Total posts: 3,954
From a Materialist view will the future have Religion, and should it?
I think no. That is because deities are not provable as of now. We can only theoretically deduce whether there is or isn't a God, but we have no physical evidence on whether there is one and how is it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
No. The extreme would be to let mothers torture their children. No sane person would give birth to a child, or support such a horrible thing.
Ah, a poor sequence of words. I meant to say since most people are sane, using the term "everyone" is extreme.
My father is a man too. My mother is a woman.
OMG Same!!
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Imagine you are in paradise (meaning a place where everything is perfect) with another person. You have no reason to kill that person, but you also don't have any reason to not kill that person. Killing them wouldn't affect your survival, or the state of thriving that you are in. Nothing would change, except for that person dying.Now be honest. Killing in this situation would be a (so to say) sinful thing to do, or a bad thing to do obviously. But why would it be bad? After all, nothing bad would happen except for that person losing paradise.
Right, it wouldn't be.
The problem is that in this world it is a bad thing.
Created:
Posted in:
There are two types of games. Games that are minecraft(including mincraft), and games that are not minecraft(including everything else such as GTA5 Online).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I often forget that men exist 😅
No, I get what you mean. You mean to convey a pro-choice position, but this is a debating website, and it is much more within my character to critique in ways that nitpick your topics. So that is what I did, since I have no problem with the general pro-choice position although "everyone" is a bit extreme including mothers who want children and mothers who don't want children abstaining. Obviously, I anticipated said to be said, so I picked a way of introducing myself to the thread in a way no one has as of yet.
And yes, men do exist. My father is one.
Created:
-->
@ADreamOfLiberty
We can never know what it's like to suck maple syrup through the hockey face plate day in and day out. Constantly having to feed the polar bear and remembering to say "if you don't mind", "sorry", and of course "eh".It takes a toll.
Yeah, you are proving my point.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@YouFound_Lxam
Would you vote for Biden, or any other legitimate Republican candidate as President.
That is a crazy question. The presence of "any other" implies that Biden is a legitimate republican candidate, which he is neither.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
I'm a dude. I can't have an abortion even if I want one. Also, I don't want one.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405_2
Just let them die. You are no business to them, they don't have to be no business to you. You aren't even Canadian, you can't decide for them.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
That the problem with the site, not you. You probably have no idea how "competitive" the site was at 2 years ago.
Created:
Posted in:
This is and should always be allowed.
Many people cause havoc on threads purely because this garners attention. Nobody comments "I commit felonies" because they are actual crinimals, they do it because it is funny and gathers attention. Sometimes, banning a person is a form of acknowledging what they are doing.
What we should do is just treat this as a normal thread with normal discussion. Of course, doxxing should always be banned because it could cause physical harm, but insults deserve to be drowned over nothing and be unnoticed by the end of time.
Just keep this a normal thread, it didn't even have any person directed towards!
Created:
Posted in:
Said the man who repeatedly stated that he moved on in life.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mps1213
On the contrary, out of about 40 students in my class, I appear to be the sole individual that do not integrate memorizing vocabulary into my learning schedule. This is strange. I never recall picking such a habit in any discrete way. I don't actually try to do that anyways.
Funny enough, back when I was normalized enough to try normal debating, my coach(or what can I call it?) said that my speeches are too plain and too devoid of diversity when it comes to synonyms and replacements. I mean, just look at everyone else, they took professional public speech classes from a former graduate of Harvard and voice their opinion with the sophistication of a philosopher or a supreme court judge, and then I just barge through with a quick silver bullet of the literal take that is the elephant in the room that somehow no one has noticed, used one minute, then stood there for 3 more until I concluded my "speech" with forced politeness because the required max is 4. Maybe that is how I got kicked. I don't quite know.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Did this site make you better at debating IRL?
Quite the opposite. Everyone else thinks that I am a lunatic at debating. Voicing my opinion at the debating club got me banned all the way till graduation. I tried enter tournaments and the judges think I am speaking nonsense even though I established my literal interpretation as early as possible and in the clearest fashion in the limited time.
Still this isn't a bad thing. It just means I am miles ahead of people. At least I treat topics as what they are: strings of words, instead of the meanings they imply. Most people mix debate topics up with the implied meaning of a single interpretation(and stick it there, and not seek out anything else, and calls me out when I uses a valid interpretation according to the topic. If I actually do try, you won't be able to find any flaw in my reasoning(due to my interpretations being the topic itself instead of anything indirectly derived from it) unless you change the topic for once(for example, setting restrictions in the interpretations).
But serously, I have got zero explanations why people quasi-automatically declare me a loss whenever I try. My proof is tautologically sound!
Created:
Posted in:
@RM
You just sent a non-malevolent message without unblocking me then proceeded to make the post itself not able to be responded according to the functions of the site itself. That is hilarious.
