Most of your bible passages were from the Old Testament, not the words of Jesus. I hope you understand metaphors. The scriptures also say that the Earth is God's footstool, which I think I would have noticed if a couple of heavenly ankles were resting upon the entire earth.
In 1019 AD/CE, the dark ages, not even smart Europeans were AWARE of the flat earth theory. 2400 years ago, there were people who believed in the correct position, but flat earth was definitely a truism in the middle ages.
Read HPMOR. The fact of the matter is that good fanfiction exists. Bad normal fiction exists too, but it doesn't get published as often, so you don't hear about it.
A thousand years ago, the flat earth was a "truism." If people believe that our model of reality needs to be updated, they're welcome to it. Some flat-earthers legitimately believe, so it's a debatable topic.
When someone purposely creates a debate for the purposes of it being undebatable, there should be some kind of foul on their part. 2+2=4 is an noncontendable fact, so far as I know, so it can't be logically debated. Either this debate and others like it should be labeled as spam or the instigator should lose conduct points automatically, or something.
" In order for a being such as amoeba to move to a higher level, to adapt to the theory of evolution, while the amoeba engages in production, energy must be added, That energy is a plus, and the amoeba themselves cannot generate this plus power."
There's this thing called a metabolic process that allows organisms through various means to produce energy. Cyanobacteria use CO2 and sunlight. Amoebas, I believe, eat bacteria or something. Humans do this thing called eating.
And the amoeba isn't personally evolving like a pokemon. Tiny mutations and natural selection allow for a species to change over time, eventually into another species, though how the distinction is defined is unclear to me. Fossil records show no intermediaries that I know of. Sure, there's archaeopteryx displaying the evolution of birds from reptiles, but it doesn't demonstrate the intermediary between CLOSE species, like a common raven and a chihuahuan raven. At one point did a common raven or an ancestor lay an egg and hatch a chihuahuan raven?
Capitalism isn't the cause of climate change. Assuming that humans have affected climate change drastically by carbon emissions, though I will withhold my own opinion, then industrialization and the resulting status quo are at fault. Instead of just burning coal and oil for light and heat, we have been also using it to produce electricity for over 100 years.
China was/is roughly equal to/a greater consumer of coal during its communist era than the U.S.
Russia is #5 in oil consumption.
So capitalism isn't the cause of climate change, nor is an alternate system the solution.
If people can be genetically Jewish by descent, then technically they could also be Christian by descent. Most people who are "racially" Jewish don't have anything resembling a pure ancestry of the people of Judah. By the same standards I would be German, and Czech, and British. But I am an American. To be fair, Jews are and were much more exclusive than nationalities when it comes to marriage. But Jews lived in Poland and Germany, etc., for over a thousand years. Little or none would be purely Judaic in ancestry.
Any specific pointers or parts you liked?
RM, I would specifically like to see how you think that " Ralph was completely in control of the pace and flow of K_Michael."
I'm thinking not doing votes because there's nothing to vote about.
I was K Michael Tolman, not Thomas, but autocorrect hates my name. That's why my first name's abbreviated to K and I go by Michael now.
Objectively the worst depiction of Hitler ever. He would be much more civilized with a head of state. Historically, people didn't talk about orgasms in that context at that time.
I've noticed that a win or loss isn't a set number of points. So how is the number of points determined? I'm guessing that it's in direct correlation to points, in which case this debate will be a huge boost for Pro.
I prefer sub, but not enough to debate you. Dub is fine if the voice actors fit my picture of the character.
Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood gives Edward Elric a really annoying voice in the dubbed version.
A basic "science" is needed, such as a grasp of causal physics, but animals can understand that much, so it's hardly fair to say that science is the priority.
I wasn't saying that life priorities are impossible.
Titanium said in the debate, "Other priorities are not possible without science."
I'm saying that you don't need an understanding of the world (i.e. science) to have priorities, and you can definitely get by with only minimal understanding.
Other animals can have priorities. A priority is just what goal you place in importance before others. For instance, a mother lioness might prioritize her babies' safety over her immediate comfort.
I don't see a difference. Science is an understanding of how the world works. A cow does not need to understand how digestion works to have obtainment of food as a priority. It simply feels an urge to eat.
Most of your bible passages were from the Old Testament, not the words of Jesus. I hope you understand metaphors. The scriptures also say that the Earth is God's footstool, which I think I would have noticed if a couple of heavenly ankles were resting upon the entire earth.
In 1019 AD/CE, the dark ages, not even smart Europeans were AWARE of the flat earth theory. 2400 years ago, there were people who believed in the correct position, but flat earth was definitely a truism in the middle ages.
Read HPMOR. The fact of the matter is that good fanfiction exists. Bad normal fiction exists too, but it doesn't get published as often, so you don't hear about it.
A thousand years ago, the flat earth was a "truism." If people believe that our model of reality needs to be updated, they're welcome to it. Some flat-earthers legitimately believe, so it's a debatable topic.
When someone purposely creates a debate for the purposes of it being undebatable, there should be some kind of foul on their part. 2+2=4 is an noncontendable fact, so far as I know, so it can't be logically debated. Either this debate and others like it should be labeled as spam or the instigator should lose conduct points automatically, or something.
