Total posts: 2,806
Reading problems are problems of reading. That is how English works. No contention on that. If you don't understand how English works, maybe I can send you some resources.
Yes same meaning, that's why I understood it. I am criticizing the retarded way you worded it. "Problems of reading" is not correct. It's how a non native English speaker would construct the sentence. A lot of languages construct sentences that way, particularly latin based languages. It's not normal for a native English speaker to form sentences that way.
It's actually so unnatural to form sentences that way, only a retard who thinks it makes him sound smarter will go out of their way to form sentences like that
Created:
. Being able to understand external individuals is definitely useful, both emotionally and even semantically.
Another stupid wording. All individuals are external the rest is written stupid as well
Created:
At this point I am almost certain that you don't want to understand me.
I never said I don't understand you. I am telling you how judges interpret this stupid wording and no not all judges will comprehend you. This isn't about my comprehension, but judges who a lot may be embarrassed to admit they have difficulty understanding your stupid sentence construction.
I wouldn't normally give somebody shit for this but I am pretty sure you are a native English speaker who should know better
Created:
Not even I understand what Ebuc writes. Nobody does except for seemingly him.
On the other hand, almost all the site members can understand me, except for you. If you have any problems of reading, tell me.
The last sentence should read
"If you have reading problems, tell me"
Not problems of reading. Come on man. This is how people speak when they are making fun of native Americans. Clean this shit up
Created:
Here is an example from a recent debate
The riddance of guns will inevitably reduce the amount of destruction caused by the human race.
This could be written in a lot less stupid ways that won't annoy judges below is a suggestion
Eliminating guns would reduce the amount of damage caused to humans. I
In the above statement you did it again. I will quote you.
If you do have a diagnosed reading disability, then tell me. I will attempt to facilitate the direction of my text so they can be interpreted with ease.
Stupid wording again to make your writing appear alien, not flow naturally and harder to comprehend. It should be written as follows
"If you do have a reading ability, let me know so I can make the text more understandable"
You see how I say the same thing as you, but I don't do it in a retarded way?
Now I will fix your post section by section
However, throwing an internet tantrum over what someone else has written as short as this, that can be possibly avoided in trade of a clearer atmosphere in this already small and expected-to-be clean webspace, unless you also have anger issues diagnosed also.
Nevermind. This is too stupid. This is a really stupidly worded phrase and almost certainly does not get the point across you are trying to make.
Created:
-->
@Intelligence_06
So far, nobody else has said anything about how anything I have written on this side is arduous enough worthy of complaining. Maybe it is your problem, not mine.
People are polite and they don't say it about ebuc either and ebuc writes things like below
Truth -+*==^ banana
Your posts aren't as bad as ebuc's but it's the same sort of thing
Created:
Eh… no comment on that. You can live yours, and I should be able to live mine.
So I assume this means
"You can live your life and I will live my life"
This is the issue with your writing problems and is a direct result of some sort of cognitive impairment.
The comment is out of the blue, unrelated to the previous comment or any comment I made and the "no comment" is likely a response to having comprehension issues when reading things.
Created:
My understanding in fact is that the triple 9 society has previously had a lot of issues because the members of it kept calling each other stupid and proselytizing about their views.
Created:
"No, I lost that debate purely because I wasn't funny enough and I didn't see the hidden objective till R2. Humor is subjective and if they don't consider it funny, maybe it is not."
I am speaking in general
"And I am not trying to be stupid, nor am I one. Just for clarification. "
This obscure wording is what I am talking about LOL. It's going to cause comprehension issues for judges.
"Most smart people don't just call other people stupid, and Hawking does not brag about his IQ."
Some smart people do call people stupid. I usually only do it when a low IQ person fancies themselves as smart though.
Created:
You really are terrible though. The average voter on this site really can't set aside bias, and your score is representative of how many debates you start and go uncontested or barely contested. Don't think I have not noticed you have failed to win against a single competent opponent.
Nearly every single opinion you have is stupid so perhaps I can debate you sometime. At the moment ai am fully invested in debating idreamofliberty
Created:
1. I just noticed you were blocking me. Grow a pair of balls and grow up.
2. You suck at debating and deserve a low ELO
The reason for this is that you have a very disconnected way of thinking. You also will say stuff in weird ways that could be said without losing meaning in less retarded ways, obviously judges will punish this for you. Your IQ barely reaches 3 digits which makes it hard for you to be creative with arguments as well as reduces your ability to comprehend what your opponents are stating.