Side note, you translated “intelligence” in the sense of “enemy intelligence”, confidential information gathered.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lemming
That is because I just kinda stick to the site. There is a reason. To quote myself 10 minutes ago:
What is the worst thing about communicating? Arguments. What is worse than arguments about communicating? Not having arguments.
Created:
Posted in:
With my 100th debate win, I am pretty sure I am the 3rd person ever to earn the gold medal associated with that after RM and Oro. It is a fitting celebration to the 3rd birthday of this account.
Created:
Money, I guess. Why would they be speaking out as incoherently like this if not to please who gives them money simultaneously?
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
Well yes, but you are missing my point. You claim because we are condemning 1, thus we are encouraging 2. The reality is that we condemn both, with the second one even more so. The first one is only morally, but the second one also legally.
Created:
-->
@Best.Korea
If a man cant have sex consensually, then he can:1. Stay a virgin2. Rape
Pretty sure what our society is trying to condemn is not being able to have sex consensually, not explicitly the first on for instance.
Created:
-->
@ponikshiy
I am very pretty
Yeah, and some murderers in prison are handsome. Does any of you girls want anything to do with those?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
I would guess none of them. Pretty sure by the end of my 30s warfare will bomb my old home that is so old it probably has nobody except dust living in it. I move a lot, so that is a real concern.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Wylted is no longer a Nazi.He has been reincarnated as a gold digger for the Soviet Union. All his original sins are wiped clean. Blank slate.Perhaps, we should give him a free pass.
Oh come on, what are we having, a Larper? How much better is that anyways?
Let's just keep this site a pseudo-anarchy server like 2b2t with mods but no president, and the mods only intervening when bots clog or when someone is so out-of-control that restraining is needed(for example, Wylted 2~3 years ago). Having a president has done nearly nothing outside ceremonial purposes in the last 1.5 years and it is unlikely that it is going to go uphill. I suggest we just remove the need of a president at all and treat this ground like it is just a ground, not a country. I think Wylted being president is not even going to be counterproductive, I think he is just going to be unproductive, no more, no less.
Created:
-->
@Vegasgiants
I am fairly sure that that is on a purely semantical approach, as opposed to pragmatic. How the sentence is structured conveys that, and your deductive reasoning shows the limitations and/or the incorrectness of the sentence.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
What, now you are saying that whatever you are talking about is "rambling"? But saying meaningless strings of letters like "brsbsxfxzfxzfzfxfxzffxdfsffasfxzx" is also a kind of conversation rambling!
Created:
-->
@ponikshiy
Nobody can be blamed for sins of father, but it is odd that a place claiming to be a meritocracy all have leaders whose ancestors have several generations of being the top 1% wealth wise.
Trump, on the other hand, is in his own generation the top 1% wealthy people. Not saying how good or bad.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ponikshiy
You don't go on Gore sites do you?I sometimes masturbate to suffering humans.Every other video on Gore sites is of some Chinese person dying because what they build is dangerous.
If so, then whoever uploaded them should probably be arrested. Suffering people is not a joke.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vegasgiants
Taiwan "is" not China, Taiwan is a part of China.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ponikshiy
I am not an expert, but that does sound like something Wylted would say.
Created:
Posted in:
But you are a small-dick nerd who cannot please a woman.
Dude, I am talking MIT, not OSU, do you seriously think I would care about that if I am in MIT?
IMO, a better response would be,
Granted, but the courses in MIT are so grueling and arduous that you can’t comprehend anything the professors lecture about. Eventually you flunk your classes, drop out, and re-enroll in an ordinary university re-starting as a freshman one year later than the average freshman.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Reece101
I wish i had the superpower of luck.
I believe Pixar or something actually made an animated movie based on a girl who can manipulate luck. It was bad.
So, my corruption statement is: Granted, but the only available power you are able to utilize is to use say-a month worth of luck on an instant. So if you get $2M on a lottery on purpose/on command, say-you are going to be unlucky for the next month, who knows, maybe you are going to get your peaking earnings stolen by a cyber thief or something.
I wish that African people who cannot get water get enough water to thrive for the rest of their lives, preferably with a stable source of water like a spring, a lake, wells, etc.
Created:
-->
@ponikshiy
If they suicide then they miss out on my blow job's which have taken years to hone with abusive uncle.
If they discover that you are in possession of this account, chances are that they will immediately consider you a pass. No one likes a woman who actively voice their desires to make their husbands dead as if they are proud of doing so.
Created:
-->
@ponikshiy
If they wanted to die, they would have bought a rope to a bridge instead of pretending to be your husband.
I find your lack of citation, disturbing.
Created:
-->
@ponikshiy
With all of that, I am left with one question.
WHY?
Created:
Posted in:
Brother D is one of the only users with an approximately 1:1 post-to-like ratio with substantial vote counts(>500). It is insane that despite how controversial he sounds it is still a stable stream of likes for him.
Created:
Oh ok, and it'd be foolish to oppose that simply because of "socialism".
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
Best.Korea,YOUR FOOLISH QUOTE WHERE YOU ASSUME I'M A TROLL: "He has a unique style of trolling. I hope he doesnt get himself permanently banned because of it. This site needs him."First of all, as I have said COUNTLESS TIMES before, my job is to make bible-stupid christians the fools that they are!For you to assume I am a troll is PRICELESS COMEDY at its best! So at your embarrassing expense again, why don't you show the membership how stupid you are.Ready, BEGIN:NEXT MEMBER LIKE BEST.KOREA WHO CHOOSES TO ADDRESS ME AS "TROLL" WILL BE ...?
The least realistic part of this impression is probably that he would not address Best.Korea by Best.Korea, the address will instead include an angry demeaning title such as "False bible heretic fool" or something.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
He is basically a troll who pretends he is a Christian. The reason he is "not listening" is because he knows he is being a troll.
Created:
Posted in:
I came across this thread after 2.5 years about, and I can't but laugh at the core composition of the so-called student.
then this equation must be followed (For respect to your IQ, I will not be using any symbols or letters):Wood's gravitational pressure - Wood's gravity + Bird's gravitational pressure
Yes, apparently in the original post, it says "equation" too, even though this expression literally has no equation sign. We do not know what this equals.
Same for this one.
Then we can get this:Water's density * Wood's volume * Gravitational constant - Wood's density * Wood's volume * Gravitational constant + Bird's mass * Gravitational constant
What do you get? How do I even know? I don't.
I imagine the student, if really one, must have received a beating from both the writing teacher AND the physics teacher.
Created:
I choose death. One bullet is much better than artificial radiation and global warfare.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@hey-yo
Basically, make porn resources like that on the dark web, except on the regular internet.
You would need a specific key to access downloadable materials, except the key is not open to the public. Why would anyone want or not want the key is unknown, but such restrictions would probably work.
I would suggest making them less likely to appear on the web browser based on the algorithm, instead of relying on external safety measures.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
As long as porn is easily available, some children will find it and be harmed by it.
But should they be banned for adults? Maybe not. Are you really advocating to outright ban all porn just because children "might" access it?
Oh that is easy, just make it less accessible, like if you require a secret key to access it(and only download it locally). If a child can somehow access it, maybe watching inappropriate videos is not the largest of the concerns. It is just porn site companies don't care about children accessing it as long as those sweet clicks run money to the voluptuous women they invest in as well as them themselves coming from everyone without discrimination. If they really care about internet safety more than their right pocket, they could just down the whole platform.
The problem is, well clearly, that porn companies care about revenue more than internet safety, not that porn exists. As long as sexual urges are still a thing within human society, porn will persist. Prostitutes are one of the oldest professions in human society, and there is a reason for that.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Best.Korea
If atheism is right, both Christians and atheists end the same.If Christianity is right, then most of the atheists go to hell to burn.Pascal's wager is a probability based argument that says that we should believe in God to increase our chances of happy afterlife.
Suppose I hold a belief that if you die, you will be happier than any Christian will be in the afterlife and the God just puts everyone in Heaven without discrimination. According to this argument, everyone should believe me.
The fact the dominant religion is not like this is in itself a reason why this argument is not only theoretically unsupported but incorrect to the population.
Created:
Posted in:
As for “echo chamber”, how do we prove that the entirety of human knowledge, the extent, is not in itself an echo chamber? Like, we all think we actually know something. We all think that there is meaning to something. Who asked any of us? Maybe not.
And if the echo chamber is of this extent, I would not consider being in it mentally an inherently reprehensible notion. As if we can escape it, lol.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Slainte
Show how you have changed your mind on something, anything, that you never thought you would.
That is like on every issue for everybody. All shifts in opinions are unconscious until you realize it AFTER your mind has been changed. Nobody consciously changes their mind, it is a subconscious process, it changes without you knowing it.
Like, you don’t often think to yourself, “I am going to change my view about Trump, I will change my mind, I will do it.” You think to yourself afterwards, “Wait, my view about Trump has changed! I thought he was a (x), but it turns out he is a (y)!” That is the format you are prone to thinking in, AFTER your mind has changed, not before.
So, this concerns nothing, I guess.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TWS1405_2
Is there anywhere on the internet where rationally intelligent people can debate sensitive topics without getting kicked because some pussy little scorned girl got offended?
Said someone with almost no debates under their profile. No seriously, you can check out the debate function and leave the forums for a while. That is how I solved my problem when I had the exact same problem coming from twitter and instagram.
I will give you a pass for the first five unrated debates, is that a deal?
Created:
I find it funny that both users participating in the debate screenshotted by the blog's author are banned. As funny as that, none of the two are RM.
Created:
Posted in:
Does it matter?
I mean, a movie is complete when it is released even if we haven't watched it. Then, why are we more displeased when we are spoiled of the ending rather than not? Why the difference?
Life is the same, you can't see the ending. Except, you would possibly be thrilled if you are told you are going to be spoiled of your own life, well. That's that.
Created: