RationalMadman

I think they max you out at three new accounts per two days or something but yeah you can make quite a few if you're patient enough. They do this to stop VPN users having so much power to create many accounts. It also helps fight the anonymity that VPN provides if/when you start scamming or spamming etc over their email service.

I'm sure you would.

No, the phone number is not optional to make a new Google account.

With one phone number you can have multiple Google accounts by using the same number again.

No it's not.

They had a lot of meaning, even more so than the advertising if Brave browser, in fact. Perhaps your lack of knowledge about DA politics and deep rivalries is why you thought they were meaningless while the others were meaningful.

What is meaningless about our argument and what meaningful discussion is it that we stopped taking place?

What discussion do you think would take place that didn't, due to our argument?

How has it done that?

What is the meaning of this thread that has been lost?

If you wanted to pay some money for a truly secure Gmail experience, this is how. The page is a good introduction, you need to buy 2 physical things and basically there's a keycode linked to your account that changes ever so often, you need to even physically plug one in to sign in in the full security mode.

I don't hate protonmail, jus tto be clear. It's a good choice but I don't quite understand why people consider gmail 'flawed', it's not flawed at all and has an airtight security system.

Torguard email would be my choice as well. Again I don't think it's free.

https://scryptmail.com/ This would be my choice if I felt I had something to hide over email.

It's not free though, that's my point. You want full privacy, it costs.

protonmail is a good choice though, I won't deny it. It just seems pointless is all

Nothing is privacy wise better than gmail in terms of unhackability etc but that requires you to trust Google, that's all. Idk about protonmail because it's easy to trust a corrupt organisation simply for being 'not Google'. If you use Chrome, Android phone or basically anything where your gmail is attached, Google is spying on your emails even if you use another email provider, just so you know. Therefore, the most privacy to aim for is with a Gmail account. Of course, there are other options but absolutely no email provider is truly trustworthy, because emails are attached to you IRL usually (or it's a corrupt provider).

I support Warren, Yang is definitely my second-fave.

Everyone should have a VPN in my opinion but I understand why one wouldn't bother. Even after discovering them I had a period of not using, nonetheless do I really want my ISP seeing everything? If the site isn't HTTPS and is just HTTP, your ISP literally sees everything you do on the website, is that what you want, some random technician reading your private messages? 

Some of the top ranked VPNs are not necessarily anywhere near the top in actual trustworthiness, they simply built good quality software. 

PureVPN and IPVanish are two I would say are this.

Cyberghost is 100% serving some kind of agenda. I won't go into the proof here, it will be deemed a conspiracy theory. DO NOT purchase or trust it.

While, obviously, cheaper usually means worse it absolutely is not in this case and that's why I love SurfShark personally, that price is likely to go up over time, of course. They are getting more popular as we speak. I even would be willing to consider the idea that SurfShark is an unofficial subsidiary of ExpressVPN as they're both based out of British Virgin Isles and both have excellent funcionality and basically SurfShark is the cheaper version whereas Express is the higher-end version with slightly higher speeds and such.

It's led* not lead and something was wrong about how you structured the overall question as it's unclear if you're more interested in what led me to it or if I agree with my ranking as #1 in all those extremes.

I don't think I'm the most narcissistic person alive at all, for instance I think you're more narcissistic and sociopathic than I am. I do agree that I'm more 'in my own head' than most, that comes from a combination of ADD and high functioning autism spectrum disorder (it used to be called high functioning asperger's syndrome but they removed that name as 4 years of his research was done under the Nazi Regime). The difference between ASD and full-on Autism is that the former talks fluently much earlier in childhood than the latter and maintains a level of verbal and overall social fluidity that isn't seen in the latter, but both do struggle socially when it comes to emotional bonding and picking up on social cues. They can manually learn their way around that, however, and since usually they're blessed with much higher IQ than most, it's not that hard for them to do.

Egostistical could mean 'full of myself' as a narcissist is or could mean that I present myself very prominently and proudly, if it's the latter you're asking about, the reason I do that is I have no shame in what I am or how I became it, how about you?

Jainism fuses Dharma and Karma together and believe fundamentally in Karma but that you're reincarnated as any species, even a plant perhaps, not just reborn as a human .

Dharma, not Karma, just so you know. Dharma believes that there's no evil, just negative value and you come back the next life in a form to balance it out. Karma declares all that goes into negative value as 'evil' and with Karma you're always reborn as a human, not another species or alien etc.

Lost? How is it lost?

Exactly they invented it, released whatever they wanted to, kept secret what they wanted to and admitted they track you through their browser.

The biggest reason Google is more honourable than other Illuminati companies is that they've been completely honest about their tracking and altering of results and ads to fit your 'profile'. YT is one of the only places on the whole Internet to genuinely get conspiracy ot anti-Google videos seen and spread by their very own recommendation system. Nonetheless, while more honest than the others, they are still indeed spying so if you want privacy, go for Firefox it's that simple. Chrome offers no extensions on smartphones whereas all Firefox add-ons work there, pretty much.

Chromium is based on Chrome. Chrome came first.

Look at supadudz saying DDO is cleaner and more polished than this site wow 

It was never ever good Omar, trust me.

Debate Dot Don't bother going there Org

I found out that Mozilla's co-founder is one of the leaders of Brave browser so if you had just said that to begin with I'd have said less but I wonder why he left a non-profit organisation for a profit one. That's all I'll say. 

Since it's him in charge I say Brave is trustworthy enough for Omar. I will never ever trust a browser other than Firefox or Chrome with my personal accounts and I'll never trust Chrome as much as Firefox when and if I'm ever on the run or something and need to access the Internet truly securely.

I know what is a moral company and what is not.

You don't know enough to think Chromium is equal to Firefox in that. They openly admit they track you. Brave may have coded those parts out but I really have my doubts.

Lol. Ramshutu, you use Safari. Safari. Okay. I cannot fathom if this is one big lie or not but if you're using Safari, all you did on other sites etc is totally and utterly in the hands of the wrong side of Illuminati. Apple are not heroes, they're just bad at what they do. So you're being spied on but rest assured, it's not done well.

You cannot have a browser that automatically kills fingerprinting unless you connect through someone else's computer like with TOR. To display a page, a browser needs to garner data from you to fit the fonts etc to fit your OS and browser, screen resolution and some extra things like Theme etc. That's your first layer of fingerprint. Your second is Cookies. There's two more, the fourth is so secret most don't know about it but I guarantee you, NSA do.

Why do you trust Brave?

Okay good luck honestly good luck. Be very sure to sign into sensitive accounts while you're on it, be brave.

Mhmm they are called Chrome Extensions not Google extensions, just so we're clear on the official categorisation and copyright.

If it's based on Chromium and not Mozilla, there is absolutely no way you will convince me it is privacy-oriented even if it uses the word 'secure' in its slogan. Chromium browsers are the most tracking ones in the market, that's their entire ethos; 'we make it fit you' etc. If Brave is  based on Chromium it is tracking habits and accruing cookies to build profiles of you; I guarantee it.

Ramshutu of course knows it all.

You can't use Google extensions on anything other than chrome.

Google has its own Internet (literally) this enables it to be milliseconds faster than other search engines but for example Bing is owned by Microsoft which also has its own Internet idk about which of the two is faster but I'd out money on Google.

It's all milliseconds, you can't say really it's so much faster but I have no doubt the edge goes to Google.

For Indian Hindus it generally is. For Sri Lankan Hindus and specifically South Indian Hindus, it generally is simply a lifestyle and they ignore a lot of the Vedas etc when preaching and learning about Hinduism, they also commonly eat meat and fish.

Of course it isn't, all privacy browsers have that flaw because they will do their best to not personalise your searches. The best privacy search engine is DuckDuckGo which is used by criminals on TOR browser to search things that Google and Bing censor etc.

Do note that your concerns are valid not because of paying. Paid VPNs, for instance, are much more trustworthy than free ones by and large. What is true here is that Mozilla Firefox is the absolute Pinnacle of a privacy-oriented browser. There is not one single thing better in Brave privacy-wise than in Firefox but the reverse is unimaginably untrue. Of you would like me to go into depth, at least tell me what you think possibly is weak about Firefox as a privacy-focused browser or Mozilla as a trustworthy company.

If you trust Google, it's fine to stick to Chrome absolutely, but if you ever want privacy online to a maximal degree, Firefox is the way to go.

Brave browser is free, he is going to get money for referring you to it, it may become premium only later.

I don't think you realise how disproportionate the skill and work ethic is between Virt's modding and Bsh1's modding but it's quite the abyss. Virt is too afraid to say it but even he knows it's true.

I was there when MAR was banned I had strong involvement in the entire process from several weeks prior to the ban. I know for a fact that Bsh1 did nothing at all and Virtuoso was the only Mod who even began to acknowledge it as a possibility through to the end where he was the only one who did anything.

From when exactly did it have no cause or should have run out?

The only mod who did work was Virt. Not bsh and not Mike. I was there.

Vietnam is red with orange star yes, but look how corrupt it is. do the slightest research and know.

how so?

Sure we did, enjoy the TV show.

When it comes to God, all are confused when they search without. All are wise or at the very least dumb and not confused that search within. 

Thus it will be found that God is only shown to the worthy; no matter how hard the people nitpick, sheep-herd each other or battle it out.

I hereby tell you that the truth is we are entertainment and stimulation to the mother of reality as we know it. It's not a 'why' it's not a 'how' it's a truth. She alters what is and what is not at any given time, she herself was randomly generated as a series of 'is's and the 'is' of being able to rig the random generator of variables caused her to permanently gain control of Fate since then.

There is no other version of reality that has no logical loopholes other than mine. If you ask 'but where did the random variable generator come from?' it is simple; it came with time, it was necessitated from the beginning of time.

So where then did time originate? Before time began, there was nothing at all, meaning the beginning of time in and of itself is the beginning of everything it's a semantic axiom and reality is actually semantic at its core, not physical. We are a simulation.