RationalMadman

Same situation here, I made ".5" for some of my answers haha

Because a couple of questions forced a ridiculous range where 'none' would be a lie but the next option up would be too high etc, I had '.5' answers and such.

I will tell you that I am approximately a solid 1 (not negative) overall. With a range of +/- 1.5 depending how you truly look at my situation and force the range upon them with the in-between answers.

It's not triumphant yet. It will be. I have updated my debating algorithm, you will see the new style on my 2 current Round 1-waiting debates.

It's the complete other way around. Dogs are generally worse pets than cats but the best and worst dogs outshine the best and worst cats.

I already revealed here that I'm a mixed ethnicity globalist who sees no reason to aim for isolationism. Beyond that I don't see reason to specifically make clear how severe or mild my situation is.

Same remark.

It was released less than a week ago. This is a remix of the original by her which itself was released around just a month ago.

Nty, helps with doxxing/impersonating me a bit too much.

Why should you aim for higher score? Inbred hillbillies would score high as hell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DvDcinQ6wM

Too many people, think they can sink what aint feeble,

Chip at your ego 'til you're such a charred, marred human embodiment of Dame Cathedral,

They don't get what's like to lose sleep though, only debates they're taking are penalising retards, slam dunk from a free-throw,

What do they care about the Madman, he's a cheap hoe, just make a debate and state you want him and he accepts it, damn what a meek foe,

Scammin' a freakshow, let him bleed slow, on the floor nothing more then yesterday's big news now locked in the asylum, quietly cryin', where did he go?

Fuck do they know about the sweat or the work? Think they slice this silverback gorilla and cover his fur with dirt and that would murder him? Sorry sir, I think your plan didn't work,

Me Madman, me free, You badman, you jerk, Me batman, Woopee! Never let the votes corrupt the integrity of my own voting or stop the gloating of this honourable opponent of the wannabe potent non-apologetic pathetic sideline bench-sitters who are too shit to ever make this damn thang sprout from a spurt,

I'm the best there is, but me tomorrow vs me today would leave Madman now a whole world 'sorrow,

So 'fore you come for the neck, gotta know if you break it, Madman stiffens up, improves his form, bides time, adapts, impresses all those messin' with the king, chucks the rest into the bin 'n' it'll never be a dim light in the Illuminati-tier construct of ingenious working of a person who literally doesn't care if you think he's someone there's no-one worse than...

Search, scan, obtain data, ride up to to a muggle struggling with debates like "Ya Vanna Kick Awff Bruh?", (Avada Kedavra)

One must not let slip the drip-drip of a leaking gutter of a buttered ego, crowd today voting against ya', yesterday's 'wow man, we luv 'ya!'

Poise with the posture, of a timid servant of the very servant itself, sat on a flat ass slim shady poopin' on the site like an executive boss chair,

Got you in the cross-hairs, It's time to not front fair, Take the enemy in the ways they never thought a debater could take it on and make the Ramshutu's lose it with WOO HOO Rational, you're back bad as ever in fact you never were this elegant before at it, 

Shut up, you back-stabbing bunny foo foo, I'm the Da Vinci to your Donatello, you nunchuck wielding wannabe, with wrick-it Raphael on a spree for now but soon I'll construct shit so complex that Admin Michelangelo'll bow before this fellow.

That's really idiotic, lol. That means they can't mark worse conduct for the rudeness.

What if voters tie us for arguments or enough voters disagree on who won them to make it so the conduct points aren't outweighed?

Counterpoint: What if I'm a rude bastard and you forfeit one Round?

No, I will like to know why from the guy in charge. That's you. Are you able to live up to your rank?

I'm not stupid enough to bother asking 'why' to people who can barely form three sentences without some abuse or self-contradiction. Supadudz has a grudge against me and warren is corrupt to the core, meaning both would be happy to ban me and never justify it ever.

I'm only interested if Virtuoso was involved.

You're saying Virtuoso asked to have me banned from Discord?

By Virtuoso, I think you mean Warren.

I'm curious the justification for my Discord ban? Is it kind of like when you made Wylted mod instead of me? Is it that kind of thing where you just say 'it's RM, we don't need a reason'?

Hahaha I have given irrefutable proof in private, just worry about yourself thanks.

He's here on an alt as Sparrow, bsh1 and virtuoso seem okay with this.

Wrick is disqualified please.

Try this.

He has had severely similar results to me on both quizzes. His 50/50s are my 50/50s other than him being 50/50 on N/S too.

This song represents my side of this.

No. We have no true say in our brain chemistry and interactions with the "game.

What we want and what it is are two different things.

I've bided my time. I know which is more important. Getting 100 wins asap with some high risk stuff is gonna let me sit up there for a long time to Garner votes at optimal times and sort out the only other 2 medals I need. I don't care about a competition. Don't vote hear t when you're a pro debater, you don't want to piss too many revenge-voters off. Refusing to vote tactically, is not banned by the CoC, rather only voting against who you believe the winners is, is banned.

If this shit gets medals, I will laugh.

It isn't and it's rigged against those who already have voted beforehand.

Waaaaa Waaaaa I wanna indirectly flame RM and Type1 with quotes that support me or insult/mock him and get away with it as I can say they are picking on a kid if they doesn't like it!

Waaaaa Waaaaaaa NOT QUALIFIABLE Waaaaaaaaaa

Saying, not quote. Under your own semantics. xD

Yeah and 'sandwiches out for supa' is an iconic saying too.

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

This site is coded so terribly in account handling. Because I had an account I can't take the test ever again on it unless I upgrade or something so I took it without and it won't let me make that my new result.

I 72% is fairly accurate.

N 73% has been a solid my whole life pretty much.

F vs T being 50/50 is always a given. I love my emotions, my sexuality and my passionate way of suffering and experiencing life but I clamp it down severely when I need to with my T powers of rationality dominating the Madman when it counts (or learning from moments where Madman got me into a good or bad situation and adapting my insanity)

P vs J was the hugest change. Based on real life events I think that's accurate AF I'm not really a P or a J. I love being a lazy deep thinker and hate it just as much as I love being a get-shit-done guy and hate the stress of that too.

T being 72% is a bit too cuck for me but I think it's because it kept asking 'in new situations'. I dominate people I know, I don't dominate random strangers.

INTP what a surprise *yawn*

Aight, in spirit of keeping this thread going and of the boredom most had to this test out of those who showed up, I'll go for this tesT:

I did research based on reviews and such and this is the best Myers-Briggs + Jung test.

If no religion and not atheist you are likely a Pagan in denial.

I think this selection and who it's intended to get at 'says more' about the one picking them than the contents or person directed at in the quotes.

Either everyone on the site uses this thread as a pinned topic or you stop doing this and do it on the debate's comment section instead please. This will become a real hassle if it's competing with several forum topics, thanks in advance.

Type1 is using the website as Sparrow and probably another account as well.

If you want to use a pigsty then use a pigsty as you please.