"I feel con missed the boat here by relying on obtuse and largely nonsensical semantic attacks; whilst pro added a very sensible sounding and intuitive argument about types. Con didn’t address the details of pros analysis here, or refute the key aspects of type pro raised in his first and second rounds."
Is identical to my reasoning in that debate he had vs Type1. I actually think he lost that debate.
All jokes aside, I respect you using the background music and making this be a thing. I also fully put effort into that debate even if you hated it, I enjoyed it.
Statement 1 (made much later than when the debate was created): I also have no idea how my position ended up being Con. I'm pretty sure that I selected Pro.
Statement 2 (made while creating the debate): I am Con.
As literally (I actually literally think) most devout fan of rap itself worldwide, from the age of around 16-17 onwards in my life, I was there from the start of Watsky. I was so lucky that a guy in my school was also into weird underground rap. He knew Hopsin back in the ill minds before he blew up and also knew Watsky. In fact he is nearly single handedly the guy who fascinated me with rap, I never knew rap like it existed.
Ill mind of hopsin 5 and Watksy's IDGAF song (since taken down for some reason) were two raps that made me realise there's actual real deal rap out there. Eminem always had the problem that he'd make such rude and meaningless shit for the sake of it and not even flow well despite having very layered metaphors. This is when I got into Minaj back when everyone hated her. I didn't see what was so bad, even her 'stupid hoe' song had the most genius flows and puns of its era.
So when you show me Watsky's song, you're showing me one of the earliest raps of my OMG THIS IS NICE RAP shit, and I do like it but that's the kind of rap you play twice.
Let me show you what a real rap you can't get out of your head is, you don't yet understand the insane addictiveness or seamless flow of Paz if you think he's mediocre. Let me show you how great this guy is:
I dislike Eminem's flow immensely and his whiny voice back then was a real turn off. I'm the type of guy who likes Eminem's lamest songs the best haha.
He tryhards too much in those songs but of course he's lyrically impressive. To me a gobsmacking rap is something like this:
the hardest part of the case is elaborating on what 'informed voters' are and why that matters more than 'many voters' despite many also mattering.
The impact of those less informed of the suffering or needs of thos ein rural areas is going to be a heavy hitter for my case. I just need some time to think.
'semantic realm' of reality is something I came up with in my anti-materialism debate. I'm impressed to see that this (and not consciousness) is how you defeated it.
What more explanation do you need? You're allowed to vote the forfeiting side if you explain why from their arguments.
"I feel con missed the boat here by relying on obtuse and largely nonsensical semantic attacks; whilst pro added a very sensible sounding and intuitive argument about types. Con didn’t address the details of pros analysis here, or refute the key aspects of type pro raised in his first and second rounds."
Is identical to my reasoning in that debate he had vs Type1. I actually think he lost that debate.
Please counter shutus votebomb here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ercWS-jUt0s
https://www.debateart.com/forum/topics/1734?page=1
This doesn't meet the option A's criteria.
All jokes aside, I respect you using the background music and making this be a thing. I also fully put effort into that debate even if you hated it, I enjoyed it.
I prefer him on his Sparrow account, at least he tries there.
Why was my vote deleted?
I debated in completely good faith, I actually worked very hard on it.
Thanks for your feedback, what are your credentials?
Then you ignore every single Round after my R1 if you think so.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
So, what's the actual reason then Speedrace?
So, speedrace, tell us all why you don't want me to accept your debates.
So, speedrace, tell us all why you don't want me to accept your debates.
Statement 1 (made much later than when the debate was created): I also have no idea how my position ended up being Con. I'm pretty sure that I selected Pro.
Statement 2 (made while creating the debate): I am Con.
"I also have no idea how my position ended up being Con. I'm pretty sure that I selected Pro."
Why did you write "I am Con." in the debate's description? LOL!
As literally (I actually literally think) most devout fan of rap itself worldwide, from the age of around 16-17 onwards in my life, I was there from the start of Watsky. I was so lucky that a guy in my school was also into weird underground rap. He knew Hopsin back in the ill minds before he blew up and also knew Watsky. In fact he is nearly single handedly the guy who fascinated me with rap, I never knew rap like it existed.
Ill mind of hopsin 5 and Watksy's IDGAF song (since taken down for some reason) were two raps that made me realise there's actual real deal rap out there. Eminem always had the problem that he'd make such rude and meaningless shit for the sake of it and not even flow well despite having very layered metaphors. This is when I got into Minaj back when everyone hated her. I didn't see what was so bad, even her 'stupid hoe' song had the most genius flows and puns of its era.
So when you show me Watsky's song, you're showing me one of the earliest raps of my OMG THIS IS NICE RAP shit, and I do like it but that's the kind of rap you play twice.
Let me show you what a real rap you can't get out of your head is, you don't yet understand the insane addictiveness or seamless flow of Paz if you think he's mediocre. Let me show you how great this guy is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8G4Uc6Derc
I dislike Eminem's flow immensely and his whiny voice back then was a real turn off. I'm the type of guy who likes Eminem's lamest songs the best haha.
He tryhards too much in those songs but of course he's lyrically impressive. To me a gobsmacking rap is something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1GH6BtWU3M
the hardest part of the case is elaborating on what 'informed voters' are and why that matters more than 'many voters' despite many also mattering.
The impact of those less informed of the suffering or needs of thos ein rural areas is going to be a heavy hitter for my case. I just need some time to think.
"Pro's source supports 2.1's major premise"
minor not major*****
Sparrow is his alt, you don't get how little this guy gives a shit yet.
Wrick is actually rapping well for the first time, I am genuinely impressed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XUAHhnEaRM
Careful, your Type1 persona is slipping through. This isn't how to mask alts.
He is the second-highest ranking user who is the acting GM of this 'hotel' in theory yes. The 'owner' is the user 'debateart.com'
"This is conceded by Pro due to"
by Con due to* Pro going second is confusing to type in third person but I need to get used to this style, it helps me a lot.
last round concession
'semantic realm' of reality is something I came up with in my anti-materialism debate. I'm impressed to see that this (and not consciousness) is how you defeated it.
Genuinely have no clue how you read it that way but alright. This one I played near perfect in my eyes.
He is type1's alt intending to take stances the norm believe in and prove that debating is a sham. He will come and grab the win, don't worry.
I am going to try and semantically out-troll this tautology. Good luck.
We can rematch if you'd like. I'd prefer more than 5,000 characters if we are to properly battle.
"In the debate that Pro links you to (where ironically Pro is saying Slyther"
Con not Pro
nice one to vote on.
111th comment with 11 votes, oh lord I'm on a whole other level.
"All the others were tied because I don't have the attention span to completely analyze a full debate."
This is sufficient?
Kid are you FUCKING KIDDING ME? You god damn feeble excuse of a mod.
Debate me on Lucius Malfoy being a truer Slytherin than Voldemort, please.
I'll take Pro.
We should angle it so neither side can say 'equal' or something.
thanks for the vote, I really appreciate the promises you keep.
This site is A JOKE!
Melcharez's RFD is for me winning wtf happens???
Please cvb Type1 so he can do it on his alt?
Please do make this your first stop, darlings.
Fantastic lying skills, I am impressed by your RFD.
Thanks. It will pass the CoC don't worry. :) now, admit it is grudge and revenge.
Then, it won't pass the CoC. ;)
So stay silent, just vote against me and say BoP not met and a quick reason why. boom you pass CoC LOL!!!!!!!
Coin flip implies 50/50, really gambling is far more intricate than 'head or tails based on nothing' gambling.
As are you.
xD! I don't give a shit what is universally accepted in philosophy, I will refuse to believe it and therefore not know it!
Checkmate!!!!! LOL!
Self-evidence LOL! That is called gambling on the truth based on what you think you know.
Yeah you can't know if yours are either, genius.