Total posts: 2,613
Posted in:
I don't have my definition for "white power". The point of that debate in connection with the debate "walking, talking, dictionary" was to say words are nothing until the definition is demonstrated.
So that means instead of jumping at the decision that particular words are wrong to say just based on face value, wait for an explanation that potentially adds value to make a decision.
I never gave anything relative to me. It was left open to whoever applies words in the manner they do.
Created:
Posted in:
No point to figure here I guess.
It's what I thought.
Created:
Posted in:
-white power is not wrong
- Atheist are religious
These are true statements I specifically said, alluded to .
Everything else not only have I never said but whether you realize it or not is presumptuous and or is subjected intrepretation. Just because I say prove something, it doesn't mean I stand on the opposite end or believe in the side against the other.
I suggest you actually quote what I've said in context from a segment or paragraph. Don't take intrepretation to translate to what I said.
What I say and what you think I'm saying are two different things. Be verbatim from my own text itself.
Now back to those two other statements, one was used as a debate title, not exact but basic.
With those two statements, would you like for me to explain again how they can be true statements?
Will you accept what I say or dismiss it ?
Created:
Posted in:
I guess no one knows the answers to those questions.
Another question, what have I said that wasn't outright true?
Created:
Posted in:
I do not convince or sell anything. You are to think for yourself. This is what you guys have to learn.
You need to have your own mind and not be persuaded. Refuse the sheeple, conventionalized in a box mindset.
It appears that those of you that think for yourselves ask questions as questions come from thoughts. It shows that you're thinking about what's said upon inquiring specifically about it.
But with just rehearsed, typical talking points perhaps regurgitated by and or from sources, authors, scientists , etc., it shows a limitation of understanding and knowledge or no willingness to add to both of these things.
Still looking for answers to those questions guys. Does anyone know?
You need to have your own mind and not be persuaded. Refuse the sheeple, conventionalized in a box mindset.
It appears that those of you that think for yourselves ask questions as questions come from thoughts. It shows that you're thinking about what's said upon inquiring specifically about it.
But with just rehearsed, typical talking points perhaps regurgitated by and or from sources, authors, scientists , etc., it shows a limitation of understanding and knowledge or no willingness to add to both of these things.
Still looking for answers to those questions guys. Does anyone know?
Created:
Posted in:
Questions, appropriately so,
What do you do when you don't understand something?
What do you do when you continue not to understand something?
Does anyone know what leading questions are and why successful attorneys are able to win cases using this method?
Created:
Posted in:
The "Your proposal to the "race" problem" debate is exactly what it is. It's your proposal, not mine.
The conclusion of the description: If the deductive reasoning is there to stand tenable with your concept , I'll stand to concede that. If I am able to undermine what's said on the basis of invalid points, you can come back to try again in another challenge.
My position is to debunk the proposal. If I can't, my position fails. So that is how it's structured. Many of these statements made from you guys just comes from a lack of understanding .
That's why we're here to clear it all up.
Created:
Posted in:
So the idea is addressed when you fully understand what's being said.
Created:
Posted in:
The reality is definitions do change. You just indicated that based on the latter part of what you said. " Because lexicographers are the standard who listens to people. So whoever said gay means homosexual gradually changed it to the social standard. That’s a better reason why Oromagi may be a walking talking dictionary "
There are times where we have misunderstanding and that is the reality. Only way to clear up confusion is through communication such as what we're doing now.
Notice there's much talking around each other as we're saying a lot of the same things. It just takes some understanding among other things to start to see it.
Created:
Posted in:
Let's have an example of a failure to an argument connection. I don't specifically see where this is being referenced.
I don't use sources for the majority of the debates other than common sense and universal law.
I do however may use a generic source such as the Google search engine. For example, the incestous and same sex marriage debate, I made a reference there.
I typically get topics that don't warrant much if it all any research. You do have to think according to real life truisms while intermittently applying hypothetical situations.
I don't know what's meant by "no structure". It comes down to whether or not you understand what you're reading. If you don't, I remind you over and over to speak up and ask for clarity. Recommended to do prior to debating. You should debate with pure understanding first.
Created:
Posted in:
So if you could translate everything said into questions, what would they be?
Problems are solved via the system of questions and answers, i.e. doctor visit , auto mechanic service.
Created:
Posted in:
Questions, pointers, tips, proposals , I'm all "ears", all eyes really.
Created:
Posted in:
Well you guys, this is why I came up with those "trial " debates.
You guys obviously have questions for me and see some problems.
I don't know if either of you participated in the "trial" debate challenges.
Does anyone wish to honestly get an answer from me to vet or would you rather just settle in the satisfaction of what you think of someone?
Created: