RationalMadman

Kylo Ren's rage is entirely blind though and you are a Yoda fanboy who doesn't see a somewhat pathetic streak to him. 

"Pathetic" isn't entirely an insult, the point is he never aimed to be great, he was just a real G in a world full of fakes and learned to play their game for the sake of picking up where everyone else was letting him and the Jedi-way down.

I don't consider Da Vinci a genius, even less so Fresco.

Lol. Giving your alt Sparrow a theme tune different to your own, at least you're learning.

I don't see any loss considering that you already do just that.

This is actually something that was 'lost' for far less time than people realise. It's definitely true it was down during the most brutal ad spam and did indeed have something to do with how easily the bots could script what they scripted (speed-wise HTTPS forces a delay when you click a button that is around 0.4 of a second due to the encryption it's adding and which would have affected a few things in the rapid nature of them doing what they did if you play it over many topics, posts and comments).

For a long time DDO somehow altered the default to be http while the https was a different site (same content) with more eye-intense formatting (think making it legible to elderly women's eyes).

No, it wouldn't. The envy people feel towards me and only me will be the sole motive behind it. Their envy is not just rage, it is just that; envy.

I don't even get what the fucking issue is and if you do create a MEEP, I guarantee you I will play politics and get a ton of noobs to back me, starting with my enemy Wrick-it-Ralph and work the opposition to see the error of their ways. The MEEP will be so brutally cemented in my favour that you won't bring it up ever again.

Why do you say 'he is lucky to be alive' as if you are flirting with the one who kidnapped him having had the 'mercy' to have let him live?

You have adblocker on.

Hahahaha, really it should get a conduct mark docked if the opponent hits the char-mark with links posted.

It's like if you can't rap like this:

get over it.

The reason you lost the right to vote is due to a recent policy vote on the site. It's not against you but all new users.

You're just here so you don't get fined,

I'm just here so that I can find a place deep inside my enlightened mind that might be quiet and pious in its fiery ire, divine,

For I got rage to inspire these anti-liars with lines so intertwined with your highness's presence; conspire? I'll mine deep in the crevices you careless fools left evidence so sublime.

I'm a riot-maker if you don't sign a paper, Affidavit admitting that you aint shit, you faker,

Your boat is right? I sigh at you weak alliance o' Tyrants, right-wing fascist you bash against this Tyler Durden type o' guy and you'll rewind your lies into silence.     

...............

Who is 'we' you mean you and him, where he's 50% of the say? When I asked Vaarka, he didn't even say he had any say in the matter. In fact, Vaarka told me to ask Virtuoso and you, he said it twice and then a third time before realising that Warren was the other mod and not Virt.

I know you have been sarcastic frequently, including in your first post here. It is actually you who never quite understood my sarcasm or dark irony.

The best way to feel powerful instead seems to be to prey on people who engage in any debate that you can get away with voting against them in and abusing the lax voting moderation on it and at the same time only engaging in clear-cut debates yourself.

I learned this from you, do not deny it is a great way to feel powerful.

No, just need to watch how I speak to Warren who is too afraid to come to the forums and sits back pulling strings in the Discord to feel powerful instead.

Being young and having power in a Discord server over someone older than you are in no way mutually exclusive of one another.

He's 15, rethink your angle genius.

It's not a date, it is a friendly meal. I pay for it all and he owes me.

Yes, definitely, he is watching and I am dancing with him on the Eiffel Tower as we have a friendly meal together after.

It happens on a computer as well.

I have been prioritising getting the 100 win badge first and miles ahead of the rest, far above my rating so far bearing it in mind simply as a side-priority.

Since my 2-3 day hiatus, I had time to meditate and rethink things and now that I am so near to the 100, I am altering my priorities. All debates begun or engaged in since I've been 'back' (since 1 week ago or so) are genuinely done with the intent to win, not to garner many.

Now 'many' is the side-thought and 'winning each one' is the main priority. This is going to result in my style becoming more brutal than it used to be, with actual thought put in, rather than reserving energy to win 8 at the sake of 2-3 out of 10-11 like I used to do.

Results are irrefutable, talking of 'skill' is entirely down to the delusion of those envying those at the top.

Not all at the top are proportionally ranked in any system but all those at the bottom are usually genuinely shit at what they do.

This is a fact in any such ranking system in life, I don't see what the issue is. If you're jealous put in the work and strategy.

No. You're capping someone ability to debate and climb rating as well as debate as bad or good as they want to by doing this. Your irritation or envy has zero impact on their right to climb as fairly as others. If you got an issue, accept the debates before they do.

Capping the rate of creation could be fair. Capping the rate of acceptance never will be fair.

Bug: red pencil icon shows as if mods edited a post when you have reported it on a phone and the flag has become red.

Should have replied this to your OP.

Watch the way you talk to me, boy. CoC actually matter here unlike your joke of a server.

You're not superior to other users just because you work with the law. If you can't put in the time and effort to write a valid RFD, you getting paid hundreds of dollars for being an expert at it only shames you even more for being so incapable of it.

I am sure you are sure.

shut up about this and justify why I was banned first.

I can tell you will enjoy this gem and never have come across it before:

Let it build, let the voice kick in, eargasm.

I was playing devil's advocate in the debate you are talking about rape in, you are genuinely mentally ill to think I was serious.

When all else has gone to shit, the cockroach will outlive the nuclear blast.

The site that would ban me over you always was doomed to end this way.

I couldn't care less what you suggest.

you are a troll, end of story.

You have a logic comprehension problem.

you never added my 'yes' to question 4.

Also change my question 2 to A>C>B

Totally different scenario, totally different concept. I already know there's no point reasoning with you, so I just smile at your dictatorship and work around the enforcement.

Most of your other wrongly modded 'troll debates' are finished so that's whatever.

Since A is winning that troll debat equestion I hope to see you remod the vote on my trump debate where we rapped but didn't have a troll debate.

I vote yes to question 4 even though I have an alternate goal that would involve a no.

Nothing has changed for question 3, answer is no. It will enable cheating to get up the leaderboard and I will actively vote against people who employ it and laugh at their inability to remove my vote the same way Ramshutu did to me with my rap battles.

If I pick A, which of the three do you think I think is most shitty?

A>B>C