Mall

A discussion comrade. A discussion.

I am live.

No in all seriousness, we're going to be discusses current event topics.

That's fine. Homophobia is just a preliminary subject.

I'll be on discord live within the hour. LucyStarfire is expected to be there as well .

The voice channel is going to say " Does homophobia really exist?" 

I'm going to be on within an hour.

What is the demographic on here?

Is it 97 percent highschool folks, recent highschool folks?

Superiority is always measured by what is actually superior . Appreciate your conceding.

They said you were banned. 

Just answer the question anyway regardless you thinking it doesn't matter.

Discord.

Any of the topics on my profile I've debated you can bring up.

This will be live on discord. Do you have a discord profile?

Ok well I plan to be on live tomorrow 10am-1pm eastern time. You can catch me on at that time or we can schedule a time.

How about this, you can enter the chatroom, I can read what you text and can respond live in real time instantaneosly.

See, where and when there's a will there's a way .

Anything you see on my profile that I have debated, you can select to your interest.

You are your own god with your own moral system. That's how that works.

Nah you don't know what I like. 

I don't have favor westerns like you.

You will find live discussions which you can view by going to website address:

I do like riding horses. You know they do that in the Westerns you like. Did you just graduate high school?

I'm not even from the West comrade. You into westerns or something.

You giving catholics a name by the way.

Are you a miso theist ?

What do you say about yourself aside from others, do you think of yourself as good?

You asking me the question.

The person was scared to be head of the person's spouse but bold enough to post unseemly stuff.

Do you think all the "bad" people are in prisons and the "good" folks are outside the prisons?

Do you support the death penalty?

Those that do, you support abortion, right.

Do you believe you're good and the God of the bible not ?

What does God have to do , not do to be good?

Should he not forgive all those behind bars in prison like he's forgiven you?

Very interesting to read your responses.

No it is not.

Not Roswell, not area 51.

Not the "alien autopsy" documentary hosted by Jonathan Frakes reviewed by Stan Winston.

Many intellectual hypocritical dishonest folks on this site. 

But it's to be expected. Some that were wholesome have said deuces.

Word. What did the person do?

Exposing you guys.

You're a hypocrite.

Are you trying to be the head of me?

I don't think you believe in that stuff so don't be hypocritical in giving somebody else directions.....comrade .

I thinking you're ducking out of the point. Not just now .

In a partnership, does only one take on the name of the other only?

Why are even men believing the lie that they're are completely and totally equal to women?

So does a woman taking on the man's name means they're partners and neither is head of the other?

If she is the head of me, I would have to obey her .

But you thinking that women are completely equal to men is error. No wonder.

Have your own mind folks. Don't just follow the crowd like these other ones do here. You will be called out on it and you will demonstrate yourself a phony as my friends here have done for themselves.

That's an alrighty there .

Folks, save your sarcasm. Don't bring any over here. Definitely not in the debates because I'll be continuing to shut you down , the ones I'm currently refuting.

All of us are to die, at least naturally speaking.

I'm a proponent of being your own president, naturally speaking, in spite of whoever is in the house painted white. You are in office to pay the rent and bills in your house.

Promises are irrational to make. 

So if a husband is able to protect his wife, will he not have to have a dominant force to lead her out of danger?

Will she not have to submit unto his direction for instance he says "step forward as you give me your hand as I pull you up off the ledge that is a second away from collapsing under her feet"?

Being mutual and trying to make it equal with a weaker vessel or lesser force trying to lead herself out the situations is not going to make them better at all .

This thing about dominance and submission and authority and obedience and leadership and subordination has to have the negative scope taken off of it .

This is in multiple areas of life from job situations, to medical situations, emergency situations, financial situations and back to family situations.

There's always natural leadership and following.

The man can respect the woman's opinion as much as anybody else, her voice as much as anybody else and still be the head of her.

Being the head doesn't mean you don't hear what others got to say or tell them to shut up or over talk them or even yell commands.

The man respects the woman's input so he hears, discusses it. She respects him by naturally following his lead as likewise with the children.

She follows his lead. Now understandably so many people have issues with that with the feminist movement and all.

But say you're all about just the female representation and so called equality right, are you going to also represent and support the rights of females that decide to follow their husbands too?

This is what I ask y'all. Will you support that and people act slow like they do know what support means knowing they support a lot of things they gravitate towards. Will you support that or only support women that believe they can be equal to men like in partnerships and just be their own individuals?

This is another thing. Many of you talk about partnerships, but why do women take on the man's last name only?

Is she not representing him?

Is she not beholden to him, answer to him, belongs to him?

There's questioning that if you claim to be equal and partnering but only one name changes. 

You don't know but know they're not to your intellectual standards.

Rethink what you're saying, take some time. Display the actual intellect you're claiming this is lacking .

"Only if they think he is correct."

Why do you think there is so much resistance for others to say what you just said here?

So you would not support women that obey their incorrect husbands.

Do you think women would already know their husbands are correct or do they not know any better, hence why they look to them to make the decisions?

No. If that is the case, children are partners. The respect for children are not to be diminished.

What I'm saying it's the same level because guiding and leading are exactly that. A husband leads his wife and they lead their offspring.

So what do you suggest to make them the way you want?

You still haven't given a basis for your response. You're just saying something is because that is what is like just circular.

Have your own mind, don't regurgitate and co sign .

Then the one you co sign for actually comes back and answers or attempts to answer the so called dumb questions. 

Don't follow anybody else cuz that someone else may be just triggered emotionally instead of responding intelligently.

Like the scripture say blind leading the blind both shall fall in a ditch . A ditch of sensible destitution to put it politically correct.

Makes sense.