You don't know how busy those three days were for him irl or how tired he was etc, it actually was lucky for me as I often intentionally leave debates to the last hour for an adrenaline rush (it actually increases your iq when you have it as long as you haven't had one in the past 12 hours or so as it will fizzle your brain out if you have too many).
If the cut-out had happened in that period for me, even if a few hours were left and I'd just gone 'meh I'll do this in the last 2 hours' I'd be exactly like him even if I then had time to reply with like 20 mins left to post. This is how it looks to me.
His source didn't prove anything at all. It would be like sourcing the definition of "and" and hyperlinking that word in the middle of a quote to make a point.
I couldn't give a single shit. You're not the victim here and your lust for revenge will come at a price.
No, the price isn't about me hurting you IRL or on here. Keep at it, others will get fed up of you. You want to make yourself a villain, just be sure you understand the hero fully first.
I don't intend to ask. I intend to tell. There's nothing about the vote that's a mystery to me.
Raltar simply needs to ban you from voting via the same means by which you make voting rules et voila, you either resort to worse harassment or fuck off. Either way you're no longer his issue for long. The worse harassment has consequences.
He is going to prove that Conifers can do something superior to Humans and then say that all ways that Humans are superior doesn't mean that Conifers aren't superior in that way.
You will realise that yours is later on. You have first a set of irrational absolutes in morality and then from there you will point out my inconsistency to match your values/morals. ;)
Dragons are real anyway, the Komodo Dragon would have been an interesting anti-troll stance for Pro to take but that's hard to justify as being a good pet.
No matter how I make a case here, it is going to directly rebuke points in your case. The case for please bargaining is naturally, when spoken second, going to directly rebut a speech/case for the abolition of plea bargaining.
Between the two of us, I was the one who manned up by accepting this debate and fighting it how I did. We both know who the coward was here. I don't think you respect people's ability to interpret (and misinterpret) things. To Raltar, and myself, there is genuinely a direct link between what my source said and what I was getting at. To me, there's a direct link between there being no actual East or West area of Earth to 'be in' and the resolution being proven false via Kritik.
To three of the four voters, my angle was too weak, to me it was indomitable. I am not here crying about them.
You have 3 voters lying for you since they don't understand how I won by liquidating there being 'the west' or 'the east' so between the two of us, you're not the one who should be salty.
Aside from needing to do things IRL until five hours left, I'm curious how one can call anything prima facie immoral. This won't be a Kritik as that's a rule so I'm trying to work out how you can even take into account its species or it becoming a grown human later on if that's not reasoning past prima facie.
If I focused on 'in' he'd say you are located 'in' the East or West I didn't make a single mistake in this debate it is just people process language different to me, I assume. I believe 'actually' means something different to what most do. Even the definition supports the way I see 'actually'.
Dude I am not an idiot, I thought it through before accepting. You all can run around calling me a suicidal hero if you want. I genuinely won this if you understand how I shifted all the semantics back onto Pro and force his BoP to remain unmet.
There's nothing that is omnipotent and God is blatantly not omnibenevolent. Pro can't win.
I think he didn't realise what he was doing. He was pressing enter and it wasn't deleting the quotes.
Feel free to vote, ty.
I showed how the Japanese are not in the East and that there is no East or West of Earth in actuality.
Would be interested in your votes here. Cheers.
Oh look he does exactly what I said he'd do.
we smear-campaign you with*
'with' was missing.
but watch as what you hurl fails,**
the 'you' was missing
Without Alfred and Lucius Fox's expertise to aid him and make custom anti-Captain-America suit and weapons etc, Batman is losing this fight.
If you allowed Intel and other things, Batman is absolutely winning this fight.
The debate description
All the ways Batman dominates (Intel, strategy beyond powers etc) you're outruling.
You don't know how busy those three days were for him irl or how tired he was etc, it actually was lucky for me as I often intentionally leave debates to the last hour for an adrenaline rush (it actually increases your iq when you have it as long as you haven't had one in the past 12 hours or so as it will fizzle your brain out if you have too many).
If the cut-out had happened in that period for me, even if a few hours were left and I'd just gone 'meh I'll do this in the last 2 hours' I'd be exactly like him even if I then had time to reply with like 20 mins left to post. This is how it looks to me.
The site was actually down for like 2-3 hours.
If a member is afraid of you, that is actually negative-percent (below 0%) an excuse to harass them further.
Lmfao
His source didn't prove anything at all. It would be like sourcing the definition of "and" and hyperlinking that word in the middle of a quote to make a point.
I couldn't give a single shit. You're not the victim here and your lust for revenge will come at a price.
No, the price isn't about me hurting you IRL or on here. Keep at it, others will get fed up of you. You want to make yourself a villain, just be sure you understand the hero fully first.
Yes, the sources vote went to the user who used 0 relevant sources other than to explain what ad hominem is in a quote.
Come, report me. Waste the mods' time.
Keep at it, see the outcome. I am 0% afraid of you.
Where did I threaten you?
I don't intend to ask. I intend to tell. There's nothing about the vote that's a mystery to me.
Raltar simply needs to ban you from voting via the same means by which you make voting rules et voila, you either resort to worse harassment or fuck off. Either way you're no longer his issue for long. The worse harassment has consequences.
More lies.
I cannot reply without breaking threat or insult CoC.
I will instead remark that I couldn't care less what you think justice is, I know how it works in detail and you're fucking with an ally of mine.
I doubt it. Lying is your specialty.
I typoed. I meant it made no sense and lied.
The sources vote made no sense
He is going to prove that Conifers can do something superior to Humans and then say that all ways that Humans are superior doesn't mean that Conifers aren't superior in that way.
You will realise that yours is later on. You have first a set of irrational absolutes in morality and then from there you will point out my inconsistency to match your values/morals. ;)
minions not minios*
She gets her pussy wet from time to time yes. She's not very highly sex-driven though, she's all about that platonic fuckery.
God is female and is not omnipotent.
By the way 'awesome' means fear-inspiring in oldschool English, Pro could have taken that stance as well.
Dragons are real anyway, the Komodo Dragon would have been an interesting anti-troll stance for Pro to take but that's hard to justify as being a good pet.
No matter how I make a case here, it is going to directly rebuke points in your case. The case for please bargaining is naturally, when spoken second, going to directly rebut a speech/case for the abolition of plea bargaining.
Between the two of us, I was the one who manned up by accepting this debate and fighting it how I did. We both know who the coward was here. I don't think you respect people's ability to interpret (and misinterpret) things. To Raltar, and myself, there is genuinely a direct link between what my source said and what I was getting at. To me, there's a direct link between there being no actual East or West area of Earth to 'be in' and the resolution being proven false via Kritik.
To three of the four voters, my angle was too weak, to me it was indomitable. I am not here crying about them.
You are quoting a source I used to add to it, the source he's referring to is this:
https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/axis/
which has in it proof that only north and south are actual poles or 'the north' or 'the south' actual dichotomy-relevant things to consider on Earth.
You have 3 voters lying for you since they don't understand how I won by liquidating there being 'the west' or 'the east' so between the two of us, you're not the one who should be salty.
I meant add onto the rareness and absurdity, not on the wrongness of it. I'll correct this in R2.
Ty for the notification though
Aside from needing to do things IRL until five hours left, I'm curious how one can call anything prima facie immoral. This won't be a Kritik as that's a rule so I'm trying to work out how you can even take into account its species or it becoming a grown human later on if that's not reasoning past prima facie.
Even when I lose the crowd screams "MADMAN is supreme."
well, thanks, I have no shame in this debate tbph.
If I focused on 'in' he'd say you are located 'in' the East or West I didn't make a single mistake in this debate it is just people process language different to me, I assume. I believe 'actually' means something different to what most do. Even the definition supports the way I see 'actually'.
In round 2 i do exactly what you say i didn't do
Dude I am not an idiot, I thought it through before accepting. You all can run around calling me a suicidal hero if you want. I genuinely won this if you understand how I shifted all the semantics back onto Pro and force his BoP to remain unmet.
Do you know what the word 'actually' means?
And I proved that 'actually' the Sun sets in the 'west' due to the absolutely identically valid timezone construct based precisely on that.
I did that in R2.
I proved there was no east or west on Earth and defeated him via that.