Total posts: 384
Posted in:
Just others way to contact me, definitely for what I have coming
Created:
Posted in:
Look me on DDO or SW
My DDO screen name is "youforgotme"
My similar world (SW) name is "darksideinthenight1"
Created:
Posted in:
Dear Da community, I want to send my sincerest apologies for my actions.. For one, I am apologizing for making 56 multi- Accounts
It was reckless of me doing this. One Account really all I need, making these other accounts is unfair for the rest of you, and the mods who trying to keep the site productive, and safe for everyone to use. it shouldn't have happened and I'm deeply sorry for all the trouble that I caused because of it. The other thing I'm sincerely sorry about is making the dox thread, I should have handled it another way. The information I posted about this individual was unfair and unnecessary. It could have cause harm, so for this I am deeply sorry for causing such a mess. I didn't mean any harm. I'm ALSO sorry for causing trouble for the mods I wasn't trying to make their jobs harder. And unfortunately I did. So, for this I apologise for my trouble. I will be better for this, that I can promise…
Created:
Posted in:
It funny how no one cares about you what is happening around the world.. this is a dangerous situation and yet no one cares. This has a far greater danger than any mass shooting.
Created:
Posted in:
Sources
Prime Minister Narendra Modi, presented a presidential special order to India's parliament on Monday
The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019
The Backstory of Article 370: A True Copy of J&K’s Instrument of Accession
Experts question legality of India's changes in Kashmir
Pakistan Suspends Trade With India, Downgrades Diplomatic Ties
China, Pakistan slam India's move to change Kashmir's special status
India did not consult Mike Pompeo before revoking Article 370, says US
Strange Bedfellows: The India/Pakistan/China Triangle
No phone calls, no groceries: Kashmir on edge under lockdown
Everything Has Been Lost. Except Our Resolve to Fight Back': Shah Faesal on Kashmir
Crisis in Kashmir: What Does It Mean?
Created:
Posted in:
3) The Domestic Perspective
There's a reason that J&K has been afforded special status within the Dominion of India: It is its own area with its own people and its own history. Just the fact that it is a Muslim-majority state should be a rather obvious clue that the people of J&K do not fit in easily with the Hindu-dominated Indian nation. As a result, ever since the accession of Jammu and Kashmir as an Indian state, there have been various separatist movements, insurgencies and rebel groups advocating for the region to become part of Pakistan or to achieve full independence.
India has always seen J&K as an essential part of India. What's more, Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (the BJP) is "driven by a far-right Hindu chauvinist ideology," making Kashmir a "dress rehearsal for Hindu nationalist fantasies." In short: Modi's government is turning India from a nominally secular and pluralist democracy into a hardline Hindu-only state. The opening up of previously protected J&K to influence from elsewhere in India is, in the government's eyes, the first step toward ensuring the dilution of the Muslim-majority territory until it is effectively Hindu controlled.
Pakistan, meanwhile, believes that the Kashmiri people should be "free" to make their own choices (i.e., support Pakistan and act as a buffer against India). That Pakistan has a security interest in the region is obvious enough; as PM Khan correctly points out, any protests and clashes with Indian military forces in Kashmir as a result of this decision will likely be blamed on Pakistan and used as an excuse for further military incursions into their country. But more than that, J&K is a Muslim toehold within India itself that has a population sympathetic to Pakistan, and as such serves a useful purpose for Islamabad in keeping New Delhi occupied and distracted from Pakistan itself.
But what of the Kashmiris themselves? Apart from being a plaything in a proxy war between India and Pakistan, or a bargaining tool in both nations' dealings with China and the One Belt One Road project, what do the actual residents of the region think about these developments?
Sadly, we don't know. As I write this column, the entire J&K region has been under total security lockdown for five days. This includes "Tens of thousands of government forces in riot gear," a "near-total communications blackout [. . .] forcing some news organizations to hand-carry dispatches out of the region," and "Shopping malls, grocery stores and even clinics" being closed. Without the ability to phone, text or email each other, and with limited access to cable TV and local radio, Kashmiris have been left almost completely in the dark about what is actually happening there.