If you want votes on your debates do the following
1. Stop making them absolute dog shit to read
2. Debate topics people actually give a shit about
3. Debate subjects that aren't played out.
You are welcome
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Polytheist-Witch
A lot of the electric vehicle companies realize this and are making SUV type vehicles fortunately. We'll see changes to this starting next year
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
Your argument is silly. The decide between who is willing and indeed able to spend more money than necessary is not a gender line it is a class line.
I refuse to believe you are mentally retarded and don't realize that there are some things women spend more money on such as nail polish and beauty supplies and some things men spend more on such as cars and fishing poles.
I refuse to believe you are retarded enough to think class lines are the most influential thing in these matters.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
Roughly half of all people are "ladies". Your argument doesn't therefore hold water.
Couples often make buying decisions together, particularly when purchasing cars that they might be sharing. Also men are more willing to spend extra money on vehicles and since electric vehicles and hybrids are more expensive than traditional vehicles it means the main demographic for electric/hybrids is men.
It makes more financial sense to market Tesla's to douchebags as a status symbol than to market faggy hybrid vehicles to men who care much more about not being faggy than they do saving on fuel costs
Created:
In/
Created:
Posted in:
It's because everybody knows EVs are cool as shit and hybrids are for ladies.
No bullshit. I would drive a Tesla but never be caught dead in some gay ass hybrid
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
I would reckon you are an ENFP, personally.
I am definitely introverted. I am extroverted when it comes to things that require it. Like if ai have a sales or management job, I behave extroverted.
If I do have a team of managers under me I basically do close myself in and manage in a way more conducive to my personal style if I can. For example allowing myself to be introverted and craft plans instead of acting like a field general.
So if I have managers under me I behave in a more discreet way. I make sure they carry out my will, allowing me to be more introverted. I of course have learned over the years that if I walk into a place, I get one on one time with every single subordinate, but other than just making sure they are all okay, I pretty much let my managers take charge.
I do express the F side of me on here more because it is a side of me I resent in real life and this is my only outlet. So it's understandable you would see me that way.
It's probably got me in trouble not expressing the F side in real life. For example. I have a knack for acquiring jobs I don't deserve. Perhaps it is a general manager job at a quick service restaurant or an assistant manager at a diner.perhaps I get a job as a manager managing several mantainance teams like I got a few months ago but quit.
So I get great opportunities, and even when I start at the bottom I am usually promoted to a better position really quickly.
Because I am trying so hard to repress that F side of me though, if I do crack. Even just a little bit and my peers see it I quit. It doesn't matter if I kept up the facade for 3 weeks or 5 years. The second the facade is cracked or I think my facade of perfectly logical and rational is cracked, I quit.
It's causing a real strain on my relationship to constantly be going from reasonably high paying job to entry level and back to high paying but then back to no job for 3 months.
So the conversation at home goes like this
Wife "why did you quit this time"
Me "I lost my cool for a second and they heard the frustration in my voice at something"
Wife "so what you punched somebody and they were going to fire you"
Me" No, but now they see me as a human being with emotions and real leaders don't lead with emotion but with winning strategies. Empathy is the only emotion I am allowed"
Wife ",call them back and tell them you take back quitting they have been begging you to come back"
Me"conversation over I applying for the car wash down the street now and we will have to tighten out belts"
It's a vicious cycle, and I can't get over it. It's almost as vicious as the cycle where I don't allow myself negative feelings so I lie to avoid awkward conversations or if I get the wrong order at a restaurant I just eat it anyway because complaining is too awkward and Then I never eat at the place again.
The perfectionism and running away from anxiety are seriously destroying my life. I think I am getting better though.
Created:
-->
@RationalMadman
Why would somebody tell you, you are not INTP.
I am INTP, and I assure you. I can't tell who in this forum is an INTP. You seriously can't tell unless you live with the person or something and then maybe not then
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
Can you provide some actual evidence that any of the things you listed made a noticable difference? Cause it sounds like you are just parroting talking points you heard on Fox news with no idea what you're talking about.
Why are you asking grey parrot to make an argument for why having less supply of oil would cause prices in oil to rise? Have you seriously never heard of supply and demand?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@secularmerlin
Perhaps... or perhaps there are in excess of 9000 drilling permits already not being used amd the industry is simply always willing to take advantage of any shortage (or supposed shortage) to aquire more permits to hoard against the future.
Nope, too costly to get permits. They aren't going to act against their own financial interests.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Double_R
What would Trump have done to prevent these should be have won in 2020? (Be specific and explain the actual impact)
H
We do have Oil reserves, Trump would have released them to drop prices push through more off shore drilling. Also coal to oil is an idea that would work with gas prices this high and was successfully tested out as far back as WW2 . This would be a big hit for his base in places like West Virginia.
Trump would have also done stuff like eliminate all taxes on gas as much as humanly possible and he would have intimidated governor's into doing the same. Trump would have taken over a new country in the middle east of he had to, to fix this mess.
I think you know that Trump is more willing to do things to end this than any establishment Democrats, and this is a disingenuous argument from you.
I also think that had Trump been in office, Russia knowing this guy was libel to nuke them, wouldn't have invaded Ukraine and would have had to have sanctions on them that are also driving up oil prices for much of the western world.
If Trump was reelected Gas would still be below $3 a gallon. If he gets elected in 2024, gas prices will drop to $3 a gallon. Everyone knows Biden is not running again, but if him or Kamala Harris win the white house, Gas is going to hit $10 a gallon.
A liberal insider even states it's part of the plan of Washington insiders. He wrote a book called something like "why $20 a gallon is coming, and why that's a good thing".
Granted inflation was coming either way with all the stimulus money, but the gas prices wouldn't have moved that much and a lot of the inflation present is due to the increase in gas prices.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
i read the above statement backwards and switched the L for the N. Yes that is infuriating and I have not only had supervisors that way, but thats pretty typical of any supervisor over 50 years old
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
Luddite (L): Why did you do that?Normal Person (N): Because you told me to.L: I'd never do that.N: 15 minutes ago, and I disagreed so wrote down your exact instructions as we talkedL: Well I didn't mean for you to do that.N: Follow your instructions?L: *huffs* Well don't do that again!
Why did you give him incorrect instructions?
I have experienced this a lot when training trainers. I will explain in my experience what leads to the above type of situation.
Me "Joe teach Sarah how to make a medium steak"
Joe proceeds to show Sarah the timer and grill cover used to help make a medium steak. Sarah proceeds to make many fucked up steaks because the steaks vary and thickness and shape and it was never explained to her.
Joe "Why did you overcook that medium steak"
Sarah " I felt it was overcooked based on my culinary training, but you told me to rely completely on a timer"
Joe " Well I didn't mean that"
9 times out of ten when this happens it is because the trainer was less than thorough and gave directions without mentioning every possible variable that could mean deviation.
Another possible situation I have seen is an employee who was told to always drop 6 chicken strips in the fryer any time a chicken strip order was made. It's an adult restaurant so 1 out of every 40 orders for the strips are for kids meals that just need 4 strips. The idiot trainer just gave a rule of thumb though instead of an extremely thorough training.
Whenever you train you want to be extremely thorough, point out every possible contingency and go forward. Even when I was managing Wendy's. I saw a lot of trainers 99% teach new crew to just use the timer for fries to know when they are done. That's not how you do it. You can't maintain quality standards that way, so I would have to retrain the trainer (I trained my managers correctly so not my fault here).
You basically use the timer as a hint that is 99% accurate and you examine the fries before pulling them up to make sure they are golden brown, crispy and floating towards the top. I would bring up several pictures in training manuals or just that I took myself to display how to visually tell what I mean by golden brown. Same with the cookies that were baked throughout the day. My subordinates trained by showing what timers, I trained by thoroughly explaining quality standards and how to achieve them.
It sounds like you were training a guy how to use computers that likely sucks with using computers. In this situation they are obviously going to take everything you say very literally. Seeing as how they suck at computers they will assume their own common sense is wrong so they will refuse to deviate from your instructions no matter what as a type of safety crutch.
I know it can be absurd when you say "Always start by logging into the computer" and there was a power outage in the middle of the night so they need to actually start by turning on the computer, but they refuse to cut it on because it deviates from instructions. It's kinda your job as a trainer though to be that thorough where they at the very least know they need to come directly to you if they see anything out of the ordinary.
We also have autistic people in general who will take your advice very literally and won't use or can't use common sense to deviate from the training when everyone else would intuitively know to.
If it isn't your job to train and you kinda just had the new guy pushed on you, probably not your fault the organization fucked up, but you should still be understanding. I've just trained a bunch of people personally in a variety of fields so I know what patterns to look for when it comes to having a person be a skilled trainer.
Do you know how every company you start with has videos that really break down for people how to not be racist or how not to sexually harass people. The videos try to take into account every possible detail on how not to do that, because the creators are skilled trainers and know people come from a variety of backgrounds with a range of intelligence and common sense, so they have to spend 3 hours really breaking down how to do what is common sense for people with any sort of experience.
It's the same way with on the job training. With me personally. I just don't stop training. There is so much depth to every job and it's just going to make your job as a leader easier when your subordinates are not guessing what to do, because they have the proper training
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@RationalMadman
@Mharman
yeah, mharman can have it. I don't want to beg users to join it and then be plagued by inactivity
Created:
Posted in:
What if the boss just accidentally trained you incorrectly. Hell, if it wasn't the boss and he assigned you a trainer, technically you still should not deviate even an iota from what your trainer has taught you. Perhaps his trainer taught him that, in which case it was unethical to even point out to him there was an easier way
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
I had a boss tell me to commit insurance fraud after a hurricane hit. The only time i dont follow orders is when I am the one giving them
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
He was scum, so he contributed to the town loss as well
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Lunatic
As scum I can tell you it was mostly the fact that they kept talking themselves out of lynches for dumb reasons. They had a pretty good collective town block
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@FLRW
Tell the 5 names you think weren't atheists. Was one Eugene O'Neill?
Jean Paul Sartre
Richard Feynman
Etc
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
No u
Yes, I may make a thread about it
Created:
Posted in:
This is why a lot of people become atheists. They see a bunch of people with good reasoning ability not believe in a God, and since they are stupid, but want to appear smart, they just copy their beliefs without giving it serious thought.
I have to tell you though. I recognized at least 5 names on that list, that were not atheist
Created:
-->
@ILikePie5
I got a gf
Are you trying to ruin your life?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@ILikePie5
I am about to move to or very close to a Cherokee reservation. Our those people non violent?
I know the reservations have problems with crimes a lot, but that doesn't affect me outside of one would it?
Created:
Posted in:
This talk about GP is ridiculous. Our brain makes calculations quicker than what super computers are capable of and we often times have no way of vocalizing those calculations in a competent way.
If you town read somebody and they have a gut feeling one of your null reads is scum, that is enough reason to lynch the person. They don't need to give you justification, justification contrived because they don't even know what calculations their subconscious made
Created:
Posted in:
1. Mharman
2. Rational madman
3. That2 user
4. Pie
5. Sir anonymous
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Mharman
Thanks, I am not going to recruit too hard, but I will keep this up for about 7 days to see where interest is.
Created:
Posted in:
You guys knew I was scum before I started the game. This is what frustrates me when I am town. Town talks themselves out of lynches. That's why when people tell me
"No need to rush the lynch, let's get their claim"
It pisses me off. Yes there is a need to rush lynches, so town does not start hamstering and finding excuses for why scum is not scum
Created:
Posted in:
I said it in the scum chat and I will say it here. That2user is scum mvp
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Barney
This is directly asking about using Ctrl+F instead of printing lengthy spreadsheets to go over it by hand... This was one issue which the parent corporation sided with me on. I got the company best practices upgraded to my standard.
What if her boss legit told her to do it the stupid way instead of using control F though?
Personally I think even if it is perceived as malicious compliance, you should never really deviate from the boss's plan
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@That2User
We can get a whiteflame lynch this DP, no need to give up. GP is fine. Seriously Danielle might be scum trying to derail a whiteflame lynch
Created:
Posted in:
Badger makes sense. I may have been a little too hot on the button
Unvote
Created:
Posted in:
Actually this makes sense. My role kinda balances Mr Chris's if he is scum. Let's do this
vTL wylted
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@whiteflame
A hunter is actually an extension of lylo. In a situation of something like 2 town members, one Mafia than a mislynch isn't as big of a deal.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SirAnonymous
Bro. You should have never claimed that. God man. Come on. We can't mislynch at all now.
I need to reread the DPs. Somebody should be standing out as scum now that we know a few people's affiliations for a fact
Created: