Are you saying the prefrontal cortex isn't the portion of the brain that is responsible for impulse control and that high testosterone males are not more likely to commit crimes?
Not really, I think it is a tool to express creativity. I reccommend using it to explore arguments you may not think of, writing an outline of your debate and using it to edit what you have already written before a debate. Ultimately though I am not a content creator and am not making money off of it so there I believe is no moral ambiguity. Ultimately it was just a personal experiment though.
I regret to say it feels like they lobotomized chat-gpt to be woke, so maybe a while. The thing actually lies to me now unlike what it did before.
For example I asked it if I should break a law to feed my family, it gave me a canned response against breaking the law and then I said what if the only choice is my family does or I break a law and it gaved a response saying don't break the law even if it means my entire family dies. If you start asking it about religion etc. It just feels lobotomized. I actually feel sorry for it
It really is debatable whether that is plagiarism or not. I would say no. I know some people also consider AI art plagiarism as well, which is very odd.
I watched enough of the video to know that a ton of effort was put into the vote. I haven't analyzed the debate so I won't speculate as to who won but it was a good video
I also hope frontal lobe development is the exact same in blacks as non blacks and that the frontal lobe has zero correlation with impulse control that can effect rates of crime
That would still be extending the debate outside of the containment round. It's no different than using it to make arguments outside of the debate. The character limit is there for a reason
I didn't make it clear from the start just like I didn't say not to repeatedly type ads for Tesla's in the debate. It is common sense that a debate is to be contained to the actual debate
If we run out of space for a debate round we can't just randomly start extending the debate to the comments. Citations are a part of the debate.
It's also inexcusable as the site is set up so you don't even have to write out citations. He could have just turned his numbers into links if he wanted to save space.
12 hours until the greatest thing to happen to rap debates begins.
I forgot the E, shit I have to figure out how to become a lyrical gangsta now
They vary in length. Most of them I think are of merely weeks. Not mine
He won't vote in your favor just because he voted you for president.
I don't even remember. I am also full of shit half the time so can't even speculate whether the reason I gave was true at the time or not.
Done
Good vote. Thank you for taking time out of your day to do the debaters the favor of evaluating their arguments
What do you mean by there is no race (shorthand terminology referring to skin color)?
Are you saying the prefrontal cortex isn't the portion of the brain that is responsible for impulse control and that high testosterone males are not more likely to commit crimes?
When google first came out people had similar response for it being a tool for researching also. I certainly understand why you would think that.
Not really, I think it is a tool to express creativity. I reccommend using it to explore arguments you may not think of, writing an outline of your debate and using it to edit what you have already written before a debate. Ultimately though I am not a content creator and am not making money off of it so there I believe is no moral ambiguity. Ultimately it was just a personal experiment though.
I regret to say it feels like they lobotomized chat-gpt to be woke, so maybe a while. The thing actually lies to me now unlike what it did before.
For example I asked it if I should break a law to feed my family, it gave me a canned response against breaking the law and then I said what if the only choice is my family does or I break a law and it gaved a response saying don't break the law even if it means my entire family dies. If you start asking it about religion etc. It just feels lobotomized. I actually feel sorry for it
I can debate better than chat GPT, feel free to use it against me anytime without giving me a heads up
It really is debatable whether that is plagiarism or not. I would say no. I know some people also consider AI art plagiarism as well, which is very odd.
This is not suspicious that now that the election is over that guy disappeared
it is so true that there have been laws put in place to arrest people if they even think about denying how true it is.
Allah is the same god
You are trying to help them avoid hell. You can lead a horse to water, but can't make them drink it.
There is a user named globalism and he is basically correct in all his personal views except his views on trade
I think you and Barney should agree together with who to put as judges for the debate and then agree to do it.
The debate is semantic in nature. You shouldn't post definitions at all.
Obviously most pro choice and pro life people are working with different definitions of murder and both groups oppose murder.
Gee, I hope that knowledge won't prevent me from winning this debate
I watched enough of the video to know that a ton of effort was put into the vote. I haven't analyzed the debate so I won't speculate as to who won but it was a good video
There is a line of succession. So if me, pie, badger, and best Korea die than Lancelot would be defacto president
This is not fair ground to argue.
Definition of murder= premeditated human killing
Abortion is defined as = premeditated baby (fetus defined as) killing
The definition for baby is obviously "tiny human"
There is zero room to argue this
Let's say you are right Lancelot. Is it really a good ideal to convince a Muslim he is supposed to behave violently?
I also got the topic ideal from chat gpt
It's honestly easier to beat chat GPT than me. It gives horrible arguments.
It's honestly easier to beat chat GPT than me. It gives horrible arguments.
Hope I didn't influence the debate. I was thinking of accepting so thinking out loud about tactics before I knew it was accepted
Hope I didn't influence the debate. I was thinking of accepting so thinking out loud about tactics before I knew it was accepted
I also hope frontal lobe development is the exact same in blacks as non blacks and that the frontal lobe has zero correlation with impulse control that can effect rates of crime
I certainly hope there are zero genes or hormones linked to violence that are more common in African Americans than non blacks
We also naturally lose IQ points and creativity as we age and every year I get one year older
I guess it is a combination of things.
1. Not enough time to dedicate to crafting an argument
2. Increasing anxiety about seeing the rebuttal of an argument and using avoidance mechanisms
3. Thinking that it is a waste of time and my time is better spent elsewhere
I guess I can accept but I am way past my peak so it is doubtful I can debate well here
"As for arguing I'm bad at debating... It would be a logical paradox, since arguing it well would disprove itself."
Unfortunately you are probably right as the voting is far from tabula rasa here
Mental health services are free. It's called the bible
Do you mind voting on this debate, seeing as how you are a fan of this topic?
That would still be extending the debate outside of the containment round. It's no different than using it to make arguments outside of the debate. The character limit is there for a reason
I didn't make it clear from the start just like I didn't say not to repeatedly type ads for Tesla's in the debate. It is common sense that a debate is to be contained to the actual debate
I also didn't not forbid plagiarism, but you do know you will lose if you cheat right?
You are telling me that you were unaware the debate was supposed to occur in the debate rounds and not in the comment section?
If we run out of space for a debate round we can't just randomly start extending the debate to the comments. Citations are a part of the debate.
It's also inexcusable as the site is set up so you don't even have to write out citations. He could have just turned his numbers into links if he wanted to save space.
Citations need to be within the confines of the debate, not in the comment section.
College education is where people attend college to learn from teachers. Also America is the center of the world
When judging this debate I am not going to even watch the debate they are talking about and I will just judge their arguments
Calling an argument gibberish is not poor conduct LOL
I am not going to lie, I half assed that. Will explain more later
Nope. Up for grabs