The reports out of the region are eerie, and read more like dispatches from a post-nuclear war zone than a developed 21st-century society. The scattered reports that have made it out of the area so far have indicated that travel around J&K has been severely restricted and in some areas is limited to those with a government-issued curfew pass. As Shah Faesal puts it in his own harrowing report: "You can say that the entire eight million population has been incarcerated like never before."
At press time, reports indicate that the Indian government is easing up on the lockdown, with some videos appearing to show people lining up outside of banks and shops selling vegetables and medicine. A massive military presence is still patrolling the region, however, with thousands of Indian security personnel stationed across the Valley to guard against any hint of protest or riot.
Out of all this mess, one thing is for certain: Whatever comes of these moves by India, the Kashmirs themselves will be the first to face the consequences of those actions and the last to reap any dividends. As ever, it is the people themselves that suffer from the power plays of the politicians.
This is obviously a developing story, and I will be keeping tabs on those developments in the coming days and weeks. Stay tuned . . ."
Created:
Posted in:
2) The Geopolitical Perspective
As I was at pains to stress in my article on False Flags Over Kashmir earlier this year, Kashmir "contains territories administered by three nuclear powers, all of whom have been to war in the region within living memory and all of whom have their own tangle of political, economic and military interests in the area." For those just getting up to speed with the northern reaches of the Indian subcontinent, the Kashmir region is home to disputed territory between nuclear-armed India, their arch-nemesis Pakistan (also nuclear armed), and their sometime-frenemy, sometime-rival China (also nuclear armed). As you can imagine, massive changes to the status quo on any side of the contested borders in the region is seen as an international incident, and it is not taken lightly.
Leading the charge is, of course, Pakistan, which is a supporter of local independence movements (more on which later) in the Muslim-majority region. Pakistan's Prime Minister, Imran Khan, warned on Tuesday that “The Pakistan army firmly stands by the Kashmiris in their just struggle to the very end. We are prepared and shall go to any extent to fulfill our obligations in this regard." These are not idle words. On Wednesday, the Pakistani government began to take diplomatic action, first suspending all bilateral trade and downgrading diplomatic relations with India, and then expelling Indian High Commissioner Ajay Bisaria from Islamabad. Khan has also vowed to take the issue to the United Nations Security Council.
China, meanwhile, has issued a statement through Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying calling India's actions "unacceptable" and claiming that they "would not have any legal effect." Don't forget that India and China were involved in their own military standoff in Doklam in 2017, so the two nations are no stranger to military tension.
And just to make things even more tense, let us not forget (as if we ever could) that Uncle Sam—as self-appointed policeman of the world—is always keen to stick his nose into any corner of the world in the name of protecting his "security interests." In this case, the US State Department has said ("without any shred of bloody irony" as James Evan Pilato sarcastically notes in this week's New World Next Week) that it is "concerned about reports of detentions and urge respect for individual rights and discussion with those in affected communities." For what it's worth, Washington is denying reports that the Indian government had conferred with Mike Pompeo prior to making its surprise announcement, but we do know that the US has intense interest in India and its future role as head of the Indo-Pacific, so it's inconceivable that the two governments aren't conferring about how to deal with the fallout of this event.
However this very tense scenario plays out geopolitically (and it is not inconceivable that there may be military posturing if not outright conflict here), the real deciding factor may be the one that many are neglecting, namely:
Created:
Posted in:
Crisis in Kashmir: What Does It Mean?
"Just one short week ago, you
could have been forgiven for thinking that the False Flags Over Kashmir that I wrote about in this very column in March had blown over, and that everything in the highly contentious Kashmir region connecting India, Pakistan and China was back to normal. Maybe it had all been political posturing in preparation for Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's reelection bid in this year's national elections, you may have thought.
But if that's what you were thinking last week, I bet you're not thinking that anymore. For you see, this past Monday all hell broke loose.
Specifically, the residents of the formerly semi-autonomous state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) in the northern tip of India now find themselves living in a state that has no special status. No constitutional provision for the region to pass its own laws. No more laws preventing Indians from outside the region to buy real estate or invest in J&K. In fact, Kashmiris no longer even reside in the state of Jammu and Kashmir; they now reside in one of two newly-created Union Territories, one called Jammu and Kashmir, and the other called Ladakh.
So what exactly happened this week? And what does it mean for the future of one of the most heavily-militarized and volatile geopolitical fault lines in the world?
Well, as I outlined in this week's edition of New World Next Week, there are three ways to examine what just took place in India this week.
1) The Legal Perspective
Fundamentally, this week's events center around a pair of major changes in the way the formerly semi-autonomous state of Jammu and Kashmir is governed, and the way it slots into the greater Indian state. The long story short is that Amit Shah, India's Home Minister and the right-hand man of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, presented a presidential special order to India's parliament on Monday that amends a section of the Indian constitution granting J&K its special status. This was immediately followed by the introduction (and subsequent passing) of The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Bill, 2019 splitting the State of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories, i.e., federally-administered territories under the ultimate control of the Indian government itself.
The short story long is a complex tale that requires knowledge of Indian history, politics and law. Essentially, up until 1947, Jammu and Kashmir was a princely state of the British Empire in India. When Britain withdrew from India, the ruler of J&K planned to remain independent from both India and Pakistan, but unrest within the state and attacks from outside the state pushed him to sign an Instrument of Accession to the Dominion of India. That Instrument of Accession has been shrouded in such mystery and so heavily guarded that some scholars even doubted its existence; it wasn't even seen by the general public until 2016 when The Wire published scans of the actual document online for the first time. That instrument vouchsafed a wide range of autonomy for J&K within the state of India, including an assurance that the Maharaja Hari Singh retained sovereignty over the territory and that the accession did not commit J&K "in any way to acceptance of any future constitution of India or to fetter my discretion to enter into arrangements with the Government of India under any such future constitution."
Article 370 of the Indian Constitution afforded J&K a special status within the Dominion of India, allowing the region its own constitution and allowing its constituent assembly to decide which sections of the Indian constitution it would adopt. A subsequent provision—Article 35A of the Indian constitution, adopted in 1954—further protected the state's special status, limiting who could become permanent residents of J&K and thus who could purchase land in the region. Further, Article 370 expressly stated that no changes to this special status of J&K could be made without the consent of the state's constituent assembly.
There was just one problem: J&K's constituent assembly was dissolved in 1956. Although hotly debated in various fora over the decades, it was widely presumed that the assembly's dissolution meant that J&K's special status was a permanent fixture of the Indian constitution. Until this past Monday, that is.
To get around the impasse, Modi's government simply issued an order replacing the words "Constituent Assembly" in Article 370 with the words "Legislative Assembly." And, since the Legislative Assembly of J&K was dissolved last year, its power has devolved to the Indian government, which is now abrogating Article 370.
All clear?
Don't worry, it's clear as mud to everyone, and like all such massive politico-legal moves, it's open to debate, interpretation, and court challenge. The Associated Press for its part, is quoting Indian legal "experts" who assure us that "The process by which New Delhi has scrapped the preferential status accorded to (Jammu and Kashmir) by the constitution and split J&K into two union territories is constitutionally vulnerable."
In other words, don't expect this to be a done deal quite yet. We're going to see plenty of political and legal fireworks within the Indian legal system and the Indian parliament itself before the dust settles on this bold move.
But perhaps you're wondering why this matters at all. Surely this is just some internal Indian political squabble, isn't it?
Which brings us to . . .
Created:
Well I revealed it here Bec I knew some ppl might remember this creep... And ppl who remember him deserve the TRUTH...
Created:
-->
@DapperMack
Yes, it does. Again you have no idea why I had these accounts....
And maybe you don't want to know the truth of someone actions.. but some ppl do. Let me ask you a serious question would you want your daughter talking to a 50 yr man online while they're are under age?
Created:
-->
@DapperMack
1st of all you have no idea why I had these multiple accounts.. and Second this is helpful information. Ppl need to know what a fruad this guy is... Their still information I left out... The point of this post was to exposed what a fruad he is.
Created:
[Deleted by Moderation]
Created:
Russia warns of repeat of 1962 Cuban missile crisis
"The U.S. deployment of land-based missile systems near Russia's borders could lead to a stand-off comparable to the 1962 Cuban missile crisis, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov was quoted as saying on Monday.
Russia has been fiercely critical of U.S. plans to deploy missile systems in eastern Europe, and of Washington's withdrawal from the INF arms control treaty.
The Cuban missile crisis erupted in 1962 when the Soviet Union responded to a U.S. missile deployment in Turkey by sending ballistic missiles to Cuba, sparking a standoff that brought the world to the brink of nuclear war.
The crisis was defused when Soviet ships headed for Cuba turned back in the face of a U.S. naval blockade. Eventually, the Soviet Union agreed to remove its missiles from Cuba; in return, the United States promised not to invade Cuba and, secretly, said it would remove the U.S. missiles from Turkey.
"If things get as far as an actual deployment on the ground of these sorts of systems, then the situation won't just get more complicated, it will escalate right to the limit," RIA news agency quoted Ryabkov as saying.
"We could find ourselves in a situation where we have a rocket crisis close not just to the crisis of the 1980s but close to the Caribbean crisis," Ryabkov said, using the standard Russian term for the Cuban missile crisis.
Russian President Vladimir Putin made similar remarks in February, when he warned that Moscow would match any U.S. move to deploy new nuclear missiles closer to Russia by stationing its own missiles closer to the United States, deploying faster missiles or both.
Earlier that month, the United States said it would withdraw from the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces Treaty with Russia in six months unless Moscow ended violations of the landmark 1987 arms control pact. Russia denies any violations."
Created:
Posted in:
Language is a weapon Edit
George Orwell
"Politics and the English Language
Most people who bother with the matter at all would admit that the English language is in a bad way, but it is generally assumed that we cannot by conscious action do anything about it. Our civilization is decadent and our language — so the argument runs — must inevitably share in the general collapse. It follows that any struggle against the abuse of language is a sentimental archaism, like preferring candles to electric light or hansom cabs to aeroplanes. Underneath this lies the half-conscious belief that language is a natural growth and not an instrument which we shape for our own purposes.
Now, it is clear that the decline of a language must ultimately have political and economic causes: it is not due simply to the bad influence of this or that individual writer. But an effect can become a cause, reinforcing the original cause and producing the same effect in an intensified form, and so on indefinitely. A man may take to drink because he feels himself to be a failure, and then fail all the more completely because he drinks. It is rather the same thing that is happening to the English language. It becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts. The point is that the process is reversible. Modern English, especially written English, is full of bad habits which spread by imitation and which can be avoided if one is willing to take the necessary trouble. If one gets rid of these habits one can think more clearly, and to think clearly is a necessary first step toward political regeneration: so that the fight against bad English is not frivolous and is not the exclusive concern of professional writers. I will come back to this presently, and I hope that by that time the meaning of what I have said here will have become clearer. Meanwhile, here are five specimens of the English language as it is now habitually written"
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
Life is good..
I can actually see the light at the end of the tunnel. It so beautiful..
Life. It good to be alive. So meaning feeling, the high the lows the middle the high and lows agoba and the cycle keep repeating it self.
Lets enjoy life shall we DA?
Created:
Posted in:
Fresh air.. ;)
In times like these it good to grather your thoughts..
A walk in the middle of the dersert, with a bottle of Jack or two. Life going to do me wrong, will let's see how wrong it could go. ;)
Good time's.. .
Created:
This is the point made by H.L. Mencken the better part of a century ago:
Yes, I'm afraid I have to break it to those on the right side of the left/right delusion: your "leader" is wrong. Not only will America become a socialist nation, but it already is one. The government itself is proof of that.
Here's how Trump could impress me. If he delivered this speech (courtesy of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon), officially disbanded the government, dropped the mic, and left Washington forever:
"The state—or, to make the matter more concrete, the government—consists of a gang of men exactly like you and me. They have, taking one with another, no special talent for the business of government; they have only a talent for getting and holding office. Their principal device to that end is to search out groups who pant and pine for something they can’t get, and to promise to give it to them. Nine times out of ten that promise is worth nothing. The tenth time it is made good by looting A to satisfy B. In other words, government is a broker in pillage, and every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods."And this is the same point made by Lysander Spooner a century and a half ago:
"The principle that the majority have a right to rule the minority, practically resolves all government into a mere contest between two bodies of men, as to which of them shall be masters, and which of them slaves; a contest, that–however bloody–can, in the nature of things, never be finally closed, so long as man refuses to be a slave."Government, whatever form it may take, is by its nature a "socialist" system, at least in the sense intended by Trump in his speech. Its very existence depends on coercion, domination and control. Its raison d'être is to enforce a monopoly of power by the few over the many, and in its modern democratic socialist form it has even convinced those many that it "represents" them. That they arethe government. And that the government will never be socialist.
