The likelihood that your vote is corrupt increases, not decreases, the more that you allow previous vote scores to determine whether you bother to land your vote a certain way or not.
The least corrupt way to vote is to vote hard and fast, before you know or care how likely or unlikely it is that this debater will beat you in the finals and how well they sway voters.
“Everything in life can be taken away from you and generally will be at some point. Your wealth vanishes, the latest gadgetry suddenly becomes passé, your allies desert you. But if your mind is armed with the art of war, there is no power that can take that away. In the middle of a crisis, your mind will find its way to the right solution. Having superior strategies at your fingertips will give your maneuvers irresistible force. As Sun-tzu says, “Being unconquerable lies with yourself.”
― Robert Greene, The 33 Strategies Of War
“Always try to lower the other side’s sense of urgency. Make your enemies think they have all the time in the world; when you suddenly appear at their border, they are in a slumbering state, and you will easily overrun them. While you are sharpening your fighting spirit, always do what you can to blunt theirs.”
― Robert Greene, The 33 Strategies Of War
Unlike the other big dogs, I have experienced the pain of what I feel is undeserved defeat over and over. This is but part of the battle-hardening necessary for a champion who isn't planning to run 98-1.
As for the job interview, I don't believe in wishing good luck if I don't need to. For all I know it's a job that isn't the one you end up enjoying vs other potential timelines. So, I wish you to do your best and endure defeat like I am here or win like a champion.
no but you can upload a link/URL if you really wanted you could make it ok for both debaters to have a list of external URLs outside of the debate, in order to go around the character count.
Tinyurl is one of the best URL shorterners out there because it has permanent codes for the URLs. Some of them make temporary codes that later can be recycled for another longer URL (very dangerous actually).
I'd concede the 'energy' point sooner if Novice had posted a round 1, I set it up so that there was ample distraction down the energy line to make Novice not realise how deadly the 'time' angle was, which is exactly what happened. Thanks for voting.
it is bad conduct for me to bring up brand new points about the difference between amazon rating system in a round so late into the debate.
I didn't want to dig into an entirely irrelevant point but sure, you got the grudge out of your system. Just know that the lower that my rating is when you lose against me, the bigger the hit to your rating.
In formal debating, all the round earther needs to do is use NASA, elon musk and spacex and they will win. There is no winnong strategy fpr the flat earthwr that can outweigh the authority of NASA.
Given that you're against one of the biggest trolls of the history of this community (even before this website began) and that you don't know how frowned upon semantic traps like this are here (more so than debate.org which was the site we migrated from) I'll let it be and not talk more about it.
I don't even hate what you did, not only objectively but even subjectively as I was the type who'd do absolutely anything within the rules to win, no matter how annoying it was, I'm annoying and cunning when I want to be. However, I can tell you that the reason I stopped it is largely a result of realising that voters punish it here or at the very least grow bored of it. You would have done better on the old website as the voters and group who were active there were much more pro-troll-debate than the ones active now.
Stick solely to the word 'raise' (as opposed to care for AND raise ) and I'm more open to accepting it but I will wait as I want a better idea of your ability and style to know how to predict and counter you.
This has becomes ridiculous to read, to be honest. I have no clue how to even vote on a debate like this as they both have a legitimate reason to say their resolution is the real one.
They never said the current format doesnt include video debating via URL. Your Kritik was ridiculous but they never pointed that out as they never posted a R2
Your question is angled so that either I was political debater or I was 'some random'. If your question is if I have alt accounts that use this website, the answer is no. So, PD isn't me.
This ended in a Round 3 concession anyway, which I didn't exactly expect before I pinged you guys to vote.
The likelihood that your vote is corrupt increases, not decreases, the more that you allow previous vote scores to determine whether you bother to land your vote a certain way or not.
The least corrupt way to vote is to vote hard and fast, before you know or care how likely or unlikely it is that this debater will beat you in the finals and how well they sway voters.
“Everything in life can be taken away from you and generally will be at some point. Your wealth vanishes, the latest gadgetry suddenly becomes passé, your allies desert you. But if your mind is armed with the art of war, there is no power that can take that away. In the middle of a crisis, your mind will find its way to the right solution. Having superior strategies at your fingertips will give your maneuvers irresistible force. As Sun-tzu says, “Being unconquerable lies with yourself.”
― Robert Greene, The 33 Strategies Of War
“Always try to lower the other side’s sense of urgency. Make your enemies think they have all the time in the world; when you suddenly appear at their border, they are in a slumbering state, and you will easily overrun them. While you are sharpening your fighting spirit, always do what you can to blunt theirs.”
― Robert Greene, The 33 Strategies Of War
Please be ready to vote, it's only a 1-week voting period so start reading it now and mentally preparing your RFD's at least partially.
