The salt is primarily yours both while you were losing and even while winning. That is why you are talking about it everywhere and now assume I would grudge against you instead of the user that votebombed me in that debate.
I do not care about this discussion, I just find your understanding of revenge and feelings are rather low EQ. That translates into why you cannot comprehend how vile drugs are to communities and the emotional distress of it.
You have absolutely no idea what freedom of speech is. You are trying to oppress my freedom to report votes which if you think 'speech' is any action, means you are a complete hypocrite.
A voting moderator caved in and altered vote to appease a debater badgering them to do so.
If I had done the same as my opponent did and a voter altered their vote (and asked wylted to vote for me on top), whiteflame would temporarily ban me. This is beyond disgusting double standards.
The vote does not explain why arguments were tied.
Please vote and please be fair with rule 2, I was genuinely busy, it was literally Christmas Eve and Christmas and I forgot the exact hour of this debate.
I think what's ashame is a coward needing such severe time restriction to hold their own. This guy has no real life distractions near Christmas clearly.
I am finished and it's up to you how to punish me.
For the purposes of moderation you need to make debates in English or a language the mods explicitly state they can understand. This is an English-speaking website primarily especially for official debates.
To understand how deeply wrong and unnatural it is for all slim-built people to teach grappling over striking, you need to understand what their builds excel at vs are shit-tier at.
You cannot ever teach this woman to be this good at grappling:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SYYzsyJCiQ
choreographed violence is not more artificial than rule-restricted MMA that is grappling-supremacist.
you whined to him relentlessly and have @'d me so much you actually have spammed me more than anyone in this website's history.
please vote. if willing.
You are irritating me with being like 20 out of the past 20something notifications I have had.
You are blocked for now, ty.
The salt is primarily yours both while you were losing and even while winning. That is why you are talking about it everywhere and now assume I would grudge against you instead of the user that votebombed me in that debate.
I do not care about this discussion, I just find your understanding of revenge and feelings are rather low EQ. That translates into why you cannot comprehend how vile drugs are to communities and the emotional distress of it.
You have absolutely no idea what freedom of speech is. You are trying to oppress my freedom to report votes which if you think 'speech' is any action, means you are a complete hypocrite.
What did you mean by my old profile?
Does Lancelot's reason for sources hold up? Is that all it takes to justify a sources vote?
Nobody has stopped Lancelot's free speech nor will they stop your tantrum or mine. Free speech has nothing to do with corrupt votes.
I could whine like a bitch at lancelot too about his bs reasoning.
You are so new to the website you cannot format yet for years you have stalked my profile. Odd.
Why did you change your arguments vote based on comments? It makes 0 sense, your rfd is the same...
I report lancelot's vote, please attend fast.
What is a guilt trap? I voted against you.
You told me if I do it I am on final warning to get banned, on PMs. I know you said it to me regarding the MC vs RM debate.
Barney has caved in to defy his interpretation of the debate to appease someone as he is scared of drama.
A voting moderator caved in and altered vote to appease a debater badgering them to do so.
If I had done the same as my opponent did and a voter altered their vote (and asked wylted to vote for me on top), whiteflame would temporarily ban me. This is beyond disgusting double standards.
The vote does not explain why arguments were tied.
Free speech and vote corruption are two different things.
is a debater allowed to frame a request to vote as this:
"drop a vote for me if you can lol"
It's also a very effective way to end up as hated as Novice is.
Careful why?
I enjoy it.
This debate may interest you especially as I can see it will be high quality.
Please follow.
https://halalhmc.org/resources/definition-of-halal this is my source for the last quote, my bad I didn't post it.
FF please vote, TY.
please vote. thanks if you do.
you blocked me, can't accept and why the fuck would i want to do 30k char rounds to an abusive shit who talks ill of autistic people and tells this:
https://www.debateart.com/debates/4014/comment-links/48551
you are a joke.
That is not 'AI'. Please paste the instances before I asked it that he has said 'AI' inside of this.
He is a known troll that likes to fuck around. I had every reason to ask if he meant AI or AL.
he posted that 1 minute before you said he'd already said 'AI'.
where did he say that, please copy and paste it
You have written upper case A with lowercase L
AL or AI?
ff pls vote ty
yes and no. I thought about this on and off, I like the opening round, the bulk will be in rebuttals.
Debate is over, skip to last Round.
https://www.debateart.com/profiles/Sir.Lancelot/medals?type=gold
Please earn a gold medal before the election or you won't be eligible regardless of date joining.
Please vote and please be fair with rule 2, I was genuinely busy, it was literally Christmas Eve and Christmas and I forgot the exact hour of this debate.
I think what's ashame is a coward needing such severe time restriction to hold their own. This guy has no real life distractions near Christmas clearly.
I am finished and it's up to you how to punish me.
You can ignore anything you want to ignore and assume things aren't a big deal that are.
You can inform this user.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct5E72lu_Ic
you better be ready boy
For the purposes of moderation you need to make debates in English or a language the mods explicitly state they can understand. This is an English-speaking website primarily especially for official debates.
Thanks
FF pls vote ty
I accept your input as valid if some day the grappler can surpass the skilled locking, blocking and striking.
They better hope it all stays 1v1 for their grappling to be useful.
You actually could have fleshed out your troll angle to have a legitimate parody case.
Entertaining nonetheless
Novice is the Niemann
It is a 3 round debate in practise with semantics left for wide play. That is how it is meant to go down.
This dude is the Niemann of this website. Oromagi is the Carlsen and I am the Nakamura.
There is nothing about this that is sabotage? He FF'd. He is actually the one who should be ashamed here, thanks for the bullshit accusation.
k_michael's vote is 100% corrupt
I will just show you in the debate the harsh reality of why we handcuff people in custody and don't need to full-body restrict them generally.
you know what i will have to just risk missing this if it's dragged to a certain day (actually not Christmas).
To understand how deeply wrong and unnatural it is for all slim-built people to teach grappling over striking, you need to understand what their builds excel at vs are shit-tier at.
You cannot ever teach this woman to be this good at grappling:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SYYzsyJCiQ
choreographed violence is not more artificial than rule-restricted MMA that is grappling-supremacist.