Yes, I'm afraid I have to break it to those on the right side of the left/right delusion: your "leader" is wrong. Not only will America become a socialist nation, but it already is one. The government itself is proof of that.
Here's how Trump could impress me. If he delivered this speech (courtesy of Pierre-Joseph Proudhon), officially disbanded the government, dropped the mic, and left Washington forever:
"To be governed is to be watched over, inspected, spied on, directed, legislated at, regulated, docketed, indoctrinated, preached at, controlled, assessed, weighed, censored, ordered about, by men who have neither the right, nor the knowledge, nor the virtue. … To be governed is to be at every operation, at every transaction, noted, registered, enrolled, taxed, stamped, measured, numbered, assessed, licensed, authorized, admonished, forbidden, reformed, corrected, punished. It is, under the pretext of public utility, and in the name of the general interest, to be placed under contribution, trained, ransomed, exploited, monopolized, extorted, squeezed, mystified, robbed; then, at the slightest resistance, the first word of complaint, to be repressed, fined, despised, harassed, tracked, abused, clubbed, disarmed, choked, imprisoned, judged, condemned, shot, deported, sacrificed, sold, betrayed; and, to crown all, mocked, ridiculed, outraged, dishonoured. That is government; that is its justice; that is its morality."But until that happens, don't bother me with nice-sounding, meaningless political blather, OK?
By james corrbett
Created:
Earth to Trump: America Is ALREADY A Socialist Country. (Debunked)
So it seems that something in Trump's State of the Union speech has gotten the MAGA crowd all excited.
Was it this?
"My administration has acted decisively to confront the world’s leading state sponsor of terror: the radical regime in Iran. It is a radical regime. They do bad, bad things."
Or this?
"Two weeks ago, the United States officially recognized the legitimate government of Venezuela — (applause) — and its new President, Juan Guaidó. (Applause.)"
Well, yes, probably. But the money quote that government cheerleaders will be shoving down your throat for years to come is no doubt this:
"Tonight, we renew our resolve that America will never be a socialist country."
Ahhh, music to the ears of any freedom-loving, libertarian-minded opponent of technocratic government control, right? Right. At the very least it was enough to inspire some congratulatory articles from Trump's base and launch a funny meme or two.
But hey, wait a minute. I've seen politicians lie about things before. Could it be possible—and bear with me, I'm just spitballing here—that this statement might be inaccurate? Why yes. Yes, it could. So let's examine a few pesky little details that contain some harsh truths that the red cap crowd don't want to hear.
Now before the socialists in the crowd chime in with the "No True Socialism" fallacy, let's define our terms. Or better yet, let's let the Dissembler-in-Chief define them:
"Here in the United States, we are alarmed by the new calls to adopt socialism in our country. America was founded on liberty and independence and not government coercion, domination and control. We are born free and we will stay free. Tonight, we renew our resolve that America will never be a socialist country."
Yes, "socialism" is one of those slippery terms that can (and has) been defined a million different ways, but it's pretty clear what way Trump is using it here. Socialism is government coercion, domination and control. Opposed to that is freedom from that control, i.e., political liberty and independence.
Alright, let's take that definition as our starting point and see where it leads us.
If socialism is defined by government coercion, domination and control (in the name of "the people," of course, i.e., "democratic socialism,"), then what do we call it when there are:
Government agents dedicated to stopping farmers from selling raw milk?
Enforcers of the state whose job it is to stop people feeding the homeless?
Government licensing requirements for driving, fishing, cutting hair, getting married, selling lemonade, blogging, or engaging in literally thousands of other everyday activities?
Government mandated geographical areas in which one can (or cannot) exercise one's right to free speech?
Entire sections of the US Code devoted to policing the size, style, color and order of the words "Turkey Ham" on every package of ham turkey (OOPS! I mean "Turkey Ham"), and any number of other products?
Tax laws in place that tell the average worker how much of their income they are allowed to keep?
Need I go on? Oh, OK. Americans also need:
Permission from the government to work.
Permission from the government to travel.
Permission from the government to play.
Permission from the government to study.
Oh, and who can forget that Americans have:
A central bank owned by a gang of banksters who print the nation's money into existence as debt owed back to themselves.
A legal code so extensive that the average American commits three felonies a day.
Intelligence agencies that record the entirety of every electronic communication flowing through the country (and then straight up lie to the American people about it).
And a president who reserves the right to kill anyone he wants, including American citizens, anywhere on earth, at any time.
But, please, do tell me about how "America will never be a socialist country." Let freedom ring!
Now you may think that this is all just an aberration. That the overarching, all-controlling, all-seeing nanny state is a perversion of the "constitutional republic" that once existed. That, with a little luck and with the right dictator in charge of the system, the country can be returned to the vision of the founding fathers. That American can be made great again, if you will.
Well, I have some bad news for you on that front, dear Trump supporter. This isn't an aberration. This is what government is. It is its nature. There is no political process that makes it better. You cannot vote yourself to freedom any more than slaves could vote their way off the plantation.
Created:
Posted in:
An electromagnetic pulse (EMP), also sometimes called a transient electromagnetic disturbance, is a short burst of electromagnetic energy. Such a pulse's origination may be a natural occurrence or man-made and can occur as a radiated, electric, or magnetic field or a conducted electric current, depending on the source.
EMP interference is generally disruptive or damaging to electronic equipment, and at higher energy levels a powerful EMP event such as a lightning strike can damage physical objects such as buildings and aircraft structures. The management of EMP effects is an important branch of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) engineering.
Weapons have been developed to deliver the damaging effects of high-energy EMP.
National Geographic Electrical Armageddon. (33mins)
This video show in-depth how an (EMP work)
And what can happen and what can be done...
The fact is this technology actually does exist....
Created:
Posted in:
The Los Angeles Rams
Vs.
The New England Patriots
My pick...
The Rams over the Patriots
36 ---- 33
Who you got?
Created:
That sound intriguing. Can You give me the name of this site? Also what your username there if you don’t mine me asking?
Created:
When this site was first created I had high hopes for it but it seem like not many new people joined at all. The topics are Kinda boring and it’s not as interesting as DDO was nor do I think it will ever be. Can any one recommend some good site to join to chat and discuss thing? I just wanna join a place that more active.
Created:
Posted in:
It suck I have a birthday coming up this week and yet I will no family And friends. This will be the first time ever I already feeling sad. This will be my worst bday of all time.
I feel depressed already…
B-DAY supposed to be fun.
But the older you get the more depressing there are…
No one to spend it with, life suck. No one even remember too. Which doesn't help.. ,.......... sigh…………………………………………………………………………………….
I guess I can drink the whole night away.. Right?
Created:
Posted in:
https://www.aier.org/article/no-shutdown-does-not-look-liberty
No, This Shutdown Does Not Look Like Liberty
“This shutdown is not showing us what freedom looks and feels like. It is not a libertarian experiment. It is showing us just how much government is doing that it need not do. It is inadvertently mapping out a solid blueprint for what needs to gravitate from the public sector over to private hands, so that the services thus rendered will be more reliable, competitive, and truly reflective of the public interest.”
“The lesson of the shutdown: if you want a service to be unreliable, disregarding of consumer interest, overly costly, buffeted by political winds, and subject to extended outages, by all means, hand it over to be administered by government.
This shutdown is revealing not how much we need government but how much the government is doing that it should not be doing at all. The best way to deal with it is not through a promiscuous budget deal that throws around tens of billions left and right until every last politician in Washington is happy. The way forward is for the things that are shut down but still necessary for normal life to be put into private hands.”
I will encourage everyone to read this article...
This shutdown is revealing not how much we need government but how much the government is doing that it should not be doing at all. The best way to deal with it is not through a promiscuous budget deal that throws around tens of billions left and right until every last politician in Washington is happy. The way forward is for the things that are shut down but still necessary for normal life to be put into private hands.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mister_Man
I know right...
At least the rains is over for now...
I know I'll be happy not to see another drop of rain this season...
Created:
Secret Brain-flying Microwave Technology UNMASKED!!!
“If there was a weapon, of whatever kind, who wielded it? And to what end? Despite a long investigation into the incidents, the U.S. government can’t answer these questions. “It’s been more than a year and a half since the first reported health incident in Havana, and we know no more today about the cause than we did then,” Leahy said. In September, NBC News reported that U.S. intelligence agencies considered Russia to be the main suspect, citing evidence from communications intercepts. But intelligence officials, in interviews with The New Yorker, insisted that they still had no evidence of Russian complicity.”
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Wrong....
You won't get shots up by the bloods nor crips... You watch too much fake news...
But, California is still a great place to live... You got it all twisted.
Have you even step one ft in California? I seriously doubt that you had...
BTW, every city's has rich and the poor. So you have no vaild point on this....
You want me to dig up dirt on Chicago? I don't think so..
I was only giving California a bad tilte Bec if the recent bad weather. And that was all.
Created:
Posted in:
LoL
Good that you are one...
But what if it's a big rig? I pretty sure you wouldn't dare a big rig to come slamming into you. LoL
Sure you can get shit load of cash. But what if u don't make it? You can't enjoy that money if you dead... Or severely injured.. I don't think you wanna be home bed for the rest of your life. No matter how good a driver you are, accidents still can occurred.
So my advice is stay safe....
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Outplayz
What.
This is crazy rain. I mean I don't mind it sometimes. But not all at once.. This becoming worst than two yrs ago. I But at least then it only one big storm at a time. Not having days of this. I have to worry about some idoits hitting me while driving.. You do know Cailfornina are very bad driver during rain period don't you?
For example, earlier this morning I seen a car hitting the side posts.. And then the driver behind me almost ram into me.
So no I see this as dangerous. And not any fun.
BTW, I didn't actually know you were living out here...
Created:
Posted in:
Cailfornia never gets it right...
Like it supposed to be sunny and just cool Southern California. We got the Kool part.. But it going to be raining for 4 straight days.. and what all ready happen today is a preview I don't want no part of it no more. I mean it rain very hard for like 6 straight hrs. And then it still rain for like 3 to 4 more Hrs. This is no fun anymore... We got rain the day before last . And it rain pretty good then too.. and now today! Then we have three more days just like this one. This is totally bull crap.. it not fair... I already seen so many clouding days already, Much more than normal. This is so well fuck....
Damn California never do anything right anymore...
Created:
Posted in:
I want to see KC and the LA Rams.
Remember that game earlier. Easiest the best game of the season....
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Look I can understand the phone part. I really can. But that isn't my argument nor my biggest factor on disliking management. It the sole purpose of their attitude and their demander. It how they directing their authority. And how they over abuse their power. Like for example I'm getting paid hourly not a salary. So when my shift is over it Should be over. Not be told to stay another 2 hours. Sure that would give me overtime pay. But it not worth it to stay and be in the middle of Los Angeles traffic for 2 and half hours to 3 hours. And putting up with work related issue for another two hrs. So you see that extra 2 hrs of me staying turn in to another 5 hours. Again it not worth the extra pay. With the added stress and workload. This is just one example…
I also have another issue and that is they giving me more of a workload bec they know I have the ability to do most of what they are asking me to do. But I do not get compensated not even one cent. If they wanted me to do those things that they want me to do then they should hired me as a accountant not as an associate. Again I'm doing more work for less. They totally taking advantage and this isn't right.
There is light at the end of the tunnel thou. And this is I won't be working here for much longer and once I do get my accountant degree they would have to hire me as one and that would go along with the pay. Either thou once I do get it, I still won't go back anyways.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
"Lawyers have been, and always will be, the quickest and most efficient way to regulate the free market."
That a true statement... Can't actually argue that...
Lawyers and judges are essentially to up hold the rules of the law. And more specifically what you just mentioned
contracts and liability are essentially the most important factor to regulate the so called "Free Market".
Created: