Kaitlyn

Illogically considered in regard to the bizarre human concept of indecency, relative to our crazy ongoing body conscious hang ups.

The richer man represents the Alpha-Male.

The how did you answer a question you thought didn't make sense?

*thinking emoji*

Juvenile.

The data point is part of the context. The extrapolation on the data point is insufficient to reach a deductive conclusion; nonetheless, the data raises the question. That's why the question is interesting: it's currently unanswered by the data I presented, but it's worth knowing the answer.

And how am I supposed to answer it?

I *can't* explain it with the data I have. That's why I'm asking the questions, you dingus.

So it's a dumb thread. 

You're just guessing. Anyone can do that. Anyone can come up with anything doing that.

Talk about uninteresting.

What else were you possible expecting? Yes, talk about uninteresting. 

You should watch it. It's a nonstop troll network.

So the natural female role is conducive to the modern breadwinning role in relation to modern family values and breeding patterns.

So perhaps under the guise of feminism and equality etc, we are actually just continuing to mirror base instinct.

If you watch enough MSNBC, such thoughts come with little effort.

Actually it answers every single one of those questions. Money buys leisure time.

(Question) "Are the women in these arrangements okay with this?" (Answer) "Money buys leisure time." --- that doesn't make sense.

Actually the question doesn't make sense.

It's a data point with zero context. You expect me to answer if the women are okay with the arrangement knowing nothing of the particulars of the arrangement besides what you have presented?

(Question) "Are men okay with working more than women in every other set-up?" (Answer) "Money buys leisure time." --- that doesn't make sense.

No, I'm mortally offended by these charts you've presented. You've found an outlier and made a thread on it, but have done nothing to explain it. All I'm left with is to get offended at bar charts.

I expect it takes a higher threshold of earning for men to allow women to be sole breadwinner. That's more or less uninteresting. 

This might be the case for some families, but there is nothing to suggest it is the case for all.

And nothing to suggest it isn't. 

This also doesn't address many of the questions I raised in the OP:

- Why are stay-at-home dads working considerably less than breadwinner mothers, relative to all the other possible set-ups? To be clear, when I say "working", I don't just mean going to a job but also work involving the house (e.g. gardening, cleaning etc.)

- Are the women in these arrangements okay with this?

- Are men okay with working more than women in every other set-up?

There are plenty of questions raised that have interesting nuance. If you want to consider that "really uninteresting", then you're entitled to your opinion.

Actually it answers every single one of those questions. Money buys leisure time.

I care because it enables their delusion, of which is a product of mental illness.

What a moron. You probably feel the same way about gay people. You know what is actually a product of mental illness, white supremacy.

Yeah, it's scientifically backed. It's remarkable when the science agrees with your worldview.

Oh really? You better check the American Psychiatry Association for an opinion on gender dysphoria then.

Nobody believes that conservatives suddenly believe in science. You idiots are still denying the science of climate change and global warming.

That's my opinion.

A girl with an opinion is like a dog walking on its hind legs — it's not done well, and you're surprised to see it's done at all.

Yep, derived from the Frenck/Italian pantaloon/pantalone..

Which were sort of both underpants and trousers.

Anyone who says "both parents should be working" is an idiot.

If both parents work, then who raises kids? Babysitter? Yeah, great thinking, really.

Honestly, the stupidity of today's people is beyond belief. Thats why this society cant survive.

It's honestly because stay at home moms are that way out of a sense of nobility and stay at home dads are in general lazy pieces of shit. 

It's certainly plausible that this is the case, but how do you know this?

For one your data bares it out.

We also know that your typical stay at home dad is a guy that thinks jobs are beneath him. "I have a PHD, I can't accept a factory job" so you have real long gaps of unemployment for people unwilling to just do whatever the fuck it takes to feed their children. I am a man, if I have to rob a bank to get my kid fed, it's going to happen.

The other type is some lazy guy unwilling to work, less qualified than the above but same general reasoning. 

I will tell you there are exceptions though. The woman who is working 2 jobs to put her man through medical school. That's her supporting her man and it means she can retire in 8 years and live a nice lifestyle. 

I also personally had a situation where I quit a job on impulse and when[...]

A woman asks her man to quit his job and take care of the kids so they can move to a new area and she can accept the new job offer for 6 figures. The man does this.

What happens is she'll lose respect for him because he doesn't make as much as her (income of partner is a trait only women care about). She'll start treating him like shit and then she will cheat or leave him for another man. That stay at home dad did what was right for his family but was naive and now has likely permanently damaged his income potential. 

Either they aren't the bread winners because they are lazy bitches or they aren't the bread winners in the relationship because they are henpecked, and emasculated losers. It isn't their fault but they need to correct the situation.

I would presume that where men are stay-at-home dads, women are earning an inordinate amount of money. Really uninteresting question. 

Unions also make people work less too.

How do you know he drinks a lot?

We know that transgender people have an increased suicide risk for some reason. We know that this reason is not caused by bullying

Serious question; are you reading the studies you are citing? Here is what your own study said about that:

Results

Victimisation and mental health were key risk factors across the dimension self-harm and suicide identified through all analyses.

we shouldn't tell transgender people that they are the opposite of the biological sex they were born. Enabling people's delusions harms them, ESPECIALLY when it's a mental illness producing those delusions.

It’s not us telling transgender people that they are the opposite of the biological sex they were born into, it’s them telling us.

Yes, it's them telling us first, and then people like you being complicit/indifferent to it.

[No response]

You also reposted a study you claim shows that transpeople are disproportionately purveyors of bullying despite that I showed you a study from the same source saying that they were both bullying and being bullied. You never addressed that yet here you are repeating the same claim with no adjustment.

Spamming a bunch of studies to make yourself appear well informed is nice little tactic but if you don't understand what you're posting it just makes you look dishonest.

I think transgenderism is a mental illness which causes trans people to feel certain ways. They think those feelings means they are a different gender/biological sex. I don't think we should enable mental illness.

Even if I granted you that transgenderism is a mental illness, you have made no attempt to argue what we should do about it. All you've provided is that we shouldn't treat these people with the dignity and respect they are asking for, which is a head scratching response to acknowledging someone as mentally ill.

So what is your solution? What have all of your dozens of studies concluded on that?

You have provided precisely ZERO data to support your idea that we should let transgender people do whatever they want

Because that's a ridiculous interpretation of my position. The only thing I've argued is that we should treat these people with respect and that your claims regarding what they believe are wrong. These are very basic ideas, if you need data to explain empathy and understanding I feel really sorry for you.

Not sure why I gave you above average intelligence in that other thread.

Your subject matter is barely interesting and your insights are non-existent.

Either you used to be smarter or I used to be dumber. We can hope for the latter for both our sakes, I guess. 

It's honestly because stay at home moms are that way out of a sense of nobility and stay at home dads are in general lazy pieces of shit. 

This thread is a Dart school shooting. Roose brought a machine gun.

In the U.K.

Pants is pants

And trousers is trousers.

Don't respond to his trolling. Wait until he makes a more substantial argument, then crush it

I will do whatever you tell me Goddess. 

The Jews will replace you.

You won't like what they replacing law abiding, middle class whites with. Besides if you want to live in a third world shitholes,. You don't have to live in thee United States, you can go live in Haiti and see if you like living in future America.

Their inability to respond with anything but Ad Hominem or irrelevancies indicates how good my arguments are. Watching people fail to address my arguments properly is quite satisfying.

This goes for Double_R too. I’ve experienced the same. 

we shouldn't tell transgender people that they are the opposite of the biological sex they were born. Enabling people's delusions harms them, ESPECIALLY when it's a mental illness producing those delusions.

It’s not us telling transgender people that they are the opposite of the biological sex they were born into, it’s them telling us.

The level of perceived superiority over these people expressed by your statement is remarkable.

You claim they are delusional yet you have made no attempt to show how. It is a tired strawman attack by the political right to pretend that transpeople are making biological claims with regards to their gender but the LGBTQ community’s definitions on gender have almost nothing to do with biology.

To be delusional is to convince oneself of that which is untrue. Explain specifically what it is that transpeople believe that is not true. Be absolutely clear in your definitions.

How would you notice I wasn't around much when you weren't here?

Um, Because your posts would still be there if you had made any.

You're so keen

Keen? What are you 15?

I'm 142 lbs, 5'10".

142? Yikes? A lot of junk in the trunk no doubt.

Would you pass the forearm test?

<3

Is this supposed to represent your boobs?

Exactly. You love my attention.

I noticed you weren’t around here much when I was out flying.

My body and face are very decent

By what standards? You’re not American so that’s strike one. How much do you weigh? 

Ok then. What country are you in? I’ll be there tonight.

you want to impress women enough to keep them around.

Keep them around? On this chat room?

That wedgie offer is still available.

Really? but then I’ll know where you live. And you’ll become a victim again.

That got a bad rap on being submissive

Ah, I see now.

You like to be dominated by women, hence why you keep @ing me.

Do you want me to give you a wedgie? Is that why you want to know where I live so badly? 

[no response]

I still think you should consider this new profession. It’s really your best chance at making a decent living. And I’ll be your pimp for 50% of the take.

Do you have a decent body and face though cause you kinda sound like a pig.

That got a bad rap on being submissive

Do you feel threatened by an intelligent woman? Is that it?

Roosevelt is threatened by asians, women, and anyone with an average IQ. 

It’s why he feels the need to fake a Harvard degree and military service to cope with the stress of losing forum arguments.

Do females get to vote in your country?

Yes. Keeping Blacks and Whites (and really any other race) together causes unnecessarily violence. It's painfully clear that races don't get along. You might find an individual or even a small community that's okay with differing races, but put 10,000s, 100,000s or 1,000,000s of people from different races together, and there will be violence because of the differing races.

Did you get this from your parents or your white supremacy meetings?

Yes, you are my ashamed. I own you.

I’m you’re ashamed? Oh that’s nice.

Or look at Japan. Very few tribal conflicts there for some weird unfathomable reason...

No. Because I don't want an old, feminine man like you knowing where I live.

Right, because if I knew that I could come find you. No, your ashamed 

Nice try, but you're not going to get my country that easily.

Because you’re ashamed? You know your country is inferior to America? So you are ashamed of your country but not ashamed to declare you are a white supremacist. 

But you can look at any site. It won’t giveaway yourself. Or do you really not look at any “independent outlets” and stick to gossip magazines 

Yes, because I make it clear that all races should have their own spaces/countries, not just Whites.

Ha, and there own schools and drinking fountains too?

Keep trying,  I made her and TWS both climax with one post and I wasn't even trying, try different approaches till you find what works.   Maybe tell her you think  she's smart, she is so needy about that, that will probably work.

You're getting Kaitlyn wet.

So all your black friends accept your white nationalism ideas such as

Some of them are, yes. I also have friends of different races. Freedom of association is great.

So do you keep your white nationalism a secret to all your many black and brown friends? 

I literally told you in the previous post that I stay informed through independent outlets

Un huh, and when I asked what independent outlets you replied independent polls. Lol

You can easily check independent financial websites for that. 

And how often to you to that? Name an “independent financial website” that you use.

--> 

@IwantRooseveltagain

Informed about what exactly?

Politics. Current events. World events. The economy. Basically what’s going on in your country and the world.

All of those can be more accurately derived from independent sources, plus my friends often tell me of anything if the news is big enough.

Ditto! 

I have a “brother from another mother” that works with units attached to FEMA. I get my inside news from him. 

But relying on friends to keep you informed doesn’t exactly make you a responsible adult.

I literally told you in the previous post that I stay informed through independent outlets as well. I'm not sure why you totally ignored that.

IWRA purposely ignores a lot when he knows he cannot refute it. 

He cherry-picks everything and more often than not creates a strawman laced with ad hominems. It is his M.O.

Yep. MSNBC fanchick.

MSNBC is truth and truth is MSNBC.

It's all he knows and all he needs to know, as in an ode to a Grecian urn.

Such as independent polls that capture the real sentiment of the public.

Lol. I see. In order to learn about the situation in Ukraine, you look for an independent poll.

If you want to know what the GDP growth is in your country, you check the polls. That’s beautiful 

Yes, it's amazing having friends. You should try it sometime.

Are they also White Nationalists? They are such a fun group to be around.

But relying on friends to keep you informed doesn’t exactly make you a responsible adult.

You are more a dingy broad who spends her time reading gossip magazines.

Many white nationalists believe that miscegenation, multiculturalism, immigration of nonwhites and low birth rates among whites are threatening the white race.

plus my friends often tell me of anything if the news is big enough.

Wow

All of those can be more accurately derived from independent sources

Such as…

I'm sweet and nice to people who deserve it.

All alone. No husband. No children. Fast approaching your expiration date. Lol

Informed about what exactly?

Politics. Current events. World events. The economy. Basically what’s going on in your country and the world.

Thank you for calling him a fanchick, too. The feminine vibes I get from Roosevelt's posts deserved to be recognized.

Ooop, back to your hostility. Why can’t you be sweet and nice like most girls. No wonder you aren’t married.