Total posts: 2,806
-->
@TWS1405_2
You don’t know the traffic laws, they do
Not always. Lawyers usually know the law better than cops and the supreme court has also ruled cops do not need to know the law in order to enforce it.
I am not a lawyer and their are aspects of the law I probably understand better than a lot of cops.
Either way, it is not to you to question their decisions and/or authority
While true, the best cops I know read the book verbal jujitsu and have an easier time getting cooperation than the cop in this incident did.
Created:
-->
@TWS1405
These idiots actually believe they have a right to question cops doing their job
They do have that right.
When you’re dumb enough to do this and you get yourself killed, you reap what you sow. Your fault, not the cops
At least somewhat of the cop's fault. Mostly the fault of the guy shot, but if I were the cop he would have cooperated with me and I wouldn't have had an issue. Now maybe the cop was a rookie or something but usually these situations can be avoided with a good combination of command presence and common courtesy
Created:
Obviously it is from hillbilly culture, but I think it's fair to call it theirs. I am 20% hillbilly though which makes me the blackest person on this website.
Created:
Posted in:
Well those cops were part of the system.
Created:
-->
@AleutianTexan
Even if white populations are declining, is this something that is bad? Why is it such a negative talking point unless there is some racialized attempt to keep America white, which is the precursor to fascist movements.
I am on a phone and agree with a lot of what you say, so am limiting my response.
I would argue this is bad. We can see what happens with non white societies. They all basically turn into 3rd world shitholes. I think you can even see the same in the United States. When a community goes from predominantly white to predominantly non white. Well then you have Detroit.
Some people would blame liberal policies being to blame not racial demographics, but if you look at New Hampshire for example, it's predominantly white and liberal and they haven't faced the same issues as black liberal communities.
I've always heard the theory as an intentional replacement by the WEF, Jews, Democrats,
I would say the theory is independent of such conclusions, but I have read quite a bit of Jewish periodicals and they seem to all think making European countries, more diverse helps them.
We can also see that maybe Democrats are to blame for some of it as well. For example they know that non whites respond better to identity politics and can play to that, even when it is self contradictory such as with their alliance with conservative Islam and feminists.
The issue with this, like all ideology, is that there is tension within these points. Property has, writ-large, taken precedence over liberty, and this isn't a failed application of liberalism, but simply one iteration.
I think John Locke resolves all of that with his theory of negative and positive rights.
Your conflation with big tech and the Democrats is also inaccurate, so even if you're right that big tech/corporations writ large are subverting liberal (in the philosophical sense)
I think it's reasonable as they seem to respond to liberal talking points and not conservative ones. For example conservatives were more likely to think we should value freedom over public health and they would often be removed from platforms for stating so. Also it appears posts like "kill all whites" or "no life matters until black lives matter" would stay up indefinitely but posts that advocated for political violence on the right would be removed quickly.
It certainly seems like big tech is choosing a side. If you only use the Google search engine, it seems like a very clear liberal bias. Just Google any Democrats name and a bunch of sites making positive statements pop up, do the same with any republican and it's a different story. Even if you aren't leftist enough, they will do it also, as we can see with what happened to Tulsi Gabbard.
It really looks like big tech is picking a side here.
Created:
-->
@AleutianTexan
I think the Democrats, as a whole, are still supporters of liberal democracy.
Democracy maybe, liberalism definitely not. You have companies like Google and Twitter who have shown a hatred for liberalism by attacking it's values of free speech. Those liberal values can't just be enshrined in law but also have to be cultural to actually have stuff like a free market of ideals.
The university's which are raising the next generation are hiveminds that openly discourages diversity of thought.
As far as white replacement theory is concerned. My understanding is that it is a theory that whites are slowly and unintentionally being replaced with non whites through things such as immigration to white countries being encouraged while immigration of whites to non predominantly white countries don't happen. Whites choosing to reproduce less etc. Maybe my understanding of the theory is incorrect, but if it is correct and those talking about it seems to just talk about those points, why do you think that whites will retain being the majority in the United States, indefinitely?
Created:
-->
@AleutianTexan
Perhaps you have a point. Unless something changes the options seem to be rightwing authoritarianism or some fucked up form of Maoism/Marxism. So at this point it is just aligning with the side you think is less likely to specifically genocide you. I am white, so I lean towards hoping the totalitarians on that side win
Created:
-->
@AleutianTexan
No. The cover-up justifies further action if the goal of the Republican party (once again, as a party and not the individual goals of certain individuals) is to subvert liberal democracy. If that's the goal, then we're lost no matter what. If that isn't the goal, only a risk ignoring the event doesn't further radicalize the Republicans and allows us to come back to a central point.
Liberal Democracy isn't as good as it's made out to be. It wouldn't necessarily be a total loss.
Created:
-->
@AleutianTexan
How would it further political divide to do a full investigation so that way the answers can be clear cut and unanimous?
Wouldn't it further divide more by behaving in a manner consistent with what those engaged in a cover up would do?
Created:
Posted in:
Badger
2. Best.korea
3. Pie
4 . Meowcat (AKA cat ranger)
5. Mharman
6. Supadudz
7. Austin
8. Lunatic
9. Earth
I never know when you guys when randomly go inactive so will rush this out today. If anyone else wants to join they are welcome to do so up until the point the game starts.
The only thing I have to do before starting the game is do my rap battle with RM
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
1. Badger
2. Best.korea
3. Pie
4 . Meowcat (AKA cat ranger)
5. Mharman
6. Supadudz
7. Austin
8. Lunatic
9.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
But if your reason is expecting an easy win, you have no one to blame but yourself
They always underestimate me to their own detriment. I remember hearing Dolly Parton joke about a similar attitude towards her that helped her outsmart everyone around her and win.
Created:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/demon
Created:
It creates a society of a lot of single young males, which contributes to a lot of violence and political turmoil
Created:
Posted in:
Feminists would get their ass kicked because those are men
Created:
-->
@Reece101
No...
Created:
-->
@Reece101
Just PM me your articles of impeachment and I will pass them on to the mods. #trusttheprocess
Created:
Posted in:
I am a dumb ass though. I don't know any better
Created:
Posted in:
Not yet. I got to make sure it is okay with the people I promised it to first and smooth that ober duh
Created:
Posted in:
Can you please stop making those gross statements about your own children.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
I do appreciate that. Thank you
Created:
Posted in:
Apparently this is controversial so I am going to donate the money if both these people refuse to contact me soon and I will provide evidence
Created:
Posted in:
I don't think either of the people who won will give a shit if I just donate the $75 to the site. I will give each a couple of days to contact me
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
He has made me rescind the offer for meep votes or offer it to everybody. Thanks for setting up road blocks to the site's success
Created:
-->
@Reece101
No we can't Donald trump
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Dude I said you are welcome for the free win because the debate we had that I forfeited just ended. It obviously wasn't a bribe.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@badger
My phone screen is too small it might crash it
Created:
Posted in:
I will contact grey parrot if Mikal does not contact me I will donate his money
Created:
Posted in:
You guys really don't get it. Ask your President why he moved the mods to let up my ban early, while complaining I keep people from joining, while trying to increase membership?
I thought your ban was unfair. Besides that it was a test case to see how much the mods would respect my input. They impressed me.
I don't recall saying you scare people off. My plan would actually be to crowd out the less productive members with new incoming members.
I actually wish you would unblock me also, it makes advocating for you a lot harder if there is no line of communication.
In short. I don't think people should be banned for lying or understanding a situation differently from somebody else. I don't think a member should be banned because I don't like them.
I like you, but if I didn't it still wouldn't be a good reason to not advocate on your behalf.
I must say I am very embarrassed though because I was a dick towards Ragnar or about Ragnar for the ban. Even prior to getting elected I gave him shit for banning you and then when I succeed at changing the minds of mods and getting you unbanned you come out and I think are intentionally trying to get banned.
I have already had to apologize to Barney and admit I was an idiot for advocating on your behalf. Your behavior after you were unbanned has no doubt made my job of advocating for future banned members even harder.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
give it to the patreon then, I am fine if this shithole burns down. The leadership is corrupt to its core at this point and the admin is never updating it for almost 2 years or whatever.
This community is not dependent on the site. I think the community is fine here and hopefully dart keeps up with the times so it continues to be the best option .
We have already created a community discord so we can communicate off this site to bring people together if anything happens as well.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
How tf did I miss that? Wylted, if you do this, I swear I will sabotage every one of your MEEP's.
That wouldn't surprise me you tried to sabotage the election
Created:
Posted in:
Damn, we should definitely discourage people using money to improve the site guys.
Created:
-->
@Public-Choice
Electing mods is a terrible ideal as we can see from how this election was almost a disaster
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
Whiteflame saw the vermin supreme video before. It got posted to dart.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
Agreed. Curious to see whether any action will be taken.
Not only is it not a violation of any rule, but I am going to announce winners for every single meep where people vote the way I want them to and if I can convince mods to do the meep of all meeps when the other meeps I want go through, I will be giving one lucky winner a free toy Yoda.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Make a new thread, so people trying to avoid the drama in that thread see it
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
HOW CAN YOU SAY THIS ISN'T BRIBERY NOW?
Dude old news, vermin supreme announced this when he endorsed me. You should have watched the video you could have voted me and been in the pool.
Created:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
What the fuck did any of that have to do with fasting?
Created:
-->
@GnosticChristianBishop
Jesus drove out demons with prayer and fasting
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Ramshutu
Yes 2 winners from qualified votes
$50 from a general pool of voters and $25 just for people who voted me. If both winners come from my voters or are the same person, it is a risk I am wilyto take
Created:
Posted in:
Because it's debatable as to whether they were merely voters or a major part of my campaign which helped me to win
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Sir.Lancelot
I appreciate that and I will be moving phase 2 closer to the present because of how fast the site is decaying
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@sadolite
Which comments are you referring to? This thread is 27pages long.
First page. Badger has shared with us that he is well endowed.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@AustinL0926
I missed you. Also what are you doing on Thursday around 1pm eastern time?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
The American 2nd amendment article is for if the American government got out of control. The 2nd amendment people aren't talking about foreign invasion though having an armed populace would certainly help against that
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
It is a lie, an illusion. With current tech and training levels, the military of any developed nationwould annihilate all populace in any developed nation.
You can't respond with military force to civilians the same way you can against foreign invaders and countries
Created:
Posted in:
Or maybe those with guns in Yemen can't be touched by the government because cops trying to enforce the law will be shot.
A lot of this is not about preventing tyranny of the government on the country as much as making sure that government tyranny doesn't touch your family, not without bureaucrats facing a dangerous situation if they want to harm their people anyway
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheUnderdog
Simple. Yemen people want a tyrannical government. Those who don't and have guns out in the middle of the Appalachian mountains, may be harder to subject to tyrannical laws.
Created: