Thank you for keeping archives. I will need them if the site goes down. There is a one term limit here and so I can't run again and the candidate I support and whose campaign I secretly run will be advised to keep their distance from me and to openly disavow me.
I appreciate that, but my main goal is to have you go on record saying something that could potentially be misconstrued as racist so I can use it to discredit you next presidential election, so my preferred candidate wins
I thought it was good, please ignore the fact that my kid kept yelling star wars when I was doing voice to text and I forgot to delete it later in the post
Do it again. You learned enough about formulating the resolution here to make it really hard to beat you as well as to make sure it stays on the topic you prefer.
I think your goal his is to convert people. Most of your opponents will be atheists so just helping them find God might be the best path. After you prove God than defending your faith with theists and changing their mind might help the best.
I personally think people would be better off by presupposing a God exists, but the west is so fucked up, that we are basically presupposing the opposite.
I hope you'll find more people here who can at least consider your arguments as well.
I think you did a great job defending your position in the debate and I would agree with you that not all perceived contradictions are actually contradictions.
The old dude in that video is actually vermin supreme and it is sad you don't know who he is. Fucking learn how to use Google that endorsement wasn't cheap
I am going to forfeit. I don't think you should wast your time coming up with anything if you want. I tried. I spend like 15 hours at work trying to come up with raps and stuff and I just can't. I would also rather use my mind for things that actually make a difference if my mind is going to spend that much time on it
"4:82-Then do they not reflect upon the Qur'an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah , they would have found within it much contradiction"
This is a silly statement. For two reasons. One is that contradiction doesn't mean it's from God. Lots of books have zero contradictions.
Another is that even if contradictions are pointed out than they'll just be explained away by apologists, typically in a stupid way that leaves some doubt as to whether it is contradictory, until a normal person applies Occam's Razor
Multiple ways to interpret something is of course true but after you apply common sense, you can tell which interpretation is most likely correct. It was further made obvious after the post in round one.
I figured I should link you to this if you feel like I am full of shit.
https://www.mic.com/articles/85201/the-surprising-way-the-netherlands-is-helping-its-disabled-have-sex
For example you could say incels have a severe decline in mental health by not getting laid and now we are talking about a debate on whether the government should pay for prostitutes for incels.
It's that crazy either as some countries were recently debating helping handicapped people get laid with government subsidies for mental health reasons.
That is just one example of how it could go off course and then the debate is you defending subsidized blowjobs for autistic people. If that is what you want to debate, fine. I suspect you have a different way you envision the debate playing out though
Thank you for keeping archives. I will need them if the site goes down. There is a one term limit here and so I can't run again and the candidate I support and whose campaign I secretly run will be advised to keep their distance from me and to openly disavow me.
In this debate, I would as a voter assume shared BOP.
I appreciate that, but my main goal is to have you go on record saying something that could potentially be misconstrued as racist so I can use it to discredit you next presidential election, so my preferred candidate wins
It could just be like a one sentence premise. A bare assertion
You should at least give one premise for your position.
I would prefer you don't use the letter f because I think you are ilon the leaderboard but whatever.
I can beat anybody if they are having a bad day and my meds are being taken
I thought it was good, please ignore the fact that my kid kept yelling star wars when I was doing voice to text and I forgot to delete it later in the post
Doesn't matter, I just fucked him up.
You're welcome. I think you should retry the debate but put tho Holocaust on trial. If the Subject was that, you would have won
Did you noop snipe me you son of a bitch?
It was a very unexpected argument. Did you use the letter f, knowing how superior you are to me?
are you arguing devil's advocate or do you really believe that man on man sex is okay?
It seems disgusting to me. What is attractive about Harry asses?
I just assumed the parameters were the same. Damn it. Lol
Bro you put time for argument as 2 days. I needed one week for a good reason, but I guess I can still just do a minor variation on the other arguments
Do it again. You learned enough about formulating the resolution here to make it really hard to beat you as well as to make sure it stays on the topic you prefer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iYpxRXlboQ
I think your goal his is to convert people. Most of your opponents will be atheists so just helping them find God might be the best path. After you prove God than defending your faith with theists and changing their mind might help the best.
I personally think people would be better off by presupposing a God exists, but the west is so fucked up, that we are basically presupposing the opposite.
I hope you'll find more people here who can at least consider your arguments as well.
I think you did a great job defending your position in the debate and I would agree with you that not all perceived contradictions are actually contradictions.
You have redeemed yourself
The old dude in that video is actually vermin supreme and it is sad you don't know who he is. Fucking learn how to use Google that endorsement wasn't cheap
That almost makes me want to try, but it won't work.
I overestimated my ability to rap.
I am going to forfeit. I don't think you should wast your time coming up with anything if you want. I tried. I spend like 15 hours at work trying to come up with raps and stuff and I just can't. I would also rather use my mind for things that actually make a difference if my mind is going to spend that much time on it
"4:82-Then do they not reflect upon the Qur'an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah , they would have found within it much contradiction"
This is a silly statement. For two reasons. One is that contradiction doesn't mean it's from God. Lots of books have zero contradictions.
Another is that even if contradictions are pointed out than they'll just be explained away by apologists, typically in a stupid way that leaves some doubt as to whether it is contradictory, until a normal person applies Occam's Razor
First mover is a stronger argument than first cause. You should have stuck with that just FYI
I am going to vote on this
Why would his opponent not believing in the Koran, mean he can't use it in an argument?
In your face
Is it cheating to choose passion of the Christ?
My sister is a middle child. I promise you her childhood sucked only mildly less than mine. Youngest sibling has it the easiest
I should have made this 3 rounds. Already losing interest. Wli will still bang something out before I go to sleep
Multiple ways to interpret something is of course true but after you apply common sense, you can tell which interpretation is most likely correct. It was further made obvious after the post in round one.
I will use that. Thanks
Copyright law is pretty clear. Once you write something down it is considered copyrighted material. You were thinking of trademark law
Just to clarify. I have no actual ability to stop votes against me or to get my supporters to do counter vote bombs.
I am the president and I will not accept votes against me for jacking RMs beats
It's a rap battle, of course I will be more votes because I am more gangsta
I also called him a snitch and then he snitched to voters about it. Fell right into my trap
Voting is supposed to be based on who won not your personal morality. If my raps defeat his. Vote me.
I got confused sorry
The first half of that round, doesn't even rhyme.
I will say that it's obvious in context he meant delusional so I wouldn't dock him points for that
your opponents first language isn't English either, so good luck getting voters to care. You guys are on equal ground.
You asked if I think it's a truism. I would say no not a truism. The debate seems fair to me
I figured I should link you to this if you feel like I am full of shit.
https://www.mic.com/articles/85201/the-surprising-way-the-netherlands-is-helping-its-disabled-have-sex
For example you could say incels have a severe decline in mental health by not getting laid and now we are talking about a debate on whether the government should pay for prostitutes for incels.
It's that crazy either as some countries were recently debating helping handicapped people get laid with government subsidies for mental health reasons.
That is just one example of how it could go off course and then the debate is you defending subsidized blowjobs for autistic people. If that is what you want to debate, fine. I suspect you have a different way you envision the debate playing out though
severe decline would be what most of the semantics could come down to, based on what both parties mean by severe.
There isn't anything wrong with semantic debates and maybe your opponent won't care to debate semantics, but I could see it turning into that
It doesn't have to be a kritik but most of these people will argue that way because they don't view anarchist arguments as tenable
This will likely devolve into a semantics debate about what qualifies as essential