That debate doesn't meet the criteria of the agreed upon troll debate criterion. I agreed to a non troll debate on neutering Sparrow. He could have made a strong pro-trans operation case but put zero effort in. I won it and deserve my rating and moderation of the debate votes.
I agreed to it being moderated you can't go in and change it against my will and force me to have to put the effort into debating it.
I want elo gain or loss on this debate, I agreed to it under the premise it was moderated and there was elo gain/loss. This has been altered since in all three instances.
if you don't fix this I will make a huge forum protest about it, I promise it will get a crowd roaring.
I agreed to this debate under the notion all votes would be moderated. This doesn't meet the criteria of troll debate that we voted on, which was the strictest definition of the three (option A) I will really take this to the forums if you don't revert all three debates I accepted with the 'moderated' option selected. The rap taste battle is the only one that you can justify.
thanks for the vote (would enjoy you to vote on my acoustic music battle: https://www.debateart.com/debates/983)
I was aware there'd be three fundamental types of voter here (excluding trolls with sinister motive). You were one who went for the type of song and how it pleased your ears. The first song was specifically for a more emotional-music voter with enough to not hit me with a 1/10 for a music-taste voter.
The third type of voter would be a 'how amazing' the overall song is, in my opinion. You were a type 2. Type 1 would be an emotional depth voter.
https://www.debateart.com/debates/984/vote_links/2339 This RFd completely lies about me and my case. I never mocked the blind or said anything about my opponent being blind, I was referring to a solution if the reader of the debate was blind to ascertain which side was red and green.
I never said that he was blind I said if the reader was blind to ask someone they trust to determine which side is red and green, stop trolling your RFD's it's embarrassing for you.
Hahahahaha, oh god you didn't see what I did. Read the sentence after what you wrote and then comprehend what I did. I turned his entire case into one of why the Chicago one is superior.
You don't think anyone could reasonably interpret the green side as Pro? It is irrefutably the absolute means of determining which side is which on this website.
You are precisely what you think I am, that's all I have to say. You can post memes, make everyone laugh at me and treat me like a piece of dirt and I am telling you I still will come out strong and grand or die trying.
You really need to lose your hero complex, it's actually quite disgusting in my eyes. You keep treating me like I'm someone you should use all means to vote against and thoroughly dig at and run off the website by emotionally tormenting me at any given opportunity.
I promise you here, openly, that you won't win in the long run and I am not going to sit quietly for long. You want to treat me like shit, you will learn I am not.
take note, ramshutu has through action and words shown that if a description says something, the voter is supposed to respect it over the logic of the debate or the facts of the debate mechanics.
the last round is the least acoustic of all. The only one I posted that pushes the edge of acoustic is my R4 as there was minimalistic editing on her vocal tone.
Your last Round was not acoustic, it was electronically edited and mastered. The entire sounds other than the ukelele, including the voice, were artificial.
I will be roleplaying as Black Widow. She likes to show her sensitive, feminine side quite often in public matters as opposed to her ruthless one. I will mix it exactly how I perceive she does.
I await a reply from Virtuoso.
I have zero reason to post a single song if this has no effect on rating. I'd do this as a forum battle if you want.
So from now on these debates won't ever be eligible to gain or lose rating? This was 'moderated' at the point of acceptance as well.
That debate doesn't meet the criteria of the agreed upon troll debate criterion. I agreed to a non troll debate on neutering Sparrow. He could have made a strong pro-trans operation case but put zero effort in. I won it and deserve my rating and moderation of the debate votes.
I agreed to it being moderated you can't go in and change it against my will and force me to have to put the effort into debating it.
Please mod supadudz vote
https://www.debateart.com/debates/1012/vote_links/2383
Please handle this vote if 'unmoderated' doesn't mean that you don't moderate votes, thanks.
That is much much worse, that is totally unacceptable to change post-acceptance.
I want elo gain or loss on this debate, I agreed to it under the premise it was moderated and there was elo gain/loss. This has been altered since in all three instances.
that is much much worse. I agreed to a moderated debate in all three instances.
if you don't fix this I will make a huge forum protest about it, I promise it will get a crowd roaring.
I agreed to this debate under the notion all votes would be moderated. This doesn't meet the criteria of troll debate that we voted on, which was the strictest definition of the three (option A) I will really take this to the forums if you don't revert all three debates I accepted with the 'moderated' option selected. The rap taste battle is the only one that you can justify.
This debate was moderated and just got changed to unmoderated within the last hour.
Just allow overlap of a maximum of two per Round and I'll accept.
Someone is changing these to be unmoderated. I accepted this when it was 'moderated' I am certain of that.
I think we'd have overlap on both 1 and 3.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnIVY8hvWqU
Madchild - Death Race
What would you rate this song in an emotional music battle?
thanks for the vote (would enjoy you to vote on my acoustic music battle: https://www.debateart.com/debates/983)
I was aware there'd be three fundamental types of voter here (excluding trolls with sinister motive). You were one who went for the type of song and how it pleased your ears. The first song was specifically for a more emotional-music voter with enough to not hit me with a 1/10 for a music-taste voter.
The third type of voter would be a 'how amazing' the overall song is, in my opinion. You were a type 2. Type 1 would be an emotional depth voter.
good luck.
How many can I repeat from your selection? We could have overlap in our top 5.
please can I have a second opinion on supadudz's vote?
how was it borderline?
I think the word 'you' means multiple things, I didn't know that to you it has only one context and has to be the same in all sentences.
WTF? I don't get it?
https://www.debateart.com/debates/984/vote_links/2339 This RFd completely lies about me and my case. I never mocked the blind or said anything about my opponent being blind, I was referring to a solution if the reader of the debate was blind to ascertain which side was red and green.
I never said that he was blind I said if the reader was blind to ask someone they trust to determine which side is red and green, stop trolling your RFD's it's embarrassing for you.
You don't get why he gave up do you?
Hahahahaha, oh god you didn't see what I did. Read the sentence after what you wrote and then comprehend what I did. I turned his entire case into one of why the Chicago one is superior.
Go ahead, show me the concession.
I never conceded this debate not even once. Lol.
You don't think anyone could reasonably interpret the green side as Pro? It is irrefutably the absolute means of determining which side is which on this website.
Mhmmm fantastic, thank you. You forget how he has burden of proof to prove that he isn't Con after having selected it.
how noble of you! preying on someone taking a bullshit stance that is going to be irrefutably countered by pure logic! WOW!
I'm sure I can find enough things to call poor and disregard throughout.
No one objectively should do anything, that is actually the truth of life. Everything is based on 'can' in logic.
I know that you do not consider it rude or severely rude. You considering it rude is irrelevant to it actually being rude.
You reject it as poor arbitrarily as you accept his as 'good'/'strong'.
'if you gave me a good reason', I did. Several. You just change 'good' to 'poor' and suddenly the statement is able to be turned on its head. :)
case in point.
You are precisely what you think I am, that's all I have to say. You can post memes, make everyone laugh at me and treat me like a piece of dirt and I am telling you I still will come out strong and grand or die trying.
You really need to lose your hero complex, it's actually quite disgusting in my eyes. You keep treating me like I'm someone you should use all means to vote against and thoroughly dig at and run off the website by emotionally tormenting me at any given opportunity.
I promise you here, openly, that you won't win in the long run and I am not going to sit quietly for long. You want to treat me like shit, you will learn I am not.
Con was severely rude to me throughout, you just enjoy when I'm verbally abused so you call it polite.
If this is untrue, please discipline him appropriately and teach him how voting works. If he is correct, please teach him how to be consistent.
take note, ramshutu has through action and words shown that if a description says something, the voter is supposed to respect it over the logic of the debate or the facts of the debate mechanics.
thank you for this, I will be sure to take note of this any time you ever even think of not holding debate descriptions as sovereign again.
Good luck regardless, winners win and if you are the winner I will learn from it.
the last round is the least acoustic of all. The only one I posted that pushes the edge of acoustic is my R4 as there was minimalistic editing on her vocal tone.
Your last Round was not acoustic, it was electronically edited and mastered. The entire sounds other than the ukelele, including the voice, were artificial.
I will go more into why the description (if it contradicts with the physical side) is to be disregarded, in my next Round.
I will be roleplaying as Black Widow. She likes to show her sensitive, feminine side quite often in public matters as opposed to her ruthless one. I will mix it exactly how I perceive she does.
The only part that's grammatically wrong is to not have 'and' between 'prior' and 'fundamental' instead of the comma.
The resolution is written in completely correct English. It makes complete sense but people like you and Ramshutu struggle with comprehending that.
or this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YAAyUFL1GQ
Speedrace what do you think of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG1JY0rt2Os
https://www.debateart.com/debates/538
How about this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j04JKdcXjkU