RationalMadman

I did, by proving that the PSA has absolutely no deontological relevance at all, it's just theatre.

However, if you didn't get that from reading what I wrote, it is clear I have to alter my writing style to be easier digested by a certain type of thinker but how to do that is beyond me.

we both know how corrupt you are about respecting descriptions.

add an extension to the title to be 'regarding God being omnibenevolent' and I will accept.

I am curious what you think I did or didn't to to use the christian framework against Pro.

I am also curious how you read the entire opening to my Round 2.

Until you answer this, I cannot give you what you're looking for, it's there and you're not perceiving it so me quoting it will achieve nothing.

If you are willing, I would be intrigued by your votes.

I not only gave alternative framework at the start of my Round 2, I actively pointed out how Christianity itself abhors and outlaws judging one for the sins or atonement of another.

I annihilated him from every possible angle and do n9t care if you cannot see it, this debate was raw brutal strategic dominance by me. Those that see it gained my respect here.

Round 2. My first round I am allowed to rebut his framework due to the description banning rebuttals in round 1.

ROUND 2 BECAUSE IF i did it in Round 1 it counts as rebuttal and violates the structure in desc

FF please vote

He agreed it was god using a human puppet avatar.

And he says it, therefore it must be true. What I say at the start of Round 2 should be ignored. Got it.

I twisted it back in Round 2 because I was not allowed to rebuke in Round 1.

Both voters for me saw me doing that.

Protestants believe the Bible itself is above any one human's authoritative interpretation, I see nowhere this debate is limited to orthodox. You are lying.

I do not care. Dumb voters are part of the game. I am just saddened as two competent voters got my hopes up.

How is it irrelevant that we have no real idea if Jesus is god himself playing a role, Lucifer or some new son?

Can you tell me how my Round 1 and Round 2 do not do the very things you say they fail to do?

I can show you explicitly where I explain how the sacrifice was fake etc.

I could not have made it clearer without ruining readability and reducing other aspects of my case. What a shame.

I worry for your reading comprehension skills. What you say is lacking is absolutely there even in my Round 1, let alone 2.

I expected no more competence than I got.

What is Ramshutu's hot take on this free win debate being allowed?

Thanks for the feedback.

This is not the way to handle it. Stop discussing the PM contents and mods please be alert.

Stop your games novice.

If you understand what Senators and House Representatives are, as well as governors, a lot becomes clearer about how the US is a democracy.

What is it you want from me? A concession or sympathy?

Okay, I feel the same about Pro with my arguments.

He is arguing that it is not pure mob rule enough for his liking.

I felt it was irrelevant as something does not need to be an extreme democracy to be a democracy the definitions spoke for themselves there.

It is up to you and other voters to decide if I made a mistake or Pro did.

Please vote, thanks.

I have just defeated misterchris in a debate against Christianity.

Do not blame me for your flawed thuglike religion being what it is. Be happy, since if my irl identity is revealed and yours is revealed, only I will get death threats.

please see below my typo, I'll correct it in Round 2

" prefer you to become a transwoman then demand"

major error, I meant 'than' not 'then'.

Ty for your vote

It counts as FF not just 40%+

I have the artists and links for the right track, wrong title. Apologies.

I am sorry, the song is dead shall rise, as linked to. In my diss.

You are unblocked

Bump

You are the one with debates about letting children watch porn, if I were you I'd back away suggesting things that anyone can see is false about me, you already look like a prick.

The fact you make it sexual says more about you than anyone doing it.

Who said I think it's okay lol.

I just noticed a ridiculous attack when Asians spank their children harder and far more often than Americans do.

Spanking has been most integral to Asian cultures. Nice try at a jibe, moron.

K means attacking assumptions in the resolution/title.

Non-issue in what sense? I argue that both are challenging cisgender norms but the the transgender movement challenges it by conforming to it inversely while genderqueers completely defy the roles genuinely.

A Transman mimics male characteristics to play a man's role, similar with Transwomen and the woman's role.

Correct in a way, the Nazi's foremost enemy would be social democrats on balance but of course this could be argued to be socialists/communists, anarchists, humanitarians, lgbtq and their rights advocates disabled and their rights advocates, jews and their rights advocates.

The ideology clash is the key in this debate. It is a shame you were blocked or I may have successfully snared you but the voters could see that either way.

I have a different perspective on which of them is the problem but sure.

You are unblocked, you can now accept the debate. Ensure you understand what you have agreed to in the description.

No, I am not an arrogant fool. I can lose this, I want the drop to be recoverable by beating the similar rating that beat me (or the rating to be so high the loss is lesser)

I tweaked the term to be position/movement

It is the other movement that's the threat to the other, you have it backwards. They are reinforcing patriarchy and gender norms backwards.

To explain more would spoil my Round 1.

Try and strawman.

By the way I am with the they/them movement.

Okay... There is not a limit to the debates you can do at once and if there was, it wouldn't be 1.

Fancy a high rated debate clash?