Total posts: 19,931
Posted in:
Omar thinks he is smarter than us for going 'oh yeahhhh ahahahaha you all don't know really who you are!'
Go ahead, Omar tell us who you are.
#exposed
Created:
I am the one who exposed MAR you hilarious irony-enacter. You and Death came months after he'd been targetting me and then feel you saved the day when for weeks if not months I'd been telling Virtuoso everything you were telling him on the last 2 days, but I did it in private.
Created:
DebateDotOrg is a pigsty, CreateDebate is a wild west 'dog eat dog' scenario, DebateIsland is a tame and near-sterile zoo and DebateArt is a chimpanzee fission-fusion community with the religion forums having no clear alphas at all and slowly the big bad ones have been banned or silenced while the main forums has a lot more passive-aggressive power displaying going on. The hilarious part is that the main alphas in the chimpanzee sense of the term (raw dominance and respect-garnering) are not really the mods or even the admin. The mods and admin are passive and sit back, not even in a cunning way, they just literally let the others fight.
So, I prefer the chimpanzee warzone to the other places.
Created:
Again, you may bring up France who fought heavily against the Royal family, I am telling you this includes 'rich', 'powerful' etc. It's not just about Tyranny but if you are VERY Red in your regime's colours, then you are almost always 'powerful' in how you have the Royal family or Elite rule over the rest, especially in your history not just present.
Created:
you may counter me saying Communists love Red. Look at them in actual action and then come back to me later. The only Communist regime to last and not have gone to all hell is Cuba which has blue and white more so than Red on it. It's not just the colours, if you have a 'star' you are very Illuminati-linked whereas if you lack a star, even if your nation has 'red' in it, it's not that you are very structured in your hierarchy but that you are brutal or that there's some kind of immovable... Royalty or Elite that will not be moved for a long time and doesn't care that you know of them.
Created:
Fiora is head of Illuminati yes but do they directly 'deal with' her? No. God (who I know as Fiora) is not one who uses voice directly. Voices of others, especially in a movie or TV show, yes. Text on a screen, yes. She can communicate like that at times but that's only for emergencies and usually used by the demigods beneath her.
There are four factions of demigod:
- Preserver (their 'essence' or 'non-physical energy' is coloured white)
- Destroyer (of course, their essence is black, note that this is not racist because the peachy and pink pigmentation of human whites and the dark brown pigmentation of human blacks has absolutely nothing to do with this, I am speaking of something much deeper, but flags, names and logos are indeed related to this as are some other things)
- Balancer (blue)
- Imbalancer (red) but more so a hierarchical 'strong must prey on the weak' 'pleasant/superior must demolish the less appealing/inferior'
So what of yellow? Yellow is the opposite of purple, purple is blue and red mixing. No alien is pure yellow, no alien is pure purple (as opposed to a slanted shade of it towards either blue or red). Imbalancers are not quite what their name implies and this is more obvious as they were created last. They oppose all the other three but more likely will work with destroyers than anything else. You will take note that in the past, the regimes with Red were the most brutally hierarchical and that orange is the most severe sort of 'red regime' and the sands in Ancient Egypt was golden (which is even more yellow than orange). This highlights the severe hierarchy.
The Illuminati run via this. Notice that the UN's colours are blue mostly but white as well, they balance and preserve the world despite all their corruption. Preserving doesn't equal 'good', neither does 'balancing', many Red-sided individuals have fought Tyranny as well. The Illuminati most certainly has factions 1,3 and 4 in it but the Destroyer faction tends to always be anti-the-rest of Illuminati.
There is more to my theory but you can mock it as you wish. We are in a simulation anyway, so none of this 'truly matters', I needn't convince you of it as such. God doesn't really care either way.
Created:
-->
@Death23
bit hard to dislike someone who has only 123 posts since the beginning of Oct 2018 and whose only real contribution to the site was trolling a multi-account spammer that they falsely took credit for exposing and making a semantically abusive 'sea lions are seals' debate where the voters both had grudges against their opponent and also intellectually struggled to grasp a single concept of definitions being wrong despite the dictionary having them, especially when science and logic of categorising defy them.
The exact same tactics were used against the same opponent to win a most ridiculous 1 = 0.9recurring debate where a literal wrong fact was debated as true and the audience of only 1 voter on the second debate bought right into it because the comprehension of the indisputable fact that if 0.0recurring followed by a '1' doesn't exist then neither does 0.9 recurring followed by a '9'... Was... a little beyond their realm of ability.
Yes, not much to hate there from a mod's POV where the mod also dislikes your opponent in the 'seal' debate and whose deputy mod had some time to shine banning the multi-accounter on the debate that this individual starred in.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
you hurt mine a long time ago fake-ass 'appreciater'. Go enjoy your Trello and mod team and leave me out of your 'nice to' circle. You are so fake and never once, not even once justified to us why the fuck you put bsh1 in power against our will to begin with.
Created:
-->
@Death23
I have seen her being bullied on CD and DDO, it is all accurate.
For more info on why all debate websites are abusive see here:
Created:
-->
@Death23
Bsh1 deleted a debate of Wylted telling YB she'd be better off dead.
It took him over a week to delete it and he laughed at her during in a very sinister tone, he is quite a cold individual behind closed doors but this time he did it even on the forums acting like she was okay with the debate when she blatantly wasn't.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
In my first reply to you, did you take the time to read the medals?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Post Count updates on previous posts even from August 2018. Your post Count was not 1,892 when you made that post, it's updating as you go along.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Created:
The most natural thing is change, that even is true of non-living beings. Eventually a change comes that ends you, that's death. Death is a natural ending for most things, yes.
My God doesn't want most to be immortal, we tend to bore her after some time alive. There are a select few immortals, they're basically vampires and run the Illuminati probably, I don't know for sure.
Created:
Posted in:
I give him a 9/10 disapproval rating. 1 because he was elected and isn't a dictator. That's about it.
Created:
Lol. 18 is fine as an age, 21 is too high for sure. America is the only developed nation to have an age that conservatively high. Same with the age of sexual consent. Most developed nations have it be 16.
Some places have it be that when it's 14-16, you can't be much older, others have it that below 18 can only be up to a certain age and definitely not an authority figure of any kind etc. Personally, I think we undervalue the importance of sexual freedom as a society. The issue is that when people are abused they are so embarassed to tell anyone because we are so angry and repressed about sex. That is actually what makes it easier for sexual abusers to do what they do and get away with it.
Created:
Posted in:
Feminism was (and is) a force for good, you backwards chauvinist. You think that men fucking and leaving their women is due to feminism? It happened all the time with any women below the highest class of income and influence in all cultures that were anti-feminist in our history as a species.
So, try again with your preaching. The thing that changed was that women can cope now with the men running away.
Created:
Posted in:
As a Flat Earther left-winger, I am completely neutral on this horseshit dilemma. How about all the money and effort put into that is put into feeding Africa, Asia and maintaining peace in the world?
Created:
Posted in:
This remix of it is pretty dope. Ludacris is actually what I call a truly mediocre rapper. He's too good to be called bad and too bad to be called good, lol.
Created:
Posted in:
It is funny because I know something about this due to me raising it to the mods earlier. I am not sure I can tell you though, as it's a breach of privacy but I can tell you no rule is being broken, despite what it appears.
You're not wrong about how you interpreted what's happening, it's just not quite how it appears.
Created:
Actually I was there when what she says happened, happened. It's completely accurate, bsh1 only deleted the abusive debate thanks to me helping her to convince him to.
Created:
Posted in:
To an admin that has completely disregarded me, put a bastard in power who unfairly rigs enforcement of rules against many including me and in the favour of a select few? Yeah, that's also why I stopped the Patreon donating after 2 months. I owe Mr. Mike nothing.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@DebateArt.com
That's because Firefox puts a lot more money and effort into ensuring it's solid as hell in terms of privacy as opposed to sexy and appealing but it is very easy to use and pleasant if you get addons for that purpose. On top of that, all privacy-focused programmers or let's say over 85% of them, are all going to first release their product as a Firefox addon because it's really easy to code on Firefox (they make it easy for 'add-ons' which are called 'extensions' for Chrome) and the massive fanbase of privacy stuff are Firefox users. This means that not only is Mozilla itself the biggest and best company at privacy-heavy browser provision but the people who make add-ons for it are the hugest proportion of the best programmers at that stuff out there.
Brave won't be happy with you creating traffic to your user link via your own website, I am not threatening you here but I'm letting you know that this is a way of getting referrals that they hate. They would much rather you do it on your facebook, twitter etc because they can then be more happy and sure that it's real traffic and not faked or 'do this so our site stays up and never use the browser again' type stuff.
Created:
Posted in:
You linked with your tag because you want a reward for referring people, that is advertising and if any other user here did that you'd punish them for it.
Created:
Posted in:
If you don't like being spied on and want to fight surveillance, stick to Firefox, it has fought for open-source privacy since the start of alternative browsers.
If you are going to not allow advertising on your website, I should be free to fight your advertising with truth. I use Chrome personally because it's the best in terms of speed and convenience, but if I wanted to become as anonymous as possible, Firefox is the diehard fighter against Tyranny and censorship in the history of all Internet Browsers. Brave is a for-profit browser, Firefox is so massive and yet Mozilla is fundamentally not for profit.
See here if you are interested in VPN purchase, my advice is sound and I'm willing to be called out on it.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
Stonehenge was designed by humans intentionally to have a certain space inside.
Created:
-->
@Christen
What you say is not fine is the very principle of law and order in the entire world.
Created:
You are living up to her reputation of users of this website, Franklin.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
The general Roman Foot was the one you say is too short. What was your question exactly?
Created:
Also the bullying from another user but I can only callout mods.
Enjoy reading the review. It is from YeshuaBought.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@janesix
What did you feel wasn't 'cleared up', as in what are you still searching for regarding the Roman Foot?
Created:
Posted in:
Pixel 2 is truly at the peak of smartphones of this era. 3 is pretty much an aesthetic upgrade only.
Good choice of phone company but choosing Pixel 3 (or even 4 which is coming out) over 2 is simply being naive. 2 lets you have unlimited images and video for 3 years after purchase as it grants you that much cloud storage (but only for those 2 types of file and only from the smartphone).
I am not saying you made a 'bad purchase' but you definitely didn't make the best one, money-wise. Google always spies on us, it's best to minimise who is spying. If Google is the only Illuminati company spying on you other than Windows (computer, unless you fancy Linux or Google notebook) then you're minimising the power that 'they' have over you.
Do not fall for the privacy advocates praising Apple over Microsoft. Microsoft Windows doesn't spy less than Apple does at all, Apple is just 'closed' in its coding in a way that Microsoft is not. Additionally, if you truly know the conspiracy theories like I do, it's your microchip (especially Intel more so than AMD) that spies on you even if you are running Linux. The reason this is a barely known fact is that it's the one thing they never want anonymous hackers etc to realise, since it's their ace in the hole.
Created:
Posted in:
Infowars is controlled opposition. The only reason the Illuminati silenced Alex Jones is that cleary he had served his purpose and gotten Trump elected, his only purpose after that became to alienate Trump fans and make them seem crazy.
Alex Jones isn't even a flat-earther, he is a fake conspiracy theorist who just ran/runs with whatever 'they' tell him to. This is why he goes so hard after Left-Wing corruption and so lenient against right-wing corruption and it was the Republicans who were behind NASA's lies.
Created:
TO TALK TO ME MORE ABOUT THE VPN THING GO HERE:
Created:
Posted in:
In nations where VPN is illegal, even if they know you are using the VPN, if they struggle to actually stop you using it, they only prosecute via blackmailing the VPN to turn you over as they say it's party to your crime etc. The only nation that may hurt you truly for using VPN in and of itself is Iran, UAE will deport you at worst. These nations that outlaw VPN all don't actually mean that using VPN is illegal other than obviously North Korea which doesn't even have Internet for the populace, to begin with so that's a moot point. They mean if you use the VPN to bypass their censorship, it's illegal which requisites an element of proof on their part of what you used it for. They can and will go through your computer when they get suspicious of you, do not fuck around do your research.
This is why using only the companies of HSS and SurfShark (or maybe ExpressVPN but it's a rip-off that's the only real issue with it) is so important. They have a track record of being completely immune to prosecution but not being malicious in their software in spite of this. NordVPN is in Panama but I am telling you, there is something very strange about their origin and why they advertised so heavily so fast. Their VPN didn't 'build up' the way others did, it's like they had an end-product in midn and haven't ever tried to make it more secure or allow additional features since then (only to update aestheticas and make it more palatable to the masses), this is why I have a strong feeling they are much more willing to sell you out when the time comes even though on paper they're not doing that to people. Panama is so extreme that it would allow them to deny they are handing you over to an authority even if they are, that's how privacy-oriented Panama is (it's the extreme haven for criminals) so the British Virgin Isles which where SurfShark and ExpressVPN are based, which don't allow companies to hide when they turn you over but do allow them to refuse to be extradited or pressured legally, are the ideal type of legal haven to rely on.
HSS is owned by AnchorFree who are based in Ukraine and Russia for their technical stuff and you may drop your jaw at me recommending them but their track record is never once being forced into anything. If they ever turned someone over it was literally massive as fuck crimes where CIA, not just FBI, were involved. That is as trustworthy as it gets, period. Their nations are high-law-enforcement yet they themselves have never actually turned anyone short of brutally investigated terrorists, in. That means they have such a flawless means of privacy and dedication to their no-logs policy that they can't be touched. They have been fighitng tyranny and oppression for 14 years, they know what they're doing and are unparalleld in that sense of trustworthiness in the VPN arena.
Created:
Posted in:
I am quoting myself from another thread.I don't want to advertise but a VPN I highly recommend is this one:A VPN that's less good but was one I was previously loyal to (SurfShark is new to the market, only became known in 2019 or so) was this one:Both are extremely trustworthy. They genuinely don't fuck around, I have looked into it. They are heavily dedicated to privacy above all else.HSS has become less good at the whole 'viewing content only available to country X' thing and it has possibly got a webRTC leak (very easy to patch with a chrome extension, and webRTC doesn't leak on Android smartphones) but it's definitely what I'd recommend, aside from NordVPN (owners are shady but it's easily one of the best out there), if you have an IPv6 IP address.ExpressVPN is fantastic but expensive. If you want to literally have a VPN at all times, even while gaming and to use on the game, I'd recommend only ExpressVPN, even Nord is too slow for that. SurfShark has a whitelister that lets you whitelist the game or specific websites where you want your real IP to be interacted with while having a totally and utterly safe VPN-encrypted-tunnel connection with other programs and websites at the same time. That's why I love it.ExpressVPN also offers the 'whitelister' thing but calls it split tunneling. I do not know any other VPNs than SurfShark or ExpressVPN that offer that in such a good way.ExpressVPN is 4-5* the price of SurfShark so...PureVPN offers an almost as good thing that splits by some apps but not websites and not all apps I think. PureVPN is known to log data that they give out to law enforcement and maybe advertisers too (the latter is not confirmed). They are frauds for saying they have a 'no logs' policy but it's not their fault, they are founded in Pakistan and based out of Hong Kong. They didn't realise that Hong Kong is not an actual haven for such investigations. There were some legal loopholes that meant the country worked with the FBI to blackmail PureVPN into defying their no logs policy on some suspects of cyberstalking etc. I am not blaming the company, the problem is they are still based out of Hong Kong. If you think about it, they can and will do the same to you based on any suspicion later on, it's just not a safe bet. So, I don't consider PureVPN worth mentioning.Torguard is also good if you live in an oppressed nation as it has the stealth/camouflage mechanism but the issue with that is that Torguard is owned by a company that is based in the US. Logically, if/when anyone gets suspicious, you're going to be turned over to your nation's authorities in no time.While Hostpot Shield doesn't have the proper stealth mechanism, it works by a very rare thing called Catapult Hydra (which it, itself, helped to innovate the way to make VPN tunnels within, it's usually used for highly secure, less well-known phone carrier networks etc) and basically while your ISP can see you're using VPN, and VPN is illegal in the most significantly oppressed nations, what actually will happen is that HSS will never ever turn you in, they were founded by people who loathed Russian Tyranny, let alone Chinese or Iranian tyranny. So, 'stealth VPN' is important sure but if you're playing out the full scenario, I guarantee you SurfShark or HSS are the two who based on their record will never turn you in and SurfShark has the stealth mechanism on top of it so there's literally 0 drawback to using it, I don't even know how to say this without sounding like an advertiser but I hope someone reads this message before their nation drives them into fear of the Internet and makes a wise decision in life.Do note, purchasing it with cryptocurrency (SurfShark and Torguard both offer this) is the optimal way to go about things if you're in a hyper-oppressed nation. If in a generally oppressed nation, the usual way will work because VPN isn't illegal in most nations in and of itself and it's about picking one that will never turn you in. That's why I will say HSS even though I rank SurfShark above it overall.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
I do not care if you agree with them or not. They are wrong. You say 'admitted', they wanted it to be that low.
75% undiagnosed, genius.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
Nope, that was utter trash propaganda and you know it. Even when they admit mental health is an issue, they make it a 'parents raised them wrong' thing.
Created:
Torguard is also good if you live in an oppressed nation as it has the stealth/camouflage mechanism but the issue with that is that Torguard is owned by a company that is based in the US. Logically, if/when anyone gets suspicious, you're going to be turned over to your nation's authorities in no time.
While Hostpot Shield doesn't have the proper stealth mechanism, it works by a very rare thing called Catapult Hydra (which it, itself, helped to innovate the way to make VPN tunnels within, it's usually used for highly secure, less well-known phone carrier networks etc) and basically while your ISP can see you're using VPN, and VPN is illegal in the most significantly oppressed nations, what actually will happen is that HSS will never ever turn you in, they were founded by people who loathed Russian Tyranny, let alone Chinese or Iranian tyranny. So, 'stealth VPN' is important sure but if you're playing out the full scenario, I guarantee you SurfShark or HSS are the two who based on their record will never turn you in and SurfShark has the stealth mechanism on top of it so there's literally 0 drawback to using it, I don't even know how to say this without sounding like an advertiser but I hope someone reads this message before their nation drives them into fear of the Internet and makes a wise decision in life.
Do note, purchasing it with cryptocurrency (SurfShark and Torguard both offer this) is the optimal way to go about things if you're in a hyper-oppressed nation. If in a generally oppressed nation, the usual way will work because VPN isn't illegal in most nations in and of itself and it's about picking one that will never turn you in. That's why I will say HSS even though I rank SurfShark above it overall.
Created:
I found out that SurfShark does provide for IPv6, it worked out a patch for it. This is what fascinates me about the VPN, it innovates at a rate I have never ever seen another VPN service do before.
Just clarifying I misinformed in a previous post that they don't provide to IPv6.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
I agree with what you said overall as I just said that 5 posts ago but don't bring Fox up as an example of bias not equalling unreliability since Fox is both biased and unreliable.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@blamonkey
Show me a single decently accurate and well fact-checked fox news story. One. Show me one.
Created:
Posted in:
If Warren wins I genuinely can see Europe and US becoming true allies again and USA finally joining the rest of the developed world in becoming a social democracy. If Yang wins, he'll try to make it that too hard too fast.
If anyone else wins out of the Dems it's bound to go wrong and if they don't win, shit will go 100000x more wrong, so really anything but Trump will do but I totally want Warren and I would love to discuss this in depth with someone who has a well-functioning brain and knows their core values need both pragmatic application as much as romantic foundation.
Created:
-->
@Death23
Exactly.
Created:
I would feel safer with a gang than with a guy who may have a terrorist agenda and see me as collateral. If the gang was suddenly face to face with a rival gang, then I'd be very afraid as well as I'd definitely be seen as collateral, indeed, but they'd usually let the neutrals run first with a head start.
Created:
Posted in:
News companies make a living from informing people of relevant things to the day and age and/or topic(s) they specialize in. Journalists work their whole lives passionately at the profession and then people come like Death23 to shit on their (Journos') reputation because they (people like Death and Franklin) ignore that encyclopedias were News in ancient times and were written by colonial bastards who rewrote history to make themselves the heroes of all the wars they were involved in hence the Britannica Encyclopedia being named after the Brits.
Bias is everywhere, quality and beauty is still able be present in spite of that.
Created:
In fact, this is the sheer limit of displeasure I am willing to have with someone before I hit the block button. There, that felt good.
Created: