RationalMadman

I agree to this if Ramshutu's profile picture stalking of me is outlawed.

I have seen users such as PaulVerliane and Wylted post extreme things in opposition of the entire violence-encouragement clause. Hope you come down harder on such stuff from now on. That's what I support in what you write. The rest is either too vague or something I am slightly against.

I am a very good researcher of people, it could be twisted into being stalking to suit someone's agenda according to these vague rules.

Nothing you added was relevant in the first place, to the thread.

Thank you for being one of the only members of the website who makes me look like I have good social skills.

Oh even that is different in the European nations etc. I promise you that no European says it 'month day' they genuinely say 'day of month'.

Not sure I follow the plot at this point or who is against who and why but it seems to be developing well.

Having Oromagi as your opponent with Ragnar and Ramshutu as the voters. 

I support them being ranked by activity 100% but DART #1 should stay that way, even though Religion is more active. Then from that downwards, ranked by activity.

$$$

43/100. I need 57 questions asked to me, will ask back people who regularly ask as well as first-time askers. If you ask only now and again, I may not ask back.

poppy put in for you.

It makes no sense right?

Go ahead, give me one of his honest and clear answers.

By 'honest' you mean giving a series of nonanswers to basically everything and stammering to the point of incoherence when it's a really tough question? Bernie Sanders wasn't born for politics, you and I agree on that much.

change my MVP vote to Oromagi.

You are the one who says you're right-wing. I am arguing for my results being true to you.

computer labs are your friend, nerd.

You are not the issue, Coal is. You are just someone who has a 'percecuted by people with persecution complex' paranoia complex.

Thank you for your time in psychoanalysis.

I will be the Rock Lee of this shit. I will brutally work from 5th place to the one Ramshutu can't beat.

A Right-Winger fundamentally thrives on competition, they want inequality. You would try to ignore inequality, you would rule simply as you saw best, be it fitting to the natural order of things or not.

Sunday

I understand every single mistake I made, not even just not allying Ilikepie. I made fatal flaws in how and why I expanded where and when I did. I should have begun like waterphoenix did and transformed into something you can't even fathom. It is time to show you my true power, when is the rematch?

Bsh1 never once, not even one tiny bit, apologised for Virtuoso. The opposite happened many times and what occured was that Virtuoso took the blame readily for Bsh1's bullshit. Bsh1 was so concerned with pandering to the very people who tore him down (the Coal clique) and it was his downfall. Virtuoso was loyal to those who displayed a genuine concern for the userbase and who also showed some loyalty to him. He is a smart guy, knows how to charm etc. I don't really approve of his playstyle to the highest degree but to a medium-high degree, I respect it. He is reasonable and even if he will permaban me, he will know how to do it, when to do it and why to do it.

You would not be an imperialist dictator, you are not a right-wing type. You would be an isolationist type overall, attacking your nearby nations only if they were too immoral for you to stand and the authorities wouldn't do it.

Also, the fact that joining in was the most absurd thing you could fathom out of all the options shows that you would not cower to influence you saw as corrupt, no matter how much peace depended upon it.

Option 5 is more like playing it safe enough and hiding behind them, you'd probably dislike that you had to do it. That's not objectively good or evil, it's just your style of morality.

Option 2 means you are giving the children up for adoption afterwards, whereas option 1 is doing what you said. Actually it's true in a way, option 1 entails they will hear/see it so I get your reasoning.

Your choices all imply that given power, you would do many things violent and/or corrupt in the name of what you see as worth doing it, especially since option 2 is to be done without witness (for their own good of course, in your eyes at least) you think most like a tin pot dictator. This sounds like a harsh insult, but that's because you are reading it in the tone of someone who is inherently against authority. I am not saying it as an insult or loathing your character. You would likely be a somewhat fair dictator, I don't doubt that. You would, nonetheless, come down like all hell broken loose on those you deemed immoral under your regime and that trait, especially when combined with your subtle means and loathing of neutrality (4 being what least to do) result in you being overall an interventionalist, 'absolute authority' type when given the chance.

I am practising. I ask please for a rematch at some stage. I am very, very good at this kind of thinking but I didn't know much about the game Risk in itself and misunderestimated the importance of building forces.

In PM, if you don't want to to it publicly, pls tell me your results so we are sure the math was done right.

I can't reveal your PM without getting punished for PM doxxing so I am bound by privacy clauses of the CoC.

GG 

no 6-4=2, so PaulVerliane is actually a chameleon who leans to lib left-wing. That makes more sense.

It wasn't 6-3 =3

I am sorry. The meta in usual Risk is to play aggro af. I didn't think others would be so passive around each other. I also was scared you were allying the others either side of you, and I only know you were near me at that point, meaning you'd have 2-3 allies including myself, while I'd depend on your mercy. I assumed Ramshutu and dudz would be at each other's throats in the positions that they were in, which is very normal to happen in ranked games there. I was wrong. The meta in these games is much more about passivity in the earlygame. I will conform to it next time.

But theb you put the 6 in the wrong part of the stafe 2 equation. You need ti minus by the 6 in stage 2

I do not give a single shit if I get banned, I will make sure to point out the pure hypocrisy at hand if I do.

A fucking genuinely diagnosed autistic chief mod sitting and clapping to you making vile abuse where you stroll around saying 'hehe I'm so smart I know how to talk about word interpretation' then mocking people for being autistic or British. Maybe the American was the autistic one in your example, ever think of that? 

It must be your Canadian interpretation that's offending you.

Don't trigger others if you want to be treated with respect.

Coal, you are a homosexual, you also happen to be unbelievably terrible at producing quality posts.

Much like your comment on autism, this was such a friendly remark on the unrelated fact that you're homosexual.

Go ahead, click that flag. Prove your theory wrong.

Coal you are absolutely fucking pathetic and should back off from me.

I meant that in the friendliest tone but I mean every word.

Autism is not an insult. If he is autistic he is also likely to be a genius at something as well.

Autism is not a cognitive defect. Virtuoso is autistic. You should seriously stop using that word as an insult. Einstein and Mozart had it.

where did I complain?

ramshutu's actions have flown in the face of that philosophy many times, but sure he can speak about it well.

100/100 soon the medal will update.

I am open for offers. You ask me a question, I ask back. No more 2 for 1 deals.

Method A at work. It's okay though, all human use method A, we cannot escape our own judgement.

It's very 'breakable' because there's quite a few ways to have Stage 3 be a negative result, but so far no one at all has had it because I designed it to cover all coherent or legitimate moral codes, tbph. If you have a negative result in Stage 3, you're lying to yourself extremely.

Dred: lib right-winger

GreyParrot - Auth Right-Winger

Bmd: dictator in denial (I think being in denial is part of that alignment to be honest, as I hinted)

In my results:

RM: Centrist/Chameleon who leans to Fascism.

Blamonkey: Centrist/Chameleon who leans to Libertarian Socialism

If I transcribe Paul's stated stances he probably is 1+5 at the start, so 6 for stage 1.

Then probably is 8 with 4 seemingly being the ridiculous thing he'd never think of as it's clear he least wants to ignore it and doesn't even process that as an option.

8-4 = 4

6-3=3 so a chameleon who probably leans to lib right and that may fit with his agenda somewhat.

Actually your result is authoritarian right winger. Your 6 was not what the Libertarian has it as in their results vs where you had it. Where you had '3' is where for your results to pan out, you'd need '6' a the very end.