don't support just shove their opinions up their digestive system like they care or what. If you don't like abortions, don't have one, don't act like you are better than everyone just because you listen to some old man lived 2000 years ago saying that you will be punished if you eat pork or touch yourself or have constructive criticism against the "lord". I care about mother lives as well.

And yeah, in a better society abortions don't need to exist because life can be sustained through machinery as well as that foster care is better. If those right-wing assholes care at least a little more about foster care instead of bluffing their bills on banning abortion the world will be much better.

Well I am a man that thinks abortions should in most cases be legal and the later, the less moral.

A nintendo ds is all he needs.

Well here, I am going to just VTL SPEED. Supa's is literally so on drugs it is basically impossible to fabricate such a claim. Speed just lied.

Yes...?

Wtf is going on

@RM

This is the same logic as "I have served more people than you, loser" from Stalin to the Swiss.

"Every single post"

You can either let this go on or you can ignore everything we have just said. I presented proof that there are posts from me that are not negative and antagonistic. As such a good debater don't you understand the composition of the fallacy of composition?

@RM

Anything can be interpreted as a threat if you try hard enough. "I like apples" could be interpreted as a threat as a radical apple-hater. If we are using personal interpretations for stuff then nothing is objective. You did harm to someone else objectively and no matter how subjective your view is it won't change the objective view.

You can dislike it all you want. You are not bringing positivity either. I am just giving you a suggestion.

@RM 

If you don't like this place, then leave. If you do, deal with it.

Or...maybe we should design something so even the people with breathing difficulties can do it. Complaining doesn't help. I complain but it does nothing. 

No. God is a totalitarian monarch.

I don't think Polnareff suits him. What do you think?

Well what about the rocks? Some of them are billions of yrs old.