'Necessary' was never defined in this debate. If it's taken to be important or quite essential, Con wins. If it's taken to be something that if lacked the war couldn't have been won without, Pro wins.
You're a rather delusional individual if you think k saying something is a truism and IG original the relevance of the nberultiplied by three has on the topic.
This topic is factually incorrect just so you know. The voter has a delusion that the 97point with 3 was irrelevant but it's directly relevant just as much as the missing 1 in .9r
stop pretending that anyone who voted for you has read the debate past round 1 (Round 2 is round 1 of debating) in fact JC didn't read it at all and is salty over me wrecking him in a clothing debate.
Smarter politicians could just as easily say let's make human farms as it's efficient for the homeless. There's more to a great leader (loyalty) than knowledge.
Thanks but I knew, it's because I intentionally leave the time for when it gets my blood pumping. I'm a productive procrastinator who times the roller-coaster to help my brain achieve an IQ it can't without the adrenaline rush, this is not a joke.
I am working on the main speech, have the contentions and opening speech already done.
I am the type of person who will admit if I lost and improve based upon it but in this debate I do not deserve the L. Please consider what Earth has ignored in my R3 (really my r2 as R1 didn't exist in the debate)
I am not the kind of guy who is egotistical enough to fall for a trap like your rap battle where you promise you have never rapped before or a debate where you promise when I have no way out to outline something key to me winning.
I don't. I only rap battle people I believe I can demolish in a decisive way enough to get voters to root for me.
You are approximately 9x superior as a rap battler than a debater so while I will still debate you even at your elo, the risk of you beating me in the eyes of some voters to a big enough degree to entitle a person with a grudge to vote against me is very high.
I don't want to rap battle you on this site outside of forums. It will be too big a risk for my rating.
Thanks for that virtuous RFD but I believe I also heavily mitigated how the decision itself was the reason for the decline on top of that. Thanks for the vote regardless.
post pms i am not a fucking privacy advocate I support government surveillance and have exposed PMs on this site itself. Nothing should be private in the utopian society.
Earth is a fallacious voter, plain and simple. Haters will hate and I will still debate. This was a flawless performance by me, couldn't have been done better to be quite frank.
You don't seem to grasp how objectively wrong Earth's vote is. He literally misses entire arguments made by me that decimated your case.
Why was my argument, while not the same as yours, the 'wrong way' to prove my case?
I did that except I multiplied it by 3 to accentuate it.
it absolutely follows.
And why is my disproof insufficient?
if you actually applied this fairly, Earth's vote is beyond unacceptable.
I'm not sure how empiricism can win. My username hints at my bias. We know nothing, we can only make sense of our assumed truths.
'Necessary' was never defined in this debate. If it's taken to be important or quite essential, Con wins. If it's taken to be something that if lacked the war couldn't have been won without, Pro wins.
actually it was pro who had to round to make his point true.
You're a rather delusional individual if you think k saying something is a truism and IG original the relevance of the nberultiplied by three has on the topic.
This topic is factually incorrect just so you know. The voter has a delusion that the 97point with 3 was irrelevant but it's directly relevant just as much as the missing 1 in .9r
stop pretending that anyone who voted for you has read the debate past round 1 (Round 2 is round 1 of debating) in fact JC didn't read it at all and is salty over me wrecking him in a clothing debate.
I have invaded Round 2 of your environment.
Smarter politicians could just as easily say let's make human farms as it's efficient for the homeless. There's more to a great leader (loyalty) than knowledge.
I know.
look how he defines free will in the debate description above.
The King of the site's about to appreciate a GOD of debating no doubt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJt1fj_C9BI
Tyvm for the high quality vote.
should not further**********
they should discontinue their involvement
NOT CONTINUE
"and seek to explain why why the two are in direct conflict"
is wrong. should be 'why when' and 'seeks' instead of 'seek'.
it's up, good luck debating.
The fourth bullet point wasn't meant to be a bullet point in that list.
The three questions are still only three.
Thanks but I knew, it's because I intentionally leave the time for when it gets my blood pumping. I'm a productive procrastinator who times the roller-coaster to help my brain achieve an IQ it can't without the adrenaline rush, this is not a joke.
I am working on the main speech, have the contentions and opening speech already done.
will truly appreciate more votes on this debate.
I am the type of person who will admit if I lost and improve based upon it but in this debate I do not deserve the L. Please consider what Earth has ignored in my R3 (really my r2 as R1 didn't exist in the debate)
Worry not bsh1, the fact you posted has been noted by the supreme intellect of the Sane Madman.
I meant only ever not never in my number 2.
Just to be clear to everyone reading I noticed this error just now.
actually that is fine as it is since the security needn't be mine.
I'm the last you tried robbin' * whatever
the last store you tried robbin'*
fake death threats*
How do you define necessary?
take to break my spirit*
He ragequit that I caught him
I have indisputable evidence that this user is Type1.
Fuck it, I am not going to pussy out of this, If you use your alt to vote I will get you banned.
I am not the kind of guy who is egotistical enough to fall for a trap like your rap battle where you promise you have never rapped before or a debate where you promise when I have no way out to outline something key to me winning.
Make the resolution specific to a non-US nation where there is no first amendment and I'll take this.
I don't. I only rap battle people I believe I can demolish in a decisive way enough to get voters to root for me.
You are approximately 9x superior as a rap battler than a debater so while I will still debate you even at your elo, the risk of you beating me in the eyes of some voters to a big enough degree to entitle a person with a grudge to vote against me is very high.
I don't want to rap battle you on this site outside of forums. It will be too big a risk for my rating.
Thanks for that virtuous RFD but I believe I also heavily mitigated how the decision itself was the reason for the decline on top of that. Thanks for the vote regardless.
Make this a judge debate and select judges that I agree to when accepting the debtate.
Your Ranking/elo is that low that people will spite-vote me and it will cost me HUGE DROP in elo to lose to someone as low as you.
sorry but to me you lost this, had to be honest in my vote.
go ahead, post it
post pms i am not a fucking privacy advocate I support government surveillance and have exposed PMs on this site itself. Nothing should be private in the utopian society.
we didn't go over this because only I went over it, you ignored it.
you ignored my entire r3 debate in your rfd
I addressed Bench's arguments entirely in R2 pure liar
THIS IS AN UTTER JOKE THIS IS WHY PEOPLE DON'T DEBATE BECAUSE OF VOTERS LIKE EARTH.
No worries, let them vote with errors, that is their own burden to live with.
Earth you DID NOT READ THE DEBATE I AM TELLING YOU YOU ONLY READ ROUND ONE AND BENCH'S R2 REALLY WHAT A JOKE
Every single angle Bench proved the resolution true I turned against him
Earth is a fallacious voter, plain and simple. Haters will hate and I will still debate. This was a flawless performance by me, couldn't have been done better to be quite frank.