" In order for a being such as amoeba to move to a higher level, to adapt to the theory of evolution, while the amoeba engages in production, energy must be added, That energy is a plus, and the amoeba themselves cannot generate this plus power."
There's this thing called a metabolic process that allows organisms through various means to produce energy. Cyanobacteria use CO2 and sunlight. Amoebas, I believe, eat bacteria or something. Humans do this thing called eating.
And the amoeba isn't personally evolving like a pokemon. Tiny mutations and natural selection allow for a species to change over time, eventually into another species, though how the distinction is defined is unclear to me. Fossil records show no intermediaries that I know of. Sure, there's archaeopteryx displaying the evolution of birds from reptiles, but it doesn't demonstrate the intermediary between CLOSE species, like a common raven and a chihuahuan raven. At one point did a common raven or an ancestor lay an egg and hatch a chihuahuan raven?
Have you actually read the books? If you haven't, you're hardly qualified to have an opinion worth listening to.
Wouldn't it make more sense to start using the corpses from the millions of deaths already taking place every year?
1 day remaining.
"There are aliens who think the sky is red."
Not verifiable. You have no proof of alien existence, much less aliens living on a planet with a red sky.
Not looking too good so far.
Sparrow already lost the grammar vote lol.
Capitalism isn't the cause of climate change. Assuming that humans have affected climate change drastically by carbon emissions, though I will withhold my own opinion, then industrialization and the resulting status quo are at fault. Instead of just burning coal and oil for light and heat, we have been also using it to produce electricity for over 100 years.
China was/is roughly equal to/a greater consumer of coal during its communist era than the U.S.
Russia is #5 in oil consumption.
So capitalism isn't the cause of climate change, nor is an alternate system the solution.
Do you guys want votes?
If people can be genetically Jewish by descent, then technically they could also be Christian by descent. Most people who are "racially" Jewish don't have anything resembling a pure ancestry of the people of Judah. By the same standards I would be German, and Czech, and British. But I am an American. To be fair, Jews are and were much more exclusive than nationalities when it comes to marriage. But Jews lived in Poland and Germany, etc., for over a thousand years. Little or none would be purely Judaic in ancestry.
Sorry. It's a little hard to convey tone through text.
I eliminated one I had never heard of in favor of the ones that I had and liked. Do you believe Speed Racer is worth watching?
Sorry. But no votes. We're compiling a list, not debating.
https://tenor.com/view/aint-nobody-got-time-for-that-kimberly-wilkins-interview-gif-3530402
There's a difference between liking a song and liking its artist. I don't like Bruno Mars, but some of his songs are good.
Any specific pointers or parts you liked?
RM, I would specifically like to see how you think that " Ralph was completely in control of the pace and flow of K_Michael."
Are/were you Kvng_8?
I'm thinking not doing votes because there's nothing to vote about.
I was K Michael Tolman, not Thomas, but autocorrect hates my name. That's why my first name's abbreviated to K and I go by Michael now.
Do you want votes on this debate?
So did you make a new account?
gasp
Vote for Pedro!
Does no one care that the end result will be twenty animes?
Here's your Unterhosen, mein Fuhrer.
Objectively the worst depiction of Hitler ever. He would be much more civilized with a head of state. Historically, people didn't talk about orgasms in that context at that time.
ohmigosh, are two weeks not already an eternity?
I meant to vote for you. The tongue in cheek "prayer" is disresepectful for a theist.
As agreed between Pro and Con, no votes.
My Hero Academia.
We're going to end up with 20 in our list.
Words are. There is no good or bad. There are connotations. I cannot be offended by a word if I don't consider it offensive.
Now that Type1 is back, perhaps you will do a rematch.
I've noticed that a win or loss isn't a set number of points. So how is the number of points determined? I'm guessing that it's in direct correlation to points, in which case this debate will be a huge boost for Pro.
I prefer sub, but not enough to debate you. Dub is fine if the voice actors fit my picture of the character.
Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood gives Edward Elric a really annoying voice in the dubbed version.
12InchBeef is his name. He's like 42% of the reason I left.
Well this is underwhelming.
If you look at the math, we'll actually end out with 20 on our list.
Technically, 3 each with one elimination for 5 rounds will result in 20 animes.
I am very, very tired. I wrote One Punch again, but consider it as saying That Time I Got Reincarnated As A Slime
You're stealing all the ones I planned on saying. Now I have to reprioritize.
I forgot to eliminate one of yours. do you want me to do that in the comments, or wait 'til the next round?
A basic "science" is needed, such as a grasp of causal physics, but animals can understand that much, so it's hardly fair to say that science is the priority.
I wasn't saying that life priorities are impossible.
Titanium said in the debate, "Other priorities are not possible without science."
I'm saying that you don't need an understanding of the world (i.e. science) to have priorities, and you can definitely get by with only minimal understanding.
Other animals can have priorities. A priority is just what goal you place in importance before others. For instance, a mother lioness might prioritize her babies' safety over her immediate comfort.
I don't see a difference. Science is an understanding of how the world works. A cow does not need to understand how digestion works to have obtainment of food as a priority. It simply feels an urge to eat.
I'd really rather not do votes on this. This isn't a debate.