Intelligence_06

dat iz it

Also, the individual debates/users pages are still the old font. However the new format is much more friendlier for mobile phones. The old one just kinda requires you to zoom in as if you are looking at a non-mobile computer.

I know why. For the home page and the leaderboards, it is the old page. The overall debates and forums pages are revised by the owner but I don't think he did the home page and the leaderboards.

bump

Please answer if you are interested. 

I consider myself to be pretty liberal. You blame the bad people, not the ideology. You blame the racists, not the Whites. pretty much every ideology can bring good except for the ones that are intended to cause chaos.

y

e

s

Socialism has failed in the past 100 years

I eat cereals once per 0-100,000,000 days

Hour is just our except used in different contexts.

And thus the King of the Hill spoke.

There are two.

I guess, same? I don’t know do anything competitively on  The physical field, but I work out often for that I must keep myself healthy.

I must say I am more fit than I was 2 months ago.

RM is the most capable being on this site. I imagine him do anything a normal person can do.

If you are slow, then I am abysmal. In 8th grade my mile run was 8:50 and that is the fastest I could ever do. 

Oh please.

...Another naruto profile? Things are really getting out of hand.

RM said he is like 45 or something on DDO.

I get it.

I don't get it.

what

I think you are confusing technique with strength. Notepads are like typing, and the fastest Typer is not necessarily strong.

It is 60 years long

Oh no, it’s a typo.

Warning: Nothing below can be considered a major judgement to anyone's quality of debating. Separation of the logics and the exercise.

You guys can post anything below as long as you are honest. If you tell me that you are a 10'9 strongman that can lift poles like pencils, sorry, NO.

I will try my best to respect everyone.

When is an age not measured in numbers? I will clap my nose off my face if you say you are Phoenix years old.

He does something he thinks is confortable and no one else is there to judge him. Had it be public criticism then I might hold a different view but if he did something that he thinks is respectful and no one else who has the job to judge him thinks is disrespectful, then he is not disrespectful.

As well we should stay fit so fat women are bad and should stay skinnier no matter what she believes. That is the same logic. It is also wrong.

OK, I intend an open debating topic upon this subject, but it seems like everyone is agreeing with me so far.

This is a debating website. Dunno why so many people are talking only on the forums. I get there is Mafia and Debating culture from DDO to DART, but even if not including these ones, there is way too many conspiracy theories and political ideologies that can easily be discussed on some other site. 

I want to see what everyone thinks of it.

What was the last lead change? more than half of a year ago?

Oromagi is flawlessly winning. Especially since Oromagi is literally 150 points over everyone else, On the contrary, Everyone below 8th place is less than 150 points above the average debater. So what that means is Oro is as far away above the lower top 10 as the lower top 10 is to a normal person(1500).

Oromagi won 80 debates in his DArt career, so one in the most-case scenario, has to win at least 80 debates WITH NO LOSSES in order to get that medal at this point. It is damn near impossible and for the average DArt user, a 10-streak of winning is already good enough, let alone 80.

At this point, getting that medal is near impossible and with a near-impossible challenge no one will be even moltivated to get that. This is equivalent to making me beat Bsh1 on DDO at its golden age.

This thread is not meant to target Oromagi in any way. This is questioning the practicality of an achievement that is almost impossible. 

Yes.

Harry Potter exists as a fictional character. Jesus exists at least as a virtual leader. I have no proof of that Jesus walked on the soul of Earth, but he exists in some way.

Oh, so it is counted as mod threat? I apologize if anyone perceives any harm. I intend no harm. 

Anyways, even if there is a system of belief and operation within this absolutely best society, the concepts will be obsolete since there is only one such concept. If a nation has only one type of vehicle and it is the best humans can make it, then unless you literally call this thing “car”, there is no concept of car. There is just the concept of that vehicle.

/out

Responsibilities just added suddenly. I don’t think I would participate in this.

Fulfilling every possible desire, and you get Utopia. It is impossible, so that is why Utopia isn't either.

That's the point.

Separation of aviation and politician. 88% is not 100%. I have seen way too many fallacies that says one contention is undoubtedly true because 51% of the evidence supports it.

11% of crashing. Again, most Americans don't think of it like this. Video games and cherries ain't gonna be the same.

Does Jesus exist as a person? Maybe, well, yes. I have met someone named Jesus and regardless, you can name anything "Jesus" and call it a win.

Jesus exists in the bible, the bible exists, thus Jesus exists. Don't call this a fallacy, I bear no need of proving that Jesus physically have existed.

I lean towards the rear when I was asked to present proof of why Jesus physically existed back in the olden days, but what I know is that Jesus exists regardless of what it is. Does Ironman or Batman exist so I can be saved by them? No. However, they are concepts. I suppose anything is real, well maybe not physically.

Anyone agrees and/or disagrees? And, oh, please, no insults for I will report to the mods. Warning here.

I think the claim above is true.

Conflict=loss. Less conflicts=less losses. The closest we can come to a utopia is if there is as little conflicts as possibly can.

The term "religion" and "politics" implies that there are separate sides, and even if it is a one-party authoritarian dictatorship, there will still be people that will NOT believe in it, unless the term is utilized so extremely that there is NO other known method of government. In this case, the word "politics" would not even need exist because it is completely integrated within the society and it cannot be separated from within. No opposition could rise in such a government in which the term "politics" would cease to have any practical meaning. Kim Jong Un of North Korea has done a very good job operating like this, except he is horrible at doing what he is supposed to do. The people knows no other good, and this state can ideologically run as its own planet outside of any intervention of anything else: Self-sufficient(What is ironic is that lots of money have gone to censorship).

Religion too. Religion is opposite to "irreligion", meaning that there is possible opposition towards this belief. If one belief is completely integrated into the society and everyone is happy, there should be no other religion/irreligion(vice versa for a completely atheist state, no religion). 

The best possible society is a self-sufficient, jubilant, conflict-less society. One party rules and one belief is penetrated extremely deeply into every existing population's minds. There is only one side, and that would mean that there is practiacally no defined religion or politics. 

I remember John Lennon singing a song about this, but I don't remember the name. You guys can tell me the name in the next posts.

Do you refer to when you temporarily shut down your account of what?

Remember Trump in 2016 was predicted only 11% a chance of victory so we can't say yet.

Ah, I see you are a man of culture as well.

Fine.

yes

Wait this is not what I looked up for.