Total posts: 19,931
-->
@dustryder
It is likely we will keep it and make it a much smaller 3-step thing but basically instead of that should it have a slogan of the site and maybe 'what debating is about' then? As opposed to 'how to make a debate'. The removal of the 'how debates work' is of course viable if enough people feel it's a waste to have.
Created:
Please tell us what you think should be on, should be taken off, and perhaps the overall aim and 'feel' of the homepage of the website.
The homepage as is, is this:
This may include Bsh1 and Tejretics depending on later participation.
If you struggle to reply, I will be happy to come up with exact questions on the matter. This will later turn into a MEEP-like thread and since MEEPs are on moderation-policy, I am entitled to make completely official threads that equal MEEPs in seriousness on non-mod questions about the website.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Okay, I want to see Virt's answer as I know Bsh1 will simply say 'no' and be vague on why and post a 'laughing at you' type meme image if probed further (this isn't the first time he's posted such an image or reacted that laidback to me about how terrible he is at moderating and undeserving he is of his position).
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Can you please ask them to elaborate on the yes or no, since they may disagree with the replacing but not with other things I said.
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
Actually you're the only one who lashed out in a nasty, sadistic way where the intention was purely to make the recipient feel humiliation and pain. My motives were not only different but you cannot show me in my OP where I said anything directly insulting as opposed to raising concern of the guy who has the power to influence this site more than any other user at present and what he's been doing so far in terms of work ethic and displayed motives.
Created:
-->
@David
@TheRealNihilist
Would you two kindly PM one another about this, as I know you (Virt) hate to talk ill of bsh1 in public.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Oh you mean him taking credit for Virtuoso's work? Alright, you're correct I can't provide evidence for that and if you want to call it a conspiracy that's hilarious. Virtuoso officially didn't do what Bsh1 is taking credit for, so from an official perspective it's correct. It has to all be run by Bsh1 to be 'officially done' so it's de facto true what you're saying. This is about the delay and how the only part of it Bsh1 is doing is the ending while Virtuoso is handling every single thing a Chief Moderator has to on top of it, without getting the credit as Bsh1 genuinely gets the credit.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Virtuoso doesn't deny anything I said in the OP. Bsh1, so far, hasn't denied it either and the latter has actually posted in this thread.
Created:
Posted in:
Your right to believe isn't the same as the right to express it or influence others towards it. That is what the CoC is there for in the first place.
Created:
Posted in:
Someone with my username on YT is not necessarily me in the first place. Thus, you also are wrong to say people would know it was me even if the name had been RM.
Created:
Posted in:
It is precisely as public as YT is. You mean less popular, maybe. If you refer to that people can alter their privacy settings on FB to be unsearchable; you can't really search people's comments on YT other than getting lucky with wording on a Google search and going page by page to look for a comment. So yeah, it's as public when it comes to doxxing and the extent of what you're linking to vs what someone would never otherwise find.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
No one in this entire thread except you, who is brand new here and knows nothing about the past of this site very clearly, has suggested I am lying. they've mocked me perhaps and defended Bsh1 based on other angles like 'democracy won't work' but no one else has said I am lying or need to provide evidence (not even Virtuoso, the Admin or Bsh1 said this). So, you're the one with the conspiracy that I am making a conspiracy.
Created:
Posted in:
Facebook profiles are identical in how public they are to YT comments (as in the link to the profile), please stop kidding yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
You even go as far as to vote me down on any and all 'troll debate' that you can get away with, recently. So let's not pretend we're buddies or that you have the right to share a damn off-site thing about me to anyone.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Dude, this is about what he has failed to do. What he has done is easy to cover up as moderation is always done in private.
Created:
Posted in:
I also know what you're doing with the profile picture suggestion to samstevens as well as your post here and on my bsh1 thread, you want to make an enemy of me and you have done, whether or not you want to keep it that way I am your enemy. The problem is that you don't get special privilege to reveal shit about your enemy, assuming we are buddies or anything.
You go around calling me a narcissist who is the site's lunatic every chance you get, then expect me to speak to you with respect. Get over yourself.
Created:
Posted in:
Mhmm, let's say my channel had email-reveal on it among other things and that was searched on fb to find me. You don't know what doxxing is or isn't, but ignorance isn't an excuse.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
I cannot prove what he is not doing, but I'll start making the threads he should be making soon.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Reversing BoP outside of formal debates against someone so utterly proficient at them is a good try, but I never will give in. You don't understand who has to prove what first here (or you are denying it).
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
What has he done to ever become the chief moderator, let alone keep his role? Go ahead, let me know.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
I have. Even in this thread, I did. Just because it doesn't have a question mark after each one doesn't mean I'm not giving him much to answer for.
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
You were not talking to me or at me, you were talking about me on my thread in a way that is insulting, humiliating and justified by nothing other than assertions. The motive was to get other people to pile on me and make me feel really shitty for daring to make a thread like this. It had zero constructive purpose, not even to defend bsh1. You have no reason to be loyal to bsh1, this was solely about hurting me.
Get over your petty motives and stop assuming I'm a thin-skinned pussy. I am sensitive because I pay attention to criticism and praise which is something this head mod of our should actually do, instead of being thick-skinned enough to ignore all complaints about the way he runs things. That is a toxic attitude to have, stop encouraging 'thick skin'.
Created:
Posted in:
Also this is doxxing me. Let's say I had a video on that YT with my real face or had my real name on it etc. You're doxxing me by revealing this under the CoC's definition of it. I didn't consent to you telling people what my YT profile was.
Created:
Posted in:
I am nice to those who deserve it and those who matter to me on top of deserving it.
I am nasty to those who are ruining something I love, such as this website, in a position of unearned authority and undeserved keeping of it.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Instead of accusing bsh1 why didn't you ask him questions in order to understand his side? Then you can provide counter evidence to state the contrary if you can.
Sure, the questions are clear. Would you like me to lay them out and show you how mockingly he responds and gets others to bully me into silence?
Created:
-->
@Ramshutu
You couldn’t moderate a nuclear reactor if you shat graphite and pissed Boron.Bsh1 has an incredibly thick skin
HAHAHHAHA ~ so either I agree or I got a thin skin unlike bsh1? LOL! Fuck off with that, also that comment violates CoC, don't ever fucking talk to me that way again and next time explain why I can't.
Created:
-->
@Goldtop
Poly is gone as of yesterday according to my info.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
No. The burden of proof is on the head mod to explain themselves as deserving authority over the rest of us or to laugh and posts memes relishing in their unearned glory.
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
MEEPs (Moderation Engagement and Enactment Processes) are official comment periods where moderation proposes and solicits feedback on various potential moderation policies. MEEPs allow moderation to pose questions about moderation policy to the site usership and empower the site usership to either ratify or reject moderation's proposals. In order for a moderation proposal to be ratified, at least 10 users must have expressed a preference on the policy in question, and more than a majority of those expressing a preference must be in agreement. That means, in a MEEP with 10 voters, the minimum threshold for a binding result is 7-3; similarly, in a MEEP with 19 voters, the minimum threshold for a binding result is 11-8. This ensures that the outcome of the process reflects the consensus of a significant number of site users. If a MEEP result is not binding/valid, moderation will maintain the pre-MEEP status quo, whatever that happens to be.
- bsh1
Created:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
No. There should be one head mod. Bsh1 doesn't deserve it at all.
Created:
-->
@DebateArt.com
@David
@Ramshutu
@Wrick-It-Ralph
I'm busy IRL and behind the scenes on-site in upcoming days. The drama with bsh1 isn't an exaggeration, there's a team that has developed to update the site and gauge userbase demands, bsh1 is refusing to participate so far and won't host the voting officially MEEP threads that means we are delayed on many taste-preference updates including renovating the homepage and help page.
It is only bsh1 who can host those threads but even if it wasn't, his attitude in replying to this thread is abhorrent. Look at the Meme he posted and the way he justifies his laziness.
Created:
-->
@Stephen
His way of punishing for warning users they're breaking rules and hinting that Mods can get involved is itself not too great and not too bad.
I'm sure you and I would agree that there also is an issue with a user trying to scare users into silence regularly by saying they can make things happen when the other users aren't even breaking rules. His way of dealing with situations is too harsh on people who give gentle warnings and are victims or defenders against abuse. I agree with you on that
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Stephen
Lucifer did. Jesus was spiritiually Lucifer the whole time. I have explained this again and again.
The Saints are written to be so According to the NT, which could easily call any loyal to Lucifer/Jesus with a grudge against OT God (who is Satan) a 'Saint'.
They went on to work together with other kindred spirits to influence Muhammad and make Islam. It is even admitted in Islam that it's a sequel to the NT Bible.
