RationalMadman

Okay last one is an example maybe

Yes I caught that. It seriously made me scumread you. I didn't investigate you and went for Barney as a Barney innocent was worth so much next DP whereas a GP either way around can mean very little if you're hit by motivated vig etc.

So both times in the whole long game prior to this dp you posted 2 read posts of just stating them and neither were with you being pressured.

BK leans Town if you really think about it.

I need Austin to just clarify something about what motivating a mafia member would do.

Was just curious what you meant, I get you'd be desperate as either alignment here

I admit no matter what you answer I can't justify voting you this dp

Can you give me examples?

When? Genuinely show me your reads this game and where they were outed or pressed

So I can't really justify voting you because of setup but you haven't town told at all this game and neither has joebob.

What scumreads? You have barely talked all game and outed reads only in hindsight this DP.

Setupwise we have an issue that makes you innocent seeming anyway

I'll wait for Austin to fully answer me on what I asked before deciding what to do here

That's such a susssssssyyyy suggestion what GP did

What if GP turned BK ascetic the NP joebob motivated him and then killed Lunatic and proceeded to turn joebob ascetic?

How do you explain with 2 different roleblock-capacity mafia dead that I got no result on Joebob?

I think he is ascetic mafia and that Wylted visited him NP1 and told us the truth about that Joebob is ascetic. He said it 2 or 3 times to me and I ignored it while not really ignoring it

Motivator is called a utility role btw

That's not how to analyse town roles at all.

Stalker is offensive, lawyer is defensive. Roleblocker is defensive and offensive hybrid and so is a bp vigilante

You also would favour a vig if others can't be offensive, since it balances out the defensive.

I think joebob si mafia and has a power so that all roles don't properly work on him.

Cop and tracker are offensive town roles.

Why are you sure it's bk and not joebob

The theme split is offensive bully bots Vs defensive endurance bots.

Idk how the pairs are split but it may have to do with championships.

Hit you*

I need Austin to fully clarify what I asked first

We don't know that.

Since Wylted was like that I predict an extremely powerful partner of ijb or Whiteflame in the sense this can go to the point where if BK is scum, BK but you as well last night via motivation.

Please clarify if a motivator motivated mafia that has a role but also a kill faction power how that would play out in mechanics of that mafia member the next night phase in this.

How else can the kill night have been matching ijb?????

I think ijb is in the same faction as another person.

Wylted is actually whiteflame's partner.

Barney died even though ijb visited me to kill me the next night.

I'm comfortable to risk game on this lynch, or since Mafia may not have a kill this night there are arguments to risk it but I'd rather not.

No result on Joebob, he really is ascetic like Wylted said.

You mean the slave owning elitist scumbag founding fathers that stole land that wasn't theirs and treated criminals and law abiding people like shit alike, especially if their race was different? Or who?

Often those that did the worst are dishing it out to lesser ones.

This isn't productive and since it isn't the worst of the worst it's done to, proportionally, you're just making worse sociopaths out of lesser ones or some weren't sociopaths going in but become it, always, when leaving.

I haven't seen one ex con online or otherwise who doesn't fall under traits of a sociopath. It turns you into that to survive there.

Go to Jamaica and Nigeria and use your pronouns. Come back and talk about your OP.

Can I spam facepalms again?

Why do you think this isn't done in the West now matter the level of massacre? Yes at least half commit suicide before it can be done but those that don't are treated with too much mercy, dignity is a separate issue but the raw mercy is astonishing to me.

Someone can do the worst of the worst stuff and be treated humanely because the soft society made that the law.

No many people disagree with it. Liberals for emotional reasons, conservatives for moral and I guess moral is also emotional and it's intertwined.

Good. They don't deserve the chance to ever function in society again. This is the primary thing I don't see eye to eye with most left wing people on. To me there is such a thing as unforgivable.

How about getting AI to do it? Then the pleasure or letting off steam aspect is gone.

Strange sarcasm at the end. It's not supposed to be about that but that narrative is what liberals always use.

Show me these atheist people that beat up homosexuals, I'm not saying they don't exist I'm asking you to show me examples.

October Octagon Octopus

November Nonagon

December Decagon Decathlon

8th

9th

10th

The opponent is ISIS and people up top there. That's a separate issue.

This is about both deterring and easing temporary agony of those close to them or in the community. They must be sure those that did this didn't get to ever experience pleasure again.

I saw a video of those that did the massacre swollen in agony beaten to a pulp, I hope they're rinsed dry of any capacity to not experience hell before going.

I don't understand why this isn't standard practise to do to massacre doers any and everywhere and frankly to many criminals.

It's not as extreme as cut the fingers off a thief but I can completely get behind what happened to them.

If I ran a country (legal disclaimer: I don't own an country this is all a fantasy) and you massacred my people, I'd make you wish you weren't born. Not others for me but me personally with them. I don't understand what's wrong about this approach if you know for sure it's them and they did something this bad. They shouldn't be allowed to not hate every second of their existence left other than to be the lull between their hell.

I have waited some time to express this opinion in a way that doesn't make me get on a blacklist but if so, so be it. The opportunity arrived. Intelligence agencies will either agree with me on this or hypocritically do this to me, so it's a win-win.

Because of NATO and game theory.

US benefits more from making this ruthlessly pyrrhic even if Russia wins, without justifying Russia ever kamikaziing nukes despite Putin threatening it, he probably never will unless provoked.

It's strategically superior to keep letting the psychopath invader waste as much as he can without triggering him to use nukes.

Some relevant arguments to a shitpost OP that ridicules queers and transgenders that actually identify as pronouns different to their birth sex?

I mean the dude thinks he's being respectful in his delusional way, I guess? Nothing to argue, just facepalm and move on.

If the hackers wanted to, they could ruin his life by making his emails and related accounts to send things to employer and whatever else.

As I myself am actually well versed in computing I can tell you that's a dogshit strategy and means they can even have enough to send your relatives etc stuff you post, do etc online but maybe BKdoesn't care.