Please be ready to vote, it's only a 1-week voting period so start reading it now and mentally preparing your RFD's at least partially.
thanks for blocking me too then?
Interesting that you'd find tht awkward since I have nothing to rebut myself
@computernerd
somehow you were blocked by me I think I pressed wrong on my phone or something, I don't remember blocking you at all.
I am not sure what to say other than I hope you can realise it was a mistake. I noticed when I randomly clicked your profile within the last hour.
Unlike the other big dogs, I have experienced the pain of what I feel is undeserved defeat over and over. This is but part of the battle-hardening necessary for a champion who isn't planning to run 98-1.
As for the job interview, I don't believe in wishing good luck if I don't need to. For all I know it's a job that isn't the one you end up enjoying vs other potential timelines. So, I wish you to do your best and endure defeat like I am here or win like a champion.
no but you can upload a link/URL if you really wanted you could make it ok for both debaters to have a list of external URLs outside of the debate, in order to go around the character count.
Tinyurl is one of the best URL shorterners out there because it has permanent codes for the URLs. Some of them make temporary codes that later can be recycled for another longer URL (very dangerous actually).
Thank you for voting
I'd concede the 'energy' point sooner if Novice had posted a round 1, I set it up so that there was ample distraction down the energy line to make Novice not realise how deadly the 'time' angle was, which is exactly what happened. Thanks for voting.
3 days remain on this debate, if you cared to vote. ty if you do.
Depends how you define 'around'
Do you care to vote on this debate? You commented implying interest.
that vote will never hold up but thanks... should just award arguments next time if you meant the vote.
Thank you for the vote.
Too strong, lol. I see.
I am curious, if I had pointed out how the Amazon thing was irrelevant, in Round 4, would you suddenly say I won the debate?
it is bad conduct for me to bring up brand new points about the difference between amazon rating system in a round so late into the debate.
I didn't want to dig into an entirely irrelevant point but sure, you got the grudge out of your system. Just know that the lower that my rating is when you lose against me, the bigger the hit to your rating.
So, will you please vote?
I do not recall having something against you...
I gave plenty of examples of you lying about con, in quoted snippets, I'd happily extend the vote if it's necessary.
pls vote if you care to.
2 days left to vote on this if you care to.
are you willing to vote on this?
that's one of his worst votes ever actually, pretty shocking how he forgets how Pro never touched your case overall.
That is not at all protocol.
Are you expecting me to say sorry for my opponent disappointing you?
Rpund 1 knockouts are both amazing and boring at once.
In formal debating, all the round earther needs to do is use NASA, elon musk and spacex and they will win. There is no winnong strategy fpr the flat earthwr that can outweigh the authority of NASA.
I am playing devil's advocate.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/3331/comment-links/40819
This is how you properly intimidate your opponent in the comments section. Keep it simple, have weight to your bragging.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vp248_pk69c
cheers
so for instance if you say vegetables are healthy it means if you have raw courgette a lot that's healthy... (it isn't).
the default is on balance or most, not 'all' you had a lot of insertion of your own interpretation there.
Watch and learn the art of the K.
Given that you're against one of the biggest trolls of the history of this community (even before this website began) and that you don't know how frowned upon semantic traps like this are here (more so than debate.org which was the site we migrated from) I'll let it be and not talk more about it.
I don't even hate what you did, not only objectively but even subjectively as I was the type who'd do absolutely anything within the rules to win, no matter how annoying it was, I'm annoying and cunning when I want to be. However, I can tell you that the reason I stopped it is largely a result of realising that voters punish it here or at the very least grow bored of it. You would have done better on the old website as the voters and group who were active there were much more pro-troll-debate than the ones active now.
Stick solely to the word 'raise' (as opposed to care for AND raise ) and I'm more open to accepting it but I will wait as I want a better idea of your ability and style to know how to predict and counter you.
Pro is going to semantically troll you with both 'race' and 'bad', just watch.
what's the definition of race?
This has becomes ridiculous to read, to be honest. I have no clue how to even vote on a debate like this as they both have a legitimate reason to say their resolution is the real one.
Con and Pro have two very different ideas about what the debate is so both are winning their current resolution at the moment.
That is a separate debate with a separate opponent.
Now, I will like to remind you the sole definition of science in the description (concise and bare-boned as it is):
not being religious
I MEANT ATHEISM IT IS OBVIOUS WAHT I MEANT IN MY ROUND 3 I SAY SCIENCE BUT MEAN ATHEISM (I said science anyway before it)
you cannot put arguments on behalf of Pro as your reason for voting...
vote please
They never said the current format doesnt include video debating via URL. Your Kritik was ridiculous but they never pointed that out as they never posted a R2
Your question is angled so that either I was political debater or I was 'some random'. If your question is if I have alt accounts that use this website, the answer is no. So, PD isn't me.