Created:
-->
@bsh1
What is a MEEP fatigue, there's many, many that need to be had. Check your PMs from admin please.
Created:
-->
@oromagi
It ain't benevolent or efficient.
Maybe you didn't get the 'if'.
Created:
^^ You can call this an anthem to this thread
Created:
I get it, he's appointed and we have no say in the matter. I'm curious what the userbase thinks.
This isn't a call-out thread to insult, this is a proper issue that keeps getting buried under the rug.
We need Virtuoso to be the head mod and to let members like myself become the new co-mod. I don't care if Bsh1 still remains in the team or not, he is not too terrible and not too great.
What we have is Virtuoso constantly staggered as he has double the workload of what a 2-man mod team would have and less of the powers and even access behind the hood to ascertain things about some users or disciplining them.
This situation is completely pointless if you guys do trust Virt enough to be doing all the work that Bsh1 is doing but having to run it all through an inactive boss who doesn't just delegate; he shoves his own role without the perks and added data onto Virt and that's fucking unacceptable.
This thread is not about hurting bsh1's feelings, this is about helping the website. I want to know how we are deciding who ends up as a mod or not. I get it, I should shut up he's appointed but fuck off with that; I have too much passion for this website and have helped it blossom from a seed. I love what debating is and what this site is enabling free-thinkers to do online. This may become a revolutionary website some day or a good outlet for nerds. Either way, I want it to become something great. Bsh1 is an obstacle to that because he has all the power to stop everyone else except him and he is not active enough or consistent enough in how he does moderate to please the userbase as is. This is beyond demand vs supply now, he's not just underperforming he is performing so bad that people are often only staying due to the diligent PMing that Virtuoso and myself do behind the scenes as well as the public work that Ramshutu at times does to defend and pursue abusive members without threatening them. Meanwhile the guy with all the power and access is just absent every single time and entitled to stay in his rank. He will say 'but I make MEEPs' yeah you make MEEPs once ever fucking 3 weeks for a website that has been lately dealing out 2 updates a day thanks to the teamwork of myself, Virtuoso Ramshutu and the admin not because of you, bsh1.
I am fucking sick of this and want to know why he is in power undemocratically and undeservedly. From day one, he was opposed by many and I was an avid defender. Over time he managed to displease every single member of the website and please how many? It seems only Virtuoso and the Admin are pleased with him, because they have a sense of camaraderie from 'opposing the masses' in the beginning but I WAS NOT WITH THE MASSES. I defended bsh1 and it's time to admit when someone isn't doing their job right.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@SamStevens
good one, everyone is laughing their heads off at your fantastic joke.
---
Someone, get SamStevens a Grammy award!
---
No, sorry I mean a Comedy award.
---
No, no, no... He should get a pacifier.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Titanium
I said don't. I meant don't. You didn't understand what I was asking him to do.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Swagnarok
I could show you a multitude of ways that US, Uk, Aussie, Canadian etc media surpasses it and you'd simply say 'exception, not the rule' every time. How about I show you how mindless most anime is?
Search 'most popular animes' whether it's Naruto or anything and watch it. Don't skip the constant filler-episodes and filler-acting. Watch every painful second of the dragged-on series to wait for the few gems in the storyline. Then realise it's no different to US series in that way and that the brilliantly-in-depth ones are always the exception, not the rule because humans as a species are shallow-minded as a rule, not exception.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Titanium
I like the look of it, I dislike it. My profile picture isn't even of an anime character that I know of, it's a drawing I came across from a music video made by one of these anime-fan uploaders who had a splash art form an artist they linked to and I got ot the original drawing and edited it with pixlr
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Titanium
I'm not a weeb and I hate most animes, find them dull. I love to catch up on the stories by googling spoilers and stuff but death note was a start-to-end (only 2 seasons helped) enthralling watch. I don't want to discuss L or Light more with you or Omar because it will involve spoilers.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@TheRealNihilist
Subjective stuff, fine. You don't like intelligent storylines I get it.
Created:
-->
@crossed
;) you understood the pun.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Titanium
huge error. death note is an absolute masterpiece of a 2-season-only series. It is the most intricate storyline and character development I have ever seen a series do, let alone an anime.
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Titanium
That's a very British term to be using. You met him then? Are you a punk, in your opinion?
Created:
Posted in:
-->
@Titanium
I don't hate Marilyn Manson. I also don't like him, nor do I like people who are 'thoughtful' just because they are.
Created: