It doesn't matter of he uses that. I'm going to prove that free wins don't exist on ddo.
The entire concept of voting is a soft-enforced rule. What that means is that Juggle itself and the website's official documents such as terms of use etc all leave absolutely no official voting restrictions. This entails that you can (genuinely, not just pre-vote-mod) vote for someone who had their opponent is FF'ing every single Round if their debate was bad enough.
Both versions (DART and DDO) have loopholes. In DA the loopholes or is patched in a strange way. If you concede openly and your opponent FFs, the only way to vote correctly is that people should give you Conduct and not give either side the other points but most will tie it.
Anyway, since every element of DDO entails risk of a loss even in as extreme a scenario as FF (which is only ever guaranteed at the price of risking a ban for collusion and/or alt-abuse) then no free and n exists.
I will use game theory and poker terms like 'equity' to explain why the risk is a real thing at the point of accepting the debate and not an imaginary thing that is undone by how obviously bad an opponent seems.
It is extremely hilarious to me that Club blocked me over this. I can see absolutely no other reason for him blocking me. He blocked me because I was willing to debate pro-flat-earth, that really is when the level of brainwashing has gone too far.
As opposers of the 'shut up and toughen up' Right-Wing Trump-fan mentality you and I can both agree that psychological venting does matter and that psychiatry is a hard science not in any way a soft thing... However, it would be naive to think you'll gain pleasure as opposed to further agony in sharing a rant against such a popular figure of the Right, on a site like this. Especially as you're also slanting it into anti-America. This will result in very much drama, it's why I avoid all debates on Trump other than ones I can troll with my angle on it, in general. I know exactly what the comments section and voting section of that becomes.
Wylted is wrong. There are times when you should semi-forfeit Rounds because of what you prevent loading the opponent with or accusations of voters of doing 'gish gallop'.
It's not a clear 'jam more text in that Round' Wylted's Rating reflects his advice's quality.
I prefer Germany as the nuances of it as a social democracy are superior to what France is as a social democracy. In fact I would say France is like a Republic that basically takes Democracy as a necessary means to an end (yes, like America but of course more left wing) while Germany, especially due to escaping its past, is a genuine social democracy.
I think side-Con will win but this is going to be very close. I realise that Ramshutu is on the side of popular opinion, he is going to smear campaign very effectively in the Round(s) he writes and Alec is very good at this too.
Oromagi and Ragnar build cases well but Ragnar builds offensively with defence being the 'guide' while Oromagi builds defensively with creative offence being his 'guide'.
The sides are flipped, this confused me... Why would... Interesting. I wonder if Ramshutu and bmdrocks work well together and if Oromagi and Ragnar work well together. Synergy in thinking styles will be important.
Yes, I will put full effort into it. My case will run along the lines that he either would be an agent approved by the UN or that he'd essentially not apply to human law and that there's a lot about a world where Santa is real that isn't so straightforward to refuse to take into account such that we say all would stay the same law-wise and policy-wise.
You won't succeed in deluding me into the idea that you're right and I'm the delusional narcissist. over time, as the site grows and you become just one voter amongst many, your power to delude me and prey on me will dissipate. You will pick on someone easier as you're a sadistic predator by nature and I will be left in peace.
The aim is to make your opponent angry, not feel sad. My ethos of rap battling has got me losses, sure, but that's because Ramshutu and you have no idea what you're voting on.
Anger is the emotion of the loser, angle everything to make your opponent fucking mad at you, not feel sad, and they will dig their own grave as the battle goes on if they haven't grasped the true aim of rap battling.
The user sadolite is another.
It doesn't matter of he uses that. I'm going to prove that free wins don't exist on ddo.
The entire concept of voting is a soft-enforced rule. What that means is that Juggle itself and the website's official documents such as terms of use etc all leave absolutely no official voting restrictions. This entails that you can (genuinely, not just pre-vote-mod) vote for someone who had their opponent is FF'ing every single Round if their debate was bad enough.
Both versions (DART and DDO) have loopholes. In DA the loopholes or is patched in a strange way. If you concede openly and your opponent FFs, the only way to vote correctly is that people should give you Conduct and not give either side the other points but most will tie it.
Anyway, since every element of DDO entails risk of a loss even in as extreme a scenario as FF (which is only ever guaranteed at the price of risking a ban for collusion and/or alt-abuse) then no free and n exists.
I will use game theory and poker terms like 'equity' to explain why the risk is a real thing at the point of accepting the debate and not an imaginary thing that is undone by how obviously bad an opponent seems.
You can stay blocked for a week to remember this mistake.
It is extremely hilarious to me that Club blocked me over this. I can see absolutely no other reason for him blocking me. He blocked me because I was willing to debate pro-flat-earth, that really is when the level of brainwashing has gone too far.
Club blocked me for some reason. Interesting...
No, I'll use poker theory to win.
In that case I could take this but he'd just argue that FFs happened at all or something
Thanks for the vote. I had a wide crowd to please, after all.
Please vote if possible, it's happy songs after all. ;)
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/EducatedIncomparableAlabamamapturtle-size_restricted.gif
And a thank you to you, too! ;)
Forfeit glitch ended a while back. The adspam 'fixes' involved a change that fixed the forfeit glitch.
As opposers of the 'shut up and toughen up' Right-Wing Trump-fan mentality you and I can both agree that psychological venting does matter and that psychiatry is a hard science not in any way a soft thing... However, it would be naive to think you'll gain pleasure as opposed to further agony in sharing a rant against such a popular figure of the Right, on a site like this. Especially as you're also slanting it into anti-America. This will result in very much drama, it's why I avoid all debates on Trump other than ones I can troll with my angle on it, in general. I know exactly what the comments section and voting section of that becomes.
Words cannot express how much I agree with everything you wrote in your description.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIV-QdPEx-Q
if freud asks to have his vote removed, ramshutu countered his vote in how he allocated points so please ensure both are redone.
club is still a votebomb.
I will leave a good vote on this one as it was a good battle.
Wylted is wrong. There are times when you should semi-forfeit Rounds because of what you prevent loading the opponent with or accusations of voters of doing 'gish gallop'.
It's not a clear 'jam more text in that Round' Wylted's Rating reflects his advice's quality.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/1162/comment_links/15543
this is utter bullshit he trolled me. He challenged me directly to this debate and then has that I forfeit if I accept in the description.
My offer still stands
Change this to be is "flat Earth" viable to exist and I'll accept.
Read Club_s reasoning for voting. Then read mine. Sit back and laugh at yourself.
What's the matter? Done masturbating over the songs I post?
Definitely. RM accepting your debate is a victory times two because he thinks he's good.
Easy win, easy life.
Until today, that is. ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyXhsTTD0Tk
On a serious note my vote is genuine. Supadudz won this in many regards.
Read Club's reasoning for his vote. Sit back and laugh at your hypocrisy.
The journey is actually what matters in religion, NOT the destination. :)
I prefer Germany as the nuances of it as a social democracy are superior to what France is as a social democracy. In fact I would say France is like a Republic that basically takes Democracy as a necessary means to an end (yes, like America but of course more left wing) while Germany, especially due to escaping its past, is a genuine social democracy.
Club are you even writing any of it? How about you Dr. Franklin?
I think side-Con will win but this is going to be very close. I realise that Ramshutu is on the side of popular opinion, he is going to smear campaign very effectively in the Round(s) he writes and Alec is very good at this too.
Oromagi and Ragnar build cases well but Ragnar builds offensively with defence being the 'guide' while Oromagi builds defensively with creative offence being his 'guide'.
The sides are flipped, this confused me... Why would... Interesting. I wonder if Ramshutu and bmdrocks work well together and if Oromagi and Ragnar work well together. Synergy in thinking styles will be important.
pls vote the Concession, ty!
I mean Con's case is false but that is irrelevant. I genuinely believe in Holyfield winning but I don't care to debate this anymore.
Yes, I will put full effort into it. My case will run along the lines that he either would be an agent approved by the UN or that he'd essentially not apply to human law and that there's a lot about a world where Santa is real that isn't so straightforward to refuse to take into account such that we say all would stay the same law-wise and policy-wise.
Lol! Ramshutu you have cheerleaders!
No, what you did was link extra so that I couldn't use it myself or use something similar to it without seeming filthy.
please vote
It is illegal to be Pro-bestiality in my country. I will not be voting on this debate due to bias.
bump
Take note, he's pulling a MAR, the definition insists on the being having omnibenevolence... Careful...
Will you counter votebomb Club? or is that not on your agenda?
Will appreciate a vote from both. Please highlight the bars you liked most.
You won't succeed in deluding me into the idea that you're right and I'm the delusional narcissist. over time, as the site grows and you become just one voter amongst many, your power to delude me and prey on me will dissipate. You will pick on someone easier as you're a sadistic predator by nature and I will be left in peace.
No, it isn't. Also, your entire RFD was making your own arguments against mine. The rebuttals you raised, my opponent never did.
Fuck off. :)
The aim is to make your opponent angry, not feel sad. My ethos of rap battling has got me losses, sure, but that's because Ramshutu and you have no idea what you're voting on.
Anger is the emotion of the loser, angle everything to make your opponent fucking mad at you, not feel sad, and they will dig their own grave as the battle goes on if they haven't grasped the true aim of rap battling.
Okay, since I misunderstood which sport this is about, I will now be representing Stipe Miocic.
I will be representing Evander Holyfield.
no it is not. It is a 'fact' that if everything NASA tells us is true than gravity is extremely likely to be real but even then it's not a full fact.
Gravity is not a fact, it is a theory contingent on other theories.