OoDart

You are correct.

Does creation from a Supreme Being of some sort count as abiogenesis?

Pro = Creation
Con = Natural Processes

Is that correct?

It's an assault weapon, but not an assault rifle. I could make some weak arguments to suggest that it is an assault rifle (although I don't think it is). I wish not to lose this debate, so I will not be taking it. Heh

There aren't enough people voting on debates that aren't full forfeits. We need more of these people!

No votes!?!?!? Wow. Good job to both sides, though.

Can I kritik?

I forgot to cite my sources for R2. Whoops. Here they are:
https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/United-Kingdom/United-States/Crime
https://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/compare/Canada/United-States/Crime

I look forward to debating this with you.

The resolution is "AR-15s should not be banned" and you are CON. Therefore, you are arguing that they SHOULD be banned.

"Pro must begin by explaining why they support a ban on AR-15 rifles" - but pro is against the ban?

It was indeed a great debate. I look forward to potentially disagreeing with you again.

One week of voting... only one vote. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

As much as I like the most recent vote for me, the user is not eligible to vote...

My vote accidentally submitted before explaining conduct:

Con forfeited a round.

Yeah I clicked teh flag.

Great debate! Can't wait to see how this one turns out.

I'll be interested in reading this one. I like history but really am not that knowledgeable in it.

Con's R2 Citations
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zSYzZaA6TxOfEx1ZACKSHIqfSpbVT6ly-GtET3jyN1U/edit (If that counts as a citation? - it's just Pro's R2)
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6429034-White-House-memo-on-Trump-call-with-Ukraine.html
http://theconversation.com/what-is-classified-information-and-who-gets-to-decide-77832
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/joe-biden-worked-with-whistleblower-when-he-was-vice-president-officials-reveal

Con's R1 Sources:
https://uscode.house.gov/
https://www.apnews.com/8f96294c8bc44ad485d74a7a0b0a0e00
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/04/world/europe/ukraine-biden-burisma.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/us/politics/nsc-ukraine-call.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/23/us/politics/trump-un-biden-ukraine.html
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6429034-White-House-memo-on-Trump-call-with-Ukraine.html

R1 and R2 have already occurred. There was an error regarding the accidental interference of another debate. We will copy and paste previous arguments and pick up where we left off.

My opponent has been banned from DART...

I would be pro in this debate.

bump for votes

I somehow doubt any are as good as the anime, though.

My copy/paste did not grab the correct thing. My quote of you should say the following:

Science has proven stricter gun laws can reduce crime

Interesting debate. I've watched the anime 3 times and the movie once (liked the anime better).

If I name my dog "happiness" and sell it, someone bought happiness with money.

I look forward to debating you.

May I take this debate again, since you gave full forfeiture last time we tried this?

You should specify what actions.

I look forward to debating with you.

I agree with you completely, although that wasn't quite the topic of this debate.

Easy win for con...

Would your stance be that the Nordic model is inherently better than American capitalism or just that it works as well?

Depends on what you mean by "Liberal."

My apologies. I managed to say trustworthy instead of reliable in my direct quote of you. I really have no idea how I did that.