RationalMadman

Lucifer Morningstar, much like Jesus, is seen as a 'lightbearer' of a divine kind but isn't directly divine himself.

Satan/Shai'tan... The Devil/Iblis is a beast. A brutally 'dark' angel (of darkness vs angel of light who was Lucifer) with a much more persuasive way about gaining loyalty than the signature means of gaining followers that Lucifer uses (which is bullying and brute force).

Lucifer is not the Devil. The Devil is the enemy of Jesus and Allah. The Devil is the God of the OT in my theory.

the TV series "Lucifer" is representing Satan, not Lucifer.

I am genuinely certain that if the Bible is true, this is the correct series of events.

If you can pls mention to him that you know a guy who thinks Jesus is actually Lucifer and that the link between OT characters and NT is that Satan is actually god of the OT while Lucifer is the more disciplined 'punish forever and lover forever' type of justice-system supporter.

Lucifer didn't like how OT God would just punish willy nilly and not have any absolute justice system or way of being a 'good guy' etc. This explains also how it's very possible that Lucifer then, when he became the holy ghost after Jesus' body died, went on to become Allah and discuss things with a human he possessed.

The battle in the Abrahamic religions is between 2 villains; one all-powerful but infinitely bored (Satan/OT-God) and the other severely disciplined and believing in brutal absolutes (Lucifer/Jesus/Allah).

Satan represents compromise and hedonism, Lucifer represents absolute morality and discipline respectively. The snake in the garden of Eden was OT God, not Lucifer.

Always will support this, can help a noobsniper do it far more elegantly because just by stalling you can get the opponent to give up since they use the site infrequently.

If he does, it wasn't his choice to believe in it (proving the anti-free-will side true no matter what).

No, airmax has to be the guest judge.

He's a terrible voter, I can prove it to you of you'll stay true to your reply to him and not turncoat instantly like you just did.

Ramshutu is one of the LONG TERM worst debate voters on the site (since he's the longest track record by far) yet you made him assistant vote mod and allow some of the most 'loaded reasoning for voting' I have ever seen anyone ever use.

I've been through a lot in my time of rhyming, oh yes, I've been grinding while sling-bound, one-armed out-boxing these Tyson-types with their one-punch-vict'ry pitiful excuse of styling,

I'm that mayweather motherfucker fighting dirty enough to out-slime the grime-kings but clean enough on paper to come back years later unbanned, no erectile issues on this vet of debate-site reputation-piling,

Build it up like a miner, chip and find it tiring, but is that gon' stop the potent rodent Ratman from gnawing at the ankles of these pussies tryna torture him?

Na, you got an issue with the smell of this shit? Smile politely, spray deodorant and worry more about getting the fucking washroom retiling.

Aint none fucked with me for long and come out the better person, that's not saying that I worsen 'em I just kinda have an effect on assholes like the biggest gangster gets when he hears the sirens.

I will tell you a secret: There's always a correct side to a debate but sometimes neither debater is directly representing it.

The 'vote' that passes as valid is able to be anything but. I don't actually abuse this other than at times when I can prove a point in the most obvious case.

It's like Ramshutu's debate with Type1 about that "Rm cannot prove X or Y". Ramshutu decides to both use gish gallop and arguing in bad faith that somehow entitle him to then vote against me even when I objectively won. I don't go and do the same to vote against him because frankly I am not into that petty shit. I am into proving the flaw is there in ways that get the mods to see it and sometimes this means voting at times where I know the other will win anyway and honestly it's just a laugh to me. 

I learned in life that revenge is pointless; even if you completely tortured the person who did something horrific to you, you'd still have just as much difficulty getting over it.

I don't worry about the people abusing the system, I worry about the system having those flaws. "Hate the game, not the player." is more than a mantra to me and something I had very backwards in my younger days on the Internet and debating sites like DDO. I learned to stop hating the player and start hating the game and trying to fix it or stop bothering with it.

Debating isn't mumbo-jumbo in its true form. This is a form where average humans of equally 'fabulous' intellect control who wins and loses one of the single most pure-intelligence based sports in existence. There is no point trying to ask 'what passes as valid'. In truth both you saying the third argument is stronger will pass and the one arguing 'tit for tat' and adding up points also will pass. There is no 'objective weighting' that is easy to explain... You kind of have to be that intelligent to grasp it (you literally can't put it into words, it's raw truth that only the highly intelligent can grasp).

Debate voting doesn't run on pure logic. After all, it's a sport and not a science...

Actually sign me up. I have a kink for impressing airmax.

Guest judge will be airmax

He means adding font colouring to the rich text editor.

I know more than you do about the thing you're 'teaching me'.

I think you are getting Parkinson's. Regardless of the depression or schizophrenia you may otherwise have, your overall description is someone with Parkinson's in early stages.

Ramshutu

No.

I like this forum thread but is the aim to get votes or to complain about voting?

I invented using ========= to break sections a while back, I am proud that it caught on.

I'll work on it later.

If you like, I can ignore the 100% confirmed PM evidence I have from CD and here and instead go about showing clues in the rap battle that Sparrow had against type1 referring to thigns about Type1 that only Type1 and myself know about him as well as speech pattern similarities.

Yes.

What the fuck are you talking about? Don't put my name in your mouth and tell that I am using alt accounts.

You want feedback? Okay.

Listen to every fucking lyric, you damn sham.

Number 1 bish of the site.

I like Virt. That's my only feedback.

He accidentally gave nations the ability to make invites and permanence to the link (because he himself is one, I think he empowered the wrong rank) so use this permanent link that I made:

There, I am Brazil, it will become very useful to dominate South America, especially as my fellow nations so far are all along rivalries that Brazil barely participates in (Brazil's main rivals are African nations who ti competes with in coffee trade and Arab nations in oil trade but it's a different thickness of oil so that's barely known).

I am a patient type, I will see how the game evolves and abuse the meta in it later on by picking a country that counters what most are doing (counter-meta is the real meta, always).

good job, congrats.

Had the fortune of being raised by parents of 2 different religions, both of whom were agnostic in nature about it. I didn't learn atheism, I learned Theism (against their will). I am a Pagan believer in alien demigod-like overlords. I believe we're a goal-oriented simulation, a game, an experiment and/or a television show for them.

When Mike realises that to get Ad revenue, you need to reveal your true identity or true corporation on the website in order to maintain ownership of the revenue stream (if you own an LLC, you have to reveal your identity so this is not a false dichotomy), then I think he will opt out.

LOL!

Do you mean Michael, the fake name he gives us while hiding being Russian VPN?

I support yes. To get ads you need to reveal the owner(s), officially. I know my contract law. :)

How is one meant to know that only I care about it? Am I meant to be inhibited in bring up moderation issues? You needed an option without 'b' of A in it.

Ending scene should have epilepsy warning.

Then stop talking to me, I'm a man. Utterly horrendous attitude to have in life. Even women will disagree with you on that attitude.

I will show you what the fuck the beauty of masculine music is:

Men shaped the fucking music industry, they INVENTED EVERY SINGLE genre of music. Respect the gender for what it is; brutally efficient and grand.

That is sexist and ridiculous to say.

Why did I get in trouble for calling Drafterman a sociopath but Ramshutu can freely discuss my mental health and about me as he pleases in the forums? I will prefer him permanently banned  from discussing me or my mental health.

I'm not the one going to your threads posting about mental disorders. Think who the real attention whore and egomaniac is. You're just an inverted more severe one than me.