Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
-->
@dustryder
What was your result?
Created:
Posted in:
not to mention the debate I had against MAR in the early days where I turned his trap against him and no one respected it. The person who voted for me didn't even understand how well I had turned the trap on him.
Created:
Posted in:
Oh yes, that's why in that debate I had on gay rights parades, you voted me down for not debating the way you liked it even though I won it.
That's why in the debating where I annihilated my opponent and they conceded, you gave it a tie sayingi gish gallopd.
That's why you voted against me on the debate I had against generalgrant on abortion you refused to admit I won because I didn't use the exact legislation or method that you wanted.
That's why every vote, whether for or against me, you refuse to compare my and the opponent's argumens to each other but instead to your 'aboslute standard of what should have been argued and how' and then pretend to do C sometimes just to blend in.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
I am a better chameleon than you are then, friend. ;)
Created:
Posted in:
Ramshutu, you have plenty-a-time voted against me saying I should have argued X or Y instead and solely based your vote on disliking the path I chose.
Created:
Posted in:
Not only could you be wrong about how he should have argued (as it’s often personal preference)
You're doing that no matter what...
Created:
Posted in:
don't be confused though, he was no pussy. He also invented the concept of training people and taming them (not just those you invaded but your own army):
One of the more well-known stories about Sun Tzu, taken from Sima Qian, illustrates Sun Tzu's temperament as follows: Before hiring Sun Tzu, the King of Wu tested Sun Tzu's skills by commanding him to train a harem of 360 concubines into soldiers. Sun Tzu divided them into two companies, appointing the two concubines most favored by the king as the company commanders. When Sun Tzu first ordered the concubines to face right, they giggled. In response, Sun Tzu said that the general, in this case himself, was responsible for ensuring that soldiers understood the commands given to them. Then, he reiterated the command, and again the concubines giggled. Sun Tzu then ordered the execution of the king's two favored concubines, to the king's protests. He explained that if the general's soldiers understood their commands but did not obey, it was the fault of the officers. Sun Tzu also said that, once a general was appointed, it was his duty to carry out his mission, even if the king protested. After both concubines were killed, new officers were chosen to replace them. Afterwards, both companies, now well aware of the costs of further frivolity, performed their maneuvers flawlessly.
- Bradford 2000, pp. 134–35.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
He is an absolute god tier genius, he invented strategy literally. Strategy didn't exist before Sun Tzu, only tactics did. He invented core strategy that John Nash's math to estimate situations and which CIA bases its op strategies on are all based on.
Sun Tzu was around at a time where most generals and kings were warmongering, bloodthirsty motherfuckers with no qualms. He taught that you should tame your invaded people to like you and fight as little as possible and only when it's a sure thing. It is one of the main reasons that even as bad as China is today, it's still a very defensive, neutral nation internationally, willing to negotiate etc.
Created:
Yeah, I agree but I played devil's advocate when I debated you on it.
Created:
Posted in:
60/100 so far, hit me up for exchange. Eventually I'll only seek people offering to ask me something, at the moment I need both.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
What is that?
Created:
Well they update now, idk what happened.
Created:
-->
@DebateArt.com
There is a maximum storage of questions, my 'sent' questions have stopped updating completely... LOL
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
Perhaps, I also am overall authoritarian when in charge but libertarian-ish when not in charge so yeah I am a chameleon in that sense for sure and would naturally lean to authoritarianism but I do not tend to increase inequality or simply go with the current rich, I don't really think so... I don't know, maybe I am more cynical and cowardly when given power than I realised. My test is designed such that you cannot fool it and one of my choices does actually imply I am less moral than I admit to myself.
Created:
-->
@LordLuke
He based it on how this movie incorrectly formatted their own title.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
Hmm, while I don't think I'm part fascist, it's also true that my 'least thought of before' result was biased as I wrote them all. You probably are accurate in your result's leaning.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Greyparrot
do you agree with the result?
Created:
-->
@LordLuke
Well if you mean on one comment, it's there since that's a prerequisite for the 25 to amass.
Created:
-->
@LordLuke
Currently that is there, but it goes up to 25 and is for a single post/comment.
Created:
A bigger issue is that one can like their own comments and forum posts to fast-track the like challenges (other than the 25-at-once one).
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DynamicSquid
I believe in A. Usually A will include B and C... Don't see the contradiction.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
Is it possible you can do it today? Ask people when they want it?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
I am mainly more concerned that they value not banning people breaking rules instead make a special case.
Do you realise that you were one of them?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
Do you have a 'leaning' to your chameleon result? Based on your feelings towards the end-result's action and how it relates to the four stances?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Vader
I believe that is accurate.
Created:
Posted in:
Unlike votes, there is absolutely no rule or reason for a rule to prevent us arranging collusion to gain question-based medals (they're new, check your profiles).
For every person who asks me a question (that isn't too personally doxxing or something) I will ask them the same question back and then one on top, which will be something tailored to them.
Created:
-->
@Vader
That is why you are trusted with power, by him, after all.
I have unblocked you by the way.
Created:
A better thing to point out is that if it came down to it and Drafterman, Supadudz and Vaarka went head to head to claim rightful ownership of the server, most of us would instantly side with Supadudz and transfer to a server he owns in the blink of an eye and Vaarka knows it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
I've unblocked you.
Created:
I am speaking of the name of the role more than the role itself.
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
Created:
Posted in:
In this day and age, a watch is purely a gimmick. Your phone tells you the time.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheDredPriateRoberts
do you agree?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
This spots your true allegiance and motives based not only on what you think you want but also what you want the least, in combination with it. You may think you are one thing but when it comes down to what you loathe the most, it appears you're more of something else than you realised and would alter in real life situations, if given power.
Created:
Posted in:
Maybe my issue isn't the site's admin knowing my IP but that any user who comes across the website could see things to narrow me down, instead.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
To prove that my test isn't just bogus, even though a negative result in Stage 3 is possible, why is no one so far reporting it? That is because I know what I am doing, no matter what your value system of ethics is, you end up with a positive number or 0 by the end.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@bmdrocks21
Tell something, if you think this test is flawed, describe your political agenda to me and I will help decode why you are correctly identified.
Created:
Posted in:
Social Democracy is a system that is different to Socialism. When will you understand that? Social Democracy is a version of Capitalism that has Socialist tendencies added on as flavouring.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
what do you lean to?
Created:
Posted in:
I got chameleon who leans to authoritarian right-wing... Oh dear.
Created:
Posted in:
Sorry it took some tweaking, it's finished now. I was a chameleon by the way.
Created:
Posted in:
Your next door neighbour, who you have a somewhat mutually beneficial peace with in the neighbourhood but isn't your best friend ever, is domestically abusing their family, housemates etc.
What do you want to do?
What do you do?
It has gone on for an extensive period of time, there is no question that they are abusing.
Options:
(some are illegal to admit you want to do, just think it silently)
- Give them a taste of their own medicine, or at least vigilante their ass in some shape or form. Then walk away, the pain'll fix 'em.
- As above, but you ensure the children are moved to safety, whether or not you are technically kidnapping them in the meantime.
- Join in and film it for a bit, ensuring you're not on the tape, then blackmail them later on gambling on them never being willing to take you down with them and you'd be getting a lesser sentence to them anyway, or equal at worst.
- Ignore it, that aint your issue, in fact you have enough shit to deal with at home. That fucking rebellious brat is playing Justin Bieber too loud, you can hear it through their $4 earphones. It's time to do what's right, handle your own household.
- Get the cops involved, simple as. Do everything you can to help the case, even if blackmail starts to happen or the family deny it in fear, you will take the rascal down and you know it!
- Eliminate the threat and replace them with a puppet neighbour you have strong influence over.
- Offer kindly, silently as possible, to help the family if they want you to. If they insist on not, you back off. If they beg you to help, YOU MAKE A FULL CASE, documenting evidence and everything. After the case begins to ensue, you refuse to turn up to court, how dare Sally have snitched on her neighbour Dominic? That's so shady. You get the neighbourhood to shun Sally but before she runs off or commits suicide, you come to Sally and offer her assistance, in private. Say you're so sorry, things just got out of hand you know how the gossip is it turned things so bitter and twisted, you can't believe that Mark would frame Sally for snitching like that. Mark is a sly one. You have sex with Sally, you enjoy it. You go back to your house. You tell your spouse that Sally is so rude that when you went to help her she reached for your groin and threatened to sue you for sexual harassment.
- You join in, genuinely, helping each other tame the victims and dominate the neighbourhood.
I would like you to do the following.
Stage 1
Take the number which is what you want to do. Add it to the number of what you think you really would do.
If the result is 2 digits, add those digits together.
If both were option 8, for instance your result will be a 7 because 16 becomes 1+6=7
Stage 2
Now, I want you to take the number you would loathe doing most.
Now, I want you to take the number that was so stupid or immoral that it crossed your mind the least before reading the questions. If this is nonexistent, the number is 0.
With these 2 numbers I want you to minus the latter from the former.
Stage 3
Now, minus the result of Stage 2 from the result of Stage 1.
Okay. Now go and read the number that is the difference.
If the answer is what you wanted to do, you are overall a libertarian Left-winger.
If the answer is what you thought you'd do, you are overall an authoritarian Left-Winger
If the answer is either 0 or something very 'grey area' in your morality, you are a chameleon and have no real agenda other than survival.
If the answer is what you really didn't want to do, you are overall an authoritarian Right-Winger
If the answer is what never really crossed your mind before reading it, you are a Right-Wing Libertarian.
If the answer is larger than 8, you are a ruthless dictator without wing orientation, you may identify as an anarchic rebel.
This is a very complicated algorithm. You cannot fool it, you cannot decode it unless you are as much of a genius as I am and you probably will think this is bullshit. Feel free to criticise it or admit its accuracy in the comments below.
Created:
Posted in:
Also, if you need the evidence to show FBI or something, just 'delete' it from view, stash it somewhere only mods can see.
Created:
Posted in:
Destroy the evidence, shut the trolls down. Tell in the CoC that to bring up a deleted thread in conversation on the website is considered the same as PM doxxing and violates the Mod's discretion and privacy, undermining the fabric of the website.
If they keep at it, say they are harassing the moderators and upsetting the userbase. Ban them, halas.
Created:
Where is your solution?
Created:
Tap it.
Created:
tap that fucking X
Created: